Lyin' Press foregoes fairness
Posted On: Monday - August 12th 2024 6:15PM MST
In Topics:   Trump  Media Stupidity  Taxes  Karmakarma Kameleon
Instapundit posted the following by an X-er named Tim Murtaugh. Mr. Murtauge says:

I guess that non-partisan watchdog group wasn't available for comment this time.
Let's also note that, contrary to what his press spokesragdoll said, Bai Dien had the IRS cracking down with a new "Service Industry Reporting Program. I wonder if the IRS has got their 87,000 new employees on line yet.
As Peak Stupidity commented when Trump proposed this move a couple of months ago, taking action on this is really a function of Congress. That should be especially obvious in light of the Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council ruling. I'd like to see it happen, one way or another, but I think the IRS won't remove its grubby hands from this income, or else, what's next, teenage boys who mow lawns?! For those not wanting to be under the jurisdiction of the IRS, there's cash.
Comments (26)
Grrrlll Power in the UK
Posted On: Monday - August 12th 2024 7:26AM MST
In Topics:   Political Correctness  Feminism  Female Stupidity

If you assume that the attempted assassination of Donald Trump happened just due to pure stupidity (I don't), the feminism and wokeness* were surely a big part. That there were women in Trump's Secret Service detail to begin with**, and from what we saw on video, didn't work out so hot.
They and the proponents of Feminism don't want to hear that they are not cut out for this type of work. It's not just size, but mental and emotional differences too, that matter. I noted this just looking at the cute face of this lady cop - at least I think she is, as these bulked-up body-armor suits don't exactly show off their bods - at the Rotherham Riot.
This screen shot if from the latter end of the hour and a half, maybe 1:15 or so. It's around the back side of the Migrant Express hotel. As a small contingent of cops faced off a similar sized group of rioters, there was some shoving. This lady simply looks like she wants to go home and have a good cry. That's the difference between men and women. She shouldn't have been there... but, but, grrrlll power!!
Adam Smith has kindly put a video up on his youtube channel with a display of more Authoritah-tive grrrlll power!
* Political Correctness on steroids.
** Peak Stupidity says, if you're gonna push quotas on the SS, at least put the women in the anti-counterfeiting department.
Comments (20)
Wise Russian Proverb
Posted On: Saturday - August 10th 2024 6:13PM MST
In Topics:   The Russians  Humor  China  The Future
Thank you, Alarmist, for linking us to this, off of Ann Barnhartz's meme site.

Thank you, Peakers, for reading and writing this week! We'll have more on the anti-Regime rallies in the UK, or, if unfortunately, there's nothing more, on the evil Orwellian aftermath there. Though it's old news, the Olympic genderbender nonsense still contains lots of humorous stupidity to be exploited. There'll be more than that, I'm sure. Have a happy Sunday.
Comments (15)
Dr. Rock on Financial Musical Chairs
Posted On: Saturday - August 10th 2024 10:07AM MST
In Topics:   Elections '16 - '24  Trump  Global Financial Stupidity  Economics  The Future  Karmakarma Kameleon

In the comments under our recent post Crash, my ash, Old Soldier spelled out the deep financial hole we are in already, with no good way out. I agree. That post of mine was a comment of the state of "the market" only. The big wigs care about that money, but also, what's left of the Middle Class sees those fund numbers in their 401-k's, IRAs, "market funds", whatever, as showing they are doing OK. When those numbers go way down, they see that they are not nearly well-off after all.
Anyway, Ron Paul's recent column on the debt had only 16 comments on The Unz Review, so I perused them. I remember the guy going by Dr. Rock as always having good comments on that site in general and particularly on Steve Sailer's blog. This comment of his*.is related to elections, and the general pointlessness of it, economics-wise [in its entirety, unedited]:
*****************************************
Every administration plays the game of kicking the can down the road, in the sole hope that the entire house of cards doesn’t collapse white they are in office, or too quickly after the leave office, lest it be blamed on them.
Nobody wants to be the guy (or girl) that decides to address it, because they don’t want to be the administration to inflict the barbaric levels of austerity it would take to address it. They also don’t want to be responsible for firing half of the federal government, or taking a ax to welfare, food stamps, medicaid, medicare, social security, military spending, international aid, and the hundreds of billions on pure pork that we dole out as part of the grift-graft-campaign contribution scam.
Their only hope is that whenever it finally blows up, and sends us into a deep depression, hyper-inflation, and complete global financial collapse, that it will be on someone else’s “watch”, and every President and Congress that came before, will act like they had nothing to do with it, and it was someone the sole fault of the people in power at that instant! (probably for more short term partisan political gain) “The Democrats mismanaged the economy!”
One of the reason why it will never get “fixed” until after everything collapses, is because multiple administrations and Congress’ failed to do anything about it for decades and decades, and now, it’s too big for any one generation to take on!
Moreover, unless you are also willing to destroy the Fed, and end Central Banking, and the entire fiat currency system, you won’t really be fixing the problem. You’d also have to eviscerate the phony casino stock market, derivatives market, bond market, “every” market… total annihilation! (You’d also be labeled as the the most destructive world leader since Adolf Hitler, and in a way, they would be right, because you’d have to be willing to basically blow up the entire world, financially)
Also, how can we go back onto the gold standard, with hundreds of trillions, maybe thousands of trillions, in so-called “circulation”? (under MMT, it might be INFINITY TRILLIONS) Gold would go to $1,000,000 an ounce, maybe higher (I have no idea, because we’d be in Armageddon).
Ergo: Everyone just “plays along”, like it’s all going to be okay (until it isn’t).
However, that Everything Bubble is out there, and growing, and getting ready to “pop” one day, and just like the past manufactured crisis got us central banking, the next one will get us CBDC and Social Credit Scores, and a complete surveillance state.
*****************************************
Unfortunately, Dr. Rock is right on the money. The people he describes here are, I assume, those behind the scenes. Kamelion is much too stupid and a solipsistic narcissist to understand this financial picture. Trump, OTOH, can understand this stuff well enough, but he would be sure he can fix all this on his own, in 4 years, never mind the century-and-a-decade-long existence of the FED and the number $35,000,000,000,000.
PS: "Musical Chairs" was the old ZeroHedge's way of putting it, back when I'd read the site thoroughly a decade ago.
PPS: There is one slight matter I disagree with Dr. Rock on. That is, the gold standard and million bucks per ounce or not, what's the difference? The thing with gold is, an ounce is an ounce. Whatever number of green pieces of paper or bits on a computer it can "trade for" doesn't mean much.
* Since I don't comment there now, I won't ask Dr. Rock if it's OK to use this. I've never been refused before, so ...
Comments (22)
Mediterranean Cuisine Peak Stupidity Trifecta
Posted On: Friday - August 9th 2024 5:03PM MST
In Topics:   Curmudgeonry  Economics  Inflation  Customer Care

Wow! In addition to being a "pop-up" Peak Stupidity Curmudeonry post - not one of our posts that is waiting in the wings - within 5 measly minutes, 3 of our niche topics presented themselves to us. The Zen of Stupidity, it was.
I attempted to get some reasonably healthful food at the hub airport. While avoiding Wendy's, Chick-Fil-A and all that, I came to a place I frequented a number of time ~ 6 years ago, while doing a lot of traveling through there. Mediterranean folks eat well, don't they? I could pretend it's healthful anyway, and it was so tasty. Also, they dished out a lot of grub, while getting me out of there for 8 to 9 bucks, tax included.
1) INFLATION: You know the drill here. It's difficult to avoid the accusations of cherry-picking, though we've never actually done any apples-to-apples comparison of cherry prices;-} We've had plenty of discussion of the BLS inflation "basket of goods" and more, so it's not all just random outrage. Anyway, I notice what I notice. After having enjoyed this food a number of times, I noticed the prices up $2 after a year or so and, probably worse in terms of value, the portions had gone down to 75%, maybe less, of what I'd previously enjoyed.
That was it. It had been nice while it lasted. I just came by after ~ 5 years though. Now, for that same type of meal, one isn't getting out of there for under $19 after tax. Hit me, Money Chimp: 14% average annual inflation taking into account compounding. That's off on the low side, as I didn't take the portion size decrease into account. If the quantity of food is only down by 25% (I doubt that), we get 19%!
2) COMPETENCE: This subject that we've covered for a couple of years now is called a "crisis" of competence often. I don't like that usage, as crisis has a connotation of something being temporary. Nah, it ain't.
I was not going for that $19 meal, but it didn't matter, as the place was out of half the ingredients anyway. This is a big hub airport - they are just throwing away money in rent. Customers in front of me were being told what was missing and then dropping out of the line. There was no point. This was not the fault of the one diverse lady there doing the serving and check-out duties. (Their problem was more that there was no competent old White guy running the place.) I did notice this woman's plastic badge, though. I kid you not, it said "I don't know. I just work here.". That was always supposed to be in fun, was it not? That joke does not work here anymore.
3) CASH IS KING: Well, that was nice for me, at least. I had the place to myself, seeing as how everyone had bailed. I only wanted what they did have, that healthful Mediterranean snack of a small cup of hummus and piece of pita bread, so this lady got to it. She put it on a plate.
That'd be "this many dollars"* was pretty much it, as she just pointed to the card reader without any price stated. I handed her a fiver. "No?" "It's card only." "How much is it, 3 bucks, right? Here you go." (I didn't care where the money went.) No can do. She stood firm, so there's a piece of pita bread and some hummus sitting there, or already in the trash. I've got cans of tuna fish, so ... it's all GOOD. Is it?
How can Peak Stupidity keep up with the news today, as we ran into a Trifecta of Stupidity.
* The movie Idiocracy has hundreds of lines that apply well now.
Comments (10)
Rotherham Riots: Two-Tier Policing
Posted On: Thursday - August 8th 2024 12:03PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Globalists  Anarcho-tyranny  World Political Stupidity  People's Revolt
(Continued from Enough is Enough! - - The Rising of the Yorkshiremen and The Cops.)

