Steve Sailer's speech in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia


Posted On: Friday - July 14th 2023 12:39PM MST
In Topics: 
  Political Correctness  Pundits  alt-right/MAGA

Peak Stupidity apologizes for just posting this a month after the great Steve Sailer's actual speech at the VDare castle in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia.

I'd watched his 49 minute speech already in the 1:13 long video*, but I didn't get to reading the comment thread under Steve Sailer's quick post with the VDare tweet containing it until about 4 days later.

Commenter Adam Smith gave us a link to Mr. Sailer's speech on his (Mr. Smith's) own youtube channel recently in the Peak Stupidity post Keep Kustomers' Kash King. I note that Mr. Smith also kindly embedded his YT channel video in a comment under that iSteve thread to spread the video (making is easier for those who don't read VDare, or maybe HATE HATE HATE tweets, perhaps, nothing personal...) I am glad Mr. Sailer acknowledged it and thanked you, Adam, as he'd directly asked for help on this.

Additionally, I notice a comment in that now-ancient thread with praise from commenter Dieter Kief for Peak Stupidity. Thank you, Dieter, and you were quite right to have wished the readers "Good luck!" on easily finding anything this site!**

Here is the speech and Q&A period in their entirety. I pasted in the intial timestamps that Commenter E.H. Hail kindly gave to us in some comments under a that same recent Peak Stupidity post. All the timestamps/blurbs after the 09:20 one are mine. The speech was titled "The Secret History Of The 21st Century” but Mr. Sailer considers Did Black Lives Matter Get All Those Black Lives Murdered? Yes. Yes, It Did.” as a secondary title.



00:00 - Introductory remarks by VDare president Peter Brimelow, on Steve Sailer's career in dissident journalism.

05:12 - A bagpipe tribute to Steve Sailer by Fred Kelly.

06:30 - Steve Sailer comes to podium to hearty applause (but speech actually starts at 7:05) .

07:30 - Sailer says this is his first public speech since early 2013; he had had other bookings but anarchists successfully used threats of violence to force venues to cancel all of the others he was invited to since then; Sailer therefore praises VDare for securing the cancel-proof Castle as its headquarters.

09:20 - Sailer says he is a "semi-legendary character whose insights show up, in modified form, in the work of 'edgier' and 'more interesting' pundits -- like Tucker Carlson, Matthew Yglesias, Ross Douthat, Scott Alexander, and lately Elon Musk -- but MY name, it appears, should never be mentioned!"

09:30 - Mr. Sailer explains why he writes and how he writes. He's not an ideologue but just "a historian of current trends". "I'm more focused on explaining "What just happened?'"

11:30 - He talks about Identity Politics, diversity, and the "childish discourse" that's just bad guys vs. good guys.

12:55 - Mr. Sailer's mentions that his anthology book is coming out, to applause from the audience. I hope he sells millions!

13:40 - Mr. Sailer gets into the diversity stupidity of both squads of the UniParty political parties, GOP first. The 1st example regarding the GOP is 9/11.

16:50 - He gives another GOP diversity stupidity example: The Iraq War and the attempt at "the spreading of Democracy" in a place with lots of 1st-cousin marriage, hence not too much civic sense.

19:45 - He gives a 3rd example, a domestic one, the Housing Bubble and crash of the mid-'00s.

22:45 - He describes and discusses his patented moniker for the Blue Squad Democrat Party, the Coalition of the Fringes. I liked a funny line there about the "constantly growing number of stripes on the gay flag".

26:30 - He explains that the only thing holding said coalition together is anti-Whiteness. He asks how much of this "anti-core" (-American) behavior can represent an overt conspiracy.

27:45 - He talks about media collusion, among the Lyin' Press itself, and also along with politicians, with the example of Øb☭ma. Applause line: "On the other hand, Emmett Till is news. Emmett Till is ALWAYS news."

30:10 - Mr. Sailer explains how this DIE system doesn't even work for its beneficiaries. (Gotta interrupt here: Contrary to Mr. Sailer, I say "fuck these beneficiaries.")

Mr. Sailer explains that's he's got to give some stats (you know you love it, Steve!), and the next, aka, last 19 minutes (40%) of the speech is a lecture with nice graphical slides on the Ferguson effect, de-policing problems, deaths of exuberance by Blacks!, murders and traffic deaths, and so on.

49:20 - Audience Q&A begins.

OK, you don't really need these, but just for fun...

1:12:10 - The shadow of Peter Brimelow appears (left toward the bottom).
1:13:07 - One arm of Peter Brimelow's appears.
1:13:15 - One hand of Peter Brimelow's waves "OK, now."
1:13:21 - Peter Brimelow appears and ends it there. He does like to keep to a schedule!

My timeline ended up too detailed, I guess, but I hope some readers can use it. Therefore, this post will stop here without commentary. Peak Stupidity will post a follow-up, hopefully later today, with both some basic commentary on this speech and some information/questions about the hosting of videos on youtube and the like.

Just as I got around to this, I took the hour and a half to watch an interview with Mr. Sailer, as embedded on his Unz Review-hosted blog site here. It deserves some commentary too, but hopefully not a month later here! (Plenty of it is already in comments under the post, with a hundred more to come, I'm sure.)

PS: A comment from Adam Smith below reminded me (because I do remember that now) that VDare had this transcript of this whole thing***. Reading can be 5 to 10x faster than listening. (I personally don't like speeding audio up.)


* The last ~25 minutes are the question and answer period.

