Freedom in China, Tiananmen Square, and Freedom in America


Posted On: Thursday - June 13th 2019 10:42AM MST
In Topics: 
  Commies  History  China  Liberty/Libertarianism

(continued from this post)

Peak Stupidity does tend to have long introductions to posts, and as an example, what I wanted to write here didn't make it into the last post on China and the Tiananmen Square protests and crackdown of 30 years back. Here we go then.

Mini Statue of Liberty in Tiananmen Square, Peking, China, 1989:



No, their one didn't come with a poem on it about "huddled masses" or some crap, either.


As I wrote, the big protest movement in China that started May 4th of 1989 could have been like any number of likely hundreds that any big country with a 5,000 year history should expect. That it was made into a demand for more "democracy" was probably just a good meme for these Chinamen, as throughout a lot of their long, often isolated, history, there either was no such thing in the world or they were in no position to have heard about it. In the midst of the Mao-created craziness in the 1950's through 1970's information about the outside was not easy to obtain. In 1989 however, there had already been a decade since Chairman Mao died, and, more importantly, Chinese people from the mainland were starting to get around. Personally, I'd seen the first Chinese visitors to the University in the early 1980's and by right at 1989 I have memories of more students from the Chinese mainland. Before that, even in NY City Chinatown, the Chinese people you'd run into were from Hong Kong, or otherwise Taiwan, then the Republic Of China (written on the back of our small toys).

Therefore, I maintain that the Chinese people had gotten some solid info. from those who'd spent time in America, back when it was a whole lot closer to a free country than it is, spit ... now. (What a shameful difference 30 years has made!) We WERE something of a beacon of freedom and liberty still, and I could see the Chinese students back in Peking and other universities getting their hopes very high after their movement had been building nicely. As I wrote in the previous post, it got the ex-Cold Warrior American's hopes up too.

In that picture up top, one can see that Lady Liberty symbol, as the meme of "democracy, democracy!" became somewhat of a demand, rather than just the usual cries for an end to the endemic corruption in a central government. Now, that's a lost cause, as, well, it's endemic. It is a never-ending thing, and you may stop one certain corrupt practice in this branch here, but, if you're going to have a central government with a lot of power, than you will have those abusing it. So, sure, overhaul the whole thing, and set yourself up with a Constitutional Republic, like that of that amazing place a colleague of your Professor visited for a year-long stint studying material science. That doesn't fly too well with The Party though, hence the crackdown.

No matter what the words out of 10's of thousands of Chinese student's mouths, and what their large-character posters said, in June of 1989, I don't think these people really understood what it would take to have anything resembling the America of 1989, much less 1959. The problem is that, in that 5,000 year history that they are so proud of, the Chinese have NO (ZERO) history of running governments in democratic, much less republican or libertarian fashion. It is just not in them.

There have always been literate, intelligent "Mandarins" and "Cadres", lots of them honest, perhaps, during the many dynasties over the millennia in the Middle Kingdom. That the smarter Chinese guys were in the government is something the Chinese are proud of. As I pointed out in some post I cannot find right now, here in America, in general, it's been the stupid people that end up in the government. Maybe that is, and maybe it's not, something to be proud of, but here's the point: smart or stupid, what you need is government employees that CAN'T DO MUCH ... TO YOU! To have that situation, the central government especially must be very small. As the protesters in Tiananmen Square chanted about "democracy", the example they looked up to was forgetting the same things that these Chinamen and their ancestors never knew.

Ancestors of most American, at least before the latest, and maybe also the century-back great immigration waves, came from a long history of steady curtailment of government power. The Magna Carta was signed 814 years back in Great Britain. It's not been 5,000 years but damn near a millennium. If not having any ancestors from Mother England, at least one could be descended from a few generations of assimilated Americans that were steeped in the ideas of small-government liberty in civic institutions and the schools of yesteryear.

That seems to be the case no longer, as the number of un-assimilated foreigners climbs to record levels. The situation here can't be blamed solely on immigration either. Per the political orientation graphs displayed by blogger Audacious Epigone a few days back, we've got more people who see themselves as liberal (in the modern sense) than can be explained by immigration, as, in fact, a higher percentage of the Blue-Squad seeing themselves as such are white vs. other, and immigration is almost entirely non-white.

No, the Chinese were never in a position, pretty much genetically, I'd say, to turn their country into a real democracy, much less a Constitutional Republic, even with America to emulate 30 years back. Nowadays, China is so mighty economically, and their people as arrogant as always, that they don't want to emulate us anyway. It's just as well. Really, at this point, nobody has anybody to emulate. I'm starting to think that the wonderful limited government set-up that our Founders made for us is a once-in-history fluke.

Here's the future of America's "Democracy" Movement and OUR Lady Liberty:

“You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!”




No comments - Click here to start thread



A microaggression ties the knitters in knots


Posted On: Tuesday - June 11th 2019 7:57PM MST
In Topics: 
  General Stupidity  Humor  ctrl-left  Peak Stupidity Roadshow

Road Trip!!!



The SJW crowd is very easily offended these days. Are they knitpicking because they are really so sensitive, or are they shrewd and cunning and just pushing their agenda to ridiculous levels to probe our forbearance?

Hearing the stupid complaints about politically-incorrect language in the political world or at the universities is something we are used to at this point. Reading about a microaggression from someone in a knitting group is another thing entirely. Blogger Stacy McCain*, about 4 months back, tells us Knitting Bloggers in Meltdown Mode Over ‘Social Justice’, putting Peak Stupidity in stitches.

A lady big in the knitting world, one Mrs. Karen Templer, ran into a kink with some easily-offendables in that small world of theirs by simply writing on her knitting blog that she was excited about going to India. What? Does one have to vet every thing one writes or says anymore with the truth ministry somewhere downtown? Otherwise, I can't see how I'd see a problem like this coming. It only takes one guy thou... wait, what, a guy in the knitting group?! One Alex Klein, "accused Templer of expressing 'a colonial/imperialist mindset'.". Others piled on, backing up his strange yarn, as such is the world of Facebook and Twitter.

As is the usual cowardly way out of this type of nonsense, Mrs. Templer caved in with an apology. Next trip lady, just save a few bucks and don't offend anybody, OK, by going on that road trip to see that biggest ball of yarn in the world. I'm sure it's what you really wanted to do anyway.



* His blog, which I've always liked, is named "The Other McCain" due to it being around when that douchebag Globalist was still with us. I guess it's too late to rename it now.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Freedom in China? On the Tiananmen Massacre 30 years ago.


Posted On: Tuesday - June 11th 2019 7:22PM MST
In Topics: 
  Commies  History  China  Liberty/Libertarianism



Peak Stupidity just CANNOT meet the deadline on , OK, remember, most of these anniversaries of historical events in time for publication date. Here's another that I even downloaded a few picture for last year to use them on June 4th of this year. Sorry, but it's just gonna be this way often and probably doesn't matter much except to me. I do remember this event fairly well though and can place it somewhere around the time of that Loma Prieta, California earthquake [Just checked - got the year right at least, haha, but it was in October. - Ed]

There are revisionist Commies right on unz.com and I'm sure all around the web as they've been crawling out of the woodwork, who will tell us that this Chinese flowering of freedom protests, along with a subsequent serious crackdown. were just all made up. I really don't know why anyone thinks our Lyin' Press, even of the late 1980's ever had, or now has, an anti-China slant. Communism was promoted until the horrors and deprivation couldn't be hidden anymore. Americans sent corn to China even during the dark days of the Cold War in the 1960's as Mao was causing millions to starve. (OK, feed corn, but still...)

Late spring of 1989, when the democracy protests started up in China, was also during the heyday of not-quite-infotainment-yet CNN. Live photos of such an on-going political happening were such a new and cool thing 30 years back. I'm sure, sympathies aside, the ratings were well worth showing things that vindicated American Cold War winners. It was a hell of a time to be a Cold War winner too. The USSR had fallen, and most of the East Bloc had also, or was in that process. Yeah, Cuba was still in the midst of its ongoing "revolution", and there were a few problems down in Salvador and Peru. That was all kid stuff, though, compared to the biggies, the USSR (GONE!) and Red China. To think that billion-person Communist land could turn around in a virtual heartbeat of history as the USSR had, made us very hopeful about the goings on in Spring 1989. Change was coming, "Right Here, Right Now", at least right there on the color TV!

There had been a building movement since May 4th of the year. May 4th is famous day in exactly one century-old Chinese history, also missed by Peak Stupidity (but we lay no claim to be all-China 24/7). There had been a big student protest, unoriginally dubbed the "May 4th Movement" 70 years before our subject here, also in Tienanmen Square in Peking, Really the "Tienanmen Square" protests were a copycat in method, but not in demands.

