Expansion of post re zerohedge on Trump (Part 1 Trump's interviews)
Posted On: Wednesday - January 18th 2017 6:26PM MST
In Topics:   Commies  Trump  Globalists
As far as Trump's interviews about European relations and trade go - in this post, I think he is headstrong about the trade part to some degree. He writes about duties on imported BMW's, but BMW's built in SC are also exported out of the port at Charleston. As libertarians (AND conservatives) that part of the quotes in zerohedge is not the stuff that gets us excited about this guy.
Here's the good stuff. First:
Trump quote - “[NATO] is obsolete, first because it was designed many, many years ago,” Bild quoted Trump as saying about the trans-Atlantic military alliance. “Secondly, countries aren’t paying what they should” and NATO “didn’t deal with terrorism.”That is right on, and my man Ron Paul could not have set it better, I doubt, though he would have added something like "let's not push Russia into a corner - inviting the Baltics, Georgia, etc. into NATO would be like Russia putting their military into Venezuela, Honduras, Cuba, and freakin' Labrador." Buchanan would be good reading on this - he explains it better than we can here.
While those comments expanded on doubts Trump raised about the North Atlantic Treaty Organization during his campaign, he reserved some of his most dismissive remarks for the EU and Merkel, whose open-border refugee policy he called a “catastrophic mistake.” He further elaborated on this stance in the Times interview, where he said he was willing to lift Russian sanctions in return for a reduction in nuclear weapons.Good honest take of the Commie Merkel. It's so great to hear this stuff from a man who will be heard all over the world.
-- break --
With Merkel facing an unprecedented challenge from the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany as she seeks a fourth term this fall, Trump was asked whether he’d like to see her re-elected. He said he couldn’t say, adding that while he respects Merkel, who’s been in office for 11 years, he doesn’t know her and she has hurt Germany by letting “all these illegals” into the country.
Ya gotta like this guy - so far.
No comments - Click here to start thread
We believe this guy is on our side.
Posted On: Wednesday - January 18th 2017 9:15AM MST
In Topics:   Trump  Globalists  Media Stupidity
PeakStupidity had not been soldered into our local terminals of the internet wires back during the November US elections, so we did not share our varied opinions of Mr. Donald Trump at the time. We do not think he is the saviour of the country, or even the next Ronald Reagan, but he IS looking better all the time.
From the information we receive daily, and especially from Zerohedge.com (one of the most reliable non-fake/gov't news sources around) we really have come to believe that the President-Elect is NOT part of the status-quo establishment. We think that he intends to do good for the American people, and is not working for the globalist elites. It's not that we/he will necessarily get our/his way, but we'd got one man in place to start some changes. Here are some headlines and excerpts:
In Stunning Pair Of Interviews, Trump Slams NATO And EU, Threatens BMW With Tax; Prepared To "Cut Ties" With Merkel
Responses from Merkel, first one, then others in the German Gov't:
Merkel Says She Is Ready To "Fight A Generational Battle" With Trump To Preserve Liberal Democracy And Trade
Germany Slams Trump Criticism: Urges US To "Build Better Cars", Accuses Washington Of Causing Refugee Crisis
The foreigners are not our main enemy to begin with - the Germans can run their mouths, the Chinese can run their factories in 3 shifts, the Moslems can run their goats and women ragged until they submit to Islamic anal sex, and the Australians can put more shrimp on the barbie (wait, we like those guys!) all they want. It's the domestic enemies that have more power to destroy what's left of the US. This next one is about one domestic enemy organization:
In Scathing Attack, CIA Director Brennan Warns Trump To "Watch What He Says"
Great response from Donald Trump to a large portion of the domestic enemies, the lying fake, government media:
Trump Team Responds: May Move White House Briefings To Accommodate More Than Just "Media Elite"
We are so psyched by this stuff - it's phenomenal. I, personally, am glad to "live in interesting times" as I read about at the Happy China Egg Roll Station.
**********************
***********************
Comments (2)
Is there a disturbance in the Stupid?
Posted On: Wednesday - January 18th 2017 8:30AM MST
In Topics:   Genderbenders  Lefty MegaStupidity  Preppers and Prepping
As discussed also earlier in this post, liberals are scared (or pretending to be scared) shitless about impending doom as Zerohedge explained yesterday in an articles headlined Liberal Preppers Are "Tired Of Being Perceived As Wusses" - Stock Up On Guns, Food As Trumpocalypse Looms. PeakStupidity has no problem at all with prepping, as we feel it is a very prudent thing, no matter who has been or will be elected to office in the near future. The financial stupidity build-up has been immense, and is not something that we will legislate our way out of.
As to the left-wing preppers, could it be that there is a lull in The Stupid? If the article is not exaggerating, this could be a hole in the Stupidity as large as a 3-day period of blue skies in Canton, China (some call it "Guangzhou", just like some call corn "maize" - who cares.) It doesn't mean that the stupidity has dissipated globally, it's just a nice respite - time to get out for a walk, charge one's batteries, and drink a coupla beers.
