So as not to speak ill of the dead ...
Posted On: Tuesday - January 12th 2021 8:11PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Globalists  The Neocons

No comment...
... though there are plenty of good ones (>90%) here on Instapundit. Feel free to write your own about this man, and I'll be obligated to respond then, ill feelings or not. This Ed Driscoll is too kind.
Comments (8)
Playin' that Georgia Rhythm
Posted On: Monday - January 11th 2021 5:07PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Music  Southern rock
Something in my head got me to the lyrics ("I got a job to do") of this old Atlanta Rhythm Section song a few days back. It was almost right at a year ago when Peak Stupidity posted Rock & Roll Never Forgets about Rock & Roll songs that either complain, glorify, or just comment on, life on the road as a rock* musician (as it was, anyway).
Georgia Rhythm is such a song, this one with an upbeat, pros-and-cons look at the group's life on the road playin' that Georgia Rhythm. I am partial to the songs on the band's Are you Ready? live album from 1979, though this song was originally from their 1976 studio album A Rock and Roll Alternative. That one had their hit So Into You, not one of my favorites, and it was the album just prior their breakout album Champaign Jam.
Peak Stupidity has featured these good old boys from Doraville, GA before and another cut from this album, Sky High, from our early-on post Inflation and Interest.
Yeah, Doraville, where this band got its start as session musicians at Studio One, was really a good old Southern town back then when the band started out. It didn't take long to get ruined, once it started to be. Atlanta has had massive sprawl out of the city, as decent people move farther out to get away from the racial riffraff, and even some of the riffraff follow to get away from the worse riffraff. Doraville, on the NE section of the I-285 beltway, has exurbs all around the intersection with the I-85. It looks in no way like the small town as imagined in the song.
After large-scale immigration from Asia and Latin America (per wiki, over 1/2 the residents don't speak English as their 1st language!), a Moving Africans Rapidly Through Atlanta light-rail station being build to bring in other vibrant folks, and then the long-running GM plant closing in '09, the Atlanta Rhythm Section would be the first to tell you that you can't go home again.
Let's get off of all that sadness for what's lost, and just enjoy this old song from 42 years back. I don't believe in lyrics being very important to a good song, but I like these ones. What a great attitude (especially as compared to Bob Seger's)!
So, lay down a back beat.
Crank up your trusty Gibson, son.
Let's give it everything we got just one more time.
We are lovin' the life we're livin',
playin' that Georgia rhythm.
Nothin' else ever made me feel so fine.
The Atlanta Rhythm Section:
Ronnie Hammond – vocals, background vocals
Barry Bailey – guitar
J.R. Cobb – rhythm guitar, background vocals
Dean Daughtry – keyboards
Paul Goddard – bass guitar
Robert Nix – percussion, drums, vocals, background vocals
* OK, it was more like country wrt Willie and his On the Road Again.
Comments (10)
Will America be looted by China? - Part 3: Big Biz
Posted On: Monday - January 11th 2021 11:30AM MST
In Topics:   China  Economics  Big-Biz Stupidity
(continued from Part 1: Intro and Part 2: Housing.)

The worry in the 1980s about foreign takeover of American industry was directed at Japan. The Japanese way of doing big business in America, since the 1980s, was opening plants in this country. Americans have been placated with those efforts. "The jobs are here." Yeah, well the decent line and lower/mid- level management jobs are, but the important engineering jobs aren't.
It's been the same with Nissan, Kia/Hyundai out of Korea, Mercedes, BMW,
and VW out of Germany, etc. They've all got auto plants here, almost all in the South for the cheaper labor. The control of the enterprises are foreign though, though it's nothing like looting, of course.
Perhaps the Chinese haven't done any of this because their car manufacturing hasn't been up Western and Japanese (for sure not!) quality standards, and 25 years ago they hardly had an auto industry. Secondly, they don't care about placating Americans and getting along. That is so 2000s. The way things are going, they may be able to just buy one of the big 3 lock, stock, and barrel.
CNBC here lists 10 big purchases of American "iconic brands"*.

Smithfield Foods, bought by Shuanghui Group, now called WH Group, for $7.1 Billion in '13 remained the 2nd biggest at the time of this > 3 y/o CNBC story, but who knows since then? (Well OK, the internet knows, but I've only done a quick DDG search.) It's the most famous case of the selling off of American industry. From that article we are told:
The deal spurred controversy and concern at the time, but Smithfield has thrived, adding jobs and hitting a sales record in 2014.Oh, sure, it's all fine then, right?
No, it's not alright, though. This is all about control. For the sellers of this big American food firm, and the Chinese buyers, yeah, it's about money. For regular Americans it results in essentially working for the Chinese CCP, when it really comes down to it. Once could bring up laws or proposed laws against holding of stock by foreigners, residency requirements for corporate boards, or what-have-you, but the Chinese are in charge. Follow the money.
For anyone in government actually trying to help Americans with regard to foreign influence and the trade imbalance (like President Trump has), face it, it's gonna be tough curtailing exports of pork in a trade war when the Chinese own Smithfield Foods. You'll have the whole State of Virginia against you. If you think that Big Biz is unpatriotic, and it sure is, imagine he case when it's owned by the Chinese. They'll be plenty patriotic .. to China and the CCP, though.

Other names I recognize are GE Appliances - now that's iconic. The manufacturing facilities are still there in Louisville, Kentucky, but those employees work for Qingdao Haier now. It cost these Haier folks $5.4 Billion. You can buy ~ 200 such companies with a cool Trillion bucks. The Motorola mobile phone division has been owned by Chinese Lenovo (who also bought the IMB laptop business) back in '14. That was an ~ $3 Billion purchase.
Then there are the movie theater chains that the CNBC page lists as big purchases by Chinese companies. Haha! That was dumb! Nobody expects the
A 5 y/o Yahoo (yeah, I know) page lists The Biggest American Companies Now Owned by the Chinese. The biggest purchase, money-wise, was of Starwood Hotels, bought by Anbang Insurance for $14.3 Billion in'16.
There's probably a lot more of this by now, and it doesn't help matters at all that American small business is getting creamed by the Kung Flu PanicFest. What about the big "TECH" guys, like Amazon, Google, etc? Would you bet any serious money that some of them won't be Chinese-owned within 5 years? Not this blogger. I value my money more than ... OK, it'll probably lose so much value that I don't have much to lose anyway.
* It's in quotes because I don't know 1/2 these companies. That's partly due to that I don't give a rat's ass about "League of Legends" and also the movie industry, but I guess it's a sign that they haven't got too far yet.
Comments (10)
The East German uprising of 1953
Posted On: Saturday - January 9th 2021 11:24PM MST
In Topics:   Commies  History  Socialism/Communism  World Political Stupidity

A few months back some unz commenter mentioned the uprising in East Germany for a few days in the long ago summer of 1953. (The war in Korea would be "settled" in another month, and Ike Eisenhower had only been President for 5 months - that's how long ago.) I'd never heard of it before, even though I do know some history of the Cold War.
This was pretty interesting reading, here on Wiki. In case the younger Peak Stupidity readers (if we haven't pissed them off too bad) don't know anything about the Cold War in Europe, let me give a short bit of background:
Just after the end of World War II, by 1946 anyway, it was clear that the Communist USSR and the US were enemies already. It was also clear that the USSR would not give up any land that it had taken while defeating the Nazis and other Axis countries. The "Iron Curtain", a term coined by Winston Churchill (or his speechwriter), had descended, and was in place north to south from the Baltic Sea to the Adriatic Sea. This means that the countries of Poland, Czechoslovakia (peacefully divided into Czechia and Slovakia 28 years ago), Hungary, Yugoslavia (split into an ungodly number of pieces, also in the early 1990s), Albania*, Romania, and Bulgaria were all under the Soviet influence. "Influence" sound too mild, though. These countries may as well have been part of the USSR, militarily speaking. Communism of sorts was installed in all of them. They were the "East Bloc".
I left out one country though. Whatever portion of Germany the Russian Army had taken, they also kept. Since they came from the east, it was the eastern portion of Germany that was made Communist, with that weird exception of West Berlin, 120 miles inside East Germany, which had been formed from the American, British, and French controlled zones in place when the city fell in May 1945.
These countries all had to suffer from Communism for 45 years or so, which was better than the situation for the poor Russians (and Ukrainians, Belorussians, and the 3 Baltic countries), who had to endure it for over 70 years. That's 3 generations growing up under the poverty, oppression, and other stupidity.
There were uprisings against the strangling yoke of Communism in a number of these countries - Hungary and Czechoslovakia being cases in 1956 and 1968, respectively. They didn't take.
The economic situation in East Germany had gotten bad in 1952 due to, well, the usual Communist stupidity that is to be expected. Wiki describes it:
The result of this change in the GDR's economic direction was the rapid deterioration of workers' living standards, which lasted until the first half of 1953, and represented the first clear downward trend in the living standard of East Germans since the 1947 hunger crisis. Travel costs rose as generous state subsidies were cut, while many consumer goods began to disappear from store shelves. Factories were forced to clamp down on overtime: in the context of a now restricted budget, the wage bill was deemed excessively high. Meanwhile, food prices rose as a result of both the effects of the state's collectivization policy – 40% of the wealthier farmers in the GDR fled to the West, leaving over 750,000 hectares of otherwise productive land lying fallow – and a poor harvest in 1952. Workers' cost of living therefore rose, while the take-home pay of large numbers of workers – many of whom depended on overtime hours to make ends meet – was diminishing. In the winter of 1952–53, there were also serious interruptions to the supply of heat and electricity to East Germany's cities.To try to solve the problems and with Stalin having just died, a "New Course" was prescribed by the USSR for the East German economy. It wasn't left up to the Germans. It was an end to forced collectivization, and a switch from subsidization of heavy industry to subsidization of consumer goods. It was still a top-down 5-year plan. You can't please everyone this way, as you can with a free market, so workers were not happy. It was then that they started strikes and demonstrations:
On 12 June, the next day, 5,000 people participated in a demonstration in front of Brandenburg-Görden Prison in Brandenburg an der Havel.The full-bore uprising happened on June 16th, and I'll let the reader go to the Wiki page for that.
On 14 June, more confusion followed as an editorial in Neues Deutschland condemned the new work norms, yet in that very same issue, news articles praised workers who had exceeded the new norms in contradiction to the editorial.
On 15 June, workers at the Stalinallee "Block 40" site in East Berlin, now with their hopes raised about the possibility that the work norms would be rescinded, dispatched a delegation to East German Prime Minister Otto Grotewohl to deliver a petition calling for a revocation of the higher work norms. However, Grotewohl ignored the workers' demands.