To the right in this image, the Rotherham rioters had just busted up that narrow plate glass window, using asphalt, stone, and wood as their implements of destruction. That opening got them to the hotel's lobby, I guess, as they were able to pull out various chairs. The small contingent of cops there, with their helmets and shields, were up against the wall, but they could have easily walked off to the right. A large number of them were around the corner. There was nothing stopping them from retreating but their "duty" to the realm. They weren't stopping the hotel from getting smashed up through a cinder-block wall (not bloody likely) either, as the rioters could already get in.
When it comes down to it, other than that these cops were in the way and acting traitorously toward their countrymen, I don't think the rioting Brits hated them here. The former were just extremely angry, having been at wits end for years, no, decades, in trying to stop the cultural and physical destruction of the UK. Enough is Enough! Chairs and rocks gotta fly. (Stuff has to burn too - that was later.)
The hate could be for the masses of alien Moslems, people that should not have EVER been residing in the UK like this. This was a *** hotel they'd attacked, after all, one housing Moslem aliens at no charge. However, on calmer days, I doubt these White folks have much hate for most of the normal working-man Moslems even. The large proportion of the hate should be, and probably is, directed at the Globalist scum, such as newcomer, 20%-of-the-populace-elected Totalitarian Kier Starmer. Thing is, they couldn't get quite so close to 10 Downing Street, that's all.
Our 1st post on this matter pointed out the Orwellian biased press coverage. Something else that's been discussed, where one can actually discuss it, is "Two-Tiered Policing". That's the term in use over there, and Peak Stupidity ain't gonna change it, but (Sam Francis-coined) "Anarcho-Tyranny" is a better and more over-arching term for what's been going on in the UK. The use of Two-Tiered Policing seems recent to me, yet the "policy" goes back a long ways.

The British police have dealt with violent Moslem rioters over the years too, much more so, in fact, since that's who normally does the rioting. All it takes - just very recent events - is for a Moslem family's children to be taken by CPS (no opinion on the specific details) for riots to start, and then another I'd heard about involving a Moslem beating down a British cop at the airport. I suppose the cops will defend property against destruction some of the time - hard to get pictures showing otherwise, of course - but there's a fundamental difference.
These guys in Rotherham have the whole system after them at this point. Even were it not for the top-level J6-style Orwellianism, the local police will arrest and charge the normally (formerly?) law-abiding British people. The CPS incident resulted in the children being sent back. (Nice work! This doesn't work for White Brits, though) The 2nd one resulted in no charges on the Moslem for beating down a lady* cop, resulting in a broken nose. How'd the latter work out for a White guy who'd lobbed a piece of asphalt more accurately?
Maybe the general population of the UK hasn't been aware for as long as your VDare people and Enoch Powell, but they've had to have seen the drastic changes from the PRP for 2 decades now, and certainly 1. Why have there been no riots yet? There've been plenty of other incidents of Moslem/alien violence that could have triggered them. The reason riots like this haven't happened is, there you go, that Two-Tiered Policing, but more broadly, Anarcho-Tyranny.
Law abiding White Brits don't generally riot, 'cause, ILLEGAL. Were they to do so, they would and will expect and get that law & order, and in spades. That's what it is in a country with Rule of Law, inn't it, Gov'nah? Yet, the authorities won't treat aliens with same way, 'cause, FEAR. Yes, that's fear of the masses of Moslems that don't go so much for that Rule of Law business and also fear of being seen as anti-Woke, pro-White, and worst, anti-Regime.

Can you imagine if these people where White and one did ctrl-r's to the signs thusly: (Islam/Muslims = White People) (Crusaders = Invaders) (Jihad = Deportations) (Shaykh = J6 Political Prisoners)?
This outcry about Two-Tiered Policing is right and just and overdue. However, Anarcho-Tyranny covers much more that their term doesn't. These White Brits surely see it, but what about the fact that these foreigners, having invaded their land in boats or Chunnel trains, are being put up for nothing using their own hard-earned, hard-stolen tax money?! How about that these folks haven't been arrested for trespassing when they broke in to begin with? How about the taxpayer money used, not to at least, pay for deportation courts, but to help them get citizenship as part of the PRP?!
Well, maybe they'll come up with more terms to cover the rest. Globalism, Totalitarianism, Orwellian Police Statism, and, if nothing else, Communism, will surely do for now. I hope this fight continues... more on that score...
* Yep, we'll get to that post.
Comments (15)
It's portals all the way down!
Posted On: Thursday - August 8th 2024 6:40AM MST
In Topics:   Internets  Humor  Curmudgeonry  Artificial Stupidity  Healthcare Stupidity

"We're going paperless.", I'm told, nearly every day now. No, you can't write a check. No, you can't bring the form in person.
OK, we can't continue to live in the '70s. I! GET! THAT! [/old FOX-era Tucker] What used to be "our website" is now "our portal", meaning, what? You can use the app, I guess and maybe cannot use a browser even? It just sounds more modern, is all... That's what it's about. "Don't have a portal? OK, Boomers!"
This particular portal was an entryway that led to our boy being able to play organized sports. It's paperless. Here went. I know longer pick anything but simple obvious passwords now, with too damn many of these things, so if someone decides to hack in and take him off the soccer team, so be it - it's nothing but Communist Kickball anyway.
Then, I'm in, through the portal. It wasn't too bad. There was then that "physical" page, so I got out the tape measure and the blood pressure machine, and put him on the scale. Ooops, but you've got to print this out, and, ooops, go to the doctor.... with... a form.
The doctors' office told us we couldn't just up and come in, because this boy hasn't been there in so long we gotta catch up.* That required going through their portal... cause, they're like... paperless.
This one was much worse. It'll require a 2nd post for some funny and PS-adjacent stuff, but let me say that "2 surveys" turned into 5, one of them with 50 questions or more. That was over half an hour. Through the portal, and around the 6 million dollar flower pots, to the doctor's office we go ... ♫ ♪ ♬
The one Doc I remembered from before, a good guy, was there on a stool in a common area typing stuff into a computer. Seeing as how I had a clipboard in my hand, I asked "I thought we'd gone paperless?" He liked that one.
To be fair, SOME of the papers on the clipboard were for insurance stuff. How lucky was I that I didn't have to get on the insurance company's portal!
It's simple, sonny, whaddya' need a refresher class?
Here's the original:

I read this on Instapundit first. To keep it short:
After a lecture on Cosmology, the Professor was questioned by a little old lady. "Your theory that the sun is the center of the solar system and the earth is a ball which rotates around it has a very convincing ring to it, Professor, but it's wrong. I've got a better theory", she said.
"And what is that, madam?" inquired James politely."
"That we live on a crust of earth which is on the back of a giant turtle."
The Professor decided to gently dissuade his opponent by making her see some of the inadequacies of her position.
"If your theory is correct, Madam," he asked, "what does this turtle stand on?"
"You're a very clever man, Sir, and that's a very good question," replied the little old lady, "but I have an answer to it. And it's this: The first turtle stands on the back of a second, far larger, turtle, who stands directly under him."
"But what does this second turtle stand on?" persisted the Professor, patiently.
To this, the little old lady crowed triumphantly,
"Why, simple! It's turtles all the way down."
* Of course, we are blessed to have heard this.
Comments (4)
Rotherham Riots - The Cops
Posted On: Wednesday - August 7th 2024 12:10PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Globalists  Anarcho-tyranny  World Political Stupidity  People's Revolt
Note: They'll be a handful of posts on the Rotherham riots in particular, among the widespread anti-PRP (Population Replacement Programme) riots going on in the UK. We'll concentrate on the video we discussed on Monday, but more good news will surely be proclaimed here.
Yes, this is all good news and something for the rest of the White Western world to enjoy and learn from. The British people can not fight the Globalist evil by voting.*. I'm pretty sure that realization is much of the impetus for these riots.
It's more than just good news. All this is glorious to see!