Here:
Colin Waugh bought a shotgun four weeks before November’s election.You don't want to live under tyranny, smart guy this Colin, but uhh, then why'd you vote for the Hildabeast, you stupid fuck?
An unapologetic liberal, he was no fan of firearms. He had never owned one before. But Waugh, a 31-year-old from Independence, Missouri, couldn’t shake his fears of a Donald Trump presidency — and all of the chaos it could bring. He imagined hate crimes and violence waged by extremists emboldened by the Republican nominee’s brash, divisive rhetoric. He pictured state-sanctioned roundups of Muslims, gays, and outspoken critics.
“I kept asking myself, ‘Do I want to live under tyranny?'” said Waugh, who supported Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary and later backed Hillary Clinton. “The answer was absolutely not.”
“We’re tired of being perceived as wusses who won’t survive when shit hits the fan,” said Stacy, a Texas Democrat who recently caught the prepper bug. She spoke with Vocativ on the condition we not publish her last name. “I, for one, don’t like to be thought of as some precious snowflake.”Alright, got no problem with that. How long are you going to keep up the facade of being a Democrat, then?
While most of these liberal preppers say they are readying for any disaster — natural, manmade, or even zombie — a doomsday scenario at the hands of a President Trump continues to be a primary concern.It sounds like Melissa (and the rest of these people) really want the Feral Government to leave them the hell alone! I'M! WITH! HER! But, but ... wait ... it sounds like Melissa and her friends are ... OMG .... like Libertarians or those evil Constitutionalists!
“With the new administration I worry about Nazi-style camps that would include my wife, our twins and myself,” said Melissa Letos, who lives with her family on a five-acre spread near Portland, Oregon. In a recent interview, she said she raises chickens, strives to keep a year’s supply of canned food, and is able to hold her own with a firearm. She and her family plan to a build a bunker-style basement in the future.
They are like Survivalists and shit!
From one (part-time, albeit) prepper to another: Welcome to the party, pal!
The Stupid, a local minimum with positive 2st-order partial-derivatives, is at. [/Mathematics Yoda]
***********************
UPDATED 4 hrs. later:] Just saw this - ""...my wife, our twins and myself,” said Melissa Letos." Wait, what the ...., Oh, I see, so that's how it is in their family. OK, added another topickey to this post - Genderbenders [Rev 1.2, update A.5.12]
***********************
No comments - Click here to start thread
Rush - Spirit of Radio
Posted On: Tuesday - January 17th 2017 6:50PM MST
In Topics:   Music
from Permanent Waves
A good song to wake up to - must be turned up to volume setting 11, or don't bother.
Comments (2)
Following your GPS
Posted On: Tuesday - January 17th 2017 12:39PM MST
In Topics:   Artificial Stupidity
To add to the previous post, if I may, at least out in Red Rock Canyon your GPS won't steer you into a lake (maybe off a cliff though).
We apologize in advance for the terrible quality of this video - the guy just pointed his mobile-phone camera at his TV, I guess - also an idiotic use of the electronics tech. Why not at least feed a line out to the recording device? It's still funny as hell, because it's "The Office" - possibly the funniest show ever.
Apparently, this happens in real life quite a bit.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Not the guy you want with you in the SHTF phase
Posted On: Tuesday - January 17th 2017 12:27PM MST
In Topics:   Preppers and Prepping  Curmudgeonry  Artificial Stupidity
This guy's complete faith in computer wireless technology left him stuck, per Drudge: Tesla driver stranded in the desert after smartphone app failure
The family only got stranded 6 miles from home, but it could have been a lot farther.
A Tesla driver was stranded in Red Rock Canyon near Las Vegas after the car's keyless control app suddenly stopped working.
Interested in testing a feature that lets Tesla owners unlock and power their car using their smartphone, Ryan Negri decided to leave his keys at home when he went for a drive around the canyon yesterday.
The keyless smartphone feature, which is available through Tesla's iPhone and Android apps, lets users remotely monitor and control their Tesla Model S without their key. One of the main features of the app is the ability to "unlock and drive Model S without your key".
Negri was able to do just this - but only to begin with. After getting out of the vehicle to adjust something when he was six miles from home he found himself locked out of the car unable to get back in let alone start it.
"Six miles down the road we decided to turn back, but before that, had to adjust Mozy & Millie's car bed, so I exited the vehicle...bad idea," Negri said on Instagram. "Need to restart the car now, but, with no cell service, my phone can't connect to the car to unlock it."
These people think it will all always work. We foresee a time coming when all this mostly won't work, at least for some time, until real engineers and technical people, not computer geeks, get to work on it.
Another thing is the way people want to record all their damn miserable lives now: "Negris said on Instagram - 'Need to restart ... blah, blah'." How about just get to work or take charge of the situation? Quit recording your stupidity for all to view later on your electronics that are not at all helpful at the time. People like this will record their own demises, like that Tim Treadwell with the bears. Let me tell you, bears have got no respect for "technology", OK - they are not impressed by it. Anyway, I can look forward to seeing some youtube videos in the future:
"Man records himself as he is being struck and fried by lighting at the golf course - did not go into clubhouse, as he was too busy tweeting at the time, captures once-in-a-lifetime lightning strike photo."