The demands 30 years ago were more openness in government (yeah, right, under Communism, OK?!), and the usual. By some point, say, when the Lady Liberty statue was brought out, the students had gotten bold enough to talk about democracy and all that jazz, which couldn't have sat well with Chairman Deng. Deng must have felt they were a bunch of ungrateful Chinamen (AND Chinawomen) to be demanding anything, after he had help get the countries economy going on the first decade of an amazing rise, by allowing free markets in some industries in some areas.



The Chinese students went for it all, which was what gave Americans hope that this could be another fall of Communism (the biggest, population wise, though, in 1989, the USSR was by far the biggest, military-wise). It was not to be. The crackdown on the protesters had started, with arrests and shootings by troops, and later executions, well before the famous picture up top, with the gentleman blocking the tank. How many people were killed, arrested, and/or executed later I don't know exactly. There were reports at the time of thousands executed. This attempted peaceful movement was spread throughout China, not just in Peking. I found out years later of someone only known to me 2nd-hand had been kicked out of his university as a bright electrical engineering student and barred from further entrance to school, ending up as a TV repairman. Hey, it's not execution, by any means, but still repression at about the level we are coming to here in 2019 America.

I really meant for this post to go into China and ideas about freedom, but that'll be a 2nd part for tomorrow's blogging.


Comments (2)




What's so funny 'bout PEACE, LOVE, and UNDERSTANDING?


Posted On: Monday - June 10th 2019 8:28PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music

Well, that depends on whether you are an 18 y/o college student during the time of the real Elvis, or a parent who should be wise enough to know what that all entails.

Yeah, this guy was the real Elvis for a short time in the history of rock music. What a goofy guy, but he sure wrote some good music. Peak Stupidity will feature him, and another even-less known figure from the not-very-often-touted genre of geek rock some more in the near future.

Elvis Costello and the Attractions:



As I walk through
this wicked world,
searchin' for light in the darkness
of insanity.
I ask myself
"is all hope lost?"
Is there only pain and hatred,
and misery?
And each time I feel like this inside,
there's one thing I want to know:
What's so funny 'bout peace love & understanding?
Ohhhh. What's so funny 'bout peace love & understanding?


(What's so funny bout) Peace, Love, and Understanding? was written by English musician Nick Lowe in 1974, but was covered by Elvis, and put in the American release of Elvis's 1978 album Armed Forces. (This Elvis is English too, BTW.)



No comments - Click here to start thread



Here We Believe ...


Posted On: Monday - June 10th 2019 8:04PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Lefty MegaStupidity  ctrl-left

... a whole lot of conflicting stupid BULLSHIT. Why? Because we want to show we are better people than you people without the sign:



Yeah, these blogs posts come out of the strangest places and times. As we visited relatives recently, I noticed the sign above on the very small yard (so highly visible) of the very next-door neighbor of our relatives. I wrote "very" specifically because these are townhouses so we're talking 20 ft away from our location. The sign reminds me of one of the two signs in Peak Stupidity's long-ago post on the Unitarians, Unitarian Stupidity - it's how they roll at the UU.. I'm guessing the Unitarians nearby have gotten their own well before this neighbor to get ahead in the game.

The game is called "virtue signalling". I believe the term was coined by John Derbyshire of VDare (articles here) and Unz.com (articles here). Hey, that's as accurate a term as any of what people with these signs boldly displayed are all about. However, I'd really be up for a less polite, civil term and something much more disparaging. Is that just because I am one of those hateful meanies that won't understand the love and wisdom in this sign?

No, I'm getting really pissed about this stuff now. Let me describe the mentality of these people to you. It's not just simple stupidity. That can be forgiven. No, the sign is out there to tell me without the sign that I do not understand these simple concepts of LOVE, PEACE, and UNDERSTANDING! I am the stupid one, per the sign-wavers, because they are so DAMN ARROGANT, that they can not see that maybe they don't have the whole picture of what's going on in the country. Their assumption is that they can't be wrong, and I am both stupid and hateful for not getting it, even after reading these signs.

The stupidity comes in simply in the obvious contradictions written in those rainbow colors. The first and most glaring one is the "No Human is Illegal" juxtaposed with "Water is Life" (come to think of it, the sign I saw had some more treehugging phrases than the one above*). Let me get this straight: You understand that clean water is important, yet you don't think that there should be ANY limit on how many people live in America. This disregard for population growth, caused SOLELY BY IMMIGRATION, for the last 3-4 decades, which is a basic factor in EVERY SINGLE ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM THAT EXISTS, is to be ignored. Nah, there must be other things we can do to mitigate the effect of 3 X the number of Americans on the same land in, in 100 years. How about we recycle more cardboard? Yes, toward Sustainable Stupidity! Oh, but VDare, and others, have found the reason the biggest of the environmental groups, the Sierra Club, has decided change their 1st rule of membership to "YOU! DO! NOT! TALK! ABOUT! IMMIGRATION!" One guy didn't want them to, and he donates a lot of money**. These are not treehuggers, they are tree-whores.

I could give 2 or 3 more contradictions inherent in just this one version of the plethora of products from the virtue-signaling yard-sign industry. It would just take too long for one post. This brings up the fact that it would take too long to explain to these people also. They are so simple-minded, yet think their minds are wide-open.

The next day, I noticed something that could have been a scene in a movie. As I walked out to the car, I noticed that, beyond the sign, the neighbor house had a young girl sitting eating in the kitchen. I mentioned that these are townhouses, and because they are symmetric, that kitchen abutted the firewall of our relatives' place, with it's kitchen on the other side. Our boy of likely the same age +/- a year, was in our place on the other side of the wall. On the one side there is the little boy getting taught to seek truth by his parents, and, unbeknown anyone but me (or the movie viewer) was a little girl getting taught bullshit by virtue-signalling ctrl-left batshit-crazy parents.

Fade-out to 10 years later, and pan between (Look, I'm not Francis Ford Coppola, OK!) two scenes of the same girl and boy walking across their college campuses, the purple-haired, multiply-tattooed Wymyn's Studies major going out to a political rally against white people, and the solid-A Mechanical Engineering student who is so into his interesting work that he just doesn't want to be bothered by politics, respectively. Oh, wait, that's a lot of suspension of disbelief there. I don't believe we'll even have a country by then.




* Yeah, Peak Stupidity has a file photo up top. OK, it's simply a photo downloaded after a quick image search on bing (bing seems to be best with images). It's a matter of both convenience and, occasionally, anonymity, that we use those photos 95% of the time over our own camera photos.

In this case, I WAS very tempted to take a picture with the phone and download it. I really would have enjoyed this very likely (since the sign was right outside the window) exchange with the neighbor:

"Hey, like our sign?!"
"It's just for my blog."
"Oh, interesting... what blog?"
"Peak Stupidity."

(Listen, they are not MY neighbors, so I don't have to be the one wondering if they'll then call the city on me for not sweeping my walk.)


** See More on the destruction of California.



No comments - Click here to start thread



The Brain-Fart of a Heel


Posted On: Friday - June 7th 2019 8:11PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Trump  Books



That's what this guy is to me now, just a "heel". Per the Oxford Dictionary on-line, definition 4:
Heel: (dated, informal) An inconsiderate or untrustworthy person.
OK, that definition is dated, Donald Trump is dated at this point, and this whole immigration issue with Trump's half-assed on/off "solutions" smells like it's way beyond its sell-date. My recollection of old-movie talk is that a "heel" is a sucker.

The latest deal that got many of us immigration patriots hopes back up was President Trump's Mexican tariff-ratcheting idea. It's a great idea that, of course, should have been done > 2 years and a couple of million immigrants ago. Tariff were an early American tradition and the main source of income to run the US Federal Gov't on up until the extremely stupid idea of the income tax. Ratcheting them up on the Mexicans according to their efforts to seriously stop the southern immigration invasion is a great way to do it. While we wait for some action, we'd make taxes on the good from down there, and if that went on long, it may bring some manufacturing back, even if just a little.

It's a great deal for us, that has already gotten the Mexicans talking about doing something serious, which is good feedback on how good a deal this is.

What's the latest? As usual, Trump has already rescinded the tariffs, citing some agreement with the Mexican top-hombres. This is getting ridiculous. THATS! NOT! HOW! YOU! RUN! THIS! DEAL! I am as far from a salesman type of personality as one can get, but damn if I do know that you don't back off on this type of deal before you see serious action taken by the opposing side. A piece of paper being signed is NOT action. People lie. Sorry, President Trump, but don't expect royalties from me (it'd have been library bond money anyway) from your book.