These guys are explaining to these police officers a number of things, much which is lost in translation to me. From what I did catch during this hour and a half (and other videos), the rioters, being for the most part, almost solely, the same people as these cops, want to reason with them as fellow Brits. Why are you cops out here in our faces today? Don't you understand that you are working completely against your own people here? What about our children? What about YOUR children, Mr. Starmer's enforcers ?
I know the much of the answers. Well-paying jobs. Pensions. There's more. Other than were it the women cops (fairly cute, I might add, but more on them later), I can see one of these guys feeling it cowardly to all march away, especially once the protest got more... riotous. These guys are decked out in their body armor, with helmets and plexiglas shields. This is not 1965 during the Vietnam War, with long-haired young ladies, and men, sticking flowers into gun muzzles. 6 decades later, the UK and the US are much more Police State-adjacent for that to happen.
Yet, rather than be a question of duty and honor, the "Domino Effect", and Lyndon Johnson's wanting o finish what was started vs. peace and quit-being-the-world's policeman", these people facing off are truly on the same side in ideology, culture, and blood... on EVERYTHING. That these cops didn't stand down or better yet, refuse to come out there at all, says lots about how our Regimes have have gotten control of society.

He was one of the many police officers that can be seen interacting (like that one!) with rightfully angry Brits outside the Holiday Inn Express housing alien people that day.
It's within a couple of minutes of the 8 minutes into the video I captured here that there's a younger cop - darker beard - who verbally agreed with the rioters. ( I caught some of it, but c'mon, please, blokes, speak fooking English!) He says something to the effect of agreeing, but then, there's a "but..." I don't know. "It's just our job, mate!" or something, he said.
Well, again, I tried to make out what I could***, but I noted the look on this guy's face. Can I tell from a face that a guy does not look like a dummy? He doesn't. He's got to agree with the rioters at some deep level, maybe even that they are in the right on this particular day too, in wanting to smash the hotel and wanting masses of foreign aliens OUT, out of the British lands. In this scene, it seems like this cop was mulling this over. (This was before things got heated and there was no mulling over anything.)
His walking off right there would be seen as cowardice only by those who miss the whole big picture. In fact, it would have been a very brave thing. It could have started a change in the action that day. One step of this sort would truly scare the BeJesus out of the Starmer Regime. It could be the start of Glorious Revolution 2.0!
Even more so than it'd be for an uprising like this in America***, in Rotherham, and other locations I've observed, the rioters and the local law are almost all one in the same in culture and blood. Will the cops decide to stay at the station next time? Better, yet, I'd love to see them join in!! The pressure on local cops from the Regime to enforce the Globalist PRP and to go Orwellian and Totalitarian on these "Far Right" "racist" "thugs"**** is tremendous, I'm sure. The Regime doesn't want things like this to keep happening.
Well, this post was to discuss "Two-Tier Policing", but we didn't get that far. This series about Rotherham will continue. As I've written, this is THE important story right now. Here's hoping it stays that.
* I didn't comment on this last time, but this traitorous scum Starmer got 1/3 of the votes cast recently and is now in charge of the country. As with these riots too, it's not the one thing (this one election).
** We'll have more on this, but there'd be a fundamental difference, IMO: Guns.
*** It was a little like listening to Peter Brimelow - same accent (northern England), come to think of it. Miss 1 or 2 words, and the rest turns to muck in my mind. Sorry! It's not you, it's me. ;-}
**** Sorry, but "thugs" always brings up ghetto dweller Black! folks in my mind. Can White people even BE thugs? What does Webster say...?
Comments (12)
Crash, my ash!
Posted On: Tuesday - August 6th 2024 11:31AM MST
In Topics:   Global Financial Stupidity  Economics

Oh, it's coming, all right. However, this 2,100 point drop over 5 days, including the 1,000 point drop in one day is peanuts. Let's think proportions - out of 40,000, that's 5% and 2 1/2%, respectively.
I imagine there are financial people out there who've been in this business a long time. In the 1980s, those 2 drops would mean 90 points / 45 points. That'd be a "Big day for the Dow.", but no kind of news story. By fall of '87, the Dow had ramped up 44% in 7 months, but there was that October 19th "Black Monday" crash. "OMG, 508 points!" Not many stock brokers worked in tall buildings with working windows anymore, by 1987. So, we had that going for us ... but that one was a 22.6% drop. That drop would be an 8 to 9 thousand point drop today. (Maybe tomorrow.)
In the early/mid '90's, this 5% drop would be 200-odd points, and in the 8 year early 21st century market, we're talking 500 points. Do people not remember this?
Listen, this is Peak Stupidity. We've been all over this Global Financial Stupidity business for almost 8 years now.* 5% in a week, or 2 1/2% in a day is NOT a crash. We'll tell you when we're having a crash!... so long as GoDaddy has still got power...
* Though we got nuthin' on good old Dr. Paul. We were a week ahead of him on the recent debt "milestone", but Ron Paul has been aware of what's coming for half a century.
Comments (12)
Mr. Hail on Kamala Harris
Posted On: Tuesday - August 6th 2024 7:52AM MST
In Topics:   Websites  Pundits  Karmakarma Kameleon

The less we read of or hear from this ditz, the better. However, Kamakama Kamelion has gotten herself into this high position, and the subject of how do you plain get people like this, I mean just in the world to begin with, is hard to avoid. Essayist E.H. Hail has stopped avoiding it.
Mr. Hail gets into the psychological phenomenon he calls Solipsistic Narcissism, present in this woman and in women in general. See Kamala Harris and “female solipsistic-narcissism” in the political in 21st-century USA
I read it last night. Our friend Dieter Kief has chimed in already, and I'm sure Mr. Hail welcomes more comments.
Comments (9)
Right = Bad. Got it?
Posted On: Monday - August 5th 2024 7:03PM MST
In Topics:   Commies  General Stupidity  Media Stupidity
Whoever is a baddie at the moment is of the Far Right.