The word spread. Protests were held in 24 big East German cities.

The demand was initially about a certain type of pay scale, called the "norm", which was obviously too low. Just as during the Tiananmen Square protest, 36 later in China, once you go all out like this, marching in the streets and confronting government officials, you may as well go in for a pound rather than just a penny. Some of the demands were about the re-forming of a different political party. No, you just don't do that under Communsim.
The Soviet Union didn't wait even till the next day to make the decision to send in the tanks.

The Soviet army with its infantry and tanks arrived in E. Berlin on the morning of the 17th. Not all of the Soviet soldiers complied with orders to attack the troublemakers. At the end of it, 10,000 people had been detained, and 32 - 40 people were executed.
What's this post got to do with ANYTHING, the reader may very well ask. Well, I already had the pictures saved, so... More importantly, the East German uprising of 1953 is just another example of an uprising that failed. That is, most of them. The lesson is to not let things go so far to begin with. Once it goes so far, the tools (as in guns and ability to safely organize) have been taken away. It's hard to have a successful uprising, it seems, as the time to reverse course has passed. Communism and any other kind of Totalitarianism must be nipped in the bud. Just nip it! Nip it, Andy! /Barney Fife]
We are at that nip it stage in America right now. Peak Stupidity included a very famous passage from a famous book in our post Alexander Solzhenitsyn on Gulags and avoidance thereof. We'll just include it again:
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat.Nip it in the bud!
* Albania was a bit of an even weirder deal, a place like N. Korea where nobody knew what kind of really stupid shit was going on and how deep in Communist hole they were. It was a bit more independent from the USSR, but that didn't make it any better. OTOH, Austria, even though part of "the West" was just a little closer to the East Bloc.
Comments (18)
Will America be looted by China? - Part 2: Housing
Posted On: Saturday - January 9th 2021 6:23PM MST
In Topics:   China  Economics  The Future

Yesterday's Part 1 of this series was an introduction to what I think could happen as the US goes more into financial ruin, and China has the dollars for looting. I want to add one thing in answer to commenter Alarmist, as he noted that the same fears were present in the 1980s as Japan had been building up a big trade surplus with America.
From that 3rd "a lot of ruin in a nation post again:
Hey, it [the Japanese conquest of a big portion of the US auto market] WAS worrisome, and tensions were sometimes high (see the 1986 humorous feel-good movie Gung Ho - not even a Japanese expression, it's Chinese! -with a young Michael Keaton). I mean, they Japs bought Rockefella Center for cryin' out loud! OMG! Well, this all faded when the Japanese stock market collapsed like many paper/computer types of wealth do. Japan still has a large economy and we all know they have kept up the high-quality and heavy-duty manufacturing as opposed to Americans.SNIP
That's ancient recent history; let's discuss China here. The country's population is an order of magnitude larger than Japan's, and 1/2 order of magnitude larger than ours, so when they do get economically powerful, things are DIFFERENT, as I said. The 2nd factor of big numbers mentioned above it that, though the Japanese grew economically mighty by the late 1980's our economy was multiple times bigger AND we still manufactured a majority of American-bought consumer and industrial goods. The situation is completely different now, and we don't have our economic/manufacturing base of even 1995 left.
Let me just respond against a couple of general arguments. "Yeah, well, that's what they said about Japan." Besides the order-of-magnitude larger problem there is this time, as already explained, are there any signs that the Chinese economy will just fold, and that ours will get right back on it's feet? I don't see it.I wrote that > 3 years back, and China's economy is growing even more quickly, as ours has been devastated more quickly than expected with the Kung Flu PanicFest LOCKDOWNS. China has 10 X the population of Japan. Their economy is bigger than ours. (I don't trust GDP numbers, neither our BLS ones nor the CCP's numbers, but they are beating us in almost every kind of market - the amount of air travel going on there is amazing!)
Now, on to housing. Note that the city of Seattle, Washington* is one that we have mentioned as having lots of foreign investment, causing problems for regular Americans who just want to, like, live there. It has been the same story in other West Coast cities, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Vancouver, BC, Canada (now called Hongcouver, and yeah, not our problem).
From my Chinese sources, I've learned that the Chinese people that come here to purchase these nice houses all over these cities (along with in university towns all over) are not the Jack Ma's. There aren't enough of the entrepreneurial rich, as good as the economy is doing. No, China still has a very non-meritocratic system, contrary to what unz writers will tell you, when it comes to the big money. It's corrupt officials at all levels of government, members of the CCP, that have the money for the houses on the hills of San Francisco and Seattle. The buyers below may be from a Chinese family whose breadwinner father makes $600 monthly. "Man, how are you gonna make the payments for this place?!" Guy puts his arm around your shoulder. "Got one word for you, for your future, Ben ... bribery."

It's corrupt money, graft, bribery, whatever you call it, taken from the much greater number of actual hard-working Chinese people and non-State-owned factory owners that makes these $600/month Chinamen into Capitol Hill homeowners. As we noted in some of those previous posts on this topic, the idea is to get that money the hell out of China, for when/if another round of anti-corruption campaigns happens. See, those campaigns are righteous and just when YOU run 'em, to punish your CCP enemies, but watch out for that Karma. Get the money out, send a child to an American university, have a wife and anchor baby pre-bugged-out in that nice place, for when you just got to get out. After all, China is corrupt as hell, and you don't want to spend the rest of your life there, right?
With those piles of money ready to bid on these investment/bug-out places, it only takes some tens of thousands or a hundred thousand Chinamen to change the market. The American middle class, or what's left of it, will be left living in apartments, commuting from far out, or leaving these beautiful West Coast cities. "Affordable Family Formation" is a term Steve Sailer uses a lot, one he may have coined, and it's an important idea. Being able to afford an actual detached house is a big part of this. Sure, kids grow up in Manhattan in apartments, and a few in some big cities, but parents want safe play areas and privacy for their kids.
The graph below from the Seattle Bubble site is fairly current, or as current as The Tim gets, from summer 2020.** Note that the blogger defines "affordable" at what a median price house costs, but his left axis represents the income required to make payments at today's LOW interest rates. Better buy now, right?!