** I came close to replying with a snide remark on the lack of searchability - someday ... - but then it'd have been 4 days later. Unfortunately, I didn't catch the part in your comment her about my going to unz and providing that link to the Helen Andrews article there, but I see you did. That would have steered me to another good thread.

*** I believe they have included transcripts for the all the speeches and panel discussions at the 2nd Annual VDare Conference held this past mid-June at their castle in Berkeley Springs, W. Virginia.


Comments (6)




From the No Shit, Sherlock Institute


Posted On: Thursday - July 13th 2023 9:59AM MST
In Topics: 
  Feminism



This one comes under the No Shit, Sherlock Department, Office of Human Nature. I ran across an article from the Institute of Family Studies*with some small bit of data on divorce rates of couples with varying husband/wife ratios of money-earning.

The title says: Husbands with Much Higher Incomes Than Their Wives Have a Lower Chance of Divorce. The writer of this short article is one Rosemary Hopcroft. I give her credit for publishing the data here, as, from the 2 posts listed by her on a site called This view of Life, she sounds like no kind of Conservative.** She could have ditched this data due to its lack of a good fit with the Feminist dogma, but perhaps a Professor of Sociology at the Univ. of N. Carolina - Charlotte doesn't do a lot of research work so ... As it is, she gives no opinion on her results, which is just fine.
It is true that more than half of all marriages in the U.S. are now dual-earner marriages and the share of women who earn as much as or significantly more than their husband has roughly tripled over the past 50 years. According to the PEW Research Institute, in 1972 the wife was the primary or sole breadwinner in only 5% of marriages, but by 2022, this had risen to 16% of marriages. There was also a decline in marriages where the husband was the primary or sole provider, from 85% in 1972 to 55% in 2022, and an increase in marriages where both spouses earned about the same, from 11% in 1972 to 29% of marriages in 2022.

But is it accurate to state
[as the Wall Street Journal did and Professor Hopcroft refutes here] that a wife out earning her husband is no longer associated with an increased chance of divorce?
No, it's not, she shows in some quick bar graphs:



The vertical scales are different between these two graphs showing the same quantities. This information would have been a lot easier to interpret if they'd been the same scales.



Yes, first of all, those are 2 very wide "cohorts", of 30 years apiece. Lots of thing were different in 1989 vs 1960 and from 2020 vs 1990. Marriage vows might have meant more earlier on in each, etc. Well, we're just looking at the one dependent variable in each large cohort, that being divorce rates. The independent variable is the 3-state difference in husband - wife's income: wife's income above husband's, husband's income between 0 and $38,000/yr above wife's, and husband's income more than $38,000/yr above wife's. How long it's been like that is another question. Just the year of the survey? I'd like to see more variation in the independent variable, but this is what it is.
It seems that the traditional male breadwinner family is still very much a reality in the U.S., and those couples where the wife has a higher income than the husband still have a greater chance of divorce than couples where the husband has a substantially higher income. This is not only true in the United States. In highly egalitarian Sweden, a higher share of income earned by the wife creates an increased risk of divorce, per one study, and another study found that even an unexpected windfall (winning the lottery) leads to a greater chance of divorce for female winners and a lower chance of divorce for male winners. These results suggest that the spouse who provides the most financially in the marriage matters differently to husbands versus wives, and they are consistent with the claim that women still value the financial prospects of a spouse more than men do.
Uhhh, no. We value other things. Those are instincts. Women, even if they have more than enough money, have an instinct to value the status and financial prospects of men. The writer of this article mentioned Evolutionary Psychology in her very first sentence. She's should not be surprised by the results here.

We at Peak Stupidity have said it before - in our Feminism 101 post - and we'll say it again, "It's not nice to fool Mother Nature!"

Just for fun, and I don't know how I came upon this, I will include an audio clip from the late El Rushbo on, as he called them, the Feminazis. No, Rush Limbaugh wasn't a real Conservative, he didn't get it all, and so on, but I do miss the guy.

"We're fierce, we're Feminists, and we're in your face!":




* Be careful of how you imagine an "Institute". One may very well envision a campus, if you will, of glass walled 2 to 4 story buildings. Many an "institute", however, may consist of one computer hutch in the walk-in closet of an unemployed political science graduate. "There are no positions available at the present time."

** One is the very exact "...genetic differences between individuals within groups are much greater than any average differences between groups of individuals, however that group is defined." crap that the HBD folks debunk almost daily. That was verbatim from a pro-Covid-Panic post of hers. Her other one is an anti-Trump post.


Comments (15)




Occam's X-acto knife and the Kung Flu Origins


Posted On: Tuesday - July 11th 2023 8:28PM MST
In Topics: 
  China  Kung Flu Stupidity

X-acto knives are probably not any sharper than razors, but I have fond memories of using them on hobby projects. This blog is a hobby project.



Peak Stupidity is in a quandary here, trying to put the Kung Flu PanicFest stupidity to rest while at the same time knowing that this stuff is a hit with our readers. It's got it all, a whole lot of stupid!

We've tailed off our coverage after that last spurt of posts on the Chinese '22 overblown PanicFest Coda* called Covid~Zero and discussed a few fairly belated apologies - see here, here, and here.

The origins of the Kung Flu, though important, have not been the part of this big story that Peak Stupidity was most interested in. It's been the USE of the virus to implement further Totalitarian measures that we've been most concerned with. Were the Kung Flu's origins sinister? We tend to chalk up events to stupidity more than we do to evil, but this has probably been a mixture of both.

This is a case in which common sense and perspective leads to the most obvious answer of the origins of the virus itself. I'll admit to thinking that the virus was transmitted from animals to humans (bats, in particular - see Cats, bats, and spoiled brats) early on. That post is from late March of '20) I didn't, and still don't know, any virology.