Here's the nice-sounding words out of Trumps Tweeter:
I am pleased to inform you that The United States of America has reached a signed agreement with Mexico. The Tariffs scheduled to be implemented by the U.S. on Monday, against Mexico, are hereby indefinitely suspended. Mexico, in turn, has agreed to take strong measures to stem the tide of Migration through Mexico, and to our Southern Border. This is being done to greatly reduce, or eliminate, Illegal Immigration coming from Mexico and into the United States. Details of the agreement will be released shortly by the State Department. Thank you!
Yeah, sounds great... "strong measures", whatever. Talk is cheap.

This is supposed to give me lots of hope that this existential problem has been SOLVED, but nothing's going to change*. The stupidity of this man is boundless, but I'd figure, though not principled, not understanding of history, and not good at hiring (maybe only firing, on TV), at least Donald Trump was good at making deals. This is the only deal I see:

****************************************************
Donald Trump = Charlie Brown
AND
AMLO = Lucille

****************************************************


Put your hopes in AMLO (WTF?) now.



I really had high hopes for President Trump 2 1/2 years back. On this particular issue, the expert on Mexican politics, Allan Wall of VDare**, paints the Mexican Presidente, AMLO as a fairly reasonable guy who limits his macho rhetoric on this topic. It’s a shame we have to put our hopes in the Mexican President rather than our dufus. #STUPID!






* Mark my words here, I'd love to be proven wrong. If that happens, I'll write a special serious apology post, and in 1070-odd posts, Peak Stupidity has only apologized ONCE so far, and that one was pretty half-assed.

** Mr. Wall's latest article on this tariff-pressure deal, written before Trump ended the deal, was Is the Trump Tariff Threat Accomplishing Something? Maybe. Better Keep Up the Pressure!. Note that "Better Keep Up the Pressure!" bit.


Comments (4)




More on Red Flag laws from America's First Freedom


Posted On: Thursday - June 6th 2019 8:08PM MST
In Topics: 
  US Police State  Liberty/Libertarianism  Orwellian Stupidity



Here is more on the Orwellian anti-gun, anti-Constitutional "Red Flag" laws from the NRA magazine, as Peak Stupidity discussed this past Saturday. The excerpts here are from the 2nd article, by a pro-2nd Amendment lawyer from Arizona named Dave Hardy, and it deals specifically with new laws passed in Colorado (signed by the Democrat Governor there).

A very important point in all Constitutional matters is that the most basic jurisdiction, the COUNTY, with its ELECTED sheriff is the final authority on the law. (OK, he's supposed to be. In the lefty wonderlands in the cities, some Senator says "blow me", and the mayor says "how long?") I used to read the Constitution/Libertarian sites, and you learn some of this stuff.

Well, the sheriffs in most of the counties in the state of Colorado are not ready to enforce these Orwellian laws as described in the article thusly:
Colorado’s latest experiment came in April, when Democrat Gov. Jared Polis signed into law Colorado’s version of a “red flag” law. The new law allows petitions to be filed by any relative of a gun owner, as well as by anyone who has resided with him or her during the past six months (in other words, any vengeful ex-spouse or romantic partner). The petition must allege that the person who is its target: 1) owns guns; and 2) poses a “significant risk of causing personal injury to self or others.”

If the court finds a basis for these claims (and remember, the gun owner cannot argue against them, since he or she has not yet even been notified that the petition was filed) the court must issue an order commanding the gun owner to give up his guns to law enforcement or to a federal firearms license holder (FFL). Afterward, the gun owner would finally get a hearing (at which the vengeful ex-spouse or other petitioner can testify by telephone). Next, the court can order the guns held for a year, then has the power to renew the order at the end of the year. The court can also, under certain circumstances, issue a “civil search warrant”—a concept with no constitutional meaning. The Fourth Amendment requires search warrants to be based upon probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, not a judge’s guess that there is a risk that a law-abiding person might commit one in the future.
Yeah, this law has been passed, which shows you a) how little regard most politicians have for the US Constitution and b) how the violation of one Amendment in the Bill of Rights can impact the ability to uphold the other ones. It is some Orwellian shit, people, but the Oceanian authorities in 1984 never had to deal with citizens armed with semi-auto shotguns, ARs, and AKs, unless I read an older version. This NRA article has blurbs about a number of sheriffs in Colorado:
Even before the law was signed, Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams announced: “I’m refusing to enforce a law I believe is unconstitutional, and I believe my constituent base is in agreement. I can’t enforce a law that I believe goes against our state Constitution or our federal Constitution.”
The next excerpt is from Sheriff Bill Elder of El Paso County, the most populous in the state, at just under 1/4 million people (Colorado Springs is there. I guess Denver is spread out over several counties.):
“My deputies will not,” he said, emphasizing the word, “search for or confiscate firearms. Nor will we execute any warrant that is not signed by a judge and based upon probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed.”
This is why the office of Sheriff is a very important one, and the people need to keep a close watch and possibly friendly terms with their local Sheriff or deputy thereof.

When I wrote that many sheriffs are "not ready" to enforce this type of law, it meant two things. Indeed, at least from their words, many of these Colorado guys take their oath to the Constitution seriously, amazingly enough (not as amazing in rural areas, but still...) There is another aspect: This kind of law is a set-up for some kind of violent stand-off. Granted, it doesn't prescribe a mass weapons confiscation, sure to be a losing battle at this time for The Man. There won't usually be a big crowd ready to back-up the gun owner, as it's a very un-due-process-like deal in which the confiscatee may not know about this until a cop car is at the end of his driveway. However, not all will go quietly. This is something that has got to also make the Sheriffs nervous, no matter what their principals, and not ready to enforce the law for that reason.

Red Flag laws, besides being unconstitutional, are a recipe for trouble. However, or BECAUSE of that, the ctrl-left persists:
Phil Weiser, Colorado’s attorney general, argues that any sheriff who refuses to enforce the law should resign.

“If a sheriff cannot follow the law, the sheriff cannot do his or her job,”
I guess this guy swore HIS oath on the Koran or something. He doesn't understand the Sheriffs' job or he doesn't understand the Constitution, or the idea of right and wrong. Many of the county's Sheriffs are planning on suing the state of Colorado about the Red Flag laws. That's all well and good, but personally, I think just standing down and un-ashamedly not complying shows more guts and means more. Will they fire all of them? Can they? Can the people elect new guys just like them, and have the old Sheriffs be picked as deputies? DO! NOT! COMPLY!



No comments - Click here to start thread



D-Day, 75 years ago, and President Reagan's '1984 speech at Pointe du Hoc


Posted On: Thursday - June 6th 2019 8:48AM MST
In Topics: 
  History  Dead/Ex- Presidents

Peak Stupidity, with an interest in history*, but not actually being a history site, has been very inconsistent in observing or memorializing important dates, especially right on the same day, and not 4 months later. It will probably remain that way, even with our great interest in the events that have resulted in the high stupidity levels we live under today.

We will at least observe today the 75th anniversary of the start of the WWII "D-Day" invasions of 5 different beachheads on the Normandy coast of France. The weather had been not good enough for the landings and air support on the planned days before, but June 6th, 1944 is when this went down. You can read the history plenty of other places, but as to the magnitude of the effort and the glories and hell of war, we'll just let President Reagan talk about it.

Going back just under 1/2 way to the D-Day date (47% of the way), America was still a serious country then. We had a President who could act and speak with dignity, and not commemorate an event with a 140-character tweet.



There is plenty the history-minded reader could argue about, whether WWII would have happened if President Wilson had not urged Americans into WWI, whether WWII could have been avoided anyway with diplomacy rather than reflexive militarism, and whether the US should have been involved even then.

One could also give Peak Stupidity some grief about President Reagan. No, he didn't fight in this war. As President, was he just too naive and trusting of the opposition in the US Congress, causing the beginning of the huge budget deficits (they'd promised to cut welfare spending as military spending was increased to end the Cold War) and resulting in his signing of the 1st in a series of illegal-alien amnesties (when promised the border would then be controlled)? Was he compromised already from the time of that .22 shot that ended up 1" from his heart in 1981?

Sure, one could argue all of that. That doesn't change the situation at all for an Army Ranger 75 years ago today that came on the beach among heavy fire and rope-climbed up the steep bluff to establish a base in France for fighting the Nazis. The war in Europe ended just about 1 year later, after General Patton's 3rd Army rolled across France and Germany to Berlin.

I'll listen to Old Ronnie's words again later. Let's try to lways remember this history.



* "And History is interested in us" or something like that.