I remember this crap during the Cold War. The hard-core Commies of the USSR were the "Rightist hardliners". After that, during the Great Replacement Programme, anyone caring about his nation above others is of the Far Right.
Comments (10)
Rotherham Riot Movie: Rising of the Yorkshiremen
Posted On: Monday - August 5th 2024 7:32AM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Globalists  Anarcho-tyranny  World Political Stupidity  People's Revolt
For me watching the video below was the equivalent of going to an acton film in the 1980s. We don't go out now, the screen is about 0.01% the size, but the action is here and I inside I strongly feel myself being part of the action. One difference here is that this one is real and happening very nearly NOW. I would rate "Yorkshire!, Yorkshire!" as my favorite film of the century so far.
I wrote that I was heartened to see the rioting in Southport and London. Here I was 10 times heartened. Youtube (probably accidentally) served up this suggestion, which is pure on-scene footage without the reporter even talking. I mean, I see that these guys have broken into the hotel and that others are throwing hotel furniture at the cops. I don't need to hear "They've broken into the hotel!" and "They're throwing hotel furniture at the cops!". I turned on the auto-closed captioning, for what it's worth, on those previous videos firstly because I'd been in a bad spot to listen but secondly because those English accents are not so easy for me to get through. I know it's English, but ... CC would be rubbish (as they say) for this one, so just watch, listen and be there...
This is an hour and a half of real action, with no commentary, or, much, much worse, Lyin' Press BS propaganda.
This riot was in Rotherham. You may recall* that Rotherham was the English town (was? or is?) in which Moslem "grooming" gangs took underage White British girls to be prostitutes for their Moslem fellows. ("It's their culture.") This went on, or has gone, on for a decade and a half or more. The British authorities have been too afraid to do a thing about it and covered it up. By "afraid", I mean both of the Moslems themselves and of being called names for wanting to enforce olde quaint British custom, like men who pimp out underage girls are severely punished.
It took me a while to figure it out, but the building around which the protest/riot takes place, with the police defending it, is a hotel that is housing "migrants", illegal or whatever, doesn't matter to me, or these guys. I've not been in Rotherdam, but I'd venture it's a hundred quid a night to stay here for those not active participants in the Population Replacement Programme. I'm no Socialist, but If you're going to have a Welfare State, it ought to be for YOUR people, not imported, often violent foreigners.
This hour and a half of action was, again, the best thing I've seen in a long time! I was right there with these blokes. When they yelled at the cops asking whose freaking side are they on, I wanted to be yelling, when they threw rocks, I wanted to be throwing rocks, when they started throwing furniture at them, I wanted to be throwing the furniture. Here's the video:
There were no interviews here, so we have no answers to "Is this about the 3 girls stabbed?" or "Is this about the grooming gangs?" Peak Stupidity will speculate though, as we tend to do.
It's about time these Yorkshiremen got the opportunity to rise up against their Regime's Anarcho-Tyranny. The murders by an African in Southport are a good excuse, and the riots elsewhere over this I'm sure triggered this one. However, were you to interview one of these guys and get the real answer - not so easy when one is in the middle of a riot with that adrenaline flowing anger being very focused - what would you learn:
Let me expand on the thoughts that I speculate are the reason for this and future riots: The UK has a UniParty, just as America does. Voters there recently punished one squad of it, and ended up with another, the Prime Minister therefrom being another Globalist Totalitarian POS. The ballot box is NOT working! It's time for something else.
It's not just the one stabbing, and it's not just the Rotherdam Moslem grooming business. It's bigger than that now. These blokes are fighting back the only way they (and I) can see, against the Regime and its policies of destroying the British people.
Peak Stupidity will have more commentary on the UK riots with screenshots (of this one) to come... mixed in with that Curmudeonry stuff, that is.
* Without the ultimate source, VDare, being able to give me 50 stories, I Yandexed it, and got an iSteve post on the 1st results page. I know John Derbyshire would have written something, but even with "John Derbyshire" in the search, I didn't get anything right off.
********************************
[UPDATED 06/19/25:] Sorry, but they've got the video restricted to those who sign in. Apparently, the throwing of stuff through windows and the setting of dumpsters on fire is less suitable for children than say, Drag Queen Story Hour videos.
********************************
Comments (15)
Poison - Every Rose Has Its Thorn
Posted On: Saturday - August 3rd 2024 2:25PM MST
In Topics:   Music
This band name came to me for reasons, today, and I know we haven't featured Poison before here. This '80s band* has a lead singer, Bret Michaels, who looked very much like contemporaneous band Guns & Roses' lead singer Axl Rose. I mean, the bandana, long hair, tattoos (only a couple, '88, '89...it was a different time, you understand...) One of these guys was imitating the other.
Even the band members probably looked like their counterparts. It was the look for bands like that, and I don't know if it was that or the sound that made me thing for a couple of decades that this song, Every Rose Has Its Thorn was by Guns &, excuse me, G&R. It's a ballad, but it's still got a good sound you'd expect from "this kind" of band.
I didn't need to see about the whole guy naked, but the hot bikini-underwear-clad chick makes up for it. She appears for a couple of seconds twice. I think the deal was to get viewers to watch/listen to the whole thing, expecting another look at black-bikini-underwear woman.
Yep, good music, good music videos and hot chicks (you try) were in my mind back 35 years ago, not all the discouraging stuff you've read here lately. I wish the country had paid attention a few decades early.
On that note, let say that we'll just have to get into the Curmudgeonry next week, as I've got too many to pass up. I hope I can make them entertaining at least. These do fit in well with our site Mission Statement, but so does one more about the Genderbender nonsense. Then, maybe we'll get to that last post on the Deep State. Others will pop up.
Thanks for reading and commenting. Happy Sunday to all!
* They played through the '90s and beyond, but that was no longer my time to listen.
Comments (8)
England Burning: Enough is Enough!
Posted On: Saturday - August 3rd 2024 9:02AM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Globalists  Anarcho-tyranny  World Political Stupidity  People's Revolt
It was proving to be too long a title, so let me just state the 3 separate points for this post:
1) My corrections in the previous post, leading to...
2) Anarcho-Tyranny: Leeds vs Southport/London/more
3) Straight video without the Lyin' Press
1) Peak Stupidity has our usual "[UPDATE]" note on the last post.
Just to reiterate, this murderer (Rwandan, not Nigerian) was born in the UK, to parents that came from Rwanda during the Million Machete Murder civil war in the 1990s. So, what? The rioters' point doesn't change - in a way it reinforces it. This guy didn't assimilate.
The kids* who weren't killed were in "critical" rather than "serious" condition when I read it, which is worse. Some may yet die. I hope they don't and won't live the rest of their lives debilitated.
I picked up somehow that Leeds had another riot of THIS sort, White people having had enough with the destructive changes forced on the UK. No, the Leeds riots had been by Moslems upset by the Child Protective Services having taken kids away from their family...
2) No, the rioters (I had to use CC only) were comparing the Leeds riots to theirs, with the term Anarcho-Tyranny not used. I'll use it, but "Two-Tier" is the term I heard and read a number to times in the videos. Not to get too far off track, but let me point you to this couple of weeks old article on that happening. The CPS office took the 4 children from their extended family members taking care of them(?), and massive rioting ensued.
I'm no fan of the CPS either. OTOH, I have no idea what exactly the problem was with the treatment of the children. However, let's imagine we are ACTUAL Brits and read the following from the article:
Leeds Children’s Services also explained they had been told by a third party the family members were going to take them to Romania.OK, so they were some kind of vague class of "migrants", and the family was going to take them out of the UK. What's wrong with that?! Save the taxpayers' money on the CPS, and get them out, where they won't be a burden and replace Brits in the future. It's a WIN/WIN! No, but the CPS was worried that they wouldn't be able to return. MADNESS! [/BotRK]
As all of the children are foreign nationals without settled status, it could be difficult for them to return to Britain.
Wait, is that the Anarcho-Tyranny? No, that was just massive stupidity. Most** of the Anarcho-Tyranny is in the very headline (explaining why I didn't link with it):v Four children returned to extended family after Leeds riots. You see? When Moslems riot, the Regime gives in. The family in question, along with future Moslems that may (probably not anymore) deal with CPS got what they wanted.