However, after reading more about the Wuhan Institute of Virology, with its connections to a Fauci-funded lab at UNC in Chapel Hill, N. Carolina and then the article by Nicholas Wade discussed here, I saw the obvious stupidity mixed with evil (bioweapons) intentions of the gain-of-function research.

3 1/2 years later, The Jerusalem Post has an article that tells us China created COVID-19 as a 'bioweapon,' Wuhan researcher claims.
China deliberately engineered the coronavirus virus as a "bioweapon," a Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher claimed this week in an interview conducted by Chinese-born human rights activist and author Jennifer Zeng.

Researcher Chao Shao asserts that the virus was deliberately engineered by China as a "bioweapon," and that his colleagues were tasked with identifying the most effective strain for spreading among various species, including people.
Yeah, I don't see a dime's worth of difference between "gain-of-function" research and bioweapons research. This one was a cooperative effort between Americans like Anthony Fauci and the UNC labs and the labs in China.
During the exclusive 26-minute interview, Chao Shao shared an anecdote involving another researcher named Shan Chao, who allegedly admitted to being provided with four strains of coronavirus by a superior.

Shan Chao was instructed to test these strains and determine which one had the greatest potential to infect multiple species, with a particular emphasis on human infectivity.
Here's the interesting part:
Spreading the virus

Chao Shao also made sure to mention that several of his colleagues went missing during the 2019 Military World Games held in Wuhan.
According to him, one of the missing individuals revealed that they were sent to hotels accommodating athletes from different countries to "check the health or hygiene conditions." However, Chao Shao suspected that these actions were unrelated to virology research and suggested that they were potentially involved in spreading the virus.
Does this military games part sound familiar to you? The very-famiiar-to-PS-readers Ron Unz has a big theory** he's been promoting for a couple years now, that it's the other way around, and the American athletes in those games were set up to transmit the virus TO the Chinese there.

(The article also mentions the either purposeful infection or testing of Uighur (Moslem) subjects out in Xinjiang.)

Who done it? Well, you just don't go using a bioweapon willy-nilly unless you're suicidal. OTOH, as a bioweapon to change the world, this Kung Flu was a dud. Don't get me wrong, the PanicFest generated on the pretext of a Black Death 2.0 scenario DID change the world for the worse. The virus itself was not good it you were susceptible (mainly if old, obese, and with other serious health problems), but it was still a dud as a bioweapon.

Were the Americans stupid enough to have used it on the Chinese without thinking that, "wait, contagion works two ways."? Were the Chinese stupid enough to have infected people within their own country, for testing even? I don't think that level of stupidity was involved. I go with what I know: The work was shopped out from North Carolina to China because Chinese safety measures (Q/A) are known to be lax, meaning work can be done more quickly and less expensively. It got out of the lab, probably by accident.

The fact that a virus of unknown deadliness was manufactured by both countries in cooperation, well, that's where the evil comes in.


* Per an American who just got back from China after 7 years or so, the reason the that shindig started nearly 2 years after original PanicFest was that it took until early '22 for all the iEspionage-based Orwellian controls to be put in place.

** That's our post, but one can find dozens of article under Ron Unz' s name on his site with his theory. He also tends to paste it into pretty much every other post he writes. There ain't no backing out now!


Comments (10)




Ben & Jerry v Breyers & Chief Stevens


Posted On: Monday - July 10th 2023 6:22AM MST
In Topics: 
  Lefty MegaStupidity  Political Correctness  Economics  ctrl-left  Big-Biz Stupidity

Sounds like a case for the SCROTUS. In fact one party sounds like they ARE the SCROTUS. The other party, Ben & Jerry, are the 2 hippie-dippie founder/owners of Vermont-based gourmet ice cream manufacturer that is owned by $130 Billion (down a couple of Billion over the last 2 days) market-cap conglomerate Unilever.

The ctrl-left just has to make everything political - even the 247th Independence Day holiday of their own country.* Their tweet on the 4th was hard-core anti-White and anti-American:



(There were more words under the tweet, but you can get the gist of it.)


This newest Woke trend of apologizing for the settling of an entire continent is something I've noted at the beginning of Wikipedia pages on places. (I thought for sure I'd posted on this, but no can find...) Lately, this stupidity has become more than just another PC annoyance, as the giving back, in various forms, of Indian land is getting real - see the case of eastern Oklahoma. (That's a VDare article by Washington Watcher II, but their writer Allan Wall has written much more about it - see here, here, here, and here for starters. He lives there.)

Who exactly is indigenous to this land American live on is a question Peak Stupidity has already asked, back on our '21 road trip, which included The Four Corners - Utah. Even if we could pin down this indigenousness to someone besides Adam & Eve or The Chosen People, how's that give anyone property rights. I'd want to see deeds and titles.

So, even as they run a Capitalist operation, protected by property rights and rule-of-law, that sells over-priced ice cream all over the world, Ben and Jerry deign to tell Americans they stole all their property. I pondered a few minutes after I saw this tweet whether there might just be a sacred Indian burial ground somewhere on B&J company property there in Vermont. This prospect very much worth checking out, I figured.



Well, I didn't have to wait but a day to see Ben & Jerry get hoisted. Per The Publica, Nulhegan Chief Tells Ben and Jerry’s Their HQ is On Stolen Land After Ice Cream Giant Announces Support for Land-Back Movement. Don't feel bad if you've never heard of the Nulhegan tribe. I don't know if anyone else had either, other than a man whose name sure doesn't sound Indian, one Don Stevens.