Comments (2)




Black Helicopter Parenting


Posted On: Wednesday - June 5th 2019 7:41PM MST
In Topics: 
  US Police State  Orwellian Stupidity  Socialism/Communism

Just your government hovering around, making sure you're safe ...



(It'll be drones more than helicopters.)


We've likely all heard of the term "helicopter parenting". Parents don't have as many kids as they used to, their neighbors are less likely to have any for them to all hang around together with shared eyes on them, and the 24/0/365(6) infotainment brings local stories to the whole TV-viewing nation's attention for months now, such as a child abduction. I guess those are the main reasons, but more suggestions are welcome in the comments. (Put that "PS" at the beginning, please, for your own sake.) The term "helicopter" comes in due to a helicopter's ability to hover over a spot, as a parent will be present almost all the time for any children that aren't already being hovered over by teachers and such.

I have been plenty guilty myself of this, though it's not likely a very good thing for the growth of children into self-sufficient adults. Sometimes, they need to be left to learn their own lessons and make their own rules. It is still understandable that parents would like to keep any watch they can, for as far along into their children's lives they can, in the interest of keeping them safe. It's just not a good policy for long-term safety that comes from being an independent adult.

I had a thought the other day that maybe the women that do the most of this are the same, over the generations, that have helped vote in the Socialist agenda in America. It's gotten past Socialism or any "ism" really, to almost a full-on Orwellian Police State. Just think of the income tax - before that it was none of the Feral Gov't's business where the hell you worked and how much you got paid. After that, Big-Gov. needed to know all that. It's been just over a century now, and people forget there could be another way.

Then, there were the organizations that started the economic Socialism during the reign (basically) of Franklin Roosevelt. Big-Gov knew better how much corn, tobacco, and soybeans should sell for and who should be growing them. Next, came the welfare state instigated by the scumbag Lyndon Johnson. Since then, the US Feral Government knows why some people are poor and some are too rich and how much money should be redistributed for "fairness".

It wasn't until Jimmy Carter pushed for the US Dept. of Education (to pay back the teacher's unions for their 1976 campaign support) that it became the big Nanny-State's business what your kids should learn each day.

In order to perform all these tasks expected of the nanny, there must be lots of oversight. Luckily (!), electronic technology has come such a long way, cameras are a few bucks, and we can therefore be watched and kept track of, you know, to keep us safe and all... No, it won't really be black helicopters, but rather drones, for cost, efficiency and less noise.

The real difference between the helicopter parenting of the present times and the black helicopter parenting of the US Feral Government is that the former is really done for the safety of our children, while that of the latter is done for the safety of the US Feral Government. No, they do not want independent citizens, as they may not always agree with and obey The Party of the Establishment.



No comments - Click here to start thread



The Softer Noisier Side of Sears


Posted On: Wednesday - June 5th 2019 8:45AM MST
In Topics: 
  Cheap China-made Crap  Big-Biz Stupidity

The Big-Biz Stupidity side of Sears



(We came in through the back side, three times!)


As I wrote in my controversial* post on the BCE/CE business, though I was very surprised at myself to have not written that post in 2.5 years, it's a wash, as I already wrote the inflation-in-the-'90's post that the substitution/hedonics posts were to be precursors to. It's one thing to repeat myself, as much as I try not to repeat main points over and over. It's another thing to do it by accident! It's that CRS syndrome that I've been prone to, known by the MD specialists as Can't Remember Shit.

Anyway, the reader is referred to the early-October-'18 post Inflation and Chinese Imports and Exports if he would like to read Peak Stupidity's experience with the ACTUAL low-inflationary times of the mid-late 1990's.

Since I'm on the topic, I will relate this (mentioned long ago - in the footnote) story on the Cheap China-made exercise bike from, apparently, the softer higher-wear side of Sears. This is about anti-friction bearings in that otherwise very solid machine.

We paid close to 300 big ones for an exercise bike, and this was long enough ago to when Sears was still doing OK, as I recall, meaning quite a while ago. This machine we bought was not one with the fancy electronics that don't calculate power and energy right (dammit, another curmudgeonry post coming on that shit!). It was/is solid mechanically with a very small display panel - no TVs and internet, etc. - and no sensors but the magnet/proximity sensor type just to get rotational speed for all calculations.

What could go wrong? After about 2 weeks of use for 1/2 to 1 hour per day, the crank bearings started grinding. Upon getting at them, I saw they were just the same cheesy ball bearings with a sheet-metal cage, no outer and inner races but the housing and crank itself, respectively, like a cheap-ass China-made actual bicycle. I remember we didn't disassemble the machine, but just loaded it up and went to the back entrance to Sears for an exchange (it's not like I knew of another with guaranteed higher quality).

We brought the 2nd one home, I spent about 1 hour in assembly time, as it went quicker, and we started exercising. We used this thing for a month before ... yeah, the same bearings were grinding. ONWARD TO THE SEARS LOADING DOCK, AGAIN ... I can't recall, but I'm sure I'd have made some remarks about their business plan and the fact that I'd come back as many times as I had to. We brought this 3rd one home, and I assembled it with ease, as I am really good at that now! I think I didn't HAVE to look at this part, but I noticed one amazing thing: The cheap-ass crank bearings of the 1st 2 machines had been changed out with a nice solid Koyo or other precision-manufactured ball bearings with nice races and dust shielding.

Wow! Was it my remarks on the Sears website? I doubt they could make a change-out in design that quickly. No, probably people put the effort into bringing these $300 exercise bikes back enough times until some executive somewhere got the hint: "Hey, wait, we are selling 2.375 machines per customer, and then we had to build this whole facility in China to change out bearings. We can't make money this way. We may have to start using quality parts, but, but, then people might thing we're Japanese!"

I was very pleased by this, whatever actually caused someone to get off his ass and fix the problem. Those bearings have not been grinding ever since we got the 3rd machine. There've been some problems with the pedals ....



* Well, it got 2 non-agreeing comments, so that's a controversy here at Peak Stupidity! ;-}


Comments (3)




Hedonics in the Current Era of Cheap China-made Crap


Posted On: Tuesday - June 4th 2019 7:06PM MST
In Topics: 
  Cheap China-made Crap  Economics  US Feral Government  Inflation

The Peak Stupidity blog got a little bored with this economic stuff after a week ago Saturday, when we last posted about the concept of Hedonics, as used as a correction for inflation stats by the US Gov't. This is the meat of the problem though, here. It's the lack of proper corrections for the Cheap China-made Crap that I believe is the biggest factor in the official inflation rate not representing reality.

You'd think a cutie like this would have a boyfriend generous enough to buy her a new pair of jeans:



OK, the jeans above may be a bad example. They may even be made in America, as rips and tears of that kind of quality are something the Chinese textile industry may not be capable of, at least on purpose. I can imagine a Chinese Q/A lady inspecting the newest shipment of these jeans, as they are headed into a 53' "high-cube" shipping container for a trip to San Francisco. She gets on the blower: "OK, corporate Americans at buffet/strip club. Please keep them 2 more hour. Machine must setting wrong again. We get container out the back before American boss, no prolem!"

In all seriousness now, what about the consumer junk that doesn't last as lots of American stuff used to? If I have to buy both derailleurs and get new shifter and brake cables every 3 years for my bicycle, when the parts on the old American-built bike lasted forever, is that accounted for by the Bureau of Labor Statistics? Yes, I got the bike for the same price or cheaper. Over the same lifetime, it may cost 3 X as much as that after all the replacement parts (not even counting my labor).

I CANNOT GET a bike anywhere in this whole range of products that's made in America, even if I wanted to. If I could, then is that one now a "luxury" model that will not be compared to a 1990 American-made bike in inflation calculations, but compared to an older luxury model instead? Qualilty is a luxury now, you see. For basic consumer products, like the clothing that the BLS specifically put on their website (see that last post on this subject), quality has just gone way down. The shirts at Target won't last long compared to 15 years back, and blue jeans, speaking of them, will inadvertently look like those on the holey model up above a lot quicker, which is only good if that's the look you're going for and you can't afford those pre-trashed ones.

Should the BLS green-eyeshade boys get their AA bosses to implement a new hedonics-adjustment policy to account for the Cheap China-made Crap of The Current Year? That could be done. They seem to know some math over there. I don't think the real muckety-mucks WANT it done, though. Remember, if the official inflation rate goes up, so do the SS checks and Feral Gov't cost-of-living increases. Worse yet, the FED would be pressured to let interest rates rise ... causing a shitshow that'll make you glad to be able to have those jeans up top just to keep warm ... maybe with the girl too!!