(The big increments are $25,000 income, and because the guy let the software break up the $800,000 in house cost into the same 6 increments, they are $133,300 each - hard to read here, I know)
For a family with household income of just under $100,000 to buy that just under 3/4 million dollar house, it'd be tight. Even with a reasonable property tax rate, I can't see the payment being under $4,500 monthly on a 3.5% loan, after some small down payment. Geeze, after taxes (though WA does not have income tax - for now), the family will take home maybe $6,500 monthly and $4,500 goes to that median "affordable" house! That's not your father's affordable living, I can tell you.
From this site, I found that there are ~133,000 detached housing units in the city of Seattle.*** That's just in the city, but it's all I got. Now, take a Trillion bucks to be spent by Chinese investors on housing (the rest for other goodies like manufacturing plants and farmland). That's coincidentally right at 10 X all of that housing in the Seattle city limits at the median price****, as in, all of the detached houses. Take 10 Seattles, and since Chinese people like living in the city, they can buy up 10 whole cities of housing.
What I'm getting at is that $1,000,000,000,000 is a LOT of money, even when compared to big city real estate. NY City is an exception. We're still saving it for looting by the Japanese, when they ever get their shit together again.
I suppose you might not call this looting as of yet. We ought to have laws that prevent foreign ownership of property at all, but then, as we'll discuss regarding other assets, there are always ways to do it. Wait until Americans are poorer than they are now and the dollar goes down the toilet. We'll see what looting looks like. Anyway, the realtors don't care:
PS: Seattle in particular also has the big money from the stock options of the Amazon/MS/etc. crowd.
* I ended up with the picture up top (on these posts) due to a search for images relating to Seattle. I'd kept up with the housing market there just out of interest during the bubble years, on a site called Seattle Bubble. A guy who calls himself "The Tim" has been running that blog since a few years before the '07 crash, and I had started reading it in '05. You gotta put some credence in a guy who used that URL early in the 00's decade. The graphic below is from the site, and I will change to the housing bubble (2.0) topic again in a post to come, again using The Tim's data and very nice graphs.
** He's slowed down in posting a lot from his heyday before, during, and for a few years after, the housing price crash of '07. This data is for all of King County, which includes Seattle, but spreads far and wide. E-W, it's from the crest of the Cascades -Snoqualmie Pass - to the Puget Sound, and N-S, it's from Kingston and just N of Lake Washington to Federal Way, just NE of Tacoma.)
*** Believe it or not, I had estimated 125,000 based on a really rough calculation: 3/4 of a million people, 1/2 a million live in detached houses, and average 4 to a household. It was just luck.
**** I know that median is not the mean. If we had the mean price of detached houses, than that calculation would be more accurate. We're just ballparking it here - bear with us.
Comments (5)
Congressional LOCKDOWNS as standard policy
Posted On: Friday - January 8th 2021 11:47AM MST
In Topics:   Humor  US Feral Government

From a term heard 2 years ago only in maximum security prisons and occasionally airport terminals, but I repeat myself, LOCKDOWN is now familiar to everyday Americans. We are supposed to not be free in our movements during these prescribed periods. (Well, the start times are known well in advance, but the end times are up in the air.) It was really fun to hear of the US Senate, maybe House too(?) being placed in this LOCKDOWN state due to fear of a hundred or two unarmed Americans in THEIR House of Represntin'.
It would be great if we could expand on this Congressional LOCKDOWN policy. Perhaps Americans could LOCKDOWN the House and Senate only during important policy-making days, using the venue for more constructive activities, such as performances of the Vagina Monologues or more politically correct versions. The Senators and Reps could work in deeper levels of the parking garage under 10 kiloton resistant desks.
When it comes down to it, why does the Congress have to meet in person at all now? They seemed scared shitless of Black Plague 2.0, wearing their asinine face diapers and keeping the filled seats down to 1/2 or less. There’s zoom, and no, the Chinese CCP doesn’t need zoom to infiltrate – they already have via Zhou Bai Dien.
Really, it would be better for all of us if these Congresscritters “worked” from home. They would be more accessible to their constituents, provided they don’t put up concrete barriers and fencing, they’d save taxpayers’ money, and, most importantly, the wouldn’t be able to smooze and make underhanded backroom deals without fear of being hacked. Oh, yeah, and those among them that start out principled wouldn’t be prone to going native, as per Peak Stupidity‘s theory, see The Cocktail Party theory of Political Stupidity.

Comments (13)
Will America be looted by China? - Part 1: Intro.
Posted On: Friday - January 8th 2021 9:48AM MST
In Topics:   China  Economics  The Future  The Neocons

Until recently, Peak Stupidity has maintained a "live and let live" attitude about the superpower nation China. With a decent amount of first-hand information, much of it obtained in that country, we have written of the good and the bad since this blog's beginning > 4 years back. During the early stage of the American portion of the Kung Flu PanicFest, one can read about our attitude in America v. China. Sure, we have to get back to reasonably fair trade dealings for America, but it seemed that it ought to be pretty peaceful between us.
There were some pundits/politicians up in arms about the spread of the Kung Flu from that land, putting blame on that country for that. In Hate the Bat, not the Chinaman, one can read that Peak Stupidity doesn't agree. This is another of a long series of bad bugs out of the Orient, whether due to bad Q/A at a lab, or those "wet markets" in which diseases first get from animals to humans. Either way, blame can be placed on lax control of our borders/entry points, but I never saw it as a reason to hate or even oppose the country of China.
Peak Stupidity's sanguine attitude about the place has been changing as of late. The first problem with China is their shift toward and Orwellian society from what was (seen first-hand) the Wild, Wild, East, a decade and a half ago. For more on this, see Dashed high-hopes for China Part 1 and Part 2. China should no longer be considered anyone's bug-out location, unless he really, really LUVS Big Brother.
OK, still, let them do that Big Brother shit over there, and we'll just not emulate them, as pundits all around tell us we should. That's be fine with me.
I'm also not any kind of Neocon, so I don't see China as a military enemy. (See, the left has it's "the Russians, the Russians!", like it's 1955, and the right (of sorts) has it's "the Chinese are going to take Hong Kong, then Taiwan", capturing all those OTHER CHINESE PEOPLE!" My feeling about it is: So what? America is way beyond broke, what, at $27,000,000,000,000 right now, but that's not including unfounded obligations (your Social Security money they tricked you out of) and the budget problems of individual Americans and families.
We've got trade deficits with about everyone in the Orient. Even those poorer countries, Viet Nam for instance, are manufacturing for China now, with the Chinese getting the big profits. Why in the hell should we keep up Cold War protection agreements with places that kick our ass economics? They are one sided, at that. Would Taiwan be expected to help us fight the Chinese if it ever did come to a shooting war? Ha! I doubt that's even written into the deal. Oh, and regarding Hong Kong, in particular, they have lost lots of cultural ties with the British who installed the rule of law in the place, so screw 'em whatever happens (see Big Protest in Little China.) Oh, and while we're at it, get those 25,000 soldiers, sailers, and airman who've been in Korea for 67 years - no, not the same guys! - and use them at the Mexican border.
The Chinese are all over Africa, to exploit its huge amount resources, and I see nothing wrong with that either, as the natives are not going to every do anything constructive with it by themselves. We could be jealous that "hey, we should have control, like we did for half of the 20th century". We're not 1950s America though. Secondly, regarding Africa, American and all the Western Euro countries have been cursed out by the Africans for half a century, since they all left upon request, for this colonialism. Let the Chinese give it a go. I doubt the Africans are going to like it any better in the long run, so let's just stay here and enjoy that entertainment.
OK, so what's the problem? Can we let China do it's new Totalitarian thing, while we do our thing, which is really going to have to be a second American Revolution, the way things look right now?
Here is the big problem, and this is even beyond what I think is the smaller problem of China exerting it's cultural influence throughout the world*: It's the economy, stupid. China's threat to the US is economic, not so much military. President Trump may have helped just a little on the trade imbalance, but Big Biz wants to make money in China, not here, and this deficit is still huge. Each excess dollar that gets sent to China is money that the Chinese can use to BUY UP THIS COUNTRY.
In our Part 3 of the There's a lot of ruin in a Nation series**, we did a quick calculation on how much US farmland the Chinese could buy with $2 Trillion of our money. A back-o-the-envelope calculation says pretty much all. I'll put more calculations in a subsequent post, along with an explanation about why this is not just stoppable by law.
One thing I personally did not pay any attention to during the 1990s, even with my perusing the Wall Street Journal during the latter part of that decade, was the looting of Russia by the American finance crowd. To me, this period just after we'd won the Cold War (the external one) was a time for gloating. (Wait, is that even in Ecclesiastes, or at least the Byrds song?) I didn't care what happened to the place. Yet, I've read lots in the last 5 years (thanks, Ron Unz, for some of this), about how Russian companies were just broken up for the cash for the equipment and materials. A friend who'd done a lot of traveling during the 1990s told me how he met a Russian on the plane to Moscow who told me about his factory being bought up for less than the steel inventory was worth.
Could that all happen to America? It's not possible during good economic times. It may not be during rough economic times if we were still unified politically. Both are not the case now.
I will break up the rest into these parts:
- Housing
- Manufacturing assets
- Land
OK, with this China posting, and plenty of down-home turmoil about to happen with a Feral Government to consist of a Blue-squad Executive branch and both-house Legislative branch, we've got plenty on our plate. I'm not trying to be a Debbie Downer or anything, but ...
* I won't get more into this, as it's discussed in Part 4 of our review of We Have Been Harmonized.
** See Part 1 and Part 2. The title was lifted from the OTHER Adam Smith.
Comments (5)
Patriots Breach the Senate!
Posted On: Wednesday - January 6th 2021 2:15PM MST
In Topics:   Elections '16 - '24  Americans  US Feral Government