"Man records his own failed brain surgery operation, using new mynuerosurgery app - dies on table, but captures entire operation and funeral using new high-cap lithium battery packs (click here to shop now for battery packs)(click here to shop for amazon i-caskets)"
Comments (2)
More on Ann Barnhardt
Posted On: Tuesday - January 17th 2017 9:09AM MST
In Topics:   Websites  Pundits
We mentioned Miss Ann Barnhardt at the bottom of this post about Pope Francis. She has had a lot to say about the guy.
Miss Barnhardt is what you might call a "piece of work". That's usually said in a disparaging way, but I really don't quite mean that about her. I ran into this character (see, "character" is a nicer word, but not strong enough for this woman) on the web more than 5 years back after watching this video of Ann reading passages from the Koran to demonstrate some of the true meaning of Islam. She does not mince a lot of words, and burns the offending passages, which is her and any American's right to do. It's a great video.
You may want to skip 2:20 to 6:20. The fun starts at 6:20.
"Raw bacon makes the best Koran bookmarks." Hahaha, now that's just funny there - I don't care who ya are. (Oh, I mean, unless you're the grand muffti top goat-fuckler of East Dearbornistan ...)
This lady rocks! Her treatment of Miss Lindsey Graham (Traitor-SC) is great too, and the use of the word "Jackass" is nice - that word has not been in widespread use for many years, and PeakStupidity believes the time has long passed to bring this semi-cussword back into the forefront of the cuss-cabulary.
Miss Barnhardt's website was originally about her cattle futures/financial stuff out of Colorado, which was the business she had been in before the bank bailouts. She has more character than most American men to leave this business behind on principle (admittedly, easier for a woman, as a man may have to hold off on principles to take care of family.) The site turned into a mostly religious but part political site after, I assume her slight fame due to the video shown above.
The part where we tend to differ is in her extreme religious views. It's not her hard-core Catholicism itself - I admire someone with her personality, so it's not that. Miss Barnhardt's views on keeping a serious amount of Islam out of this county are correct, so it's not that either. Although she does rightfully malign a neo-con warmonger with the "Invade-the-world, invite-the-world"* strategy stupidity, she does not seem to understand the problem with the "invade-the-world" part. In fact, I quit reading her website regularly only after she revealed her dislike of Ron Paul. (She dislikes a lot of people, but we could say the same for ourselves at PeakStupidity.)
How about we leave these people to wallow in their own deep, deep, stupidity in their part of the world? Just leave them alone. More about this "invade-the-world, invite-the-world" stupidity of the American elites in a later post, but I just don't think Miss Barnhardt gets the problem with the first half of it.
Lastly wrt Ann Barnhardt, again about her religious views. She thinks worse of this Commie Pope Francis than even PeakStupidity does. Good stuff. However, she also thinks all Protestants are going straight to hell (yes, without passing go or collecting our 200 monopoly dollars). Her religious views are pretty extreme. She knows so much history of the Catholic church and believes very strongly as a Catholic. We can't fault that; we find nothing wrong with extreme views of people who aren't in a position of power to exert control of other people via these views. She is not. It's just that reading her website gets pretty tedious if you do not agree with her 100%. Believe me, I would write her that if she had access to her website via commenting. Again, she had a problem with Ron Paul, and that was enough for me re Ann Barnhardt.
*This phrase was originated by VDare.com, and probably came from Mr. Steve Sailer, though possibly from VDare strongman ;-}, Mr. Peter Brimelow.
No comments - Click here to start thread
"Hungary set to turn screws on Soros-backed NGOs" and GOOD ON 'EM!
Posted On: Tuesday - January 17th 2017 8:27AM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Globalists  Media Stupidity
I admire the Hungarian, "strongman Prime Minister Viktor Orban" as much as President-Elect Trump, now that Yahoo mentions him (zerohedge and VDare mention this guy some too, but in a good way). BTW, is "strongman Prime Mimister" the complete title of Orban's office? You don't hear Obama called a "strongman" though he violated the constitution daily. I'm starting to think that in the Western world, according to gov-media, a strongman" is someone with certain political views only, who, if he doesn't rent an apartment, must live in a "compound". Of course, it's hard for us to imagine this AA-hire, effeminate President-Eject Øb☭ma as anything but the "weak-man in the white hut".
We want to add also that this story is in Yahoo News, not someplace to read a whole lot of truth, but it was linked to on Drudge.
In fact, just like in yesterday's post regarding a USA Today headline, the article, with it's embedded globalist opinions, just reinforces the opposite view in the awake reader. Here's half the story on Yahoo - see what you think the writer wants. Hint, he's a leftwing globalist imbecile.
Budapest (AFP) - Hungarian NGOs have long felt the heat under strongman Prime Minister Viktor Orban -- but they now fear that, emboldened by Donald Trump's victory, the right-wing premier will turn the screws even tighter.