Comments (2)




Hildabeast Tapped for Expertise on Cyber Security


Posted On: Saturday - June 1st 2019 7:07PM MST
In Topics: 
  Humor  AntiChrist  Hildabeast  Globalists  Artificial Stupidity

(First of all, "Hildabeast tapped"? Let's not go too far with that ...)

See, now here's your problem ...



It's been an absolute pleasure not having to have written any posts about the Hildabeast in, well, let's see, in passing 2 1/2 months ago and then a whole nother year prior for the previous one. We'd rather not hear anything more about this candidate-for-antiChrist till after the Peak of Stupidity and well beyond. Alas, though it's a fairly harmless thing, we hope, there's word that this Queen of Email Forwards will be speaking as an expert at this fall's FireEye cybersecurity conference.

Michael Scott - Actual King of Email Forwards:



This is from the link above to Russia Today (yep, Pravda is more of an American thing now):
Clinton will deliver a keynote speech ...
ugghhhh!
... at the cybersec summit in October, organized by the security firm FireEye. After her speech, Clinton will take part in a Q&A discussion with FireEye CEO Kevin Mandia on the “geopolitical landscape and its implications for global cyber security today.”
After the long-winded speech by this blowhard about how (let me guess) women should be more represented in the field of cybersecurity, so long as there will be no math ... so they need to get rid of some of the math ... and Trump sucks (aaah, crap, if I agree with the Hildabeast will I go straight to hell? I'd like to at least collect my 200 dollars*...), uhh, then let's see... Oh, we will be taught about the geopolitical landscape, after the Krispy Kreme donut break, I sure hope.

I guess the former Secretary of State knows the geopolitical landscape that's left after blowing countries all to hell in the Middle East for, what again? Still, what does she know about cybersecurity? Does she even remember how to wipe a hard drive clean with a damp cloth and some isopropyl alcohol? Where'd she put that server anyway? No one's ever found it but the Russians. You need to write that stuff down in a cute little notepad with Minions on the cover, along with the passwords, and LEAVE IT IN YOUR PURSE, in the same place, so you have it when you need it!**

The Western world is truly comical at this point. If "Peak Stupidity" weren't available, per an Unz commenter, I'd have looked for a variant of "Clown Show" ... HONK, HONK!

I've read a little on cryptography, the Neil Stephenson book Cryptonomicon (great novel, BTW), know a bit about programming, and even slept at a Holiday Inn Express a few nights in a row. One thing I've learned about the area of computer security is that the geeks involved are in it for the creativity and the glory, not mostly to "save the world for Democracy". The people on both sides of the cyber wars, the "white hat" good guy security experts and the "black hat" bad guy hackers are two of the same type. They even switch sides fairly often. Note that Julian Assange and Ed Snowden*** are now white hats, at least to Peak Stupidity, while still being black hats per the US Feral Government.

I'm pretty sure, for the Hildabeast, it's the color of her soul rather than her hat that matters to us. We hope to not have to write another post on this creature for another year or more.

All this talk about white/black hats does remind me of an old magazine though. It's something our mascot above might have read, and Spy vs. Spy was the silly cartoon with said hats:






* Old Monopoly board game joke there... it's probably up to $20,000 in the new version of the game.

** We do warn those who follow this protocol to avoid at all costs being the target of a Male-Honeypot operation, a reverse-Honeypot, in this specific case an "Operation Crustypot". For the Hildabeast, we feel she is very secure against such an operation, as no sane Russian will EVER volunteer for a mission like that.

*** See also our movie review - Part 1 and Part 2


Comments (4)




NR/NRA Writer on "Red Flag" Laws


Posted On: Saturday - June 1st 2019 3:51PM MST
In Topics: 
  US Police State  Pundits  Liberty/Libertarianism

Mr. Charles C.W. Cooke - Patriot



As the chief organ (of some sort...) of Conservatism, Inc, the National Review magazine/site is not one read or visited by Peak Stupidity. We will cop to having "taken" the print version for a year or two in the 1990's at some point. There's 50 bucks we'll never get back, though I did love the late Florence King, with her column in the back, she understood by me to be the sole female curmudgeon there ever was (that link is to OUR FIRST POST!) OK, I may have accidentally clicked on a link to an NR-online article, but I redeemed myself afterwards with a bit of Vin Suprynowicz.

OK, this is not the post in which to trash National Review, as the editor of the on-line version, one Mr. Charles C.W. Cooke, is a big 2nd Amendment proponent, and I only learned this via reading his great article on "Red Flag" laws in the June issue of America's 1st Freedom magazine. Yes, it was the paper copy, as I am one of the > 5,000,000 members. I'll now preemptively take back anything I may still accidentally write about him in the future, as this is one great piece of writing. It's really above the usual style of the NRA (political*) magazine, as Mr. Cooke presents, and argues against, even the most reasonable possible arguments from the anti-gun people. That's not to say America's 1st Freedom is not a good magazine anyway, BTW. I tend to leave already-read copies in doctor's offices and other places, usually based on where they will piss off the largest number of people.

Please read Charles Cooke's article if you have a chance, as it's very timely if you look at the headlines today on the shooting in Virginia Beach, Virginia. What I'm getting at is that, whether False Flags or not, the mass shootings America has seen are never wasted by the ctrl-left as opportunities to blame the inanimate gun as the culprit rather than say, the usual over-medicated kid or a disgruntled often-non-white or immigrant employee.

The Red Flag laws, not to be confused with False Flags, are those that have been drawn up to allow individuals to expeditiously (meaning without due process) have individual American's guns taken from them based on here-say by, well anybody. As a 2nd article in the same NRA-mag issue, Colorado Sheriffs Unite Against "Red Flag" Law**, very un-politically-correctly states with regard to the "petitioner" having resided with said gun owner, "in other words, any vengeful ex-spouse or romantic partner". Yep, the crazy ex-wife can decide to take away your right to defend yourself and the remains of your family at will.

That may not be the most egregious use of these unconstitutional laws even. They can, AND WILL (as they say), be used by political opponents of patriotic Americans to take revenge for any on- or off-line speech, as, just like in the old USSR, you can be deemed just "too crazy" to own a gun. (Well, OK, in the USSR, you wouldn't have had the gun anyway; they'd have just sent you to the institution and drugged you into oblivion.)

First let me excerpt the portion that illustrates how Mr. Cooke see the people pushing these laws as having good intentions (the "road to hell", and all that aside, no, not all of them do):
As is typically the case with gun control measures, “red flag” laws are sold to voters as riskless guarantors of public safety and come replete with the bad-faith accusations of villainy to which advocates of the Bill of Rights have become sadly accustomed. “If you oppose this idea,” critics are told, “then you must support terrible outcomes.” In Colorado and beyond, opponents have been told that they are bad people who desire the abuse of women, do not care about the death of police officers, covet a general reduction in public safety and so forth. Which, of course, is dangerous nonsense. If one so chooses, one can always demagogue support for the Bill of Rights into enthusiasm for nefarious behavior—and, indeed, the same people always do. In the eyes of the wannabe authoritarian, champions of the First Amendment are mere advocates of “hate speech” or “lobbying” or “religious intolerance”; champions of the Fourth are trying to ensure that criminals have a safe place to hide; champions of the Fifth want “the guilty to walk free” and the evil to “stay silent”; champions of the Sixth hope to permit defendants to “revictimize the accused” and so forth.

There is, as a matter of fact, not a single American liberty that cannot be cast in this light. Depending on what the accuser is selling, the details may change. But the instinct most definitely does not. Thus it is that opposition to stripping rights away from Americans whose names have been placed unilaterally onto secret government lists is transmuted into support for “terrorists buying guns.” Thus it is that opposition to the government snooping around one’s social media and search histories is transmuted into support for “giving crazy people access to guns.” And thus it is that opposition to “red flag” laws that lack even basic protections for due process is transmuted into indifference toward women or children or anybody who is generally liked.

The correct response to this tactic is as simple as it is universally applicable: “No, I’m in favor of the Constitution.”
He's right, you can't trash one freedom from government prescribed by the Founders and not hurt the others. The 2nd Amendment though, is the last bulwark.
That, of course, is precisely what the sheriffs in Colorado are saying. And not just once, but twice. Critics of the sort of vaguely written “red flag” laws that have prompted otherwise law-abiding people to meditate aloud upon the likelihood of being sent to jail are concerned with the protection of not one, but of two core rights—the right to keep and bear arms, and the right to due process. As a matter of political rhetoric, it may make sense for the architects of “red flag” laws to pretend that merely to utter “but the children” or “but women” or “but the terrorists” is magically to change the facts on the ground or amend America’s legal and cultural foundations. But as a matter of fact, it does no such thing. For those who have taken an oath, for those who hope to defend the American constitutional order, and, yes, for those who merely seek the protection of the highest law in the land, there can be no “good intentions” exception.
That is the core of Charles Cooke's great argument against the "good intentions" business. In the rest of the article, and probably another post about this, there is/will be discussion of the position that local law enforcement will be put in (in particular, in the case of Sheriffs of Colorado, location of one of the Red Flag laws proposed). For them, there's an obvious RIGHT THING TO DO, and we'll see which law enforcement officers in the country even THINK about this.