Chief Stevens doesn't look like no Indian [/Silvio**] other than by the Indian get-up he's got on. He does look like a guy who's had his share of Ben & Jerry's. Now, he wants his share of Ben & Jerry's.
Don Stevens, who is the chief of the Nulhegan Band of The Coosuk Abenaki Nation, a confederacy of Algonquian tribes that formed in and around Vermont in the 1600s, spoke to the New York Post yesterday and expressed an interest in opening dialogue with the company regarding returning the land.

Stevens argued that if Ben and Jerry’s was “sincere” in their support for returning land to Native Americans, then they should reach out to him to see how they can better benefit Indigenous people.
Yes, a dialogue... something along the lines of "Show me the money." This guy's an Indian sub-sub-sub-contractor, Assistant to the Regional Chief of the Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk-style Abenaki Nation's people, who are a sub-tribe of the Algonquian Tribe - now I've heard of the Algonquians!

Back in the day, the various indigenous people's fought each other and stole each other's indigenous land, as the American settlers conquered the whole shebang. Unity helped. We current Americans can enjoy these political battles between the Woke ctrl-left band and these Indian claimants who want their property back - "Wait, what are you, a bunch of Indian givers?" - Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield - as we enjoy our own indigenous American ice cream.



I know, I know, saturated fat out the yin-yang, ingredients the names of which would topple a spelling bee champion, etc. The Coffee flavor is my favorite. Runners-up would be Chocolate Chip Mint, French Vanilla, and Strawberry.

PS: I don't advertise Breyer's ice cream here to support the grassroots Bud-Lite-style boycott against B&J's that seems to be starting up. (I still have a post on that coming.) No, I really like Breyer's more than the fancy stuff, and indeed, from what I just looked up, Ben & Jerry's is 3 times the price of Breyers. That's even after the Inflation by Deflation that's brought a half-gallon down to 3 1/2 pints, and down to 3 pints at present.


* Peak Stupidity got political too, but a) we are a political blog, b) our post was in support of the Founders of this country, using the revolution as an example, and c) we support the progeny of the Founders, unlike Ben & Jerry.

** I can't find the "He don't look like no Indian" scene from The Sopranos for the life of me.


Comments (21)




Forever and ever stamps - Part 3: Racial profiling and the Mighty Mississippi


Posted On: Saturday - July 8th 2023 3:07PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Political Correctness  Economics  US Feral Government  Race/Genetics  Southern rock



Time really flies when you're blogging! It was almost a full year ago, the middle of last July, when Peak Stupidity had a 2-part series on US Post Office "Forever Stamps" - Part 1 and Part 2. Our point then was just to discuss the idea of hedges against inflation and what is real money. (Retroactive spoiler: These stamps can be the former to a small extent, but they surely aren't the latter.)

Though this post will be a quick anecdote on another subject, I will mention one economic thing first, one that relates to what I'd written in the 2nd paragraph of the 2nd footnote in Part 2. Now that the banks are giving out some significant interest*, it doesn't make as much sense to pay ahead - as in bills and such** to save envelopes, time, and (these) stamps. At practically ZERO interest it did. Now, that $1,000 or so average floating out there for say 4 months ahead average, could have gotten me a whopping 12 bucks! That is more than the extra stamps and envelopes, but as for my time ...

While down there at the P.O. checking if my son's amended tax form and enclosed paperwork needed more than one stamp, I figured I'd buy another few sheets of Forever Stamps.. for the bug-out bag, you know .... The Black! lady at the counter was the only employee in the place, and she'd come to the counter from the back where she'd been working. (Well, one would hope...) She was nice, and I didn't want to waste too much time picking stamps out, as there was a short line behind me.

Holy moley, though, the first 10 or so styles of stamps were this Black! guy and this other Black! lady. I had no idea who they were. No Tuskegee Airmen, no Peanut guy, no Aunt Jemima... but then, I gotta admit my near vision is not so hot. You think you can do that faggy swipe on everything to zoom in, but that doesn't actually work in meat- or stamp-space.

Well, I didn't want a one of them, even if some of these stamps may have had a wonderful human being on them. You don't want to be rude though. I could see lots of White people, simply trying to not cause a scene or bad vibes, opt for one of those first bunch of sheets. You just stick them on envelopes anyway, and lots of the handling of bill payment mail may be done with machinery and software. (In China perhaps, the SYSTEM may note your stamp choice for purposes of your credit score.)

The only exception I can see is if you still write love letters to girlfriends, yes, on paper with pens and stuff. "Who is this Nancy Reagan lady you put on your letter? You like her, don't you?! We said we'd be honest with each other...." Yes, I gotta a couple of sheets of her.

There at the P.O., I just told the Post-lady flat out, "Nah, I don't know who these people are. What else?" Her fingers kept on turnin', Peak Stupidity kept on learnin'.... "The Mighty Mississippi! Yes," I took all the sheets she had and a couple of sheets with waterfalls. Refrain from being a part of the wokeness.

One on each sheet has an old riverboat. Hey, Peak Stupidity does riverboat songs! You gotta go back a long ways, to the beginning of this blog, 6 1/2 years back. We featured an upbeat riverboat song by Elton John called Dixie Lily (1974) and then a much darker tune about a riverboat*** by Neil Young called Powderfinger (1978). I don't know how anybody couldn't like them both.