First in line may be groups backed by Hungarian-born billionaire financier George Soros, whose foundation once funded the Oxford studies of a young Orban more than 25 years ago.
Last week the deputy head of Orban's ruling party Fidesz, in power since 2010, said that non-governmental organisations should be "cleaned out of here".
Szilard Nemeth said that criticism of government policies by "fake" civil organisations set up to "influence politics" by Soros and others was "impermissible".
The remarks triggered alarm among beleaguered NGOs, many of which -- in the absence of a credible political opposition -- have long attacked Orban's sweeping revamp of state institutions and hardline anti-immigration stance.
"This is a new level of NGO-bashing," said Marta Pardavi, co-head of the Hungarian branch of the Helsinki Committee, a human rights group that provides free advice to asylum-seekers.
Nemeth name-checked the body as potential targets along with civil rights group TASZ and corruption watchdog Transparency International.
"The notion that we should be swept away like rubbish or have no right to comment on politics shows their arrogant intolerance of different views," Pardavi told AFP.
Her office, staffed by some two dozen lawyers, heaves with case files as well as reports that have slammed Orban's anti-migration policies.
She freely admits that her organisation relies on foreign funding to continue operating. But "otherwise it's not possible to do human rights advocacy work in Hungary," she says.
Mirroring pressure in Russia under President Vladimir Putin, scrutiny of foreign-funded NGOs has been cranked up since Orban was re-elected in 2014.
NGO bashing is the new bocci-ball for patriotic Europeans - excellent, that game is kinda boring anyway.
More:
"Soros in crosshairs -
The 86-year-old Soros, whose Open Society Foundations (OSF) body has funded civil groups in Eastern Europe since the 1980s, is in the crosshairs of the new push.
"Soros has decided that he will be Viktor Orban's opponent and opposition in Hungarian politics... People have the right to know which organisations he's doing this through," Orban's chief-of-staff Janos Lazar said last week.
Hungarian officials have even accused Soros-backed NGOs of posing a national security risk during Europe's migration crisis by allegedly colluding with human-smugglers and "terrorists"."
"Hungarian officials have even accused ..." - I take that as "Hungarian officials have even started telling the truth about ..." See, just like with the old Soviet Pravda or the NYT for the last 50 years, you've simply got to translate from elite-speak to truth by changing out a few words and phrases - there's an app for that!
Lastly, I like "Soros in the crosshairs" very much, but even with the best scope, a good rifle caliber, and correct windage adjustment, remember this guy's the AntiChrist, so, you know, I'm not sure if that would do the trick. Let me check Revelation, and see what it says about firepower.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Neil Young - Sail Away
Posted On: Monday - January 16th 2017 8:24PM MST
In Topics:   Music
Another great acoustic song, this is from the first
The great female backing vocalist is Nicolette Larson, who also sung on Comes a Time, on not just that song, but others on that album.
We hope you like the music.
No comments - Click here to start thread
The more we read USA Today, the more we like this guy,
Posted On: Monday - January 16th 2017 8:11PM MST
In Topics:   Trump  Media Stupidity
Donald Trump, that is. USA Today probably shows some pretty large numbers for the circulation of its color paper newspaper, but much of that is copies laid outside the door of people's motel rooms. I usually purposefully use it as a doormat, as it is as much "the Gov't news" as the rest of the fake-news operations.
I had to keep this copy after seeing the headline, so's we could scan it in and present it to you:

They write this like it's a bad thing. ("They" meaning author Heidi M. Przybyia, in this case - please Miss Przybyia, I'll sell you a coupla vowels on the cheap). This is where the opinions of the gov-media journalists really "shine" through in their writing, not in a good way. A majority of Americans would NOT agree it's a bad thing that President-elect Trump is announcing agency heads that want to overhaul or eliminate the agencies they are being appointed to oversee. *Miss Przybyia is very out of touch with the average American!*, we at PeakStupidity would tweet, if had been taught at an early age how to tweet.
Now, personally, I might handle this in a gentler manner than Mr. Trump at a press conference, such as:
"Please, folks, you are making too much of this. Let me put you at ease here. We will not be shutting down the Department of Education, or any of the others you have mentioned. The Dept. of Education will be merged into the Dept. of Energy. The EPA will be integrated into the Dept. of Motherland Security. The new Dept. of Energy will then be combined with the new Dept. of Motherland Security. Much duplication will then be saved by having this one big Dept. of EnviroEduEnerSecurity. Then, we will shut that one down like a rabid dog. See we are eliminating only one Department. Any questions? No, good, more re-orgs in the morning. Good day, gentlemen!"
Here's a snippet of the front page of USA Today's article:

STORY CONTINUES ON 2A it says. No thank you, Miss Przybyia - we know your agenda now. What you've done for me is made me appreciate Mr. Trump more than I had already.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Trick question: Would you rather be ruled by the people or the experts?