I should have been there, dammit!
I am very pissed at myself right now for not being part of this historic event. For the last day and a half, I was thinking of logistics on-and-off to get to this big rally in Washington, FS. There's something in me that wants to be a physical part of the events unfolding right now in our country, rather than simply blogging about it. I learned from a friend just now that the Senate has been breached. I went on-line to see some video of the riot cops (of some sort) trying to block the big steps, and I'm sure we'll see some more of every step on the way to entering the building and scaring the shit out of "our" politicians. (They need lots more of it, too!)
This is one case in which I regret very much that I and Peak Stupidity (and you've read this before) are not about "current events", so much as just thinking/writing about trends. In this case, I only really learned anything of substance about this rally on Monday, and I did not get myself enough time to work out the logistics. As of yesterday, I thought still about being able to go, but it didn't work out. With some earlier planning, even by the weekend, it could have. I should have been there!
Your blogger here was able to make the big, no, HUGE, gun rally in Richmond, Virginia just under a year back - see There's great power in numbers - Case study: Richmond, Virginia with the pictures I took and a follow-up post Richmond gun rally - a lesson about ignoring the narrative. The plan there, by the organizers*, was simply to inform and show numbers, hence, power.
This was different. Lots of patriotic Americans have got to know by now that we are not voting our way out of this, "this" being the direction in which we've been taken for 50 years and the direction we are being further taken. This was the first purposefully big non-compliant protest that I have seen or read about. Maybe that wasn't the stated goal of the rally, but what else was? Did all these people (in the millions, perhaps), think that they were going to influence those Senators in there to just change their votes cause Electoral College, State's Rights, CheatFest? I think most knew that it'd HAVE to come to what happened today, if not today, soon enough - the sooner the better.
This is history being made today. The reason is am so angry at myself for not properly arranging to be there is not that I expect to be written into this history. I just want to be there when history is being made and on the right side of history.
Thank you, patriots, for coming out in huge numbers. Thank you, tough guys, young and old, for finally going non-compliant. Thank you all for doing what needed to be done today. Thank you for causing the US Senate to be in LOCKDOWN!
Just a minor couple of more notes: It is really great to hear of the US Senate experiencing the LOCKDOWN process, whatever the hell that means each time, after they didn't seem to care that the country has been under various random LOCKDOWNs at the whim of whomever. I noted also that the UK Yahoo site (just happened upon it at my first attempt to check this all out) had a remark about how many of the patriots didn't have face masks on. Yeah, right, that silliness can stop right now, when the SHTF. I'd have not worn one either.
Zhou Bai Dien is on the youtube right now telling Trump that he must DO SOMETHING and tell these violent people to stop. Did this same Chinese-run puppet ever say anything through 3 months of BLM thug/antifa-Commie violence and destruction? He just said something about "rule of law". Every single line is hypocritical BS made with this soft sensitive tone he's got right now. Haha, fuck you, Biden. Karma's a bitch! We're just getting started, and I want in next time.
PS: The reason there was no posting yesterday is that my thoughts werre still about this rally. I'd forgotten it by the time my friend called, at which time I'd just started a post about China. I'd never had an urgent one to write like this before.
* They'd been having these rallies that same time yearly for a long time, but this one was more specifically about the latest out of their traitorous Virginia legislators involving "red flag" laws and such. That's what happens when your state "turns blue", and the latter is what happens when you let anyone and everyone come into your country.
Comments (30)
Site Note: SSL certification in progress, geeks at work
Posted On: Monday - January 4th 2021 8:31PM MST
In Topics:   Websites
OK, we've been throught this saga here at Peak Stupidity before, 3 months back. It's a Secure Sockets Layer thing.. you wouldn't wanna understand, honestly*.
The reason I am a tad worried is that 2 months ago I ran into problems with this SSL deally because I apparently had never "installed" the certificate in October correctly, having not completed the very last step per the helpful dude at our hosting outfit. He did it for me, but I did not ever get what I'd missed.
Now, I'm back to that step, having followed my notes and even added a bit more for next time. (I am using free SSL certificates** from the pretty helpful ZeroSSL site that are good for 3 months. Oh, and I have to keep downloading a new trial version of WinZip each time too, haha.)
I wrote "installed" in quotes, because the terminology is the problem here. Things get downloaded - I get that. After that I can't tell the difference between "installed", "active" and other terms like that, because none of these represent any reality to me. What this reminds me of is a long time ago being told that our company was going to "port" the database from SQLserver to Oracle. OK?? Was there a big cable that they woud just hook up to one server and the other and open a valve, OK, a gang of switches? That's what I envisioned because, damn, how the hell to you get "port" from "change over the code"? The computer folks do a lot of this misuse of wording, and I think they like taking terms from the engineering world.
OK, whatever, but I am NOT SURE that this site will work the day after tomorrow yet, because I have not done any new steps. Per the instructions, I'm finished. I will put a call into my homey over there at Maggie's Server Farm and hopefully get this straight.
It the site is down on Wednesday, you may be relieved to know it's not the Deep State or Zuckerburg that done it. I only wish Peak Stupidity was big enough to have these types hate our guts. Hell, we can't even get on the $PLC Hate List! Who do you have to know on this internet, anyway?
* No, really, I had a number of commenters with great suggestions last time, and even the unanswered one of "do I really need this crap?" I swear the site wasn't going to work without it before, but I'm just going with the flow now on this.
** Free, yeah, it ain't like they are anything real or something, so I don't feel at all a cheapskate about it.
Comments (5)
New Years New Yorker - WE! GET! THIS! ONE!
Posted On: Monday - January 4th 2021 8:01PM MST
In Topics:   Humor
I've picked up the New Yorker magazine a few times back in the day. They have these one-panel cartoons that people don't get. I'm not sure you have to get the articles either, you just have to get the magazine ... to lay out on the coffee table ... it's a status thing - you people west of the Hudson wouldn't understand ...
In the Intro section of his latest Radio Derb podcast (I just read the transcript), John Derbyshire brought up this old cartoon from The New Yorker. Yes, I GET one of them! I'm somebody now!

That IS a good one, unless you are under 35 or so. "Like, what's a check? I don't get it. This isn't funny at all. I agree with Elaine Benis." "Like, who's Elaine Benis?"
Elaine on Seinfeld goes into the offices of The New Yorker to pin this guy down on what's funny about the cartoon. She thought that just maybe she was missing the joke:
Comments (2)
ClusterFuck Nation with some predictions for a lovely '21
Posted On: Monday - January 4th 2021 3:04PM MST
In Topics:   Elections '16 - '24  Websites  Trump  Pundits  Dead/Ex- Presidents
... just lovely. Commenter E.H. Hail of the Hail To You blog pasted a link in a comment here to Mr. Jason Kunstler's blog with a very long* post of predictions for 2021. Sorry for the cussword in the title - I try to avoid that, but it's in his URL after all, and it's almost as good a blog name as Peak Stupidity.