Going back half a decade before Elton, and almost a full one before Neil, there was another song about a riverboat that is much more widely known than the other 2, having been a #2 hit on those old Billboard magazine charts. That would be Proud Mary by CCR (Creedence Clearwater Revival), from their 1969 album Bayou Country. This falls between Dixie Lily and Powderfinger in tone - hard rockin' (more than Elton's and less than Neil's "fuill-distortion guitar") but upbeat like Elton's.

Bayou Country had only 7 songs on it, with one, Good Golly, Miss Molly being a cover song. It is a great album nonetheless.



CCR was:
John Fogerty - Lead vocals, lead guitar
Tom Fogerty - Rhythm guitar
Stu Cook - Bass guitar
Doug Clifford - Drums

What a band! Under that name, they played for only 5 years - '68-'72, but made 7 albums.

Southern Rock? Nah, the band was from the San Francisco Bay area (El Cerrito/Berkeley), but that Bayou Country album would have listeners figuring they were from the South. It was a different time, you understand... and the song bring back an even "differenter" time in this great land on the Mighty Mississippi. Well, we still got the stamps ..., so there's that ...


* No, of course not enough to even make up for inflation - which is not the actual point of charging/paying interest either, this point being lost to many. I'm not happy with that rate, but it's better than 0.15%. ("Wait, but the APR is ...!")

** I have my reasons to not do this stuff on-line, but I explained that.

*** Not a riverboat, per se, but "a white boat comin' up the river..."

*************************
[UPDATED 07/09:]
Changed the song out for the one I'd really intended to include, before I got rudely interrupted by dinner or something. Removed The Doobie Brothers' Black Water and Doobies' info, and inserted CCR. Interestingly, the band's hometown and the Southern Rock misinterpretation still fit. And, it got to #2 on the charts, not #1.
*************************


Comments (17)




The increase in university enrollment and the 3 Branches of Government


Posted On: Friday - July 7th 2023 9:57PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  History

Note, that our title only includes the 3 official branches of government. I'm not sure how many de facto arms the Feral Beast has now.



The steady and attentive Peak Stupidity reader may be forgiven for assuming that our post on Wednesday, Another favorable SCROTUS decision (re the student loan Unforgiven) was the post advertised back last Saturday as the other one on university, as not related to AA. Nope, this one is that one.

I had a question about something while reading the very interesting and very worrisome article Complex Systems Won’t Survive the Competence Crisis, as discussed 2 weeks here back in Harold Robinson on the Competency Crisis. What brought it up were the following couple of paragraphs by Mr. Robinson under the From Meritocracy to Diversity heading:
The first domino to fall as Civil Rights-era policies took effect was the quantitative evaluation of competency by employers using straightforward cognitive batteries. While some tests are still legally used in hiring today, several high-profile enforcement actions against employers caused a wholesale change in the tools customarily usable by employers to screen for ability.

After the early 1970s, employers responded by shifting from directly testing for ability to using the next best thing: a degree from a highly-selective university. By pushing the selection challenge to the college admissions offices, selective employers did two things: they reduced their risk of lawsuits and they turned the U.S. college application process into a high-stakes war of all against all.
His article doesn't get into more detail on this, but most who discuss this on the internets (think Steve Sailer) will bring up the March 1971 SCROTUS decision on Griggs v Duke Power. That branch of the US Gov't affected university enrollment, but let me point out 3 other factors, 2 of them earlier, and one later, caused by all of the branches of the Government.

Going back to the 2nd of the last year of World War II, the Congress passed the GI Bill in 1944. From that short article on The Army Times site:
Concern about another depression when some 16 million service members returned to the U.S. after the second World War spurred the passage of the 1944 GI bill. Without formal job training outside the military, many of these service members would have been unemployed. After Congress passed the legislation, then-President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed it into law on June 22, 1944.

The “GI Bill of Rights,” as it was dubbed, provided extensive benefits — job counseling, employment services, and tuition assistance for educational pursuits for honorably discharged veterans. These services kept veterans from flooding the job market all at once while increasing educational and employment opportunities to anyone who served after Sept. 16, 1940.
Yes, of course Statist FDR would sign it. Guys like that don't care about the US Constitution. I will say that it's easy, but still wrong, to put aside that document, in this case out of sympathy for returning WWII draftees. I'm sure it was very popular then, and it still is. (The article covers 3 extensions to the law over the years - the latest, signed by President Trump in '17, makes the GI Bill apply to reserves and national guardsmen.)

This bill was passed out of political expediency, the avoidance of a depression, and there was officially a short recession due to the economic changes of war demobilization in '45 and an 11-month one in '49.

The point here is that, though it included other benefits for veterans, the main effect of the law - the only idea most people currently have of the "GI Bill" - is that it encourages people (men at the time, as they were who fought WWII) go to college. Tuition and board may be completely covered, depending on the university and program.

The Vietnam War brought with it another impetus for men (again, as women weren't subject to the military draft) to go to college. That was the draft deferment policy. I don't know the ins and outs of it, but as for the immediate effect on university attendance, I glanced through a short easily-readable '01 paper by Economics Professors David Card; Thomas Lemieux of the U. of California - Berzerkely and the U. of British Columbia - Vancouver, respectively, called College to Avoid the Draft: The Unintended Legacy of the Vietnam War. From the summary:
Throughout most of the Vietnam War, men who were in college could obtain deferments that delayed their eligibility for conscription. It was widely believed by contemporaneous observers that college deferment was an effective means of draft avoidance, and that draft avoidance led to a rise in the college enrollment rates of young men. We use data on the enrollment and completed education of men relative to women to estimate the effect of draft-avoidance behavior on the education choice of men who were at high risk of being drafted during the Vietnam War. We find a strong correlation be- tween the risk of induction faced bv a cohort and the relative enrollment and completed education of men. Our estimates suggest that draft avoidance raised college attendance rates by 4-6 percentage points in the late 1960's, and raised the fraction of men born in the mid-1940's with a college degree by LIPto 2 percentage points.
I note that the methodology used the male/female college attendance ratio to pull out this effect from other effects on attendance.

