Another great English artist


Posted On: Saturday - March 11th 2017 8:22PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  History

How can one argue with PeakStupidity's view that 99% of all good rock and pop music was created in the English-speaking world? The English themselves could take most of the credit. Listen to a different Mr. Stewart from last week's Rod Stewart. Al Stewart was a pop/rock musician who wrote about, no, not girls, not cars, not touring on the road with people bitching about my long hair, no, no, no .... about HISTORY. Possibly he was the only music artist to make a career out of "History Rock".

More catchy tunes by this guy will be coming later on, some that you'll know, but here is one that tells some history, as either Al, or a guy named Peter White, plays with a classical guitar sound. This one starts out slow, but it's a great song.



In case you listened to the whole song/story, no we're not pro Commie Soviet Russian here. The song isn't either - it's told from a soldier's point of view.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Zerohedge post about university student loans


Posted On: Saturday - March 11th 2017 7:58PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  Humor  Global Financial Stupidity

This post on ZeroHedge is a good follow up to my simple anecdote about the restaurant near me taking university meal cards, as the students can just see it as "it's all part of the deal - my future no-home-involved mortgage payment financial "aid" will cover all this stuff".

Zerohedge says: 31% Of College Students Spend Their Loans On Spring Break. Were you on the main page of the site (probably page 5-8 now as they post incessantly over there, and we are NOT!A!NEWS!SERVICE!) you would have seen a small photo of the a string-bikini clad (WAIT... stay here for a second, will ya?) on the stage among the college kids on spring break. Here's the problem - half of the time that you click on a ZeroHedge article based a bit on a girly picture on the main page, it WILL NOT BE BLOWN UP or existent on the page for that particular post. OK, that's not the real problem, is it?

The real problem is that living the high life for 4-6 years is not worth it, if you are not in a serious major like engineering (even that possibly not) and will have a debt the size of a mortgage, but BEFORE you even buy a damn house. However, you may never end up paying this loan, at which point it isn't a problem anymore - well for you, but it sure is for the taxpayers and sons of taxpayers. This high life, though the eating out per our post is just a small symptom of the problem, when it involves going to Mexico or the islands on spring break, using student loan money is really pushing it. Here are some numbers from Zerohedge's source LendEDU (from the name, they're probably "Luvin' it") followed on Zerohedge by one of their few decent graphs - Zerohedge is not generally good with graphs!

According to the LendEDU poll, 30.60% of college students with student debt claim that they are using money they received from student loans to help pay for their spring break trip this year. For reference, you can use student loan funding for living expenses.

The National Center for Education Statistics calculated that 20.5 million students will be attending college this year in the United States. Orbitz reported that 55% of students will be going on spring break. Using this data, we can roughly calculate that 11,275,000 students will be going on spring break this year. And, it is estimated that 69% of all current college students use student loan debt by the time of graduation. By doing some additional arithmetic, we can calculate that roughly 7,779,750 student debtors are going on spring break this year.

Factoring in our data, and assuming the claims made in our survey are accurate, this means that 2.38 million students are using money received from student loans to pay for their spring break excursion this year.

Many of the comments will most likely be statements of strong dismay over this financial travesty the fact that the bikini girl is nowhere to be found on the page!

It's all gonna end it tears, as one could say about a lot of things. Looking on the bright side, per PeakStupidity's rose-colored glasses green-colored graphs, it's all gonna end up with smarter people around.


Comments (4)




So sad ...


Posted On: Friday - March 10th 2017 7:51PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  US Police State  Curmudgeonry

A Warren Zevon song played on the radio today, and it brought back memories of some good times. The thinking was along the lines of the stuff, with an attempted explanation back in the very first post of this blog, about what it means to be a "curmudgeon"? Is it that everything seems to be much better at a younger age, just because on hasn't experienced so much BS from people yet, or things really have gone downhill bigtime. Of course, it could be some of both.

The song "Werewolves of London", though popular almost a decade earlier, happened to remind me today of a Halloween music concert in the early 1990's. That time, in my mind, was before I started noticing, by the middle of that decade, that every single step change to society via law, was a step away from freedom. Though nothing like the 1970's, even in the early '90's I remember that the police state mentality in this country had not taken hold much yet. I think we may have gotten driver's licenses glanced at going into the concert hall that night, it wasn't made into a serious deal. You could smoke in there, and though I don't, I didn't see a problem with it. Nobody searched through anybody's stuff! Nobody was automatically photographing license plates of cars in the area. Whatever phone calls you made, from the pay-phone, were nobody's business and not snooped by Big Brother.

I realize in writing this just now that I can not give all the details of just the various differences that would show the freedom we had back then. Also, what does all that have to do with that particular fun Halloween concert/party? I don't know. I had a home-made costume that I made while we had a party earlier on the porch, and then, one guy in there was dressed like a woman with curlers and kept doing the "I've fallen and I can't get up!" routine from a current TV commercial - that was his costume, and it was a riot. We were fairly drunk.

I can't get the thoughts from my head during the time this afternoon listening to Warren Zevon into any kind of coherent writing to explain to anyone younger what freedom felt like. So sad ....

I know, some of the stupider Trump tweets (he needs to quit that shit) say this "so sad ...." thing, but this is no tweet. It's so sad, what we have let happen.

Warren Zevon is gone from the world too, but he wrote some great stuff; we have featured his "Excitable Boy" already.




No comments - Click here to start thread



Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose


Posted On: Friday - March 10th 2017 6:41PM MST
In Topics: 
  Commies  Lefty MegaStupidity  Global Financial Stupidity  Liberty/Libertarianism

James Kirkpatrick of VDare has an article contrasting treatment of Trump supporters, conservatives, and white people in general by the law to treatment of the hard-core lefties and differently-colored peoples: Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Increasingly Unequal Justice For Whites, with quite a few examples. The ongoing low-level battles between the new radicals (same as the old radicals) in Berzerkely, California has been in the news.

Yeah, PeakStupidity does not pretend to be a news site, per say, so this is a few days old. During the latest violence by the anti-free-speech lefties out there, some Trump ralliers had one guy who was set up for a little bit of defense this time, which is good to see. Mr. Chapman was not out to kill anyone, and he just had a decent-sized stick, a shield, and a helmet (see, 2/3 defensive pieces) with him, and he ended up kicking a little ass when the lefties attacked the peaceful crowd of President Trump supporters. From James Kirkpatrick, with links de-activated due to laziness:

America is not bound by blood or culture, we are told incessantly, but by a dedication to certain “ideals.” As we can’t even agree on what those ideals are, all that we have to hold us together is the law. But now, it appears that even equality before the law has become a meaningless expression, as the post-American managerial state is selectively enforcing the law depending on who is committing a crime.

Witness the case of Kyle Chapman, a.k.a. Based Stick Man, a.k.a. the Alt-Knight. Chapman was among the thousands of Americans who rallied in support of President Trump last weekend. As “anti-fascists” had vowed to violently disrupt the protest in Berkeley, California, where they had already rioted to prevent Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking, Chapman came prepared with a stick and a helmet.