Anyway, kudos to Mr. Charles C.W. Cooke, of (yes) National Review for very well explaining this threat to Americans and the US Constitution.




* The NRA also publishes more magazines about hunting/fishing and guns in general. NRA members can get one free with their membership, and I tend to be more interested in the political, hence this blog and all...

** This article written by Dave Hardy should be read along with Mr. Cooke's article. It has the view straight from the Colorado Sheriffs' mouths, and should be the subject of a 2nd post.



No comments - Click here to start thread



The Psychedelic Furs


Posted On: Friday - May 31st 2019 7:14PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music

35 years ago, when these British wierdos appeared on MTV, I didn't know what to think of them. I am referring to lots of other "post-punk" British bands too, with their weird accents and moves in the videos - they all seemed to want to be David Bowie, who was, face it, a wierdo back when these guys were in diapers.

I looked up other songs by the Psychedelic Furs but neither recognized nor particularly liked a single one. However, this one, The Ghost in You, from the album Mirror Moves, brings back some faint, hazy memories, which go with the ethereal sound of the song.



The band members playing during the recording of Mirror Moves, in 1984 were the two Butler brothers, Richard the vocalist and Tim on bass guitar, along with John Ashton on guitar, and Keith Forsey on drums.

Well, it's this or hedonics, so ...?



No comments - Click here to start thread



Mexican Monex Milks 'Mericans - story ... aaah, manana.


Posted On: Thursday - May 30th 2019 7:38PM MST
In Topics: 
  Global Financial Stupidity  Americans  Big-Biz Stupidity

I don't trust bankers in my own country,
much less this freakin' guy:




Peak Stupidity has not written very much about Preppers and Prepping though we admire the practice, and agree with those who see what's coming. In a future, pretty serious post that's been burning a hole in that blogging area over by the hippocampus, I'd like to write some about not so much "bugging out", the prepper term, but at least "bailing out" of this western center of stupidity. It's just a thought with no plans in the works. It comes when the stupidity seems endless and unstoppable.

"Where ya' gonna' go?" is the question. Believe me, if there were any country with more freedom than the little we have left, that was inhabited by any kind of people one can reasonably fit in with, I would be DOWN with it. I think of Latin America, and as we've written already in "Down to the Banana Republics... goes Fred Reed"*, that expatriate life can be very tempting, especially for the single guy. Your money can go a long way. The lifestyle, though corrupt and without much trust among men, can be more easygoing, and yes, the stupidity level may be officially just as high, but they don't take the stuff so seriously.

Let's go back to that important money thing. In that 2 y/o post, the exhortation to Fred Reed, the expatriate pundit, was "get your money out of US Dollars". The money may be worth a lot now, but what happens after the Global Financial Stupidity peaks, and the crash results in the loss of confidence in the un-backed no-longer-mighty BUCK?

For right now, though, your money can go a long way. It may just go a long way away from YOU, though. We still have enough financial law and due process left here, probably due to the country being run as a F.I.R.E. economy. However, down in Ole Mexico, the big financial firm Monex, or the Mexican version thereof, has just scammed Americans living down there out of their savings that had allowed them to have it made. A news site that we read from the Peninsular-Mexicans (that's the Yucatan) reports that American Expats say money they had at Monex is gone and the bank isn’t helping them.

Y eeez gone!


In late December, Kathy Machir called Marcela Zavala Taylor, her banker of nine years at Mexico’s Monex Casa de Bolsa, to get cash for contractors building her retirement home in San Miguel de Allende. Typically, Zavala would wire money or dispatch her assistant, Juan, on his motorcycle with an envelope full of pesos. Monex, with $5.2 billion in assets and operations in the U.S., was woven into the lives of Machir and the 10,000 other Americans who’ve moved to San Miguel de Allende.

The transfer didn’t happen. Juan didn’t show, Zavala didn’t return calls, and Kathy and Jim Machir discovered that their nest egg was gone. When the Machirs and other San Miguel expatriates met with Monex officials in early January, the bankers told some of them that about $40 million was missing from as many as 158 accounts, many belonging to English-speaking Americans. A dozen people interviewed by Bloomberg News say that bank statements Zavala sent them purporting to show full accounts were apparently falsified. Most say the bank has told them little since they filed complaints, and some say Monex tried to settle for far less than the balances owed. “When they told us we had 6 pesos [32¢] in our accounts, I just felt sick to my stomach,” Kathy Machir says. “Since then, they have not dealt with us in good faith.”
You don't say! "We don't need no steeeenkeeng passwords!"
A notarized letter that Karger’s attorney sent to top Monex executives on April 15 lists 12 allegations of fraud, including transferring money to people whom the depositors didn’t know, making unauthorized investments, and changing account login information. “If a relatively low-level employee can go into your account, change your email address for notifications, change your password, redirect deposits, withdrawals, and wire transfers,” Karger says, “then you have a kindergarten-level security system safeguarding tens of millions of dollars.”
So Peak Stupidity and the crash of your almighty dollars are not your only worry, Ameri-migos. This could be a more immediate concern. I'll say it again - DIVERSIFY, DIVERSIFY, DIVERSIFY. DIVERSIFYING IS OUR STRENGTH!

This kind of thing puts a damper on the thoughts of a new life in that part of the world. You'd better do some thinking before you pull the plug here.



* I've gotten really sick of the lies out of that formerly-decent pundit lately, so I'll leave Fred Reed, currently an American expatriate in Ole Mexico, out of this one.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Bezos Bride Blows Billions ... Story at 11.


Posted On: Thursday - May 30th 2019 12:14PM MST
In Topics: 
  Humor  Globalists  Big-Biz Stupidity

The Bezoses, in sadder times ... for the lawyers.:



MacKenzie ex-Bezos, one of the early adopters both of TECH husbands and last-name first names*, has been in the news, as seen in one quick glance at the Yahoo home page while closing my email. She is divorcing Jeff Bezos, CEO/founder of Amazon, or vice-versa, and the chick-bait** headline said she is giving away all her money, the $17 Billion that she is getting from ... whoa, wait. Shouldn't this be more like $35 Billion, as half of Mr. Bezos' hard-earned assets?!

Is this just a woman-led-to-believe-there-would-be-no-math thing? That's hard to believe, unless ex-Mrs. Bezos hired only women-led-to-believe-there-would-be-no-math lawyers to represent her. That's remotely possible, I suppose, but maybe the lawyers are really pretty damn good at math ... too good, as a matter of fact. Just the usual 20% or so of the settlement is some pretty good pocket money, even for a lawyer who's got his own exes in Texas and '19 BMWs to support. Hmmm, it'd give Peak Stupidity real good feelz inside if we were to learn that the divorce lawyers are also giving away all their money ... should I have clicked on the Yahoo link?

Philanthropy can be a good thing, if one has really thought of the consequences of the windfall to the supposedly needful folks on the other end. It's something, for example, that Bill Gates has sucked at ALMOST as much as with the development of computer operating systems (after MS-DOS that is). His philanthropy to the continent of Africa, with all good intentions as usual, has resulted in an out-of-control population boom that is the cause of much rightful consternation. Some of that consternation can be found in the Gates household itself, within which Bill Gates is working on philanthropic projects to ... uhhh, help Africa?

With Jeff Bezos having joined the Globalist Elite crowd long ago, I don't know if MacKenzie can really go wrong with this, in his eyes, as women will go with the flow per their close friends, all globalist elites themselves. It'd be a tough blow to Jeff Bezos, if now-Miss MacKenzie would miraculously lean alt-right or even half-way conservative, in her donations, but that's not bloody likely.