Which branch of government caused that change? I suppose it was the Legislative Branch officially, but it was the Executive Branch that got us into Vietnam to begin with. (No, it's NOT supposed to work that way.)

Then there was the Griggs v Duke Power SCROTUS case, as mentioned above. In that article linked to, there's a whole lot of discussion of the cases in the lower courts that led up to this case and decision, too much for me right now. Here's an important part:
Completion of high school alone continued to render employees eligible for transfer to the four desirable departments from which Negroes had been excluded if the incumbent had been employed prior to the time of the new requirement. In September, 1965, the Company began to permit incumbent employees who lacked a high school education to qualify for transfer from Labor or Coal Handling to an "inside" job by passing two tests -- the Wonderlic Personnel Test, which purports to measure general intelligence, and the Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test. Neither was directed or intended to measure the ability to learn to perform a particular job or category of jobs.
Due to the complaints along the lines of "It's not fair! The tests are biased toward White people with those questions about polo!"*, the decision made it precarious for businesses to do general merit testing. The chances of being sued would be high.

Without this kind of testing of employees who may or my not have a college degree, Big Biz had to switch to relying on college graduation as a measure of merit. It was still the early '70s though. This wasn't the university environment of today. A degree, even in an obscure Humanities field meant the holder of it could organize his thoughts and get white collar work done. Therefore, there was a new impetus for young Americans to go to college, as some of the plentiful white collar jobs that didn't used to require a college degree now did. As for Big Business, well, they didn't have to py for it...

... but it was very inexpensive still in the '70s and only went up drastically as the Feral Gov't got involved YET AGAIN, in guaranteeing student loans for the bankers who did the loaning. (Some are directly from the Government now.) Well, Peak Stupidity has beat that one to death

That's 4 different Feral Gov't policies that have given an incentive to Americans to go to college when they otherwise may not have. The Administrative, Legislative, and Judicial Branches have all been a part of this. None of this should be the Feral Gov't's business.

Does the graph at the top show all these 4 factors well? (The first 2 factors should affect men's attendance only - in a positive direction.) Take a look at it, and see what you think. Well, this post has gone on long enough already. I may continue it sometime with a comparison to further university attendance data.


* Hey, I'm White, and I've only been to 1 polo game. It was with the Boy Scouts, and I have no idea where that was now.


Comments (5)




Communication iCrap Gap


Posted On: Thursday - July 6th 2023 7:14PM MST
In Topics: 
  Curmudgeonry  Artificial Stupidity  Muh Generation



These curmudgeonry posts pretty much write themselves. This is again about a communication breakdown, this one being about more of a feature than a bug.

We had to rearrange the time for a piano lesson for our boy. I tried to call his teacher first on my wife's phone (she had a series of texts there) but got no answer and there was no voice messaging system. Well, she could have been in the middle of a lesson. My wife wrote a text message. We got a response an hour or two later - no problem, as this was for the next day. It didn't mention anything about a new lesson time, just:

"I was in the middle of teaching." See? "Do you have a question?"

My reply: Yes.

Enough! I gave the phone back to my wife. After more texting between her and the teacher, my wife showed me the latest message. It had a lesson time that was still no good.

I called again, and after 5 rings, Hallelujah! The lady answered, and we hashed it out to arrive at an agreeable time in about 30 seconds. What in the hell is so hard about that, as compared to pecking at a screen back and forth with often long intervals in between?

This new generation does not understand the use of a mobile phone as a phone. There's that app on all of them, a feature, not a bug, called PHONE. If you refuse to use it, why don't we get this over with and stop calling them phones?!


Comments (12)




Ron DeSantis against Birthright Citizenship and his Anti-illegal-alien program


Posted On: Wednesday - July 5th 2023 9:00PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  President DeSantis



I hinted at an "I told you so" post back on Saturday. That may not be to so many of our readers, but to those who say Trump is the only hope for a good fight against the immigration invasion, nah, I told you the good Governor of Florida is serious.

This is just a follow-up to Peak Stupidity's post Trump v DeSantis: Round 8 - Birthright Citizenship which said near the end "You're move, DeSantis". Well, per VDare's A.W. Morgan's recent post At Eagle Pass Immigration Presser, DeSantis Outflanks Trump To Right On Border Invasion DeSantis is indeed against the Birthright Citizenship stupidity. (Does any country but the US have a policy so stupid?)

Here's Ron DeSantis' proposal on illegal immigration, per the article:
* End Birthright Citizenship;
* End catch-and-release;
* Renew Remain in Mexico;
* Detain potential asylees;
* Close the Flores loophole;
* Tax remittances from illegal aliens;
* End prosecutorial discretion and parole authority;
* Report criminal aliens and visa overstays;
* Fortify, enforce E-Verify;
* Defund and prosecute those who violate U.S. immigration laws;
* Strengthen penalties for human trafficking, smuggling, and reoccurring illegal reentry;
* Focus Immigration and Customs Enforcement on illegals;
* Cease subsidies for Treason Lobby non-governmental and international organizations that aid the Great Replacement invasion;
* Renew asylum agreements with the Northern Triangle;
* Immigration judges received summary disposition authority;
* Curtail visas from countries that refuse deportees;
* Hire more personnel for U.S. Customs and Border Enforcement;
* Deploy the military to assist the border patrol until the wall is built;
* Declare Mexican drug cartels to be Transnational Criminal Organizations and use force to fight them;
* Cross the border to fight cartels if Mexico refuses to help shut them down;
* Stop DOJ from suing states when they enforce immigration laws, and support their constitutional right to defend against invasion;
* Cut federal funds to sanctuary jurisdictions; and
* Drop illegals from census apportionment.
Great stuff!