Posted On: Monday - January 16th 2017 3:13AM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  US Police State  Liberty/Libertarianism
This Daily Bell article (they are featured on zerohedge quite a bit) refers to a guy named Tyler Cowen who wrote this article,featured on the Bloomberg financial site titled Would You Rather be Ruled by the People or the Experts? The question refers to William Buckley's statement of long ago that he'd rather be ruled by the first 2,000 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than by the faculty of Harvard University. Tyler is asking this question with the specific issue of immigration in mind.
First of all, if you're going to choose a phone book to pick these regular people (as Buckley was implying), I would not go with Boston. Those folks are a bunch of statist left-wingers who are about as politically far from the colonists of Massachusetts Bay,or at least the ones around in 1775, as one could possibly get. How about the Dallas, Texas phone book - let's start from there. Just pick names that sound like people who would speak English first of all. Yes, that would beat the graduates of Harvard by a long shot, but it's not the right answer.
The unz.com website features Steve Sailer again with his usual smart and funny comments about this article - not necessarily on the side of William Buckley, but just pointing out the hypocrisy of our elites on the immigration issue. Now, after having perused some of the comments, I have not seen anyone with the right answer to "Who would you rather be ruled by?" in all that I've read so far. The Daily Bell comments are better.
Let's be like Captain Kirk in that one episode where the Enterprise crewmen are discussing his performance in the space flight training class - heck, maybe it was in one of the movies; I don't care - I'm not a geek, OK? The gist of it was that he was in a real dilemma in whatever situation was being simulated and he thought outside the box, and did what nobody else had thought of in all the years of Starfleet Training Academy. Let's do that here, why don't we?
The answer to this question is easy. Neither one, not Harvard graduates and not regular Joes from the phone book. Just imagine freedom, if you will. This country has changed so much to where the young people now could not even think that there are no rulers or leaders needed for many realms of their lives. "Very sad!" as our President-elect would tweet-out. We lean hard-libertarian here at PeakStupidity for a reason. Free people do not act stupidly as they must be responsible for their lives as nobody else will bail them out. Statist governments like America's, and about any of them in the world today, take away responsibility, which, encourages stupidity, leading us toward the peak of it we are near today.
Take one example out of tens or hundreds of different realms of our lives: Do you need tens of thousands of bureaucrats in a US Feral Department of Education, so that people can learn a lot? Well, we didn't in the past, and people DON'T learn a lot in school these days. Do we even need public schools? OK, that sounds pretty hard-core, but just imagine freedom for a minute. Don't 99% or more of parents love their kids and take decent care of them? Couldn't parents arrange among themselves for school buildings and teachers themselves. Would they not cut out about 75% of the costs by leaving out the useless admins and bureaucrats and hiring, say, a retired engineer to each math (keeping him busy and making a few bucks) and someone who loves writing (say a blogger from one of the big ones, I dunno, PeakStupidity) to
What about those 1% of the kids in the example? They don't deserve to have no foundation in life. No, they don't - what about charity? There used to be lots more of it on the small scale (not the Gates' foundations and Zuckerbergs pushing global agendas). People tend to do a lot of good when they are left alone to put their money and time into where they know it's needed. Statists, however, would rather have the monetary accumulations of our labor stolen from us and given out as they please. People really tend to dislike the type of "charity" that steals from them, especially when the recipients are living larger than the theft victims.
What a libertarian rant that was, but at least PeakStupdity could answer the question correctly:
Q: Would You Rather be Ruled by the People or the Experts?
A: NO!
No comments - Click here to start thread
Comes a Time - Acoustic Neil Young
Posted On: Saturday - January 14th 2017 7:50PM MST
In Topics:   Music
We've posted some hard-core distortion-electric Neil Young already, so here is a great acoustic song, Comes a Time from the album of the same name - late 1970's.
"This old world keeps spinning 'round; it's a wonder tall trees ain't laying down ...."
OK, he's not gotten a handle on dynamics and the general acceleration equation yet (nor politics, for that matter), but what a great songwriter anyway.
No comments - Click here to start thread
In other news, Mr. Fox appointed hen-house minister by Mr. Retarded Pig, barnyard Premier
Posted On: Saturday - January 14th 2017 7:19PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity
A reader wrote this letter to VDare about Justin
Re: John Derbyshire’s blog post Memo To Trump: Start Planning For A Northern Border Wall
From: An Anonymous Canadian Reader [Email him]
John Derbyshire beat me to it! I saw this appalling Star story before I left for work this morning. There are so many things wrong with this appointment, it’s hard to know where to begin.
However, two things come immediately to mind. 1) There is no recognition that there is a historic English-Canadian nation composed of white Europeans and this nation might have an interest in staying a majority in the country it created 2) Canadian immigration policy has become a post-national, anti-white ideological project completely divorced from Canada’s economic needs. [Former refugee Ahmed Hussen takes over immigration ministry by Alex Ballingall; Toronto Star, January 10th 2017.]
It’s troubling that the Star at least sees Ahmed Hussen’s status as a refugee as being more of a qualification for office than, say, a knowledge of economics and Canada’s labour force needs.