As White British people who want their country back riot, we all know that the police will not relent, and the Regime will not give in. Yeah, right, can you imagine "OK, we feel your pain. An immigration moratorium will be started next week along with a deportation program."? I knew you couldn't.
3) A good video showing the scenes in London appears below, which was embedded on ZeroHedge in UK Prime Minister Calls For Crackdown On Angry Brits - Violent Migrants Get A Pass.
I had previously looked through more of the Lyin' Press ones to make further points about the lies and hatred of the British people, but rather than that, this one has no Lyin' Press Orwellian corrections of the views of the British rioters. There's just the one guy, Wesley Winter (not a true Brit either, obviously) who is small media reporter. He asked folks in the crowd questions and commented on the video footage, for a whole hour.
My commentary first***: I'm glad he's doing this kind of reporting, but Mr. Winter's commentary is pretty lame. "There a bunch of police over there." (Yeah, we see that.) "They're launching stuff at the police." (Yeah, we see that.) "These people are angry because ...". He must have said that 20 times. Oh, and "The noise is crazy." (It's like, a big crowd of people, so, yeah...)
His questioning of the rioters was decent, but he had a couple of points he seemed to want to push. 1) "Do you see there are more police here than at Leeds?" They respond yes, but this reporter seems to want to drill that in over and over. 2) He's on the other side wrt the real gist of the rioting. "It's about the little girls killed, right?" Some answer yes, and some give him more of the overall big picture. It's not just about this particular violent act against these White British children. It seemed that reporter Wesley Winter wanted to clarify himself that it most certainly was.
England Burning: Enough is Enough.
Notice a few things. Everyone is angry, and rightly so. However, even in that anger there are a number of cucks seen - or just so beaten down from years of PC that they can't get themselves to say more. "No, it's not about race or color." Others are straight honest. I hope their courage and honesty are contagious. It can work like that, but I guess it depends on whether the cucked are careful with words due to fear, or due to ingrained PC they just can't shake.
The guy interviewed at 06:15 in does a nice job, but never was explicitly pro-White. (The woman with him or near him is extremely annoying.). An example of one of the cucked is at 26 minutes in, while right at 29 minutes we see a nice rant for 45 seconds.
This large woman starting at the 30:06 mark did a nice job explaining the Anarcho-Tyranny, excuse me, Two-Tier policing.
It was great just to be ABLE TO watch footage of this rioting without the Lyin' Press's pro-Regime, anti-White Orwellian messaging overwhelming it all.
* Adults too were injured.
** Another part, as heard many times from rioters in various videos - "What about Leeds?" - is that the police didn't have he presence they have now when the big programs of the Regime itself are being threatened. Perhaps, the Bobbies are more scared of the Moslems than they are of even the strongest of the Brits. For probably both reasons, rather than escalate things, in Leeds they would stand down or run away, from what I've read. That sounds like the Summer of George over here.
*** As of this writing, I've not watched the 2nd half.
Comments (6)
The Riots in Britain: Lyin' Press version
Posted On: Friday - August 2nd 2024 8:23PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Media Stupidity  Orwellian Stupidity  Anarcho-tyranny  World Political Stupidity
I've always felt that Western* Europeans in recent history were too proud of themselves as racially virtuous people to learn anything from America the EASY way. This comes from my talking to some of them in the 1980s and later. They could have learned the easy way by touring Memphis, Tennessee - the FULL tour - or inner city Detroit, for a few weeks.
They decided to learn it all the HARD way. I'm probably being hard on them, as that's kind of general. I'm sure there were plenty of Brits, for example, who've always been against immigration of non-Whites to their islands. I've heard of this one guy named Enoch Powell...
The UK - slightly different from Great Britain, I know - is only 81% White now. Even as late as 1980, BTW, Britain was 96% White, as per wiki. They didn't care to (why bother?) take this data much early, but if you read or talk to people who lived there in the '50s and '60s, many would not have ever met a non-White person. It was probably at 99.9x% White.
Most of the people, as is the case here, have had no choice in the matter. During this recent period, along with this invasion, and probably well related to it, the place has turned into an Orwellian Police State. Eric Blair, aka, George Orwell, even got the setting right - Oceania. Maybe they'll change the name soon and memory-hole the whole "UK", "Britain", "England" stuff - it's so hard to keep straight, right?
Something else kinda related to the above is that the UK is not such a civil and peaceful place anymore. The latest news about that is that a Nigerian stabbed a dozen people or so, killing 3 little White girls and seriously injuring a half dozen others, on the streets of a city called Southport, on the west coast in northern England, about 15 miles up the coast from the famous Liverpool.
Before I move on, let me mention those injured. The news says a number of them were "critically" injured. That does means they may or may not eventually be whole people again. Some of these other children may have cuts that require gut surgery, requiring colostomy bags, maybe injuries that cause pain throughout the rest of their lives, who knows. Not being dead is on thing. As a parent, imagine a child with an injury that will affect him the rest of his life. Some may be so horrendous that you may wonder if it'd have been better off the other way.
Let's think on that, and move on to the reaction of the people of Britain to this, yet another, act of violence on their White people. There've been riots there in Southport. The people know what this is about - they don't even have to go through the news stories trying to pick out clues on "what kind of person would do this?"
Rather than be let to vent their anger, as Black! people always are during their riots, Anarcho-Tyranny requires the police to come down hard on the White people. (That is, if they have the man- and woman- power in place.)
In England, the Anarcho-Tyranny shows up different treatment for Palestinian protestors vs. the actual Brits. Even when it's real Brits for Palestine, the protests don't threaten the Globalist Establishment, so they're A-OK. The problem for the UK authorities is that these White people out in the streets know what the problem is. They know what needs to be done to prevent these horrible acts from happening again... or at least from INCREASINGLY happening. The people are acting like NATIONALISTS or something! That's very scary to those in power.
The UK Lyin' Press is an arm of the authorities, just as it is here. They've been trying to get across to the rioters and sympathizers that you can't go assuming mass killers are Moslems. No, he wasn't an Englishman, but it turns out that the stabber was a Welshman name of Axel Rudakabana. (Not the kind of Welch names I'd seen on the signs there.) No, this guy is NOT a Moslem, so quit rioting and complaining. He's a Welshman, albeit from Rwanda.
One Judge Menary down in Liverpool allowed the 17 y/o's name to be released because he was within a week or so of being 18, but also (per the 1st video below)...
Continuing to prevent the full reporting has the disadvantage of allowing others to spread misinformation, in a vacuum.Ya see, the people have misinformation about violence from the Moslem "migrants", so I suppose now that they know he's a Rwandan "migrant", born of Rwanda "migrants", actually, they should just stand down and go home. Does that change these angry rioters' point one bit, though? No, it doesn't.
Here's a sample of UK news reporting. You'll notice they've studied a few tactics seen before in American Lyin' Press reporting.
That's the Travon Martin baby picture move. Hey, we invented that move here, like 12 years ago, buddy! They show the guy at what 8 years, 10 years old, maybe. The mass murderer could be 220 pound and in shape at this point. We don't know. (How are we gonna know?)
If you've got the stomach for it, take the 10 minutes to watch the pure evil of the Lyin' Press - UK Bureau - as they make the story of one into mistaken ethnic identity. (This one started playing after the above one finished.)
I'm going to have to post more on these riots, both there in Southport**, and now in London. This is very heartening stuff to see. People have had enough, finally!
And lastly, 3 cheers for gun control in Great Britain. When guns are outlawed, only outlaw evil violent foreign invaders may have guns, or they'll just have "bladed knives".
* We can't speak for the Eastern Euros, as most of the time in question, they were locked in, with no good sources of outside news and no source of non-White immigrants too - the cons and pros of being oppressed by Communism for 40 years, I suppose...
** Mercyside (as in by the Mercy River), I think - man, that could be in any one of a dozen British invasion pops songs from 60 years ago. Now there's an invasion I don't mind so much.
*********************************
[UPDATE 08/03:] Fixed a few items (thanks, Mr. Hail, for the one), as I'd written this after watching videos with CC on - not able to get sound - and got some details I thought were right from context wrong.
*********************************
Comments (5)
Kameleon makes history?
Posted On: Friday - August 2nd 2024 6:44PM MST
In Topics:   Elections '16 - '24  Media Stupidity  Karmakarma Kameleon