When the “antifa” attacked, the police did nothing, so Chapman defended his fellow demonstrators. Needless to say, while many of the masked antifa who attacked with weapons were let go, Chapman was arrested for multiple alleged felonies [Trump supporters have Stick Man’s back! ‘Hero’ arrested protecting ralliers heads to court, by Samantha Chang, BizPacReview, March 7, 2017]. Trump supporters have since raised over $65,000 for his legal defense at WeSearchr.

Chapman has not yet been formally charged, but the police are saying such charges could be coming soon [Demonstrators Arrested at Berkeley ‘March 4 Trump’ Rally Await Charges, by Rhea Mahbubani, Elyce Kirchner and Pete Suratos, NBC Bay Area, March 7, 2014].

This guy's got a lot of support behind him, but still, if he were to really be put away for a while for defending a hitherto peaceful protest it may put a damper on further single-man operations like this. The governments (at all levels), the Lyin' Press, much of the judiciary and some of the police are arrayed heavily against any one individual and small group that would have the audacity to defend himself/itself. On the other hand, even disregarding the cuts, bruises, or even hospital visits, the till-now peaceful conservative or liberty-loving crowd is not doing itself any favors by being above reproach while some are getting their asses beat by these commie bastards. It looks cowardly even though it's not. Also, if there's to be a speech to be made, you've got to keep these commies out of the way somehow.

More from the article, after the many examples of widely differing treatment under the law between the sane people and the left:
The late Sam Francis’ concept of anarcho-tyranny appears more relevant every day, as illegal aliens, Leftist protesters and anti-white ethnic activists operate in a kind of twilight zone unrestrained by either law or morality.

President Trump’s election is the last chance the Historic American Nation has to restore some semblance of the rule of law in what was once a First World nation.

If President Trump and Attorney General Sessions are deterred from cracking down on Leftist protesters and illegal immigrants, it will only further the collapse of America into chaos. The managerial state may continue to persecute dissenters from the Right, but it can do nothing to stop the collapse of America’s civilizational order.

I will explain here why crackdowns on the flaunting of the rule of law from on-high may not be the last chance to stop this anarcho-tyranny (a great term, BTW). Right now the country, though slowly failing economically, has still many people, mostly on the conservative side and the side of liberty, who still have decent jobs or a promising degree and significant assets in terms of houses/land, and functional families, to where they have something to lose were they to be arrested or hurt really bad. With the financial slide, being slowly documented in the Global Financial Stupidity topic key, going on, things will not remain in this state.

At some point, for especially young white males, the present and future will not offer enough to make people behave with any worries about "an arrest on my record", or "I could get hurt and be off work a few days". Times are going to get a lot tougher, and though the blame is not all on the same groups of lefties, they are sure not helping things a damn bit by sponging off the few remaining hardworking taxpayers while reacting with violence to a little bit of truth-telling here and there.

People may learn some lessons from the turmoil of the 1960's, but this time I believe it will be the opposite side, realizing "they can't arrest and prosecute ALL of us", and "an arrest on my record is not going to change my life for the worse", or just "this is a lot of fun, and the chicks dig it more than they think of me as a $10/hr. wage slave trying to make a living at 1/2 the standard of living of my parents"

This is what these Soros-supported commies, and all of them all over the media, universities, and government have not thought over well - it's probably best not to push people too far when they don't have much to lose. You do that, and the people might feel the freedom to kick some ass back.



No comments - Click here to start thread



University of California, San Fran IT Dept - throw a spanner in the hole


Posted On: Thursday - March 9th 2017 8:03PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Lefty MegaStupidity  Music  University

University of California, San Francisco Out/In-sources 20% of it's IT department ...

... and there's a whole lot of irony going on.

Michelle Malkin writes, in, A Day Without American Tech Workers, about the IT Department at UCSF being replaced by imported foreigners. Here is the original article from the Los Angeles Times. Hey, it's ironic cause it's true, hahaha (no wait, that's not how it goes.)
UC San Francisco, the system’s biggest medical center, announced in July that it would lay off 49 career IT staffers and eliminate 48 other IT jobs that were vacant or filled by contract employees. The workers are to be gone as of Feb. 28. In the meantime they’ve been ordered to train their own replacements, who are employees of the Indian outsourcing firm HCL Technologies.

The irony comes in as the California universities, even more so then those all over the rest of our country (barring the the Ivies and the Massholes) are so left-wing in administration, teaching staff, and student body, that the people involved have probably all voted and demonstrated for the policies that encourage the demise of the 97 decent jobs that are gone now.

The loss of family-supporting jobs is one thing, but the security of the data seems to also be a concern, and why not?
The university says outsourcing their work to HCL will save $30 million over the five-year term of the HCL contract, which will cost $50 million.

That’s a meager savings of 0.1% of the UCSF budget, which was $5.83 billion in 2015-16. But the key question is what the university may be giving up in terms of system security and other important considerations.

The work being sent abroad isn’t trivial. According to an email sent to the IT staff last July, it includes managing and backing up most of the system’s data; management and administration of its data networks; operations related to its telephones, email and video conferencing; and payroll and financial applications.

Laret says UCSF expects the security of all these systems to be at least as good under HCL as it is now, though he acknowledges that “there are no guarantees.” Breaches of medical systems can be exceptionally harmful; a hack attack of UCLA Health System’s network revealed in 2015 may have compromised personal and medical information of 4.5 million patients.

It's worth reading both Malkin's and the LA Times' (reasonably fair, I'm surprised to find) articles to see more of the irony, especially regarding the nasty dike Janet Napolitano, and also the idea that after UCSF gets away with this, they want to screw over IT people throughout the UC system.

None of this is my main point today. I have a point about the "training their own replacements part". It breaks down into two parts:

A) The financial stupidity is so strong with people nowadays, that nobody has got enough cash on hand to at least make a stand. Quit on the spot and don't look back - that'd be nice to be able to do. I know, "I've got a family, I need the 3 months pay, that I won't get if I don't train this guy". Damn, if you had a year or two of savings, you'd miss that cash for a time, until you sue the crap out of the school for the money and get even more. It's really hard for anyone to stand up to the big guys when he is on a month by month budget with nothing in reserve.

B) If you're gonna be forced to train a replacement, I think, especially as a computer guy, it'd really be time to wreak havoc on the system. You'd be surprised what you could get away with, with no trail or at least no provable evidence of intent. To top it off, you could even make a cron-job (in the Unix world) that would send yourself an email 2 months later with the SUBJECT field filled in "Things are fucked-up, please come back at double pay!", just so's you could save the managers the trouble.

Really, things have gone pretty far beyond being civil and within normal rule-of-law in this country. Were this happening to you, you may think it'd be time to "throw a spanner in the hole", causing some of that Industrial Disease. Here's Dire Straits, with the great Mark Knofler on guitar:



You really should listen to the lyrics on this one - awesome - my favorite verse:

Dr. Parkinson declared "I'm not surprised to see you here.
You've got smoker's cough from smoking,
brewer's droop from drinking beer,
I don't know how you came to get those Betty Davis knees,
but worst of all, young man, you've got industrial disease."