After a quick intro., the blogger starts off with predictions of political happenings in the short term, as Jan 6th (the date for the voting by our electors) goes by. Just as Mr. Hail noted in his comment from his reading of Mr. Kunstler's post's comments, I got the impression from this portion about President Trump's possible getting satisfaction and winning this re-election, the putting of the Deep State back into its place, arrests of perpetrators of the recent witch hunt against Trump, etc. as a wish list rather than a prediction.
I really like an optimist, so don't get me wrong. I liked blogger Kunstler in the beginning of this post. It's just that, nah, none of that's going to happen. I'm sorry. I'd like to believe half of that. Upon looking at the writer's picture just now, I see he wasn't born yesterday. Maybe he hasn't been following politics as long as this blogger. Otherwise, I don't see how he wouldn't have noticed that a) there's no real rule of law on the high political level in the country and b) States' Rights is ancient history. Even the rights that have as yet been officially still left to the States, the complicated (for a reason) election process, as this example, are NEVER made use of by the States. As Peak Stupidity has noted numerous times, when Big Fed says "jump", State officials say "high high, Sir?!" (Much of the blame for that can be chalked up to the stupidity of the ratification of Amendment XVI, BTW - see also our posts Amendment XVI - Part 2 and Amendment XVI - Part 3.)
Mr. Kunstler gives Donald Trump a lot of credit in his hopes for the near future that I just can't give Mr. Trump credit for. There's no 4-D chess going on. If he were trying to play it, he'd be playing with the black queen and black rooks, bishops, and knights that HE HIRED as the white king!
As for the rest of the post (of which I admit I just skimmed (saving for later, through the last 1/3 of to look for anything about China, I'll say this.
1) I don't agree completely with the Mr. Kunstler's take on oil and the American production thereof, with it being the driver for the economic turmoils of this century. I see this view as seeing cause & effect backwards.
2) I almost had more criticism of everything econ related, thinking "where is any mention of China in here?" However, China is discussed later down in relation to the US economy and Trump, and I think the blogger does a fine job with that.
3) I really like James Kunstler's prepper mindset. However, as he discusses (this is fairly near the beginning) his predictions regarding the American economy going back toward "let's get small", I think he's missing one thing: China. Peak Stupidity has a post coming on this, but let me foreshadow it with this. Mr. Kunstler has discussed his prediction of how the American economy will change, as if we exist in a vacuum. With businesses, equipment (and maybe land too?) selling for pennies on the dollar, does he not see who may buy up this country of ours? Yeah, China can plunder this place as if it's a fire sale** at a wet market in Canton. American financial types did the same to Russia in the 1990s (and there's yet ANOTHER post long-time coming). Our future may not be so much up so us, Americans, as this blogger seems to think it is.
Therefore, I see the financial reset/prepper pep talk portion of the essay as another piece of wishful thinking. Believe me, I like those ideas, but I'm not at all optimistic that outside influences will let Americans go in that direction.
4) There's no mention of large-scale immigration and deteriorating race relations in the post. (If I missed it in my skimming of the final ~1/3 or so, let me know.) These two issues have had major influence on America's economic and political state, and they will after whatever type financial reset occurs, and yes, there will be one.
In summary, I hope our readers here have the time to read the interesting forecast-for-2021 essay on the ClusterFuck Nation blog. Were I Siskel or Ebert, I'd call it a "feel-good" essay. Thanks, Mr. Hail, for the recommendation.
* 7,000 words, per Mr. Hail. Give yourself an hour.
** Mr. Kunstler used the idiom "Chinese Fire Drill", while I'm using "Fire Sale to the Chinese". You'll never run out of good idioms.
*********************************
[UPDATED 01/06:] Corrected Mr. Kunstler's name 8 times. Really, that was not intended to be a slur, though it sure would be a good one. (would have left it in, if I din't like this guy) Thank you, Commenter Hail.
*********************************
Comments (6)
Our Lips are Sealed
Posted On: Saturday - January 2nd 2021 5:58PM MST
In Topics:   Music  Humor  Kung Flu Stupidity
In that post a few days back about Millennial angst(?) at the auto parts store, I mentioned the fact, well, maybe it's opinion, that it's often hard to get what people are saying through these face diapers. That's especially true with the cloth ones. No, my hearing is pretty good. 120 decibel rock music hasn't phased me a bit over the years, so ... it's not me, it's them!
I mentioned trying to read the lips of the woman, that were trying to push through the mask. I don't know if that's really the way to go, learning lip reading to get by in this panicky age. Upon thinking about it, the tongue position is probably critical - that's what she said - and furthermore, the face masks probably block small details that actual lip readers would need to see.
I'm particularly talking about the deaf, of course. For those only somewhat hard of hearing, I believe seeing faces has got to help with conversation. It could have been the noise in the background, or his way of speaking through another of those thicker cloth masks, but I had to ask a guy to pull the mask off so I could understand recently. That was after asking him twice already to repeat the last part. Was it really that I could see his lips better? Communication is important in some lines of work, and it is suffering right now due to this BS!
I'll tell you what though, lip reading would really be a great skill to have, face diapers or no face diapers. There was a scene in The Mechanic where the main character Charles Bronson read someone's lips from way outside of hearing distance in a park. (I tried to find the scene on youtube, but no joy.) It was an important piece of info. Mr. Bronson got too, like whether the guy was out to kill him or something, as I recall from long ago.
George Castanza of Seinfeld found a very good use for the lip reading skills of Jerry's girlfriend-for-the-show in this, one of the funniest episodes ever. Please take the < 5 minutes for this one:
(In this case, the small detail missed with the lip reading was just one consonant. It could happen to anybody!)
Just to fit in with the title, and for a fun end to the week, Peak Stupidity presents The Go-Go's from way almost 4 decades ago. They sure were having fun in this video, and the wiki says that Belinda Carlisle was still under the impression that the music video fad was nothing important...
Damn, this song has a great bass line! It's simple, but it's good, and LOUD. I can't believe I listened to this on a tablet speaker. It's time to get a real stereo again.
I looked all around the dBase and could not find any posts with the Go-Go's and Our Lips are Sealed. This song, from their 1981 album Beauty and the Beat, was written by Jane Wiedin. I really haven't put in any music from those fun girl bands of the 1980s - to me, that means this band, The Bangles and Bananarama.
The Go-Go's:
Belinda Carlisle – lead vocals
Charlotte Caffey – lead guitar, keyboards, backing vocals
Gina Schock – drums, percussion
Kathy Valentine – bass guitar, guitar, backing vocals
Jane Wiedlin – rhythm guitar, backing vocals
Comments (22)
Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!
Posted On: Saturday - January 2nd 2021 11:22AM MST
In Topics:   Elections '16 - '24  Pundits  Media Stupidity  Race/Genetics  Anarcho-tyranny
I'm recycling the Godfather-reference title here, as I see that Peak Stupidity already had a post titled Just when I thought I was out, SHE! PULLS! ME! BACK! IN! three years ago. (That one was about Ann Coulter's writing, and yes, I did make one joke from the title but could have done better, something about "that's what she said", I guess.) Wait a minute, we had the exact same title, except with the 2nd line not in the title itself, already, with the Godfather scene - here.
This time, I am referring to a couple of bloggers, the two best on the unz.com site by far. In that New Years post yesterday, I wrote that I've vowed to spend less time on that site. Today, I want to give two examples of why it's hard to quit.

Yeah, Steve Sailer has been far overly worried about the Kung Flu this past 9 months, and this has reduced my enjoyment of his blog to some degree. He only occasionally writes anything about the cost of this PanicFest to the economy and Americans in general. As a numbers guy, at least regarding social phenomenon, this ought to be right in his wheelhouse. I never did think of Mr. Sailer as a great principled Constitutionalist to begin with though.
The reason Steve Sailer always pulls me back in to his writing is that he comes up with posts like his What Can be Learned from Differing Rates of Suicide Among Groups? of 3 days back. Even the title is sarcastic, as he knows damn well that the writers of this (another) NY Times article aren't going to learn anything, at least not if it's anything that should make us care about the White Man.
Whites have higher rates of suicide than Asians, Hispanics, and Blacks. It's lower only compared to Indians (feather-type/casino style, still haven't found a good ASCII symbol, sorry.) Yet, the NY Times writer, one Austin Frakt, doesn't want to learn anything that might help here. As usual, in the most twisted fashion, which is probably the only way that works, that writer puts the blame on racism against the black people, who after all, have the lowest suicide rates.
Steve Sailer "fisks"* Frakt handily, and it's enjoyable to read. Mr. Sailer likes to speculate on root causes of social phenomena (often with some numbers to back his ideas up), and he keeps his usual sense of humor in there:
Maybe blacks have low suicide rates because they externalize more than they internalize, as seen in their having a homicide rate 8.2 times as high as nonblacks in 2019? If somebody disses you, rather than dwell on what’s wrong with you that that person said something so unkind about you, you go get your Glock and start firing into the crowd of people eating BBQ in the general direction of your disser, well, that apparently relieves a lot of stress.Heh! Yeah, see, this is why I go back to his blog often. Mr. Sailer comes close, but being a civil and, sometimes I think, naive guy, he doesn't get to the simple fact of THEY HATE US!
I've already noted that in order to not be bombarded with bullshit from these NY Times/ Washington Post / Atlantic blowhards, one can simply not subscribe and not click. However, I appreciate Mr. Sailer's doing the reading so we don't have to. His writing gets read all around the political sphere, from what I read about occasionally, so maybe he can red-pill some people.
Speaking of those red pills:

Now, between these two bloggers, and among the COMPLETE set of all writers on the unz.com site that I've ever read, this Audacious Epigone comes across at the most common sensical and level-headed**. I haven't mentioned him that many times on this blog though.
Mr. "Epigone"'s (hey, what the hell kind of name is that anyway, Sicilian?) big feature is to give us numbers, usually in graphical form, of results from polling of all sorts regarding political and social views in America***. My one problem with many of the posts on his blog is that I just think many polls are done with worthless questions. Your blogger here has just recently been polled (no not poled, as in by the IRS or something, and, yes, I used that joke too already, thankyouverymuch). There's also the cases in which I don't believe respondents will necessarily be that truthful.
With those concerns in mind, I keep up with the Audacious Epigone's blog regularly. He keeps it quick, with a nice thoughtful analysis of why the opinions are what they are. I will say that the commenters under the blog, many overlapping or overflowing from the iSteve blog, are very polite and civil, as Mr. Epigone made it clear he wanted long ago. I still like better the worldly knowledge and expertise that I see in the iSteve threads, along with the digressions on music, etc. (though not the Hollywood stuff). There are a few consistent Socialist commenters under AE, but one can put up with them, as they are very civil in their idealogical failings.
Not all of AE's posts have polling data and bar graphs though. To get back to the article, the blurb of which is shown above, 2020 Red Pill Review, this is some of AE's best stuff.
I guess I like the blog because I happen to agree with that blogger's political opinion on almost everything, especially regarding what Peak Stupidity calls the Global Financial Stupidity. In this post, Mr. Epigone lists the 3 biggies of obvious examples of total hypocrisy in our political class from 2020:
1) The obvious Lyin' Press's transition to nothing but a "lapdog" instead of "watchdog" (Mr. AE's doggie terms).
2) The blatant hypocrisy of having Black Lives Matter / Antifa-Commie errr, large peaceful protests during the summer of the Kung Flu PanicFest.
3) The election 2020 fraud.
My only argument about the post is about the "red pilling" part. This type of thing should have clued any patriotic American that THEY HATE US! Are people taking these proverbial red pills? Are they doing any good? Like a lot of medicine, medical marijuana for instance (though I would in no ways know), people can build up a tolerance after a while. Maybe these red pills were shipped over from China like everything else and are just made of rhino horn and dehydrated bat semen in a substrate of brick dust.
All this very obvious hypocrisy, and the Anarcho-Tyranny that has come with it, should have been swallowed as a red pill by any sentiment American who is not himself a party to the destruction. I'm not gonna believe these pills are working until I see crowds of millions in the streets. How much more do people need to take?
* Old, old internet term - see more in this post of ours.
** I'm even including ex-Congressman Dr. Ron Paul here. He's a great guy, and I agree with him 99%, but he never does bring up the immigration/race questions that the other guys do.
*** His favorite style of graph is having a bar graph with the usual categories of age/political leaning/race/ethicity/sex, and with nice color coding for a welcome change too! White will be white, black, black, Hispanic, brown etc. If there is Oriental, it'll be yellow. Hey, don't like it, get a tan or do that Michael Jackson thing. I don't care, but I just don't want to have to keep going back and forth to the legend - in AE's case, you usually don't even need one.
***********************************
[UPDATED 01/02, evening:] Wow, while searching for the Go-Go's (the band, to see if they'd been on here already - for next post - I found a post with the exact same "Just when I thought I was out ..." title. I sure didn't remember. The post was about the genderbender BLT-G business.
***********************************
Comments (10)
Reading InComprehension
Posted On: Friday - January 1st 2021 6:29PM MST
In Topics:   Curmudgeonry  Educational Stupidity

The above image is from a workbook for a 3rd-grader. It's a new year, but he's catching up on some school work from last year. We didn't make a resolution on this procrastination thing for him, as he's got a number of more high-priority resolutions.
The reason for the procrastination is perfectly understandable to me at this point. The blurb there is from a writing assignment, more than a reading assignment. With his math skills top notch, and his interest in, and understanding of, a little science satisfactory also, it's the writing that's come last for him. He seems to hate it.
It's not the handwriting, which is C- level on a good day. His spelling is pretty good, and, as I told him, "the more you read, the better you'll be at spelling." He's been putting this writing off, though.
"Hey, it's just a couple of sentences that they want. Look at me on my blog here. I think about what I want to write about, get some sentences in my head, and start writing." "No, but I can't just write about what I want." "OK, just answer the questions they've got about the thing you read." I looked at the book to help him out or at least see what the hold up was.
I saw that blurb of hifalutin Ed School brain-storming out of a Master's Thesis hypothesis. "Inferences"? Really, for a 9 year-old? Listen, I know the writer of this book spent a lot of his or the taxpayers' money on an advanced degree. You want to get your money out of this. Putting this kind of thing in the elementary school kids' books is, I'm sure, a big feather in your cap. Please, though, just STOP!
You can leave that Big Ed stuff in the book proposal, or in your resume in which you note how you used advanced teaching methods in your book, so it's simply the best, a paragon of excellence, in fact. Fine, but please don't actually put this crap in the book itself!
The first idea is for the kids to just plain READ. My kid can read very well, thank you very much. Then, since this is even more about writing, you ask questions about the passages to test both reading comprehension and writing ability. He'd have been able to accomplish that. However, when you put in this Big Ed theory of reading, or whatever it is, you just confuse even the smart ones... and their parents! I can't help my kid with this stuff. I get the terms, but I don't even WANT to think of clues and inferences. I completely understand his procrastination on this shit now. I hate it more than he does, I think.
Homeschooling looks better and better by the year and with each passing PanicFest.
Comments (10)
Happy New Year!
Posted On: Friday - January 1st 2021 3:56PM MST
In Topics:   Internets  Holiday from Stupidity

2021 AD will be another year with plenty of stupidity to keep this site rolling in it. We've probably all heard the expressions of disparagement regarding the year 2020, as if it the greatly increased stupidity around us the past year had come from some kind of mathematical cause.
No, it's just been stupid people leading and stupid people following the former in a country with obviously not enough sanity and too much hysteria. It has gotten quite frustrating lately. The calm and sane among us can do our thing with our own families in our own neighborhoods for part of the time, or in on-line conversations on the right web-sites (hint, here ya' go!)
In the short and maybe medium-run, we'd be happier staying off these parts of the internet. The reason we stay on is often to reassure ourselves that we are the sane ones, but also because we think we may make a small difference by spreading some sanity around. I hope that is the case. We'd be pretty sad in the long run knowing there was more we could have done.
I'd written in comments here just yesterday that we don't do this New Year's resolutions in our household. That changed about 6 hours later! We'll see how this goes, but of mine I was bullied into was to spend no more than 3 hours on this blog and unz.com combined per day. The former alone would be doable. The latter thing, reading and commenting on unz, has been a growing time-suck for me for 4 years now*. The initial idea was to link to here and gets some traffic. That has worked, and I can see that a majority of commenters here are from the unz site**.
This is gonna be hard. I enjoy the commenting there, but also I have an obsession with finishing the reading of comment threads. With Steve Sailer's posts going from more like 50 or so comments in '16 (just my recollection of the approx. amount) to more like 100 each average, it takes time, man! I'll have to see how this one goes, but my wife (just one of them) has a good point. I could be doing more productive things, no doubt.
I hope to enjoy this island of sanity, along with plenty of others on the internet, with you all for a good 2021. Will it get saner than '20? (Yeah, we're gonna need a
NOTE: This mention of this advice that I was given regarding my time, should NOT IN ANY WAY be taken as advice to Peak Stupidity readers to lay off. Far from it! [PS Legal Department, working from
* It was right at 4 years back, ~ a month after the start of this blog, when I realized you didn't have to give away your life story to comment there, and I got to reading/commenting (initially just Steve Sailer, but I've branched out...)
** I can see stuff in the log files too for visitors here. I have written before, probably in an unz comment, that those Fred Reed columns really must get read a lot. If I get a comment in there with a link, it'll get quite a few hits. That's pretty much the only reason I read that exasperating guy anymore.
Comments (9)
Prognosis Positive
Posted On: Thursday - December 31st 2020 6:39PM MST
In Topics:   Healthcare Stupidity  Big-Biz Stupidity  Kung Flu Stupidity
(This post's title is a reference to the old TV shows Seinfeld* and addtionally The Office (American version)*, of which some kindly Chinese lady was glad to rip/burn 4 seasons for me for 2 bucks on the streets of Canton years ago.)