How's that? I wondered, but I was not going to give the yahoo servers the satisfaction of another page view.* I had to think back to Presidential election history. A women already ran for VP long ago. Oh, yeah, but this lady is running for Pres. Wait, so did the Hildabeast. Oh, oh, it's the Black! thing. She's all that and always a women to (not) me.
History has been set by a black woman running, ahhh, that's their deal. Yeah, but then she's something like 1/4 black. Is it the 1st Indian candidate ever, but also female Indian to boot? What are they trying to say? (As little as I care, I'll never know.) I don't buy the "making history" thing, and that's why it piqued my curiosity. Yahoo is going in the direction of obscure baseball records here. "This is the 1st time a Cuban baseball player has gotten 2 homeruns on a Tuesday... at Wrigley."
Hopefully no more records of any sort will broken by this weird silly broad, unless she gets on an anti-(c)rap kick.
* As usual, I was on the home page just plugging in "Peak Stupidity" into the search feature. Yes, I DO know my own URL by heart. ;-}
Comments (8)
Tucker/iSteve interview Transcript - Final Commentary and Comments
Posted On: Thursday - August 1st 2024 6:58PM MST
In Topics:   Pundits

Although it's quicker reading, I hope many of you had a chance to watch the full Tucker Carlson interview of Steve Sailer. It was very enjoyable. I spent the time to paste in the somewhat flawed* transcript into the 8 posts below: 1st 15 minutes - - 2nd 15 minutes - - 3rd 15 minutes - - 4th 15 minutes - - 5th 15 minutes - - 6th 15 minutes - - 7th 15 minutes and 8th (last) 15 minutes.
I'm writing this for those who've read it. I have one point on the last minute or so that goes with a general disagreement of the basic view of Stupid v Evil of Mr. Sailer's. That'll be later with a reference to his book and material I've read on his new site too.
Just a few things, then:
Though much of what Mr. Sailer told Tucker Carlson here is what we "fans" have heard in various way in hundreds of posts (+ his book, for me at least), it's still very satisfying to hear, that is, knowing a pretty big audience has heard this too. I know iSteve isn't being completely serious saying he's "the most reasonable man in America", but he does seem to have gotten a big head recently. There's plenty of people who already know much of what he says. Perhaps it's that they don't know how to put things this well. iSteve's great terminology or nomenclature for all the stupidity (evil) helps him link the various parts. He also is good in relating his stats to things we see in our own lives in a down home style.
Most of the interview is like this. I think Tucker enjoyed it. Let me then just point out a couple of things that bugged me (besides that major one). These aren't in order of time.
1) This goes along with the "big head" thing. Mr. Sailer believes that all his work hasn't been used by others because they can't reveal they know, "follow", or whatever him. No, they can't reveal that. However, these people could write much of the same out of their own work (though they couldn't put it together as he does), whether done independently or "independently" and not cite him. They don't do that because they are either Woke themselves or scared of the Woke for the sake of their careers. So, it's not quite the way he puts it.
2) Some of the few things I've tried to tell him in his blog's comments regarding areas I know a lot about he still didn't make an effort to get. One of them has to do with that talk about Air Traffic Control. The Kung Flu LOCKDOWNs did indeed play a big part in slowing the training, hence hiring. I know people... Well, that's small, and he really doesn't want to bring up the Covid-one-niner. But Tucker couldn't help himself and did anyway, haha.
Also no we don't have better pilots now. They've got less real-world experience on average, actually. However, a lot of other things have improved, such as the use of real aircraft flight data to make changes to training.
3) Mr. Sailer has never really liked Trump at all. I'm sure he appreciated the work that Trump DID do on the immigration invasion. He didn't cover that much, likely because the rest of VDare did. On Trump, though, I don't know if Mr. Sailer just can't stand the buffoonery or he's snobbish. No, not all the good guys are erudite, quiet, civil fellows like you and Jared Taylor.
I agree with him on DeSantis being a more capable guy in office, as the readers here may know. He's right that the persecution of Trump had the effect of putting him farther into the lead.
4) He talked about Trump taking the GOP "downscale intellectually". Well, from reading of the recent RNC, I see that point. This interview was well before the convention, but being prescient is a good thing. However, I read too much about "Can the Republicans keep some competent, higher brow people around?" That's not always what it takes. You make do with who you've got. I would bet good money that Steve Sailer doesn't like Matt Gaetz or MTG. That's because they get loud and try to actually DO SOMETHING (not easy when you're a drop in a 454 count bucket). They are not nice and quiet and civil sometimes.
5) Also, there are too many conspiracy theorists on the right, he states. Yeah, you've got some out-there stuff they occasionally say that is plain wrong. They are quite right about the big things though. Steve Sailer just won't believe there are evil people around though. That's that other post ...
As I just perused the transcript, I see how much great stuff there is though, so don't take a few minor criticisms as saying this guy's full of it or something. He's also really honest. I'm surprised he brought up possible or likely cheating on standardized tests by Asians** to this big audience. His snark is most excellent when he's right:
Tucker [01:36:59] Or could there be other reasons? [For quickly rising Asian SAT scores]Heh!
Steve Sailer [01:37:00] Yeah. Could could it be, you know.
Steve Sailer [01:37:02] I mean, we know there's a lot of cheating in Asia itself.
Steve Sailer [01:37:05] On the S.A.T.. We don't.
Tucker [01:37:08] Think people bring their bad habits when they come here, do you?
Steve Sailer [01:37:12] Yeah. I mean.
Steve Sailer [01:37:13] I mean, nobody can possibly communicate across the Pacific Ocean. It's thousands of miles wide. How could anybody text message what was on the test?
That's a good place to leave it. I hope you all will put in plenty of comments on what you think about this interview over the next few days. I'll be kind of busy until Saturday. Good evening!
PS: I'm not sure if I ever pasted in the actual title of the interview, per TC. It's Steve Sailer: BLM, Karens, Donald Trump, and What Democrats Don’t Want You to Know about DEI. He talked about a lot more than that.
* It's missing 2 pieces of discussion that matter near the end - one I did myself, and the other I'll do soon - meaning I can't trust that it's all there otherwise. Also, though, it being the best a computer could do, you have to read the repetition, run-on sentences, changes of direction, (minor) interruptions, etc.
** I include the Indians here too, so I didn't write "Oriental". I just =know much more about the latter. Oh, and Steve even said "Oriental". I think I drilled that into him. It's NOT a slur! Nice going, there, iSteve!
Comments (10)
Site notes
Posted On: Thursday - August 1st 2024 8:24AM MST
In Topics:   Websites
If you were checking out the site last evening, or trying to, you may have seen some weirdness. (Yes, something like what we see out of a GOP Presidential candidate.) It was a mess.
Because Notepad is very simple (what I like about it!) I had no word count of the Tucker/iSteve interview. I pasted it in for 1 post on this site, then 2, then 4, 6, and finally 8 parts, to get it to fit on the one page without a scrollbar. That was on a Windows machine, and I know this works differently on others. I was messing around with the various stages of post-part-counts, editing 2 at a time online, etc., so my apologies for the confusion. What's also a shame it that the rest of the stuff is way down the page now.
However, I changed the posts/page to 20 and greatly elongated the page. That'd be fine if this site ran normally, but it doesn't. One shouldn't have to do all the scrolling to spots that should be automatically at the top. I got back into the software to do 2 minor things.* By "back into", I mean reading through the fairly short files of .php code. It's been probably 5 years since I've looked at this stuff, but I remember a lot, and I had put in comments. (Part of that was that I'd started with someone else's free stuff, and I had to figure it out.)
If I myself can't stand the way this software works at times**, I sure you readers feel the same. It's time to do something. The problem is I have to change big stuff in order to change the small stuff (AND, of course, to add decent features, which is just as important). That's because the very simple - early/mid-'90s HTML - thing of putting anchor tags just doesn't work with this guy's way of doing things. I've spend many hours trying to figure it out.
Here's the deal. Along with comments, the posts are in the database too. It's a simple one with a handful of tables. I need to get the existing posts into "flat" (simple HTML with no programming code***) files (pretty easy), and then change the programming so that new posts become the same. This will speed up the site, but the main thing is it will allow me to make my own changes for new features that should have been here from the beginning without any confusion.
That stuff yesterday has me motivated. The first thing that must happen is that I get my "sandbox" in order. That's a computer geek term for all the components on my own machine that allow me to test everything OFF-LINE. I am hopeful, but I haven't checked all that in those same 5 years or so.
About the 8-part interview transcript: Please, let's just wait on any on-topic comments for a post I'll put up later today with my comments on it. I don't know, it'd be nicer to have my commentary and some comments under each part, but we'll go this way - you can refer to the 8 posts. In the last 14 (really 13) minutes, there is that addition that I made. I may still go back and type in the minute or two (quite a lot, really) that I found missing. I'll make sure you readers know of the change.
* The other, besides making the page longer, was adding those forward/back/home options to the top of the page. Again, the scrolling, man, the scrolling ..