This is off of the great "Love over Gold" album which has the best guitar lead of Mark Knofler in the first cut "Telegraph Road", an epic song!

Oh, a "spanner" means a "wrench" - more British weirdness.

********************************
[Update 10/28/17:
Replaced missing video
with live performance one.
**********************************



No comments - Click here to start thread



Can't even watch Seinfeld anymore


Posted On: Thursday - March 9th 2017 7:38PM MST
In Topics: 
  TV, aka Gov't Media  Political Correctness  Curmudgeonry  Race/Genetics

Seinfeld in PeakStupidity's opinion is the 2nd most funny show that ever was on TV*. Granted I don't watch anything off the air or cable nowadays, so if there were a show from the last decade that were funnier, perhaps I could be convinced. The 5 minute compilation embedded in this old post was a demonstration of the political incorrectness of that show, which was part of it's charm. Other clips have been inserted into posts here, and they'll be more to come; hopefully I can find clips to fit in with the posts.

Though I've seen all episodes, many of them up probably 5-10 times over the years, I still like to relax and enjoy this show when I'm on the road at a motel, and it happens to come on TBS in the evening. It's just very familiar, and beats any of the new crap that I've seen flipping through the 50-100 channels once in a month or two when I can't find anything on, on the internet ;-} and am really bored.

It's gotten hard to watch lately due to the commercials. Yes, the commercials. Of course I'll mute the volume, then look at the TV part of the time to see when the show is back on - yeah, I'm not worried about missing something (as I said, 5-10 times!). That worked fine some years back. Now the commercials, even without any sound are so stupidly politically correct and agenda-pushing that it bothers me to even see this crap. Each commercial has an interracial couple like this is mandated. There can never be a group of even 3 white guys doing whatever they've gotta do to sell whatever kind of crap is possibly being advertised. Of course the white guy is always the moron who has something to learn from the others about this new product or service. I don't mind a few like this, but it's bothered me that it is every damn one of the commercials. These commercials really clash with the show, and demonstrate how far through the U-bend of the toilet the media have gone with this PC.

I try to think back on what commercials came on during the early to late 1990's when the Seinfeld show was on regular TV once a week. I guess I could pull some up on youtube, but I know they wouldn't have pissed me off like they do now. I guess the TBS network don't really care who they turn off, and it's not like I'm a big viewer - I'm guessing I wouldn't buy anything they'd advertise even with a decent commercial.

This explains why people get Netflix, Hulu, Roku, and all that to just get the content they want without the PC crap inserted. Me, I'll just leave the TV off that much longer, which is going to bring it right to 100 % of the time.

* # 1 is The Office.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Good day to apply or interview for that job


Posted On: Wednesday - March 8th 2017 11:19AM MST
In Topics: 
  Feminism

Per ZeroHedge, America's Women Go On Strike, Pledge To "Avoid Spending Money" (Men Celebrate). Off course, the comments beat the article itself, as is usual on ZeroHedge.

Imagine no women in the HR department today. Apply today! Go to that interview! You could just talk about what you could be doing for the company in this job, and they could tell you straight what they want you doing. Talk money for a minute or 2 and get it done.

If women would stay out of HR, I wouldn't even mind granting them the vote, but only for library bond issues, nothing else.



No comments - Click here to start thread



The great University textbook scam


Posted On: Tuesday - March 7th 2017 6:38PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  Economics  Artificial Stupidity  Inflation  Scams

Somewhere in one of the latter posts on the topic of Universities I promised to write later about the textbook scam that has been going on for a while - thanks a lot computer-tech! (you'd think it'd be helping the students, but the computer-tech has helped lock this scam in place, it turns out.)

Here's a bit of historical data first. Back in the middle 1980's a one-course book for a math or engineering class went for about $20 or less, and sometimes the 8 books or so for English may have added up to the same or about the same (but these were mostly novels, not textbooks). A thick old Chemistry or Physics book that covered 2 semesters were in the high $30's and that seemed pretty egregious.

Here is a 3-semester Calculus book vs. a new one by the one of the same authors as a 2006 edition:



OK, Isaac Newton and Mr. Liebnitz, little Gauss (as our professor called him), and the rest of these brilliant men worked out this great math from 200 years to 400 years ago. This stuff has not changed in any respect, so these many revision changes over just the 2 decades were purely a money-making endeavor and added nothing to the body of knowledge. This is part of the scam but there is more to it, coming a few paragraphs down.

Upon thinking about these prices, one can get deflated inflation figures from the US government that are rigged low to keep any inflation-adjusted transfer payments (especially SS) from rising and busting the budget more than it is already, or one could find real numbers. Shadowstats is one such place; it is a great site that works out inflation, unemployment, and other measures of the economy using consistent methods, unlike the US Gov't B(L)S. Just a reasonable number to use for the 3 decade period in question is approximately a factor of 3, with plenty of exceptional products/services that fall way off of this.

However, think about textbooks. Even if we stick with paper - not necessary anymore - printing technology and more so, word and image processing, have seen so many productivity improvements that the price rise for a textbook should be well under general averaged inflation. Yes, fiction and other non-fiction books at the Barnes and Noble and Amazon have seen a large rise during the 3-decade time period, but that's also needed for pay to the authors. What has changed in the standard textbooks in basic science, math, and engineering that requires a price rise for the same material? Nothing is what. This stuff gets recycled with possibly different graphics and different homework problems. Recently, I have seen lately some average humanities textbooks going for $150! That is just the average price of some regular one-semester book. Actual-paper textbooks have increased in price by well over a factor of 8. Well, OK, at least it should be cheaper reading the whole book on-line or on a tablet. It is to make it, but the textbook publishers don't pass this savings on.

With all this said, the reader must have been thinking "hey, get used stuff, that's what we used to do!" Let's go back a few decades again. Sure, we thought that too - the used books would cost about 75% to 90% of a new one, yet the stores would buy them back from you for < 50%, sometimes quite a bit less. There was a lot of collusion among the few stores too, as prices didn't vary but 5 to 15 cents. The idea of opening up an exchange occurred to me and many others, I'm sure, with some actually getting off their asses and doing it. At the early part of this period, newspaper ads were necessary, and an actual physical storage location would have been required. Even by the late 1980's some young entrepreneurs could have used a data base and just become middle men - no internet, but, hey, phones worked back then, too. I think it kept the publishers fairly honest, but the used market can depend upon the requirements of the professors too - more about this.

See, you'd think that now one could do great business in used books (in the image above see the used one for $20 - don't buy it just yet) to beat the ridiculously high prices and help each other out at both ends, buying and selling. One could use the internet and make it require almost no labor on the part of the middleman who builds said website - sounds great. Here's where the real scam comes in. They've got the courses requiring use of software on DVD or websites in which codes are required to keep use of it for the semester. Sure, the book can be passed on, but when the professors require, for part of your grade, work or reading material from the electronic portions (that require the code), there is not a good way to sell the material you paid for.