One reason I read the horribly globalist Star is that it has a lot of local news stories. Not a day goes by that the paper doesn’t have an article related to the fact that 100,000 new people come to the Greater Toronto Area every year: the skyrocketing cost of housing, the shortage and appalling state of Toronto’s public housing, controversial development proposals that promise to complete alter the character of residential neighbourhoods, our very expensive overburdened public transportation system, etc.
These articles often mention the 100,000 figure, but they NEVER question why this is happening. No journalist or local politician ever asks if it’s necessary to bring in all these people when the city’s manufacturing base has been decimated, when many immigrants end up in poverty working at minimum-wage jobs, etc. When I’ve raised the issue with local politicians, I get the usual clichés: immigrants are good for the economy, Canada has a low birth-rate, immigrants work hard and do the jobs Canadians won’t do, etc.
Just one bone to pick with the otherwise great letter. You've "raised the issue", huh? That's naive in this day and age. You have to realize that not only would said politician get in trouble for doing anything to help the regular Canadian people, as you would for speaking out, but he just does not care either. He's hoping he'll get through his career before "the shit goes down", and this won't happen if he goes against the status quo. Unless he's about 65 y/o though, he won't (get through before TSGD, I mean).
Here's the direct link to John Derbyshire's article, again.
Hey, if you Canadians are going to try to out-stupid your big-brother country Americans, you've got another think coming, eh? Keep up this crap and PeakStupidity will quit promoting the 30-40 year-old Canadian music!
No comments - Click here to start thread
Global Climate DisruptionTM - The Politics (Part 5)
Posted On: Saturday - January 14th 2017 8:57AM MST
In Topics:   Global Climate Stupidity
This is the final, final wrap-up of this subject, we really mean it this time (till we get more subzero weather or next week, whichever comes first ;-}
Continuing from here, we want to add:
We have the leaders/proponents of the whole GCDTM business pretending to be extremely worried about a coming change (of some sort, not really sure yet) in the climate of he whole world. We have their useful idiots really extremely worried about a coming change (of some sort, determined by the scientists and explained (haha) by the "journalists") in the climate of the whole world. There is some overlap between the groups of "pretending to be worried" and "really worried".
The following description of the logic of the GCDTM story should clue any intelligent person in to the idea that maybe this is all political:
1) The greenhouse effect - on process of a myriad of physical processes that has to do with the climate. Changes in CO2 increase the heating effect. The theory is simple, and it can be tested even on a small scale. OK.
2) CO2 is a PRODUCT of combustion. The more industry, transportation powered by combustion, etc. in the world, the higher the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. [IF] this is a bigger factor than natural changes in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, then people have an effect on this atmospheric concentration. [ BIG IF, as there are many natural sources of combustion - take volcanoes, please that are orders of magnitude greater than changes we make]
3) [IF] the greenhouse effect is something to worry about, but water vapor makes the same effect, why are we not worried about the amount of water vapor - also a PRODUCT of combustion.
4) [IF] we are worried about the greenhouse effect from whatever gasses, we would need to model all the other physical processes of the atmosphere as other processes may affect the climate in much different ways. Do we have a working model of the earth's climate that has been proven by comparison of the model with actual observations, since we can't do full-scale experiments? NO, we've written 5 posts just about this mathematical modelling part.
5) [IF] we had a working mathematical model (we don't), what would be the effects of the results on human populations? This purported data that says just what the future climate will be at each place on the globe will show that we have better conditions for farming up here, more diseases we didn't used to have down here, drier conditions here, more frequent storms here, better spots for tasty fish over here, worse spots for furry polar bears over here, and so on. Do you future-climate experts know that this is ALL BAD for everyone? Why would that be. (This last IF is the one that was in a Vin Suprynowitz (former columnist of the Las Vegas Review-Journal) post on-line that resulted in a 6-month ongoing discussion by a future PeakStupidity writer and a climate worrier, as described here, in the 4th paragraph, before the bit by George Carlin.)
That is a lot of [IF]'s, my loyal readers. There is nothing sure about any one of them. This is the kind of thing that even non-scientific, but reasonably intelligent people will unconsciously perhaps, note in their minds after reading/hearing the BS over and over. It leads finally to the realization that, no, the media/elites/leaders either are stupid or don't take themselves seriously in terms of the science. Yet they take the politics very seriously, and that's the problem!
Two more arguments that I'll bring up, but refute in more detail later on:
1) I've heard it brought up that, to paraphrase "yes, there is a lot unknown about this, but better to be safe than sorry?" What? Cause massive damage to entire economies because something may or may not be a problem - homie don't buy that crap.
2) To paraphrase again: "What you say may be true, but there are all sorts of other pollutants that come from burning, let's get us off Muslim-world oil (yeah, good idea!), etc." Sure, I may agree with you on the other problems, but this lying about a fake problem in order to bring attention to some real ones is neither a good idea in the short nor the long run.
Still more to come on these two points, but that can be much later.
GAME, SET, MATCH for the Deniers! Where's my trophy, bitchez!