** I do not disparage the creator of it. He had made it as a plug in, and for a much smaller level of use.
*** HTML is just formatting code. HyperText Mark-up Language. By George, I think she's got it!
Comments (5)
Tucker/iSteve interview Transcript - 8th (last) 15 minutes
Posted On: Wednesday - July 31st 2024 6:17PM MST
In Topics:  NONE
(Continued from 1st 15 minutes - - 2nd 15 minutes - - 3rd 15 minutes - - 4th 15 minutes - - 5th 15 minutes - - 6th 15 minutes and 7th 15 minutes.)
**************************************
Tucker [01:43:30] Is there a point? I mean, I'm asking this question because South Africa, you know, tried this in the country is just continuously degraded for, well, 30 years this year and to the point where there's no electricity in parts at times, and the murder rate is among the highest in the world, the rape rate is the highest in the world. And but there's no deceleration that I can tell from afar, thousands of miles away. But I'm watching and it's like, no, there's no second guessing. It's just like going to ride it right back to the Stone age. Pretend it was never an advanced society in our country, which is different from South Africa in a lot of ways. Will there be a point, like when the planes do crash and the air traffic controllers are just high, or too dumb, or distract or don't care, to keep the points from crashing? Will there be a public demand like, no, no, no, let's just hire by ability from now on?
Steve Sailer [01:45:31] Of it is we just we got really good pilots these days, in part because congressmen worry about stuff like that. Now are we?
Steve Sailer [01:45:41] You know. But on the other hand, the.
Steve Sailer [01:45:44] Obama administration came along and basically sabotaged the, system for hiring, air traffic controllers. And, Congress has set up a pretty good system for finding good people in the 90s.
Steve Sailer [01:46:01] But, yeah.
Steve Sailer [01:46:02] It turned out to be. It's like white men really like air traffic. They really like airplanes.
Steve Sailer [01:46:07] It's like, you.
Steve Sailer [01:46:08] Know, what is what is a what have white men ever done with airplanes since the Wright brothers?
Steve Sailer [01:46:14] So there there. So what happens is then you get fewer people still make it make it through the training. So the training is been kept pretty legitimate. So you flunk out more people, which then means. That you're. You're under the number of air traffic controllers you expected. So you you're making them work really long hours, and they're getting more and more tired on the job, and they're making mistakes and stuff like that. And it tracks back to the Obama administration's DUI program for for air traffic controllers. Can we avoid that? Yeah, we we can. We just got to talk about it. And we just can't just shut down discussion by saying, are you saying that. A stereotype that on average, blacks wouldn't make as good air traffic controllers as whites? And the answer is yeah, yeah, I'm saying that. So you expect to have a few percentage passing the test and we can live with it.
Steve Sailer [01:47:27] We we live with it every day in sports that there are racial differences and performance on average. And nobody cares that much.
Steve Sailer [01:47:37] And you know, God bless them.
Steve Sailer [01:47:40] We love sports. So yeah, there are there is hope for the country that we can go back..
--------------------------------------
Steve Sailer [01:47:45] ... and have a philosphy for things, you know, like jet travel that were ... we consider as important as the NFL, and therefore we can't have racial quotas getting in the way. That doesn't seem out of ... outlandish.
--------------------------------------
Tucker [01:48:03] No it doesn't. So last question, and I'm sure began with this, but maybe you've. I just want to push a little more. Why do you think that you're able to have these conversations? And when you travel the country talking about your book, you're not attacked. And, you know, speaking of good signs. Do you take that as a good sign that the country's becoming, open?
Missing a whole bunch here from both Tucker and Steve, dang it, for over a minute!
Steve Sailer [01:48:31] Well, yeah. Somebody suggested to me, it's like, well, Steve, you're in Ideas that I've been propounding for 30 years and people out there going the other saylor's ideas, they make sense. He's like, the most reasonable guy in America. Maybe, you know, we've gone through a watershed, and we're beyond the meaning of. The racial reckoning and the Great Awakening. Knock on wood. I hope so.
Tucker [01:50:15] Or for this period, ten years from now, is described as the dark ages where Steve Saylor was actually in public. Yeah. I mean, face uncovered.
Steve Sailer [01:50:27] I mean, what do you think I mean? All right, let me ask you why. Why me in particular? But I but I.
Steve Sailer [01:50:37] Became sort of the Lord Voldemort, whose name cannot be, cannot be mentioned.
Steve Sailer [01:50:43] When I'm just, you know, this kind of, to.
Steve Sailer [01:50:47] My mind, this very kind of public spirited.
Steve Sailer [01:50:51] Benevolent guy.
Steve Sailer [01:50:53] Who can see both sides of various problems.
Tucker [01:50:55] Well, I've always thought that. I've always thought that you were particularly threatening because you're so obviously moderate by temperament. You're just clearly not a hater. You can smell that on people instantly. You're very reasonable, and you use the language that the left would like to keep for itself, like of science, of reason, of data. Yeah. And and you actually argue from that basis and they'd like a monopoly on that. And so there's something really threatening about a guy who's like, no, actually no. Here the numbers. And doesn't raise his voice. That's way more threatening than some guy who's jumping up and down on cable news or, you know, sending crazy tweets all day long. That person is, you know, his potential audience is much smaller than yours. Your potential audience is like, you know, sort of any open minded person who'd like to solve a problem. That's always been my thought.
Steve Sailer [01:51:53] Yeah, yeah, I hope so. But yeah, I, yeah, it's it's it's been, you.
Tucker [01:52:05] Did it bother you when they called you a Nazi or white supremacist or when they threw these slurs at you first?
Steve Sailer [01:53:17] No. My last memories of my father before he died at 95 was, Pat sent me one of his new books, and he'd gone through and put post-it notes on every page where he quoted me or made reference to some concept of mine. So I showed it to my dad, and he read it, he looked through it all the. Things that Pat had with his own hand and said. All the nice things he'd said about me and was like, well. You're this is. Great. And you know, that was like the last thing or the last interaction before he died. And then I think Pat Buchanan for. And a lot. Of people have good stories about Pat Buchanan.
Tucker [01:53:58] What a, what a nice man.
Steve Sailer [01:53:59] Yes, absolutely. You know.
Tucker [01:54:03] So, I mean, I guess it could kind of go either way. It depends on who's writing the history. I mean, I bet I'd bet money that, you know, Pat Buchanan is described in 50 years from. There's not a single living person who actually knew him, you know, some sort of monster or hate or something like that, wouldn't you think?
Steve Sailer [01:54:21] Yeah. I mean. I mean, they say.
Steve Sailer [01:54:25] Histories were written by the winners. My impression is more history is written by historians who got paid by one side or the other, not necessarily the winners to write the history. So, you know, for 100 years after the Civil War in the United States, the South, which was mostly pretty broke, but they could still scrape together enough money to pay historians to write the story of the Lost Cause.
Steve Sailer [01:55:14] We'll have different heroes all of a sudden. You know, that's maybe you and you and me will come out looking pretty good business.
Tucker [01:55:23] Well, I have trouble believing that, but I admire you. Steve, so thank you very much.
Steve Sailer [01:55:31] Tucker, Thanks.
**************************************
Comments (2)
Tucker/iSteve interview Transcript - 7th 15 minutes
Posted On: Wednesday - July 31st 2024 6:09PM MST
In Topics:  NONE
(Continued from 1st 15 minutes - - 2nd 15 minutes - - 3rd 15 minutes - - 4th 15 minutes - - 5th 15 minutes and 6th 15 minutes .)
We're a little shy on this one, at more like 13 1/2 minutes, but we like to find good cut-off points.
**************************************
Tucker [01:30:15] In Argentina, the whitest country in the world. Yeah.
Steve Sailer [01:30:18] And it's so stupid. But it's also happening at the.
Steve Sailer [01:30:23] The government.
Steve Sailer [01:30:23] Level or the census.
Steve Sailer [01:30:25] And so forth for. So the Biden administration just recently announced.
Steve Sailer [01:30:30] That.
Steve Sailer [01:30:31] They're allowing.
Steve Sailer [01:30:34] Middle.
Steve Sailer [01:30:34] Easterners and North Africans to know lot to have their own racial category.
Steve Sailer [01:30:40] Many so that they don't have the.
Steve Sailer [01:30:44] The unprofitable, ignominious fate of having to check white or Caucasian.
Steve Sailer [01:30:52] And this this.
Steve Sailer [01:30:53] Has a long tradition in the United States. If you go back to, in the 1970s, South Asians were, classified as white, but that, really annoyed the South Asian businessmen.
Steve Sailer [01:31:07] They because.
Steve Sailer [01:31:08] East Asian businessmen were getting all sorts of, low interest loans from the SBA as a minority. They were.
Steve Sailer [01:31:15] Getting.
Steve Sailer [01:31:17] Contracting preferences on government deals. And the South Asians said, well, hey, we just got off the airplane. We should be getting those deals, too. And so the South Asian organizations got themselves declared.
Steve Sailer [01:31:33] To be.
Steve Sailer [01:31:33] Asian and grouped in with the East, with the Orientals and form the new Asian group so they could get these, these, good deals from the government that white people.
Steve Sailer [01:31:42] Are not entitled to. And, so that was.
Steve Sailer [01:31:46] That was an early example of flight from white. You see it with, the Hispanics increasingly, originally when the Hispanic category was created, it was set up so Hispanics could get good deals from the government and get good, affirmative action benefits, but without actually declaring themselves to be racially white, because a lot of them were.
Steve Sailer [01:32:12] Kind of took pride in their Spanish heritage and so.
Tucker [01:32:19] There's an awful lot of that in Latin America.