I suppose one can do a long night of PRT-SCREENing, even from the electronic materials, to store them and pass on, but I have seen it where the electronics require homework to get done within the secured websites. The code can't be passed on or the software hacked as each version of the DVD, or entry of the website, is kept connected with the student. I think it's locked up pretty well, but I'm no hacker, but I wouldn't say if I were.

Here's where the professor possibly comes into the scam, sometimes not really willingly but out of laziness. Suppose this 18th edition Chemistry book just came out. If the professor will just let the DVD's and website be optional extra study material, students who have just the book can get by. I have seen new additions in which I could find nothing different from the last edition besides, not different homework problems, but just swicheroos of the order of the homework problems at the back of each chapter. The professor can just print out the problems and hand them out or put the problem statements on the university's student-work website, or whatever they may call it, and let the students use older editions. That's not really a lot of extra work to save each student $100 or so and, in the process, fight a bit against this BS. Others might be involved in the publishing of this book and will make sure that you need their new book to pass the class. The last category are those who don't help due to laziness.

You'd think you would read or hear more complaints from the students. I can tell you why not - as
this post described, the school loan money is treated by many students as one big credit card with a long deferral time - for a 20 year-old, it's too long to worry much about, life is long. Put it on this semester's loan; after all, it's the same for all of us. This works just fine for textbook publishers, as they can jack the prices to the sky without much feedback.

Nice work if you can get it, and a small but not negligible part of the University Bubble. Al Capone and Tony Soprano both are turning green in their graves from jealousy (and from normal bodily decay, too, I guess).


Comments (2)




Beans, Beaners, and Political Correctness


Posted On: Saturday - March 4th 2017 4:57PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Music  Political Correctness

I will put a disclaimer at the top of this post, just because I think this is the right post in which to, not for my conscience, as it does not run the show here. After having written quite a few posts on the Immigration Stupidity topic, I know I may have offended multiple individuals. That doesn't bother me a bit, as this site is a certified Equal Opportunity Offender by the US Dept. of De Of fense. This is really just about my thoughts of a few friends who may read this getting the wrong idea.

As often said on VDare, many people aren't particularly anti-immigrant though they may be totally against any (further) immigration, for lots of good reasons. I can't say this for all regions of the globe, but I have have and have had friends from many far-away place. I have good friends who came from the Far East - some long ago and some not, and way back some friends from Latin America and Eastern Europe. In some places where I was not a local, I fit in with them better than local Americans in fact. The people I am talking about fit into America, back when that was just the thing to do, except for the politically correct part, so that works out great for me. Yeah, I'm really not writing this to cover my ass - it's true and needed to be said. Anyhoo ...

Upon having a comment blocked from appearing on one of my favorite websites, I had to look back (it helps to save em) and see what was the problem with it. I don't begrudge anyone who runs a site from blocking stuff that may cause a problem in some way the the commenters possibly would not foresee. The comment was not particularly pertinent, but that hasn't stopped me before.

It turns out, from my testing, I had used the word "beaner" in reference to a particular Mexican guy that I can't stand, named George Ramos, or Jorge, if you will. I had only heard of this guy from viewing this video on youtube of Ann Coulter tearing him a new one back in '15 when she was promoting her Adios America book, subsequently allegedly read by Donald Trump - heck you know the rest.

(youtube came up with multiple videos, in case you didn't like that one: "Showing results for ann coulter tears jorge ramos a new one Search instead for ann coulter tears george ramos a new one". ;-)

What was the subject? Oh, beans, beaners and political correctness. We were in a phase in my household in which we ate a lot of beans for health reasons. I mean, 2 lb. of beans in the crockpot with a gallon or two of water, cook for 4 hours, and presto - protein city without the sat-fat. While at the best grocery store for beans - it had 1/2 of one side of a long aisle full, I contemplated the purchase of a new type of bean to make it 8-10 types in the mix. I cannot now remember which type, but upon not reaching the wife on the blower, I noticed a Mexican lady about 20 ft. away in the same aisle.

"Hey, you'd know about beans, right?" I asked. See, I knew that this lady wouldn't mind, because unfortunately, it's the damn Americans (and Euros, of course) who now are the Kings (and Queens, of course) of PC, not the foreigners. This Mexican lady not only told me these beans were pretty good, but she started giving me recipes! I really couldn't remember all of it, but I thanked her and put the beans in the buggy. Now, she might mind being called a beaner because that is just rude, but I doubt if an ordinary Mexican overheard the word he's going to have a cow about it. Most of the time, people are pretty mellow, or the ones without chips on their shoulders are.

Do you really want Political Incorrectness? I'll give you some. This is Wall of Voodoo from the early 1980's - watch it, you beaners, and tell me that this wasn't a great country still back then (even MTV didn't suck!)!



Hahaaa, I can't forget that image of the guy's face coming out of the pot of beans at the end. (ooops, spoiler alert!)



No comments - Click here to start thread



Toward Peak Neocon? (Part 2 - Unavoidable, one of 2 ways)


Posted On: Saturday - March 4th 2017 8:15AM MST
In Topics: 
  The Russians  Global Financial Stupidity  China  US Feral Government  The Neocons

(This post is a continuation from this one.)

Now, I will discuss what the commenter suggested - how can this continue? He is absolutely right that it can't, first of all. Sorry to spoil the ending, but please read on.

As to the neocons and war, there does not seem to be anywhere on the globe that these people feel is off limits for meddling by the American military. In addition to the smaller readily-induced hot spots, there are the powers Russia and China. The neocons either are THAT stupid (possibly) or purposefully ignorant of the fact that Russia != The Soviet Union. They know the Cold War was won, want to take credit for it, but yet really miss it and want to continue the good parts. More on this later, but was there a reason for NATO, an arm of America, to start adding member states and making defense agreements to surround Russia like a game of block-out? What about China - through favorable trade agreements along with sell-outs for cash we greatly accelerated the rise of China economically, and military power has followed. Are we going to fight for some stupid rock islands in the China Sea? As far as the dealings with these 2 major powers, is any of this the things true conservatives would push for? Well, really this has all been written much better by others, such as Ron Paul, John Derbyshire, and best by our own Pat Buchanan.

A little bit of reading anywhere on the internet where common sense exists, say ZeroHedge or PeakStupidity, on the topic of Global Financial Stupidity, especially as our homegrown American version (USA! USA!), will clue anyone into not just the sorry state of our economy, but the worsening trend of that. $20,000,000,000,000 of debt, an order of magnitude more than that in future obligations, and an eviscerated manufacturing base really should be in the minds of anyone proposing more war. Even people who are not neocons that are high up in our military forces up to the Commander-in-Chief Trump himself probably do not really take it to heart that one must have a strong economy to KEEP HAVING a strong military. Note, KEEP HAVING was bolded, as there can be a very long period of drawing off the resources of the past - Adam Smith, who should know a thing or two about economics, observed "There is a great deal of ruin in a nation." There is a lot of inertia to keep our military moving and strong until the bills really come due.