No comments - Click here to start thread
More Gord's Gold - Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald
Posted On: Friday - January 13th 2017 10:57PM MST
In Topics:   Music
Not just a good tune but the lyrics are a memorial to the 29 American seamen lost to Lake Superior's "icewater mansion" on November 10th, 1975. Nice job with the video:
Notice this Gordon Lightfoot song doesn't have any chorus, just one verse after another.
******************************
[Update 01/16:] We are so sorry that we didn't check the youtube link after posting. This great video should be up now.
******************************
No comments - Click here to start thread
Global Climate DisruptionTM - The Politics (Part 4)
Posted On: Friday - January 13th 2017 8:53AM MST
In Topics:   Global Climate Stupidity  Globalists
Let's wrap this up, whaddyasay? After long discourses on the difficulties of creating a working mathematical model of the entire world climate, then discussion of the politics involved in GCDTM, first wrt the "journalists", then the scientists, we come to the top of this scheme. (It's all here.)
I think that Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit says it best and the most times ;-} thusly:
"For the political leaders, well, I’ll believe it’s a crisis when the people who tell me it’s a crisis start acting like it’s a crisis."
I'm sure Professor Reynolds thinks of this the same way as PeakStupidity: No, they don't really believe it's a crisis (spoiler alert: IT'S NOT), but even if they did, these "leaders" - and we would add others - the outspoken idiot actors and musicians also - would not consider themselves as the ones to make any sacrifice of any sort. After all, they are our betters, the self-chosen elite, so there are much more of us peons to sacrifice our civilization and revert back to a middle-ages type lifestyle to keep the "Carbon in it's place". (Damn Carbophobic bastards, all of them!)
I would respect these people if they really did believe in the nonsense and lived a lifestyle that would allegedly mitigate the effects they are worried about - no, I still wouldn't believe them, because they are innumerate and have no understanding of science, but I would still respect them, so long as they weren't in a position of power over us with their bullshit.
Gonna have to do one more post ...
Comments (2)
What've we got against Pope Francis, anyway?
Posted On: Friday - January 13th 2017 8:03AM MST
In Topics:   Commies  Elections '16 - '24  So-called Pope Francis

A lot, that's what!
This Zerohedge article of a few days back reports that this guy put his two papal cents in regarding world financial
As the new year dawns, it seems the current occupant of St. Peter’s Chair will take on a new function which is outside the purview of the office that the Divine Founder of his institution had clearly mandated. Besides being a self proclaimed expert on global warming and a vociferous advocate of societal-wrecking mass immigration, it looks as if “Pope” Francis has entered the realm of global economics specifically, international monetary policy.
In an 18-page document issued through the Vatican’s Office of Justice and Peace, Bergoglio has called for, among other repressive and wealth-destructive measures, the establishment of a “supranational [monetary] authority” to oversee international monetary affairs:
In fact, one can see an emerging requirement for a body that will carry out the functions of a kind of ‘central world bank’ that regulates the flow and system of monetary exchanges similar to the national central banks.
Is there any wonder our software has automatically assigned all posts about this man to the Commies topic key?
PeakStupidity and Zerohedge both detest the global elites and their plans for control of money and other aspects of the lives of us peons. We cannot speak for Zerohedge, but to re-iterate, we at PeakStupidity do not believe there is some long-term overarching conspiracy with conspirators running the show. It's just that these people think the same way, and they do hang out a lot. This pope either works for or with some of the evil elites of this world*
Besides his mouthing off on the whole Global Climate DisruptionTM nonsense repeatedly, this globalist wants to tell us how a world central bank should run our financial system? (I imagine Ron Paul would not be welcome during mass at this point.) In this post we opined about Pope Francis meddling in world politics. It's one thing to ask for peace, and pray for every human being in all kinds of sad conditions throughout the world. However, as that post pointed out, he advises the Western World to allow their countries to be invaded and overrun - that will not lead to peace, we at PeakStupidity guaran-damn-tee you.
Lastly, along with other hypocritical stuff, Pope Francis had a lot to say about the US election, and it seems like he took sides to me. How is his bloviating not meddling in the same way as the publishing of actual (nobody says they were faked) emails proving corruption of one party's management and the Hildabeast itself? This meddling could be considered a major foreign influence on the election '16, as this guy is the top man of all the Catholics in the world. How many does he influence in the US? Pope Francis, if it's not about God, and or Jesus, just shut your pie hole!
OK, before we forget, LIGHTEN UP, FRANCIS!
Watch the entire 46 seconds -- funny, funny stuff:
(His name was Francis Soyer. /ZH)
*BTW, want a second opinion about this guy? Read this lady's website sometime - Miss Barnhardt is a serious, balls-to-the-wall Catholic, and she could tell you more than you wanted to hear. She deserves a post of her own here, upcoming at PeakStupidity.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Global Climate Disruption TM - The Politics (Part 3)
Posted On: Thursday - January 12th 2017 12:23PM MST
In Topics:   Global Climate Stupidity
As I wrote here - "Now, I'm not letting all scientists in the field off the hook either, as might be assumed by this and previous posts on this topic."