Since I read this post over a week ago, VDare's Washington Watcher II asked the readership DeSantis Releases His Immigration Plan: Is It Better Than Trump’s?. He's got a lot of detail in there an immigration patriot voter ought to read. Part of his answer though is "Indeed, finding the differences in the two plans is difficult."

OK, but even if the plans are identical, Ron DeSantis is a much better bet, as he is a guy who will ACTUALLY EXECUTE the plans he promotes.


Comments (17)




Another favorable SCROTUS decision


Posted On: Wednesday - July 5th 2023 1:35PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  US Feral Government  Zhou Bai Dien

Peak Stupidity has enough to write about that we not only can't write about all US Feral Gov't happenings, but I don't even follow some fairly important happenings that are Peak Stupidity concerns. I know there were a couple(?) of other SCROTUS cases decided along with the one most written about - OK, on my corner corner of the internet* - on Affirmative Action.

There was another favorable decision made during the same session - sincere thanks, Donald Trump - on the moral hazard and travesty known as university student loan forgiveness.

The Unforgiven:



Yeah, I can't pay you right now, well, ever. "You'll get it when I get it.", what I'd been told by a guy who owed me money long ago, was a little better. Still, what was going on with his other financial dealings wasn't my problem. He did pay me back. The people in the picture above don't look like they'll ever be able to NET pay back anyone. By "net", I mean that they will likely work, if at all, in jobs that are parasitic of the taxpayers anyway.

I'm getting this off a totally, totally, I tell you, NON-political financial site, CNBC. (Didn't the financial types used to be less political?) CNBC reports Supreme Court strikes down Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan. (Actually, though it deals in the politics more than the finances, this article by one Annie Nova, gives opinions from both sides.)

Near the beginning of this blog, over 6 years ago, Peak Stupidity had a series on the Global Financial Stupidity (financial doomer stuff) aspect of the student loan business. Besides offering an initial section, University Bubble101: , we provided a short remedial class, University Bubble 99 - Remedial Global Financial Stupidity at the U in 5 parts: Part 1 - - Part 2 - - Part 3 - - Ben Folds Five musical intermission, and Part 4 . More recently, with this forgiveness talk and actual efforts by Zhou Bai Dien we posted the one linked-to above along with AOC on Student Loan Forgiveness.

The SCROTUS never got the real bottom of the issue in this case, which will appear at the bottom of this post for you. They did at least call Bai Dien out for misuse of Executive Branch power. Since he is administrator of the Dept. of Education - which should NEVER have been there in the first place - he figures he can change Feral Education policy around to help him and the blue-squad out in coming elections errr, the poor young people, many in debt for amounts like $60,000 after those grueling 5-year efforts to obtain that Art History and Black! Studies degrees.

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down President Joe Biden’s federal student loan forgiveness plan, denying tens of millions of Americans the chance to get up to $20,000 of their debt erased.

The ruling, which matched expert predictions given the justices’ conservative majority, is a massive blow to borrowers who were promised loan forgiveness by the Biden administration last summer.

The 6-3 majority ruled that at least one of the GOP-led six states that challenged the loan relief program had the proper legal footing, known as standing, to do so.

The high court said the president didn’t have the authority to instruct his Education secretary to cancel such a large amount of consumer debt without authorization from Congress.
That's my bolding, as that's the point that's the actual Constitutional issue that was ruled on. In detail the case was about something, something, some Missouri financial outfit getting screwed, hence the State of Missouri getting screwed... whatever... the President doesn't have the power to just blow off university deadbeat graduates' debts to the taxpayers.


"My dissent is as follows: The standing, muffled, muffled... State of Mis-muffled... muffled muffled, so I submit to you ..." "Whaaaa? Take off your face diaper, Jumanji, so we can all be privy to the wisdom of a wise soul Sistah."



"So let be scribbled, so let it be done!" - Chief Justice Roberts to AA SCROTUS reporter. But, but ...
Consumer advocates slammed the ruling, and accused the court of bias.

“Today’s decision is an absolute betrayal to 40 million student loan borrowers counting on an impartial court to decide their financial future based upon the established rule of law,” said Persis Yu, deputy executive director at the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group.
Or, they could have refrained from signing on the dotted line, knowing getting a huge student loan for anything but certain engineering/science degrees is a stupid move. They've been betrayed alright, but that's by the university admission bullshitters who've been promoting this bubble for 3 decades or more. I think a lawsuit against the U's would not be much more solid, but it'd be pointing the finger in the right direction. (There's one other direction in which to point, again, discussed at the bottom here.)

We gotta give Senator Tim Scott a little credit:
Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., a Republican presidential contender, called the loan forgiveness plan an “illegal and immoral” bid to “transfer student debt to taxpayers.”

“If you take out a loan, you pay it back,” Scott said in a statement.
The amount of money involved is not insignificant, but then it's about 10% of the "CARES ACT", "HEROES ACT" and whatever other smarmy-named huge spending bills that have been in effect with the excuse of the King Flu. The Kung Flu excuse was used by a "brilliantly performing" lawyer on the side of Zhou Dien also, per this CNBC article. Here's a graph of the total amount of loan money outstanding:

The total amount owed is tailing off in growth. Are people learning something about university "educations"?