Assembled in USA, some parts Hecho en China

Just think about it, neocons, we've got supply lines from China for all manner of mechanical items and electronics that are necessary for all of our high-tech military hardware and even for the jigs to build some of it that we might build here. Smart young American guys are discouraged to work as engineers as the bulk of the work is overseas and then, we are importing H-1B visa indentured foreign workers to get the jobs that are left. Yeah, you can go into high-finance instead with your math background to write fancy algorithms to buy and sell pieces of paper - that doesn't exactly build up our economic OR military might. Really, what will happen if a hot war starts with China - "Listen, Sec-State, tell Chairman Wen that we will hold the cease-fire until Tuesday afternoon, when Fed-Ex brings the missile guidance parts we need - are you sure you put in the right tracking number?" We all know that our military is only powerful due to the high-tech hardware - the manpower levels are low, but more importantly, morale cannot hold with the military being made into one big social experiment into gender and dieversity - no fighting man wants any part of that shit.

We can not keep this up even if we all wanted to, neocons! The money is there, so to speak, for now, but much being spent is being borrowed, and the lenders will not continue their stupidity once the confidence in the money goes or said lender is at war with us, whichever comes first.

Now, going beyond what the commenter said, here is another point of mine. What if, in terms of the economy, it were 1985 right now, but without the Cold War going on? We did indeed have the economic and the military power to spare (again, were the Cold War over). Could the nation have taken on a big power? We could have won a war, but at a large cost and the Cold War was about stopping Communism from spreading over the entire world, not about some small defense agreement with freakin' Estonia or Georgia. Our military was powerful as a defense - no serious American wanted offensive war against The Soviet Union. There is not, and should not be, a large will for all out war like that of WWII if it's not for defense of the nation.

My point here is that, in all of the smaller wars that have been fought since Vietnam, the US has had an OVERWHELMING advantage in manpower, logistics, air power, all of it. I really don't think these neocon warmongers ever think in their heads about a real war with a country that has a real military, and what that would cost in lives and limbs. It would not be a war of button-pushing killings of this guy over here and nicely taking out that road, village or staging area, while the men and equipment can go right back to complete safety in this base over here, etc. This is all assuming we had LOTS OF MONEY. Guess what, we don't - far, far from it.

This blog is favorable toward President Trump, the loyal reader must know by now. His stance on Russia and NATO(partially) shows courage against the neocon establishment. I really wonder about his knowledge about China however. One always reads that this is all negotiation, but 2 things: a) the Chinese don't have our same culture and really have a fixation about not being embarrassed (losing face in their terminology), and b) You really don't use war-mongering as a form of negotiation, but then, hey, I didn't read the guy's book.

The peak of this neocon war-mongering business will come soon, one way or another. We all should hope it will be just due to the lack of ability to fund this stuff and not due to a hard learning process during a hot war.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Toward Peak Neocon? (Part 1 - Definition)


Posted On: Saturday - March 4th 2017 7:34AM MST
In Topics: 
  The Russians  History  US Feral Government  The Neocons

A commenter suggested that I write a post regarding what I (in all silliness) have just termed "Peak Necocon", as that is, in a nutshell what his idea/question is about. The question from this commenter went "how do these neocons think they can continue their shit? How can it keep going on as the US drains its finances?" Let me first define "neocon"; I'm no Noah Webster, so it'll take a paragraph or five.

The term "Neocon" is, or course, from "neo", meaning "new" and "con" from "conservative", so New Conservatives. Where did these people come from and when? I believe the term came into vogue (no, not "Vogue" with the bikini pics, but just "vogue" - small v) in the late 1980's or so. Though there must be many more followers than proponents of any political philosophy, right now I'm writing about the proponents. By the middle of the 1980's, after a few years already of President Reagan and Americans' final rejection of the left-wing hippy era, conservatism had made such a big comeback, not necessarily in actual legislation and reverse in the slide into stupidity, but at least into the minds of your average American. There had to have been many pundits, media people, and elites of all sorts that, though still holding to their lefty/commie philosophy wanted to retain some power and relevancy.

As written in PeakStupidity a number of times already, we do not think that most of the political "movements" and just really stupid and/or evil ideas being pushed on people are the results of some grand master plans, written or unwritten. There are usually just many people at the same level of stupidity, who think they are at some higher level, that hang out in employment and leisure with primarily others that are at that level of stupid. Many of the neocons suppressed most of their left/commies ideas, but relished the idea of the US becoming THE superpower at the end of the cold war, won by Ronald Reagan with help by millions of mostly American (+ some European) mechanical/electrical engineers, soldiers, sailors, and airmen, with help from the old Pope, the German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and the Poles - Solidarity and Lech Walesa.

OK, back on topic, once the Cold War was won, the US had by far the most powerful military in the world, much goodwill built up, and still the most powerful economy by a factor of 3, probably, over any other single country in the world. Any true conservatives left by 1990 or so, many of them regular Americans, but in the political world, your Pat Buchanans and such, would and were arguing for our country to stay out of the world's business finally, as the Cold War was won (on the military, foreign affairs level, not domestically, but most of us didn't see that coming!) Not only was it difficult for any part of the Military Industrial Complex to just stand down, there were politicians, elites, pundits, etc. wanting us to DO SOMETHING with this power, and many a allegedly-former lefty could become part of this huge power structure just by not saying "We should not be the world's policeman." and "Unilateral disarmament, Now!" anymore, and by shutting their pie holes on conservative social issues that they didn't really believe in. Lastly, because it must be mentioned, the neocons support Israel, as if it were essential to life in the US because a) many neocons are Jewish and just as importantly b) the middle east is a good place to have wars, as until now, the US military could kick ass fairly inexpensively throughout the region.

I really doubt that all of the neocons, since this type became an infestation by the early 1990's, were from the left as I described, but there were others just absorbed and deflected away from true conservatism onto this new path.

These neocons changed the working definition of conservatism over a few decades, let's say 1990 to now. I see the neocon philosophy as an American phenomena but also as a subset of Globalism, as it fits the agenda of the neocon urge to see one big empire. So, neocons are Globalists, but Globalists are not all neocons, as the neocons, in particular, want the US to be the operator of a global empire.


Part 2 here - Peak Neocon - unavoidable, one of two ways.


Comments (2)




Not exactly living in the shadows


Posted On: Friday - March 3rd 2017 3:56AM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity

From Alejandro Lazo, Wall Street Journal:

Daniela Vargas, who came to the U.S. from Argentina when she was 7 years old, was detained by agents of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as she and a friend drove away from the news conference in Jackson, Miss., said her lawyer, Abigail Peterson.

The news conference was organized by attorneys, church groups and the Mississippi Immigrants Rights Alliance to bring attention to recent immigration raids in the region, said Patricia Ice, an attorney with the immigrant-rights group.