A quick paragraph about Carl Sagan was in the previous GCDTM post, so I won't repeat it. He is an outlier, as not many scientists, maybe a dozen at a time, are media stars like that. Let's discuss the rest of them. From a backwater branch of geography at most schools 25 years ago, the field of Climatology has become glorified, as there is this huge mass of useful idiot leftist/treehuggers that either truly feel that this stuff is extremely important due to the urgency of the situation (of it not being cold sometimes?), or just to get in on something that makes them feel important.
As for grad students, professors, the post-docs and the like in this field, this is our PeakStupidity-certified opinion: Scientists are as human as anyone, and though the scientific method and integrity of the data are still taught, there is always the push for more research money, more exposure of the research work being done, and glory for the professors. This is natural, but this field has had money poured into it from government agencies like nothing since the Manhattan Project. It must hard to stay uncorrupted. Papers will get churned out based on whatever work has been done, shoddy or not. The deal with science is that it's not engineering - nobody is going to specifically rely on the results for human safety or security of property. Another effect of the big money and attention from media is that climatologists, like most people, like to feel that they are "making a difference". Any results that don't show approaching doomsday in some fashion will not get accolades from the science-illiterate and innumerate peanut gallery (aka, the journalists), and be downplayed.
Most have already read about Professor Michael Mann - in England, I believe, and the "hockey stick" graphs, the emails that urge colleagues to "hide the decline" in temperature, etc. All the scandals cannot be repeated here; as they were old news - but not fake news.
What's a shame about the scientists partial role in this GCDTM nonsense is just the "boy who cried wolf" effect that it will result in. People would like to have trust in at least the scientists, as this type of news/hype is not something most have the ability to verify, of course. Most of the smarter laymen who pay attention to this are learning to not listen to so-called experts anymore. This Climate Stupidity has been blown into such a big deal, yet people are waking up to the fact that the climate is NOT changing drastically and the predictions from the mathematical models have been wrong just as often as correct (as in, random and of no more use than the Farmer's Almanac). People get tired of lies after a while, and governments and the "Non-Governmental Organization" sack-hangars to these governments are pushing this crap even harder than before. All scientists will eventually lose much respect from the public, tainted by just the one field of Climatology.
Well, enough about the scientists - the next, and hopefully last post for a while about this Global Climate Stupidity will be about what we think will happen with the politics and the politicians who forever push this stuff. This writer is getting even more bored right now than you the reader, trust me, ;-}
No comments - Click here to start thread
There's a gator in the bushes, he's callin' my name...
Posted On: Wednesday - January 11th 2017 7:28PM MST
In Topics:   Music  Southern rock
... (and he says) c'mon boy, you better make it back home again.
Yesterday's song by Jerry Reed brought up gators, so here is Gator Country by Molly Hatchet. It's some real Southern Rock from late-70's real Florida*, with plenty of guitars and a nice long jam after the lyrics. The lyrics, BTW, are just ragging on other Southern Rock bands/artist in good nature.
A little bit o' that chomp-chomp:
frameborder="0" allowFullScreen>
* Only state of the United States in which you've gotta head north to get to the South.
Comments (1)
First post on Feminism - starting off at a low stupidity level
Posted On: Wednesday - January 11th 2017 7:14PM MST
In Topics:   Feminism  Curmudgeonry
When it comes to stupid stuff, there is no possible way for PeakStupidity to keep up with it all with current staffing levels "in the current year". Still, this blog attempts to keep the reader informed about some aspect of each of the various flavors of stupidity. We have been in arrears with any opinion about the highly toxic, especially noxious, form of stupidity called Feminism.
Although there will be a more general overview post coming shortly about this area, this is a follow-up of one part of this post describing a murder subject who is supposedly just called "they", as
Nutcases from Berzerkely, California notwithstanding, the following English language stupidity has been around for a long time and will not be followed here at this blog. The problem is with the use of "they" instead of "he" in reference to a single (as in 1) person of unknown sex. If you start thinking about this while listening to others and reading, you will find out the scope of this problem in short order. Example: "We are looking for one more pizza driver for the afternoon shift. They must have their own car ...." English grammar states very clearly that one must use "he" and "his" and "him" as the pronouns, if sex(gender) is not known.
The Feminists back in the 1970's or so, back when they brainstormed the "Ms" thing, got the ball rolling on this. Nobody wanted to keep saying "he or she" all the time, as fortunately these people did not get their speech police system up and running yet. In writing, it is very cumbersome too. The "they/them/their" thing just came about slowly. I've found myself saying that and realized it only after I've spoken.
It's not just that it's wrong - we are all used to it, but it can definitely cause confusion simply because "they/them/theirs" refers to the plural. I've seen stories told on the web that were not understandable due to this. All the handbooks used in my work use this form, they even state that they will in the front, and it gets damn confusing, and this is often safety related stuff. PeakStupidity realizes that this is not the most egregious feminist nonsense going on right now, just that it's some of the earliest of the feminist stupidity on record. Homie over here ain't playin' that game, no matter what
No comments - Click here to start thread