Your Peak Stupidity lead blogger has been pronounced "positive". However, it's not what you think.
I was called up about the fact that I’d worked closely with a guy who tested positive for the COVID a week or so before**. We were probably 4 ft. apart for 4 hours or so. No masks, no mess. Due to this fact, determined in hindsight, of course, I am supposed to stay home for 10 days, but then I’m on off time anyway. Were I not, I would get paid time off. I lamented to the HR guy that, damn, I was about to do some extra work for them, but hadn’t decided yet. Too late. (They would have paid me off.)
Now, this damn thing is costing me money! I don’t like that aspect of it at all. It's one thing for the Kung Flu to be turned into a PanicFest for political reasons and to screw up the entire small business economy of America. This time, though, it's personal! (Hmmm, this rings a bell. What US President does that remind you of?)
It wasn't that I tested positive for the COVID. I imagine I very well could, but I'll be damned if I'm going in for a test. I feel fine. Any Peak Stupidity reader of more that 9 months will know that I just don't worry about this thing, disease-wise. Politically, you know I do!
The HR guy on the phone was complimentary that I was so positive (see, positive, get it?) about the whole thing. “I’m not worried about this thing. Those bugs have probably been running in and out of me since March”, I told him.
The next morning, I thought of something else. Who knows if that guy I worked with recently gave me the COVID, as opposed to me giving him the COVID? Do either of us care? I think not.
PS: A 61 y/o friend just got over it. He had some diarrhea, a fever up to 100 F max, and said he just felt weak for a couple of days. I told him Donald Trump knocked it out in 2 days, so I should start calling him (my friend) “Sleepy REDACTED“.
PPS: Our family member in the healthcare field, a nurse to be precise, had this to tell us: There are various COVID patients on the regular floor she works on. Sometimes, they don't know that till additional symptoms come up, as doctors don't always catch it. The police for the nursing/tech staff is that, even if you test positive, you are required to come into work unless you have symptoms. So, let me get this straight... is that what people did during Black Plague 1.0? Just asking for a friend ... working in the hospital ... during a time when hysterical people are acting like we have Black Plague 2.0.
* The big reference is to the name of the fictional movie, Prognosis Negative, in the old show Seinfeld (thanks for clearing that up, commenter, Alarmist). Then there was the Office show in which Michael Scott was under the impression that a "negative" result on a skin cancer test was BAD.
** HIPPA laws say he couldn’t tell me who it was, but I narrowed it down, and he sheepishly said, “well, yeah.”
Comments (10)
Peak Constitutional Amendment - XXIV
Posted On: Thursday - December 31st 2020 12:25PM MST
In Topics:   US Feral Government  Morning Constitutional
(Continued from Amendment XI, Amendment XII, Amendment XIII, Amendment XIV, Amendment XV, Part 1 on Amendment XVI, Part 2 on Amendment XVI , Part 3 on Amendment XVI, Amendment XVII, Amendment XVIII, Part 1 on Amendment XIX, Part 2 on Amendment XIX, Part 3 on Amendment XIX, Amendment XX, and Amendment XXI, Amendment XXII, and Amendment XXIII)

Amendment XXIV was proposed by Congress (as in voted "yea" on) in August of 1962 and ratified by January of '64. It reads as a very minor detail in the big scheme of Federal voting rules and rights, but, as usual, it's got usurpation of States' Rights written all over it. Here is the full text from our usual source, the Constitution Center site "Interactive Constitution" (yeah well, the less interaction, the better from what I've seen in hindsight):
Section 1Note first that this restriction on one specific restriction on voting only applies to elections for Federal office. Also, though you'd think the lawyers would have caught this, that bit about "other tax" makes me wonder: If you are 10 years behind on your State income tax, or your county property tax, will they let you vote from jail? Maybe they've got that covered.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay poll tax or other tax.
Section 2
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
This was mid-1962 to early 64, during the early stages of the increasing Civil Rites stupidity that we've all been suffering from ever since. The big legislation hadn't been passed yet. There were people pushing the stuff in the Kennedy administration, and the House and Senate were overwhelmingly Democrat, yet the spark by the usual crowd hadn't ignited in this still conservative government and people yet.
The poll tax, along with literacy tests and such, had been used in Southern States to keep the black vote down. However, as our usually helpful Interpretation Page notes, plenty of poor white people were prevented from voting too. The money we are talking about, even at the time the last States had this tax in the early 1960s, was 1 to 3 bucks, approximately $10 to $30 in today's money. The complaints about it remind me of the current complaints about a State ID (usually driver's license) being required. When you count the time down at the DMV, if you really don't drive, then I'd say the current complaint is about more money (time being money) today, though the principle of having honest voting overrides that argument*.
I don't think the poll tax was any big burden. As I started to note above, the particular interpretation page on that site for Amendment XXIV is not your usually unbiased factual information. Of course, they had to get a black woman, as I guess Amendment XXIV was another "black thing", really poor (or obstinate) white people notwithstanding. There are different writers for these pages, but this time they've got this Deborah Archer who is "Professor Law and Director of the Racial Justice Project at New York University Law School". Yes, [sic] in her freaking bio! The other writer, one Derek Muller, with his bio including that missing "of", is likely there to check her work on the legal stuff and the history**.
It would have been nice to see more discussion without the racial angle, as this is an issue to think about. States' rights aside for a minute, don't we want voters who can make good, informed decisions or with some skin in the game? Maybe a poll tax is not the way to go about this, but then then I see these concerns being a farce when I read about the subsequent (1965) Supreme Court decision to overrule Virginia's provision for an alternate provision for those not wanting to pay that poll tax, after this Constitutional Amendment had been ratified. This was covered in that interpretation page, but I'll take this from the wiki page on the 24th Amendment.
The state of Virginia accommodated the amendment by providing an "escape clause" to the poll tax. In lieu of paying the poll tax, a prospective voter could file paperwork to gain a certificate establishing a place of residence in Virginia. The papers would have to be filed six months in advance of voting, and the voter had to provide a copy of that certificate at the time of voting. This measure was expected to decrease the number of legal voters. In the 1965 Supreme Court decision Harman v. Forssenius, the Court unanimously found such measures unconstitutional. It declared that for federal elections, "the poll tax is abolished absolutely as a prerequisite to voting, and no equivalent or milder substitute may be imposed."Whaaa? This decision was bullshit. I could see that Virginia was not allowed to have the poll tax, per the new Law of the Land. Fine, but could they have just had the 6-month residency requirement for everyone?***
Our Founders did not want everyone to be able to vote. They also wanted the power to determine who can vote and who can't up to the States. It took how many, let's see, XIV, XV, XIX, 3 so far, and (spoiler alert) 1 more that we haven't discussed, so 4 Amendments to force the States to change their ways. The Feds absolutely do not like this "experiments in democracy" deal that the various States are supposed to be part of. If you don't like the poll tax, quite understandable, then work to change it in your State, rather than running to tattle-tale to Uncle Sam. Failing that, move! OK, that alone would probably be not enough to get 99.9% of Americans to move, so I suppose it's not THAT important compared to things that are better about your State.
We at Peak Stupidity are big State's Rights advocates, OK, mourners, so, again, we are not happy with Amendment XXIV. Note the way it's been
* As a Libertarian, I'm all about not needing to show any "steeenking ID" to the cops, for example, but then you could just not vote, in that case or get some other type.
** I'm sorry, but ever since Affirmative Action was in place (OK, my whole life), I will just have to assume that AA types are not the brightest in the class or office. Yeah, some are, but how am I gonna know that, with AA in place?
*** It seems like a no-brainer to have just disallowed the poll tax wording period, and taken out the phrasing for the residency requirement to be in lieu, and made it THE requirement. Nope, but that wasn't the real intention here (it was 1965, you understand ...). From this CaseLaw page on Harman v. Forssenius, which one doesn't need a law degree to read, we read from the decision:
Reaching the merits, the District Court held the certificate of residence requirement invalid as an additional "qualification" imposed solely upon federal voters in violation of Art. I, 2, and the Seventeenth Amendment.How so? Maybe I do need to be a lawyer...
2 (a) The poll tax is abolished absolutely as a prerequisite to voting in federal elections, and no equivalent or milder substitute may be imposed. P. 542.[My bolding] The residency requirement in no way violates Amendment XXIV, but SCOTUS has ruled! So let it be, cough, cough, this is bullshit, cough, written, so let it be done.
Comments (7)
Collapse of the Service Economy - Part 4
Posted On: Wednesday - December 30th 2020 8:28PM MST
In Topics:   Economics  Kung Flu Stupidity
(Continued from Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3.)