ICE enforcement actions under the Trump administration have stoked fears in immigrant communities after large numbers of coordinated arrests across the country in recent weeks.

Agency officials have said they are targeting undocumented immigrants convicted of crimes including assault, murder and drug trafficking. But the agency also acknowledged picking up some immigrants they encountered during those raids who have violated federal immigration law, but not committed other crimes.

From Nelson Muntz, Simpsons:



From Rick Moran, The American Thinker:

My guess is that Ms. Vargas’s press conference may be one of the last of its kind for a while.

It’s one thing to live your life unobtrusively as an illegal alien in the U.S. It’s quite another to spit in the face of immigration enforcement officials by openly defying the law by holding a press conference and bragging about your status.


From AE Newman, PeakStupidty:

In your mind, pick any other country and think what would happened if you, and thousands of other Americans who snuck into said country, regularly held rallies and told [The Mexicans, the Russians, the Chinese, the Kiwis, the French, the Botswanans, the Romanians] "this is what you gotta do for us!" Madness.... madness... I tells ya!



No comments - Click here to start thread



Every Picture Tells a Story, Don't It?


Posted On: Thursday - March 2nd 2017 6:35PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  China

After reading and discussing China today, the older, English names for countries and for the cities in China came up. PeakStupidity believes the English names were so much nicer and evoked images of the mysterious Orient. For example, would you rather date a girl if she were billed as “a beautiful Oriental lass from Canton, in Cathay in the Far East” or if she were “a good worker loyal party-following comrade from Guangzhou's Tein-hou district of the People’s Republic”?

Well honestly, I’d want front, back, and side-view jpegs anyway, you know, just to be sure. Every picture tells a story, don’t it?

Rod Stewart (in this song) seems to have been stricken by this “slant-eyed lady”, especially after she bit his neck, up on deck of the Peking ferry. How romantic!! (seriously)

This song has no chorus though, just verses:



The lyrics are pretty easy to understand, but here's the one verse in question:
On the Peking ferry I was feeling merry, sailing on my way back here.
I fell in love with a slant-eyed lady by the light of an Eastern moon.
Shanghai Lil never used the pill, she claimed that it just ain’t natural.
She took me up on deck and bit my neck.
Oh, people, I was glad I found her.
Oh, yeah, I was glad I found her.

Listen to that drumming by a guy named Micky Waller!



No comments - Click here to start thread



Chuck Schumer / Nancy Pelosi: boot Attorney General because we're used to winning


Posted On: Thursday - March 2nd 2017 11:11AM MST
In Topics: 
  Commies  Lefty MegaStupidity  TV, aka Gov't Media  Media Stupidity

... and they better get their minds right, because this crap stops now! I'm sure the reader could read elsewhere (ZeroHedge comments would suffice) about how damn hypocritical it is for them to be wanting any US Attorney General to resign if the 2 racists Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch weren't fired. Jeff Sessions could hold a KKK rally on the Washington mall and that would not be a reason to fire him anymore.

ZeroHedge:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer joined many of his top Democrat Congressional peers including Nancy Pelosi, Elijah Cummins and Elizabeth Warren, in calling for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to resign and be investigated by the DOJ’s inspector general to determine whether he compromised an investigation into Russian influence.

“It would be better for the country if he resigned,” Schumer told reporters. “You have to be above reproach,” he added.


Senator, nobody is above reproach, but you need more of an ass-kicking than any reproach, you gun-control freak!

ZeroHedge again:
Of note: Sessions was not actually asked whether he or anyone affiliated with the campaign had any kind of communication with the Russians, ever. He was asked, first, about “a continuing exchange of information” — repeated contacts between the campaign and representatives of the Russian government. In the full context of Franken’s remarks, Sessions was asked about the allegations in the dossier, and he denied such “communications” to the extent of his ability to do so.

Additionally, the WaPo adds that Sessions was asked by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) whether he had “been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day." Sessions answered, simply, “no.” And there is no evidence in the Post nor elsewhere to cast doubt on that claim.

In any case, semantics, and for now Democrats are happy to use this line of attack in hopes of repeating a Michael Flynn outcome, and oust Sessions.

As Politico adds, it wasn't just Democrats amping up the pressure. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said a special prosecutor should be appointed if investigators find any evidence of wrongdoing by the Trump campaign, adding that Sessions should recuse himself from any investigation into contacts between the campaign and Russia.

"I don't know that there's anything between the Trump campaign and the Russians. I'm not going to base my decision based on newspaper articles," Graham (R-S.C.) said during a CNN town hall where he appeared with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). "If there is something there, and it goes up the chain of investigation, it is clear to me that Jeff Sessions, who is my dear friend, cannot make this decision about Trump."

It's Miss Lindsey and Juan McCain again - is there anybody left who still thinks the "R" next to a politician's name means he is on "our team"? I think I know what team Miss Lindsey is on, and I really doubt he is a "dear friend" of Mr. Sessions. They just may have called each other that when they were in the same Senator/Millionaires club together.

These commies are just so used to getting their way. They really don't care how ludicrous and hypocritical any move of theirs looks. That's because the LP has always been backing them, meaning exaggerating any story that is to be at the forefront of the news and minimizing anything that is to be buried. It ain't working this way anymore, Muchachos!



No comments - Click here to start thread



Not interested in politics? Politics is interested in you!


Posted On: Thursday - March 2nd 2017 9:24AM MST
In Topics: 
  Pundits  Liberty/Libertarianism

John Derbyshire writes a monthly "Diary" article for VDare, composed of many segments, like his weekly RadioDerb podcast is. Anyway, there was one section I didn't agree at all with, regarding interest in politics, as Derbyshire discusses what he termed, 4-years back, the "Cold Civil War".

This is snipped out, mind you, from the February Diary, in the 6th section, about a NY Post article in which the author says that some people can not date others with opposite political views these days:
I haven’t yet heard of cases like that of Union General George Thomas in the Hot Civil War, whose Virginia family disowned him when he declined to join the Confederacy, but ruptures like that can’t be far away.

This is damn depressing. Politics shouldn’t matter that much to civilized people.

I’m occasionally asked about the politics of the Derbyshire household. Short answer: There isn’t any.

Mrs D, like most sensible people, is uninterested in politics ninety-five percent of the time. She stayed up to watch the election result in November (which was more political engagement than I could summon) but in all probability has not thought about politics for ten consecutive seconds since.

She understands instinctively that a passionate, all-consuming interest in politics is characteristic of bores and monomaniacs. Normal people have better things to think and talk about.


I am in great disagreement with this part of the otherwise great February Diary. Here’s the deal, Mr. Derbyshire's from England, see. Over there they’ve had big government for a long time. With China that time is another order of magnitude longer. There are still Americans to this day who can remember when Americans had pretty good control of all governments up to the Federal one. It used to be a really free country, because state government was small, and the Federal one was reasonably small enough to control.