What IS bloody likely is that there is no way on God's green earth that this lady MacKenzie is giving away ALL her money. Hey, 95% would still leave a cool billion, and even 99% leaving enough to still afford a nice 20,000 ft2 mansion and Gulfstream, but she'd have to be pretty chintzy with the remainder, along with garnering much advice from the Hildabeast on cattle futures, to heat the house and feed Jet-A to that airplane. I can see more of this sort of thing, though:
"Yeah, I'm so virtuous that I'm giving away all my money, people! That'll show him what happens when you screw around with 50 y/o bimbos. After I buy those 2, OK, maybe 25 at the most, dresses, the remaining $16 Billion will go to the needful people of the world, ... no, not privileged American white people .. I want to make sure all $14 Billion, after the small amount needed to travel around the world to make sure this announcement gets heard far and wide, goes to those ... you know ... all these people that make me feel guilty for earning all this profit by calling the lawyers.... What? Pay the warehouse employees more, at "the end of the day"? No, no, they are the privileged ones, not the people you send money to. I remember those old Sally Struthers public service announcements. For just the price of a cup of coffee a day... see with the Vente Lattes I buy, that's $6.50 each, so with the $12 Billion I'm giving away, after coffee, well that's a lot of coffee for the masses ... Bon appetit, African children! "
Hey, Miss ex-Bezos, Peak Stupidity is feeling a bit needful right now. Just think, for the price of a couple of Grande Vente Expressos, you could sponsor your own blog post. The world does not have to remain stupid.




* Although we can go all the way back to the 1960's, to MacKenzie Phillips, actress daughter of Mamas & the Papas fame, to hear of this name, but she was just the "MacKenzie the Baptist" to the modern day last name as first name crowd.

** It was not even regular click-bait that I wasn't about to click on, but chick-bait, in fact, a real feel-good story, ... for the lawyers.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Good Schools, Race, and "Worrisome Signs"


Posted On: Tuesday - May 28th 2019 6:18PM MST
In Topics: 
  Race/Genetics  Educational Stupidity

I suppose the billboard on Peak Stupidity's early post "On Schools, Race, and Billboards" is a worrisome sign, and this post is a continuation (with one correction) of that one. If you are very interested in this stuff, you can read 100 X more about it after searching through the 10's of thousands of posts by Steve Sailer on Unz.com.

For now, I want to make a slight correction to my story from that previous post regarding the 2 elementary schools in question, that is near the middle school that the billboard is parent-whistling about. I looked at the two sites, both Great Schools and School Digger (graphics off the latter) some more. It looks like that worse-off elementary school is quite a bit worse off, not just slightly. The stats on race of the children alone pretty much give the schools' ratings! I just noticed that. Yeah, I know, it's not NICE to NOTICE!

Pertinent Stats for the better elementary school:



A 5 STAR SCHOOL.



Pertinent Stats for the worse-off elementary school:



A 2 STAR SCHOOL.


These schools are less than a mile away, so it's not the zip code that's the problem. It's not the climate. It's not the economy either. Hmmmm?? "Click here to learn more." "Be glad to!"



The bad test scores at the 2nd school are not due to the students, per the graphic that SchoolDigger kindly presents to us. No, instead, they are a "worrisome sign". Due to this worry, we should have some kind of conversation, it says. Let me start:
I think I'm onto something, fellow parents. Check this out! It seems like whenever you have a lot of white and Oriental kids, the grades are better ... did you notice that ... BONK!
Ugghhh ... I see what you did there ... How else can you help? Must ... not notice ... any more ... statistics ... I see 2 ... stars ... no, I see lots of stars ... spinning ... galaxies... billions and billions ... [/Evil Captain Kirk]


Comments (1)




All the News that's NOT WORTH PRINTING - Immigration Invitation Edition


Posted On: Tuesday - May 28th 2019 5:50PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  TV, aka Gov't Media  Student and other Snowflakes  Media Stupidity

" ♪♫♬..with each blow and every little movement
you show it... ♪♫♬"




I had thought that the Red State news/opinion site was a part of Conservatism, Inc, and have not perused it for quite some time. They have an article here that may change my mind, as they point out the odd quietude of the Lyin' Press in reporting on an attack by some Minneapolis teenagers, well, OK, if I must, some angry light-bulb-headed young Somalian invaders at the East Side light-rail station in Minnegadishu. Oops, sorry, that wasn't even quite right - no, they are not invaders, they were INVITED by stupid Minnesota snowflakes!

Now, before I get further, as not to anger possible real-Minnesotan Peak Stupidity readers, I will explain this Snowflake terminology. It was originally to be applied for students of this generation who have been so coddled, they can't deal with the real world, and make stupid decisions accordingly. However, it's not just students, and because I don't want to create topic keys for all 50 states plus the Federal Shithole, I just lump them together. Why pick on Minnesotans*, then? Sure, it's not just them, and there are plenty of them, as everywhere, who want no part of the snowflake-flavored stupidity. You gotta admit though, you see lots of snowflakes up there, but really, you've got the epitome of Midwestern nice, helpful, friendly, clean, cheerful, kind, thrifty, etc. Yeah, that's most of the Boy Scout law, but what about the motto: Be Prepared! Don't take it the wrong way, Minnesotans, but I'd look more into that motto than the law.

The Somalians that the nice, cheerful, kind, friendly ... ladies of Minnesota have imported have obviously not all read that Scout Law themselves. The title of that Red State article above, not fit to print in the Lyin' Press, is 8-10 Somali Teens Armed With Hammers Attack Bystanders At East Bank Rail Station in MN; Media Oddly Quiet". (Big Capitalization folks there at Red State.)

The story, attributed by Red State to Alpha News, says:
Transit police for “a group of 8-10 males chasing people with hammers” and that some people were injured. A Facebook post a minute later on Minneapolis Scanner page said that the three police departments were responding to “multiple [911] calls” about “10-12 Somali teen males armed with hammers chasing people,” also with “several injuries reported.”
Man, good thing they've got the guns off "the streets", oh, and the rails. Still, with all those illegal straw-purchased ball-peen hammers, there's more work to be done ...
A person who claimed on social media to have been at the station when the incident occurred said that the group of males had “hammers and bars,” and that they seemed to be “attacking anyone who looked like they had money or were white.” The witness, who said he isn’t white, said he didn’t want to “[take] on a bunch of dudes with blunt objects,” and that he “hurried an older white lady away” and they walked a few blocks to catch a bus.
OK, so if you were not white, and didn't have money, there was nothing to worry about. Naaah, it's not a hate crime, because, well lots of our newcomers are good kids, don'tcha' know, and they just need a little more time .. to figure out what's a hammerfor, yah, you betcha'! (This really works better if you imagine this post in the accents of the characters on Fargo.)



On the lack of media attention, can you imagine if things were even partially reversed? The Lyin' Press Infotainment would be going on through the whole summer, until the next snowflake falls. From Red State again (we've posted most of the short article):
Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this incident is how little media attention it received. The second most remarkable thing is that none of the article titles about this story indicate that these teenagers were Somali.

This story was tagged by Instapundit’s Glenn Reynolds late last night and it has received enormous reader interest. He has captioned the post “Minnesota Nice.”

Reynolds takes note of the teens’ nationality. He writes: “Males.” They were Somali teens, showing their gratitude to the nation that gave them refuge.
Good on the Instapundit! From a former Conservative, Inc type, and maybe even quite the neocon back in the day, it's good to hear from him on this. He always had a good head on his shoulders and was very fair. Somehow, he's a law professor ...

As VDare Chief Peter Brimelow has often written, "This can only end in tears."



* It's also where the largest concentration of people with the most foreign culture imaginable on this planet have been imported. I do keep up with the situation in Maine too.



No comments - Click here to start thread



Hedonics - Pleasure from Products and Services


Posted On: Saturday - May 25th 2019 5:37PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Economics  US Feral Government  Inflation

(pretty much continued from here and, earlier, here.)

The 2nd major component of the part-inadvertent/part-intentional correcting of the official "basket of goods and services" used as an attempt at reaching apples-to-apples comparisons of costs in a changing economy is the simple concept with the fancy name - "Hedonics". The Greek root of this is the same as that for "hedonism" (oooh-la-la! Are we going to learn about the economics of orgies today?!) [Negatory! This is a family site.- Ed] The root is has the meaning of "pleasure". The point of hedonics is to make calculations that correct our purchases based on an equal amount of pleasure derived from them.

What's your pleasure? Air travel in the '70's vs. '10s:



Which cabin service gives the customer more pleasure?


The pleasure could be literal, like with that juicy steak vs. that obtained from a can of Spam. It could be just economic pleasure, as it, you were able to travel farther on a gallon of gas in this new car versus the old model. Hedonics is a method of correcting the value of the items in that CPI basket after attempting to measure pleasure obtained from newer versions of the same good or service.