The last 3 posts on the service economy really didn't go along with the title, as I had initial intended to write just one post (yeah, that happens a lot here). The title is good for this conclusion though.
We all have seen small service businesses close down around us. That is, the restaurants and bars in which those aforementioned folks were selling each other, and me too, occasionally those craft beers and gourmet burgers. It's hard to tell which ones will ever re-open. I can tell you that 3 favorites, one only a mile away from us, and 2 of the most favorites in our relatives' hometown are close for good. I'm just thinking of myself here (and a family member who I knew would be just devastated about 1 of them, his favorite), I guess, but this really pisses me off now. I'm sure the readers here have their own hangouts in mind that are gone for good.
Restaurants and bars aside, hotels and motels are another big area of the economy for which the elites can't outsource the whole deal. Yes, they can import the cheap labor of course, oh, and the owners - looking at you, Mr. Patel, and you Mr. Patel, and ... x 10,000. I've been traveling just as much as before this whole Kung Flu PanicFest, and I talk to the managers of hotels in the lobbies about all this.
It's not good at all. My eyes tell me that these places, whether downtown hotels or airport types, are still pretty empty, but managers tell me numbers like 10% to 40% with only a few special nights when they get up to over 50%. In the past, many were sold out most weekends or special days. I'd hear from the people at the desk that around 30-35% occupancy rates are needed to break even, but for "full service" hotels, those with restaurants inside, the number is closer to 50%.
I am not in the hotel business, mind you, so these numbers are not comprehensive. However, on the Statista website here I found the graph shown below. In this Trip Savvy article, the breakeven number is given as 37.5%, close to what I've been told.

Here's the big number I've heard, but it's one that I haven't been able to find good numbers on on the web yet: I've been told by a few people in the business that 60-something percent of hotels in the country may close for good!
Is there something about the service industry that makes it more prone to a government/media panic-induced collapse? In this case, of course, the fact that the big hysteria is about a contagious disease makes it obvious why the service industry has been beaten down. Even with some other big bad event (or supposed one) though, the service industry, specifically hospitality (food/beverages/lodging) is bound to take the biggest hit, as it provides services that we don't absolutely need. I suppose accounting, vehicle repair work, and those services that go along with production are left alone, as the production of goods is more important.
Then, there are the F.I.R.E. "industries". They are not particularly necessary, but yet, they have been left alone, or at least still making money (I read that "E" as standing for Education.) You know, I meant to mention this, so I'll stick it in yet another post.
This Service Economy that was supposed to well serve Americans after we shipped off all that manufacturing might has collapsed due to this Kung Flu Infotainment Panic-Fest. It's pretty much all we had left, so now, as the bored kids say, "what do we do??"
Comments (6)
Millennials - Calm the Hell Down!
Posted On: Wednesday - December 30th 2020 1:59PM MST
In Topics:   General Stupidity  Curmudgeonry  Muh Generation
Here I was, with another post in mind for this morning, along with the final part of the series on the service economy. I couldn't quite remember what the 1st post was to be, though I would run back into the idea later, I'm sure. Well, I just go to the auto parts store (could be anywhere, though), and BINGO! There's a post! There's another post!

The image above is from our post from 2 summers called Are the Millennials Retarded?. I can use this because (a) again, Millennials and (b) same auto parts store. Now, before any younger readers get bent out of shape, let me say that the title of that last post was facetious and that I agree with the one comment (that's wasn't mine) under that post that noted we need to all stick together. No, when I ever, if ever, get to writing my Strauss & Howe Generations/The Fourth Turning book review, my main point will be that you can't paint any whole generation with one broad brush regarding their attitudes and personalities.
It's just ... man, a lot of the young people do get offended SO easily by things that are just, I dunno, trying to do business or trying to talk normally to get things done. The point of my trip to replace a part of some Harbor Freight POCMC could be another quick post, but anyway, I was at the auto parts store, after checking in at the bicycle store, to at least find out if this was a part anyone could get anywhere. It's got a bike-pump head on one end, but male pipe threads on the other.
The thing is, just asking anyone at the store about this would be a waste of everyone's time. I needed the guy (oh, it could be a woman, 1 in 1000 maybe...) who could simply answer the question in a few seconds. I've written before that I have no problem when frustrated just waiting for the one white guy (he does commercial sales, but will help time permitting, and he knows his shit). I've written that I even asked specifically "can I wait and talk to a white guy, please" one time.
Well, it was one black guy who pointed to another black guy who supposedly knew his stuff. Fine. While waiting for the one guy, a woman clerk with a cloth mask on mouthed the words that I think were "can I help you?", but a) that's bad English, so that couldn't be what she said and b) between the plexiglass and that cloth mask, I couldn't hear much of it, and I'm still not a lip reader*.
"I'm waiting for that dude for a question. The guy there said he's supposed to know the store really well." That was a simple statement. No offense was intended. I just wanted to not waste time in there. Per her face mask, with the lips showing through and making different patterns, the woman had some little problem with this. It was probably about her being an employee and "we all know what we're doing", blah, blah. This was not something to be looked up on the computer though, or I'd have been fine getting her to help.
Why should I have to explain myself to this easily offended young lady? We are trying to get things done, and, yeah, I want to talk to THAT guy. I think I just told her "take it easy. It's going to be OK."
I can't deal with this business of being so quick to take offense. It's not all personal, but I guess these people learn this way in school. I can't deal with it very well.
Oh, and the guy went to the right place, we looked around, and nope, they don't have the part.
* There, see, now there's another post. Should we all become lip readers to help fight the COVID-one-niner?
Comments (13)
Collapse of the Service Economy - Part 3
Posted On: Tuesday - December 29th 2020 8:21PM MST
In Topics:   History  Economics  US Feral Government
(Continued from part 1 and part 2)

To wrap up a little bit, what I've concluded for myself (may be quite obvious to others) is that an economic entity cannot run a sustainable economy based on nothing but a domestic service industry. Back 25 - 30 years ago, when the idea of this wonderful service economy that America would become (see, no messy factories, no smoke, no grimy hands) was pushed, these economists and politicians thought we could be the service industry for the world, perhaps thinking of the way we'd been the manufacturing economy for much of the 1st world before. A guy at the coffee shop just this morning mentioned ex-President Clinton's Secretary of Labor with his 1991 book The Work of Nations, which extolled the idea (per coffeeshop guy, who is a decent honest, conservative, pro-White, intellectual).
This wasn't about just making each other gourmet burgers and craft beer. Americans still made all the important advances in computer software, computer networking, and had intellectual capital that still beat the rest of the world. We could get the messy, polluting manufacturing out of here and the same people could work in nice clean offices, OK, cubicles now, making spreadsheets, and filing paperwork electronically. Additionally, engineers could do their portion of the production here at home while things got made to our specs in Mexico and, a bit later, China.
Did anyone worry about the idea of these other countries picking up the clerical, computer, and engineering work themselves? I could see no thought about the internet changing everything within a decade, as I don't have that kind of foresight either. (I thought that's what some of these people were paid for though...)
Maybe some of the folks pushing this stuff didn't care either way. The Globalists were going to come out fine on this. I can remember having a discussion with a friend about all the work going on in China back in 1996, and I didn't get it. He did. However, I do know that I was not comfortable with the idea of the US converting to having a service economy.
This was in Winter of 1992. The guy pictured at the top is former Massachusetts congressman/Senator Paul Tsongas. He was one of the many (I recall 5 or so well in the running) running for the D-squad Presidential nomination in that year. I'd already had enough of George H.W. Bush for breaking his "no new taxes" pledge. He'd told us to read his lips even - guess I'm not a good lip reader Also, he'd pandered in Spanish in the previous election, turning me off long before anyway.
Mr. Tsongas was one of the old-time D's, I guess, though I didn't think about this stuff. I just knew that here was one guy in the whole campaign that brought up this stuff about keeping manufacturing here. I volunteered to help in the primary campaign in my State. All I ended up doing, as I recall now, 28 years after, is helping by driving around a NY Times reporter from the nice hotel to the local manufacturing plant where candidate Tsongas would have a press conference.*
I ended up about 6 ft. from Mr. Tsongas as the small press conference went on inside the factory. I even had a question to ask him, probably about this service economy idea which he was there to argue against. It wasn't a lack of courage to speak up, but I just thought that, as a campaign helper, it wasn't part of the deal. I kind of regret that I didn't speak up. The press conference ended well, but that campaign, as anyone could remember or look up, ended pretty soon after. It was the S. Carolina primary which put Bill Clinton, just another Globalist, up to the top of the pack.
By March 19th, Paul Tsongas was out of the campaign. He died in 1997 of the lymphoma that he had beaten off once back in 1983. Then, Ross Perot had come on the scene, also telling us to back off on this outsourcing so we would avoid that "giant sucking sound" into Mexico. During the summer of that year, he may have been "deep stated" as we wondered a few years back. Mr. Perot died just last summer.
Back in the day, there were some serious politicians who cared about Americans. Recently, we've just had the one. (Well, he cares about Americans. Serious? Not so much.) This is not going well.
* OK, now the memory gets pretty good, as I remember I drove the big-media young lady around in my muscle car with the rebel flag front license plate. While we talked a bit about politics, for my amusement I mentioned that, "yeah, and that David Duke fellow may be the guy to vote for too, I dunno." This young white gray lady reporter didn't seem amused in the least!
Comments (10)