OK, so far this may seem like I’m getting it backwards here, but I’m not. Listen, you SHOULDN’T HAVE TO be interested in politics. That’s the case in a few great countries like the former US. However, when the government gets big, politics is interested in you. The future of your life, that of your family, your business or even whole field of employment, the property you own, ALL OF IT, can be messed with by changes made in the Washington Federal S__thole .

In other countries that have had statist governments for centuries running, nobody figures that there is any control; government is gonna do what it’s gonna do, so what is the point in caring about it so much. Now, the reason many Americans feel they need to get so involved is that they used to have control of things, and not that long ago. The decent Americans that can remember freedom want to set things right, and are used to having a say. They also see that any day of the working-week some new law could be passed to mess with their lives, and we still feel like they need to fight this stuff.

Normal people are not really going to have any “better things to think and talk about” when this world becomes nothing but a big statist hellhole resembling George Orwell’s Oceana. It’s time to put the hurt on the statists before that is not possible.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Quitters never win and winners never quit....


Posted On: Wednesday - March 1st 2017 9:05AM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Trump

Still we gotta hope President Trump isn't one of the quitters.

Following is my response to a commenter about this article on unz.com about Trump's weasily-sounding comments on deporting illegal aliens.

Commenting on the other commenters' worry about these words from the president, this guy says:
The zipper mask contingent is pretty strong here.

People (including Steve
[this is Steve Sailer, ed]) keep reaching for any reason to quit. Easier to post pithy blog posts than actually work.

PeakStupidty says:

I think you are misinterpreting a large portion or all of the comments. You may be right that Trump knows what he’s doing and will get this thing done mostly in the manner Americans elected him to. I hope you are, though I don’t understand this negotiating thing. What you do (as Trump, that is) is put the pressure on in all sorts of ways, on the LP, on the Repub-traitors, even on the Lefties as some commenters here has suggested.

You’re wrong if you think people want to quit – quit what, first of all? Nobody here wants things to continue the way they have obviously. Quit hoping? No, this is just one guy – the ball will keep rolling without him.

If you mean quit supporting Trump, well, if he isn’t going to do the job we elected him to, he should be fired like the people on the TV show. (He does need lots help of regular Americans in a lot of ways of course. I understand who he’s up against.) Trump needs the pressure on him from Americans, so that it can counteract the tremendous pressure he is under from the elite, LP, most politicians, etc. Possibly the wife and/or daughter are involved “we need to fit in, I want to be able to wear my new dress to more cocktail parties – we aren’t getting invited, sob, sob,…”.

As a man suggested above, possibly Trump is very impressionable. That is a bad thing for a leader (opposite of a Ronald Reagan, for example, who spent years making his mind up on his principles; before you chime in on the ’86 amnesty, his fault was he trusted US politicians more than he did the Russkies – big mistake.). If this is the case, we need to keep up the deep impressioning on his ass, such as when he did hear the stories from the families of the people killed by reckless multiply-deported illegal aliens, but there are lots of other stories, say the imminent death of the middle class – I think Trump does have a lot of empathy for the common man.


Comments (1)




Pension fund running-out-of-money story - there's gonna' be a lot more of these


Posted On: Wednesday - March 1st 2017 8:39AM MST
In Topics: 
  Global Financial Stupidity

After the long series of introductory posts on the Global Financial Stupidity situation, we can now just, more sporadically, have some posts with examples. Zerohedge would be the "go-to" site on this, and here is another in many posts about the impossibility of pension funds to deliver on their promises, as delved into here, more specifically on PeakStupidity. Zerohedge describes NY Teamsters Pension Becomes First To Run Out Of Money As Expert Warns "Pension Tsunami" Is Coming.

This ZH post is a series of a four or five different stories of a few different pension funds of the trucking industries. These trucking guys are usually guys that you don't want to fuck with, but I guess, by definition they will be too old to fight things with tire irons around the time they begin to need this promised money. The post is a kind of meat-and-potatoes post of Zerohedge, or their forte (if you eat French cuisine instead of meat and potatoes). It's real world, good stuff to read and to me what the ZeroHedge site is all about. The commenters most likely have good stuff to add. I can't put the whole thing here - people don't like that, and one can read it there.


The New York Teamsters Road Carriers Local 707 Pension Fund has won the unfortunate award for "First Pension to Officially Run Out of Money." According to the New York Daily News, and a host of angry former truck drivers who've had their pension benefits slashed, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC) has officially been forced to step in and take over payments to retirees of the Local 707, albeit at a much lower rate.

Teamsters Local 707’s pension fund is the first to officially bottom out financially — which happened this month.
------------------------------------
“I had a union job for 30 years,” Chmil said. “We had collectively bargained contracts that promised us a pension. I paid into it with every paycheck. Everyone told us, ‘Don’t worry, you have a union job, your pension is guaranteed.’ Well, so much for that.”

“It’s a nightmare, it has just devastated all of our lives. I’ve gone from having $48,000 a year to less than half that,” said Chmil, one of five Local 707 retirees who agreed to share their stories with the Daily News last week.

“I don’t want other people to have to go through this. We need everyone to wake up and do something; that’s why we’re talking,” said Ray Narvaez.
------------------------------------


OK, I said this didn't I: "Everyone told us 'Don't worry .... your xxxxxx is guaranteed.’ Well, so much for that.” Don't believe that from any big organization (especially government), and more likely you really should only believe this from family and good friends.

More:

Meanwhile, under the maximum benefits provided by the PBGC, many former Teamsters, like Ray Narvaez, said their monthly retirement checks have been slashed by two-thirds.

[snipped out: picture of this guy getting an award for service, yeah that helped ....]
------------------------------------
Then Narvaez, like 4,000 other retired Teamster truckers, got a letter from Local 707 in February of last year.

It said monthly pensions had to be slashed by more than a third. It was an emergency move to try to keep the dying fund solvent. That dropped Narvaez from nearly $3,500 to about $2,000.

“They said they were running out of money, that there could be no more in the pension fund, so we had to take the cut,” said Narvaez, whose wife was recently diagnosed with cancer.
------------------------------------

The stopgap measure didn’t work — and after years of dangling over the precipice, Local 707’s pension fund fell off the financial cliff this month. With no money left, it turned to Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., a government insurance company that covers pension.

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. picked up Local 707’s retiree payouts — but the maximum benefit it gives a year is roughly $12,000, for workers who racked up at least 30 years. For those with less time on the job, the payouts are smaller.

Narvaez now gets $1,170 a month — before taxes.


I'll say it again. The financial world is in between a rock and a hard place. The plans cannot be solvent at interest rates of 0.5-1.5%. They are basing all of their future payouts on returns of 6-8%. The way to get that high return is risky investments, such as, I dunno, the stock market? The stock market, though based on production of certain industries that are not expanding much at all, must be pumped up anyway, as that's where some of this money is, while more of the money is invested in other funds, which also need to make the high return, but based on what exactly? If the Federal Reserve board raises the rates to the 6-8% range, then the Feral Gov't will be more broke and even sooner, as interest on the direct national debt of $20,000,000,000,000 will be a big part of the budget then, say 1.4 trillion bucks a year (that's at 7% interest) out of a 4 trillion dollar budget, one third of it.