Steve Sailer [01:32:22] So some increased, so they could set up a separate ethnicity for Hispanics so you could get all the affirmative action benefits without actually, admitting your shame.
Steve Sailer [01:32:35] Of being white.
Steve Sailer [01:32:37] But enough time has gone by that.
Steve Sailer [01:32:39] You know.
Steve Sailer [01:32:40] Only your. You know, your Fuentes types anymore are, like, really publicly, white racist from Latin America.
Steve Sailer [01:32:50] And, and now it's.
Steve Sailer [01:32:53] More prestigious to declare yourself racially. I'm Hispanic, even though nobody's exactly sure what that means.
Steve Sailer [01:33:00] What?
Tucker [01:33:01] What does it mean? I'm confused too, because it would that include Brazil, which is, of course, a different language. It's not right and a different colonial power. And but of course, it's a multiracial country, heavily black country as a, as as Cuba, which is Spanish. But I mean, it's like I don't understand what what does the word mean?
Steve Sailer [01:33:23] Yes. Is is.
Steve Sailer [01:33:25] Brazil? Are Brazilians and Portuguese included in Hispanics, or are they.
Steve Sailer [01:33:29] Lucille, Lucy.
Steve Sailer [01:33:31] Titanic's?
Steve Sailer [01:33:32] And.
Steve Sailer [01:33:34] According to a book I read by David Bernstein, categorized, I believe it's called. Law Professor, he said that.
Steve Sailer [01:33:45] Most of the.
Steve Sailer [01:33:46] Federal government will not give you a break on federal contracting if you, if you put down your Brazilian except the Department of Transportation, they'll they'll give you racial preferences for bidding.
Steve Sailer [01:34:00] On a.
Steve Sailer [01:34:01] Highway overpass or something like that. If you're Brazilian, they'll they'll include them in. But he has Hispanics.
Steve Sailer [01:34:07] So it's I mean, we live we live in a society.
Steve Sailer [01:34:13] That's increasingly mixed in terms of ancestry. So we have more and more people coming out who were a quarter this and a quarter of that, and there's lots of money on the table. And as long as you're not, as long as you don't declare yourself white, you've got all sorts of opportunities to to get freebie.
Tucker [01:34:33] I wonder how long this can go on though, before this blows up the country. I mean, is there any chance of getting back to an it a race blind posture? Officially by the by the federal government? I mean, you can have whatever opinions you want on race. I mean, but the government, which represents everybody has to treat American citizens equally as citizens. Is there any hope for that?
Steve Sailer [01:34:54] I mean, the Supreme Court nominally outlawed affirmative.
Steve Sailer [01:34:58] Action in colleges, like, because Harvard was clearly, clearly discriminating against Asians.
Steve Sailer [01:35:28] I mean, the one issue is that the that Asian.
Steve Sailer [01:35:33] Students are pulling away so fast from everybody else in terms of things like SAT scores.
Steve Sailer [01:35:40] That the Asian black, gaps are opening up so widely. .
Steve Sailer [01:35:50] To total colorblind college admissions.
Steve Sailer [01:35:53] At the high end. You end up with. A campus with very, very few blacks qualifying to get in and a huge number of Asians and places like Harvard really worry about whether they might turn out like Yogi Berra's former favorite restaurant that got so popular that nobody goes there anymore. So if if Harvard becomes 56% Asian, are Asians going to consider Harvard cool?
Steve Sailer [01:36:22] Or do.
Steve Sailer [01:36:23] Asians want to go to places that there's a lot of white people.
Steve Sailer [01:36:27] There? You know.
Steve Sailer [01:36:29] Nobody really knows.
Steve Sailer [01:36:30] And. You know what I don't?
Steve Sailer [01:36:34] What I don't know is whether the the Asian, rise, the rise in Asian SAT scores is completely legitimate. And they just really have been getting so much smarter than everybody else in the 21st century that Asian test scores are pulling away from the field, like Secretariat in the 1973 Belmont or.
Steve Sailer [01:36:58] You know.
Tucker [01:36:59] Or could there be other reasons?
Steve Sailer [01:37:00] Yeah. Could could it be, you know.
Steve Sailer [01:37:02] I mean, we know there's a lot of cheating in Asia itself.
Steve Sailer [01:37:05] On the S.A.T.. We don't.
Tucker [01:37:08] Think people bring their bad habits when they come here, do you?
Steve Sailer [01:37:12] Yeah. I mean.
Steve Sailer [01:37:13] I mean, nobody can possibly communicate across the Pacific Ocean. It's thousands of miles wide. How could anybody text message what was on the test?
Steve Sailer [01:37:23] Or, you know.
Steve Sailer [01:37:24] Just the the enormous amount of tiger mother.
Steve Sailer [01:37:28] Prep that.
Steve Sailer [01:37:29] Asians brought with them.
Steve Sailer [01:37:31] From.
Steve Sailer [01:37:32] Their 2000 year old tradition of taking test, become mandarins and and doing enormous amounts of test prep for years.
Steve Sailer [01:37:43] Or is it, is it or it? There's possible technical reasons that. The the people making the SAT have been criticized for one thing or another for discriminating against blacks and Latinos. So they keep doing things like, let's get rid of analogies and that'll be fairer. But it winds up just benefiting the Asians most of all. Why? Oh, it was more of a the when. They had analogies it was it was harder to memorize apparently. And test prep didn't work as well. It took a certain amount of creativity and.
Steve Sailer [01:38:20] Kind of insight.
Steve Sailer [01:38:22] In the brain.
Steve Sailer [01:38:23] And, but.
Steve Sailer [01:38:26] The University of California demanded getting rid of analogies about 20 years ago. So the College Board said, yeah, sure, you're our biggest customer. We'll do what you want. And then things just sort of got worse after that. And.
Tucker [01:38:40] But but there has been a noticeable rise, relative rise in Asian assets. Yes.
Steve Sailer [01:38:46] Huge.
Steve Sailer [01:38:47] Huge since since the year 2000.
Steve Sailer [01:38:50] And I think basic leaps we should have, you know, blue ribbon commission to look into like what's going on exactly with the SAT.
Steve Sailer [01:39:02] You know, I mean, that's that's one reason, that just Covid came. No. Yeah.
Tucker [01:39:07] I'm sorry to say that, but does it still matter? I mean, is that the trend of schools getting rid of the SAT requirement? Is that real or the.
Steve Sailer [01:39:15] Yeah, definitely.
Steve Sailer [01:39:16] It all happened during Covid and the racial reckoning at once. All the colleges went well. They had to they had to cancel some. SAT tests. Because they had to be six feet apart and they couldn't fill in the classroom, etc....And then they all decided that due to the racial reckoning that they weren't going to take SATs and in fact, they're going to make it go totally test optional. And the University of California went further. They banned the applicants from submitting any kind of test score. And then what happened was that the colleges started noticing like, wow, these kids who are showing up that we let in, they're not very bright. They are not going to become computer science graduates of MIT. So MIT was the first one that went, this was stupid. We're going back to demanding. Standardized tests. And now Harvard's jumped on board. Everybody except the University of California at the elite level is moving in that direction. Because it was, it is it is a measure of aptitude, actually. And it yeah, it's it's a very good measure of aptitude. It tells, you know, GPA, high school GPA is a great measure, but it's hard to compare schools. Some schools are hard in grades. Some are easy. Having having this. Having a test and having high school grades, you can put them together and they work pretty well. But because of the racial gaps that have been around forever and these things, it was decided during the racial reckoning. That lead. As Ibram X Kendi has. The only reason some races might be doing better than other races is because. But of course, what it turns out is the Asians are doing much, much better. And because of the evil of whiteness. Because nobody really knows, because nobody's that interested in studying it, because it sounds like the kind of thing you could get canceled for finding out. And.
Steve Sailer [01:41:34] Just.
Steve Sailer [01:41:35] In general, we have a lot of problems that have been swept under the rug in in recent years because they don't fit within the ideologies, the woke ideologies.
Steve Sailer [01:41:48] And just to.
Steve Sailer [01:41:50] Think about them is kind of dangerous sounding.
Tucker [01:41:52] When the plane start crashing.
Steve Sailer [01:41:53] Yeah.
Tucker [01:41:54] Will people start thinking about them?
Steve Sailer [01:41:57] I hope so. I mean, my my father worked for Lockheed from the late 30s to the 1980s, and when one of his planes crashed.
Steve Sailer [01:42:07] He spent two months.
Steve Sailer [01:42:09] On the site.
Steve Sailer [01:42:10] Because when a plane hits.
Steve Sailer [01:42:11] The ground, it spreads out over a mile or so, picking up all the pieces.
Steve Sailer [01:42:16] Of the plane.
Steve Sailer [01:42:18] So they could reassemble it. And there's a jigsaw puzzle and figure out why it crashed, and also picking up pieces of the pilots and the passengers and so.
Steve Sailer [01:42:26] Forth and over. You know.
Steve Sailer [01:42:30] The last hundred years, people who were picked because they were smart and hardworking.
Steve Sailer [01:42:37] Have done a whole.
Steve Sailer [01:42:38] Lot of good at getting airplanes. So they don't. Very much any.
Steve Sailer [01:42:43] More. Now, Boeing.
Steve Sailer [01:42:46] May be working on reversing a lot of that history.
Steve Sailer [01:42:49] But. Yeah. You know, we we got a lot better at.
Steve Sailer [01:42:55] Things.
Steve Sailer [01:42:56] By having systems to.
Steve Sailer [01:42:58] Find people who were competent and work hard. And now the Zeit Geist in the 21st century has been moving away from that. Will we see a lot of planes crashing?
Steve Sailer [01:43:12] God, I hope not. But, you know.
Steve Sailer [01:43:15] We need to to. We need to make 180 degree U-turn in terms of what we value, whether it's competence or diversity.
Steve Sailer [01:43:24] And.
Steve Sailer [01:43:25] You know, lately diversity's been winning.
Steve Sailer [01:43:27] And that's.
Steve Sailer [01:43:28] Going to get people killed.
**************************************
No comments - Click here to start thread