Let's go back to that old IBM (or what were called IBM-clone) computer seen in the previous post versus what would be in the basket now, a $300 Samsung tablet, perhaps. In this case, first of all, prices really are way down, in nominal dollars. In addition, the BLS would reckon, you are getting much more pleasure out of that tablet. (Sure, but that's because porn just wasn't the same on that old 640 x 480 pixel screen.) Seriously, you can do a lot with the tablet. I would agree it has more value, and there would be no one item or even combination thereof, 30 years ago, to compare it to. Computer/electronic technology, or Artificial Stupidity, as we like to call it at Peak Stupidity, is a pretty special case of items that legitimately lower the inflation rate.

The BLS has this page with more interesting links on it, that list the categories of items for which they do "quality adjustments", or hedonics. They even get hard into the math, using formulae to assign weighting to the different qualities of these items. There are even base-10 log functions in there and Greek letters! Cool!

The Mises Libertarians have their criticisms of the whole process. I'd like to point out some problems. I don't see autos on the list, but appliances are there, and I'd like to use automobiles, as also pieces of machinery, to illustrate one problem. There are features on newer products that WE DON'T HAVE A CHOICE ON. Let's say, the BMW has that feature in which the windshield wipers turn on automatically. If we paid for that, OK, then that should add to the pleasure obtained and the car price should be adjusted for that, before apples-to-apples calculations. However, most of us don't mind turning a knob when we see rain coming down. Are features like extra usb-ports, "green-mode" shifting, rear wipers, extra trim, that we don't have a choice in buying, part of the adjustments. This goes for appliances just the same.

Then there are the intangibles, such as the airline service depicted above. Air travel has gone WAY DOWN in real dollars over the last 3 decades (i.e. almost steady in nominal dollars), a subject for another post. Part of the way that was done, however, was to eliminate much of the personalized service. Now, sexy flight attendants are one thing - I don't think they cost any more - it's a PC thing, maybe never to come back ;-{. Having only one agent board a flight with no time for questions, or doing every step of reserving/checking-in on-line, may give equal or MORE pleasure to a younger customer, say of Generation Z, who really doesn't want to talk to anyone besides his barista to begin with. For some of us, it IS a loss of the pleasure or utility of this service. This type of thing can't be measured easily though.

Just as some services, are other items for which there really isn't anything that they can substitute FOR, in the basket, such as internet service. We didn't need it back then, and we didn't pay anything. Now, we almost need it to live (I don't even mean this sarcastically as a disparagement of Facebook and Twitter, but there are things your employer or school may only expect, or allow, you to do on-line), and, well, you're gonna pay 50 bucks or more if you don't bundle it. I imagine, the CPI basket must get some new items in it, just as some are deleted, to keep up with the times. This is neither substitution nor hedonics (even though the BLS site lists it as such). It can be fudged too, keep in mind, but I have no examples at the ready.

When I mentioned in a previous post that substitution and hedonics were two forms of correction of the CPI that could be abused, likely under pressure, by the green-eyeshade boys (AND gals) at the BLS, I left out another factor that could be a third from. That is, the Inflation by Deflation phenomena explicated by Peak Stupidity. We've probably mentioned it in some of the other posts with the Inflation topic key in addition. Does the BLS really measure food prices by the fluid or weight ounce? I would hope, but how about thickness of lumber that is still called 1 x 2? I seriously doubt that.

In summary, though I would trust them on a gasoline price graph, or other commodity, no, I don't think you can trust the general inflation numbers out of the US Gov't Bureau of Labor Statistics, along with a lot of other important numbers. That's why, for us noticers, there's Shadow-Stats.

No matter how you measure it, the real effect of inflation is to diminish the quality and size of the products we are used to paying a certain amount of money for, and, for the same price, to turn what used to give us pleasure into a new miserable experience. Since that's the name of an album by a band that Peak Stupidity has woefully neglected to feature, here are The Gin Blossoms, out of Tempe, Arizona. From that excellent 1992 album New Miserable Experience, this is Allison Road, not a hit, but to me the best song on it.

What a simple, bright guitar sound there!



Ahhh! Speaking of electronic hedonics, wouldn't it have been easier to make that video today, with flat screen TVs?! I'm glad the guy didn't try to lift up that big console model at the end (probably should have just shown a scantily-dressed girl instead of the TVs anyway - this is rock music, right?)

Bill Leen – bass guitar
Jesse Valenzuela – rhythm and lead guitar, backing and lead vocals
Robin Wilson – lead vocals, acoustic guitar, percussion, harmonica
Scott "Scotty" Johnson – lead and rhythm guitar, backing vocals
Phillip "Phil" Rhodes – drums, percussion, backing vocals

(There were 3 Scotts in the band over the different years, 2 of them "Scotties" and 2 of them on drums.)



No comments - Click here to start thread



Ann Coulter and VDare strike out about The Pot


Posted On: Saturday - May 25th 2019 9:55AM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  US Police State  Pundits

From Ann Coulter's latest column - still batting a .990.



Miss Coulter's point was that at least the Romans DID build a wall.
Hadrian's Wall in England - keeping the barbarians out
for MUCH LESS than the cost of an interstate highway
(had they had 'em)

I'll give Peak Stupidity's numero uno pundit a break - it's pretty hard to bat one thousand. Actually, it's literally pretty hard to bat in the .400s, if you play serious baseball, but we're figuratively talking about punditry here. It's not at all like hitting a 90 mph fastball, contrary to what most of us pundits would have you believe! I've pointed out before that Ann Coulter still hangs on to a nutty belief that Affirmative Action is a good thing, for certain people. Bullshit. She is a real Libertarian, so this belief is a complete failing, as there is no way AA is Constitutional, along with Statist in other ways too. This kind of shit tends to bring one's average down.

Now, in her 2-columns ago at-bat, warning on the evils of "the weed" Miss Coulter whiffs another one. I don't argue with her anecdotes. She is a lawyer, so ... However, we've been through this stuff for almost a century in America. I'd though by now it was pretty clear that marijuana is one of the milder drugs, the Drug War causes nothing but more violence and crime than it prevents, and we (the nice proper lady voters) tried the outlawing of a potentially much more harmful drug alcohol, 100 years back, and that was a real shitshow. I always give the Americans and the Feral Gov't of that time lots of credit for at least handling prohibition via amendments to the Constitution rather than this "stroke-of-the-pen, law-of-the-land, kinda' cool!" shit* (as proudly advertised by the Bill Clinton administration) of the "current era".

Yeah, we are Libertarian here, not particularly pot-smokers, per se, but really, are there not much more important issues than this? Slowly chipping away at the unConstitutional "War on Substances" is a good thing and at least one piece of good news among all the Police State stupidity going on.

I will agree, though, that the liberalization of laws regarding pot due fall well into speculated plans by the globalist elites to "soma" (Brave New World) the people and keep them too mellow to fight back against the doom coming down on them. I just don't usually believe these elites are that brilliant and that they have 100-year plans, but perhaps it's just in the back of their minds, "yeah, let them have their pot. It can only be a good thing."

The only point I can see having in support of the Drug War is that at least it gave Conservative Inc, a reason to care about the southern border of the country. "Oops, those people are bringing drugs over - we don't care if they stay here among the proles, but we can't have that pot coming. Better send a few guys down there." Maybe that's the point at which the Reason magazine Libertards got the idea that it's OK for ANYTHING to come across the border. Is Ann Coulter's column a back-handed way of saying we need to control the border? Nah, I think she's more principled than that, just wrong here.

I don't know if it was due to their admiration for Ann Coulter (w/ present company included), but VDare seems to have briefly joined the anti-pot bandwagon too, as this within a day of Miss Coulter's column half of the meat & potatoes of VDare, James Fulford had two columns here and here along the same lines. There are dozens of different writers who write for VDare, but, come on, they've railed before against the Trump administration's concentrating on tax policy, etc., over immigration (agreed!), but let's get off the marijuana thing, huh? That's not a #winning** issue!

Back to Ann Coulter, well she has already redeemed herself a week later with Ann Coulter: U.S. Isn't Becoming Europe. We're Becoming Rome. In her latest column, she states that America is in a worse state with it's immigration stupidity than Europe. To me, that's arguable, but let's not argue too long - let's get another President and a large crowd of American people together who will do more than argue.



* From World Net Daily on executive orders back in '12:
It was a presidential aide to Clinton, Paul Begala, who put the controversy into perspective, back in July 1998.

“Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool,” he said, boasting how the Clinton machine was able to simply dictate what it wanted to have happen.

It came as Clinton glibly announced he would issue a barrage of executive orders to push his agenda forward without input from Congress.

** It's not like I believe you need to support the "winning issue" on anything, of course. After all, Immigration was not a winning issue until candidate Donald Trump, but that never meant it wasn't THE existential issue. Pot is just not any kind of existential issue. Leave them kids alone.



No comments - Click here to start thread