How can we cover that gap, you ask? "No problem", says anyone who's been in government long and knows what he's doing - "we'll just take out a loan for the gap, you know, sell Treasury bonds. C'mon guys, do I have to give you a refresher course - it's all borrowing nowadays!"



No comments - Click here to start thread



Tuesday night rock - Houses of the Holy by Zeppelin


Posted On: Tuesday - February 28th 2017 6:55PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music

Just a 4 minute long hard-rockin' song from Led Zeppelin. It is titled "Houses of the Holy", yet is NOT on the album "Houses of the Holy", but on "Physical Graffitti", the cover of which, for the actual vinyl LP (not "Lyin' Press" this time, but "Long Play") had a sliding inside cover that would move some letters around in these windows in the cover picture of a couple of old stone row-houses. That is awful quaint - what was the point of all that back then? Have any of you even bought an album to get the cover as a toy? Anyone? Now, if you knew what you'd get on eBay for it 50 years later, that's different.

BTW, Houses of the Holy, the album, has not one bad song on it, and contains the excellent "Rain Song" and "Over the Hills and Far Away".



Robert Plant - Vocals
Jimmy Page - Guitar
John Paul Jones - Bass guitar and keyboards
John Bonham - Drums

Tell me if the 17 second intro is not a 6/4 time signature or something like that.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Allan Wall of VDare - LP complains: Illegals fear President Trump


Posted On: Tuesday - February 28th 2017 6:26PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Trump

It's like nobody goes for sob stories any more. It's not that these stories don't bring tears to our eyes like they used to; we've got tears in our eyes but they're tears of joy. The more the Lyin Press puts these out, the more any Americans who still read their crap, or hear about it like the reader will here, will be encourage to keep this all going - go Trump!

In an article in VDare two days back Allan Wall laughs at the silliness or purported stupidity of the Lying Press. In Memo From Middle America: MSM Complains That Trump Raids Sow Fear Among Immigrants. Yes, So What’s The Problem?, Wall points out some excerpts from what he quaintly calls the Main Stream Media, now known as Gov Media, Fakenews or more eponymously the Lyin Press.

The first part of the title above is the name of Allan Wall's column on VDare. The background is that the column used to be named "Memo From Mexico", as the writer and his family had lived in Mexico for many years. Mr. Wall, as mentioned in our VDare review, is fluent in Spanish so both now and when he lived there, he can give us the Mexican take on our illegal immigration situation (spoiler alert - it's strongly encouraged, and major meddling in the affairs of governments in the US is assumed to be the right of all Mexican people in power). One could learn a lot by going back through Allan Wall's columns here, though I could see it taking a week or so to read them all, as there are right about 1250 columns of his. Mr. Wall's writing is very evenhanded and moderate in tone.

Anyhow, a few excerpts:


Immigration and Customs Enforcement is launching raids and detentions of illegal aliens, leading invaders to fear an “enforcement surge” [Reports of raids have immigrants bracing for enforcement surge, by Nicholas Kulish, Caitlin Dickerson and Liz Robbins, New York Times, February 10, 2017]. ICE is downplaying it, calling it “targeted enforcement action,” no different than what was done during the Obama years. But it appears there is a real shift and illegals are right to be concerned.

And as Americans, we want illegal aliens to be concerned.

As CIS’s Mark Krikorian noted in USA Today, all that is happening is a “return to normal enforcement practices” where those who have committed crimes other than illegal immigration are still the priority, but “ordinary lawbreakers are no longer exempt from enforcement”. [Trump immigration raids show greater focus on non-criminals, by Alan Gomez, USA Today, February 16, 2017].

Yet for some reason, the Main Stream Media is running sob stories portraying it as somehow wrong illegal immigrants fear consequences for their crimes [Federal immigration raids net many without criminal records, sowing fear, by Arelis R. Hernandez, Wesley Lowery, and Abigail Hauslohner, Washington Post, February 16, 2017]. Thus, we get lurid tales of illegals being detained after leaving a church homeless shelter, and locking themselves in their homes or not going to work or school.

One bit of unintentional comedy:

[cited LP article here:]
A government social worker for Durham County, N.C., said that the number of Hispanic residents seeking assistance had dropped off rapidly in recent days amid swirling rumors about an ICE checkpoint at a Durham intersection and ICE agents making arrests in a supermarket parking lot.

“Today, I haven’t gotten one Hispanic client in the entire check-in today,” said the social worker, a longtime government employee who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

“That never happens … They think that when they come here for assistance, that they’re going to be on some sort of invisible list.”

[Allan Wall again:]

Wow, just wow. “Hispanic residents” so fear-stricken that they won’t even show up to collect welfare benefits! What is this country coming to?


Personally, my response would be: quit worrying about some sort of "invisible list" - we have no such thing. It's quite visible, if you'd bother to look on the web or at the post office!

Great ending here, but as they say all over the internet (people that don't write all their own stuff, that is), READ.THE.WHOLE.THING.
Carlos Garcia de Alba, Mexico’s Consul General in Los Angeles, complains in the Times that people are “really scared” and “fearful.”

As Americans, we shouldn’t fear spreading “fear.” Fear is good. If ICE can keep the heat on and not apologize, many illegals will self-deport.

There are many advantages for them. They’re more likely to save their personal property and vehicles and can leave on their own terms. If they are detained and deported, all bets are off. Ideally, they will leave gradually, allowing Mexico to process returnees.

Carlos Garcia de Alba further whines that Mexicans in the United States “want to know what is going to happen and how to protect themselves.”

I have a suggestion. Why not protect themselves by moving back to Mexico?


Again, this guy writes pretty evenhandedly and really has nothing against regular Mexicans at all; heck, he lived there for many years.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Free Tibet


Posted On: Tuesday - February 28th 2017 9:42AM MST
In Topics: 
  Humor  China

In response to this John Derbyshire post on Unz.com regarding the U. of California San Diego Chinese students forcing the cancellation of a speech by the Dalai Lama (religious leader of Tibet), commenter "Cloudbuster" opines:
I guess all those “Free Tibet” stickers on the bumpers of Progressive’s Priuses and Volvos are going to have to come off.

His comment is about the conflict in the politics between the commie lefties and the Chinese people, a large influx of which has come to universities here. There is some overlap between these groups only because the incoming Chinese become MORE politically correct after being at an American university for a while (or the not-so-bright ones, anyway).

Anyway in response to the suggestion of pulling off our "Free Tibet" stickers:

Yeah, or they could get all entrepreneurial and s__t, and, instead of peeling them off and possibly ruining the bumper-cover paint, they could add another sticker to the right that says:

en Coffee – www.commie-coffee.commie
Twitter #Zedong


hahaha … get it, Pound Zedong (instead of Mao Zedong) … hey I’ll be here all week folks … try the free Tibetan coffee, along with your favorite whores-dee-voors.



No comments -
Click here to start thread