As for those who've already taken advantages of the taxpayers:
Even before the Covid-19-related public health crisis, when the U.S. economy was enjoying one of its healthiest periods in history, there were still problems plaguing the federal student loan system.

Only about half of borrowers were in repayment in 2019, according to an estimate by Kantrowitz. Around 25% — or more than 10 million people — were in delinquency or default, and the rest had applied for temporary relief measures for struggling borrowers, including deferments or forbearances.
"You'll get it when I get it."

Good on the majority 6 SCROTUS judges here, but nobody got down to the gist of the matter, Constitutionally. Is a Federal Department of Education Constitutional? No. Is the loaning out of taxpayers' and future taxpayers' money to university students Constitutional? No, it most certainly is not. Is the absence of any that discussion due to that these judges must only base their decisions on the details of this specific case? Hell, maybe one of the opinions does mention the unConstitutionality of the whole shebang. I don't have time to read all that. If it were in there somewhere, I'd bet on it being in the writings of Clarence Thomas. Clarence, mah man!!


* See also Part 2.


Comments (21)




Them US Blues - '23


Posted On: Tuesday - July 4th 2023 1:22PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Liberty/Libertarianism  US Feral Government  Holiday from Stupidity

(It's almost 1/4 of the way into this century. I keep seeing 4 digit years written and hear them spoken. It's not about COBOL and memory space here, but how about we drop the "20" till the end of this century? That saves a lot of typing and talking.)

It's Independence Day. 247 years ago today, the brave Founders of this nation put their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor on the line, but signing their names under the Declaration of Independence. It's easy to read and hear this as a standard platitude, meaning nothing much to us. One might understand the feeling any of these men would gotten in his heart and guts, knowing that it this war against the most powerful armed forces in the world doesn't somehow end in their favor, he will be hanged, if he were involved in what's to come.

In this Unz Review thread, there was a discussion about separation of America from the tyranny of the Potomac Regime. How would that work, as we are all mixed together, not only within the various States, but within counties, down to the voting precinct level. The discussion was interesting. Who will dare to go against the Regime directly, as individuals, a militia, a State, or what?

My recent viewing of a short video within a VDare post by Federale titled Border Patrol Agents Now Under Orders To Cut Barbed Wire, Bring In Illegal Aliens!. got my blood boiling*. Thanks yet again to Adam Smith, here's that video:



Think about the traitorous actions of that Fed. Would the British commanders of a quarter of a millennium ago have ordered anything that egregious be done to the Colonies by a Lobsterback?

I’m telling you that, were I a Texas National Guardsman near there watching that, I know that the chances that I would raise my rifle and fire at the traitorous Fed would be non-negligible.

I spent a few minutes daydreaming after watching that scene. When it comes finally to a (hopefully successful) attempt by Americans at separating from the Feral Beast/Potomac Regime, that video has me imagining how it well get started. To me there's a good likelihood of it going like the following:

As with control of the invasion at the southern border, the Feds derail State policies that are designed to prevent the evil that the Potomac Regime has been implementing. Some Governor with guts, or maybe a group of brave locals, decides that enough is enough. Force is used against the Feds in something like a skirmish. Then, of course, the FBI, Motherland Security, or other alphabet group comes to the State to arrest said Texans or Floridians (my best guess, but it could be anyone/anywhere) that were involved. Then, State officials make the effort to prevent this by detaining these FBI men at the airport.

What would be next after that?

Please watch the video above of the traitorous Regime Fed. First, take your BP medicine, if you have a need to.

We'll light up a few fireworks for the sake of the kids this evening, with hopefully nothing like this scene from Adam Smith's youtube channel taking place.



Otherwise, well I am not waving any flag wide and high today. If I were, it'd be the Gadsden or Rebel flag. That lead us to the yearly tradition of the same featured music here at Peak Stupidity. For the 7th year in a row, I've got them US Blues.




* The video is embedded in a tweet, first one on that post. Peak Stupidity WILL NOT do tweeting or embed tweets here. I can’t find the video in question from youtube to embed here – Adam Smith, please pick up the HuWhite courtesy phone!

**************************
[UPDATED 07/05:]
Though it's not on his own channel due to a punishment levied on him for something else, Adam Smith came through with a link to the 1st video on youtube. Thanks, Adam. I took out words about going to Federale's article for the video. However, there's a lot more there though.
**************************


Comments (10)




We're Bad ... We're Nationwide


Posted On: Saturday - July 1st 2023 7:26PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Southern rock

That's pretty easy to achieve in the age of the www.

It's time for Saturday Southern Rock. Peak Stupidity has featured music from Skynyrd - the unarguable Kings of Southern Rock - and The Allman Brothers, the Marshall Tucker Band, a couple by The Outlaws, Molly Hatchett, and then one or two by ZZ Top.

These tres hombres* were from Houston, Tejas* and played together for 51 years! That was until one of them, Dusty Hill, died in 2021.

I'm Bad, I'm Nationwide was from the band's 6th (studio) album, Deguello.



ZZ Top was:

Billy Gibbons – guitars, lead and backing vocals.
Frank Beard – drums, percussion.
Dusty Hill – bass, backing and lead vocals, keyboards.

We just ran out of time today for any substantive post. However, the horrible S. African story, as it may apply to America, must appear sometime, then there's another about university enrollment, one having not so much to do with AA, perhaps more on the Titan sub story, some more on Feminism, an "I told you so" report on Ron DeSantis, an attempt to wrap up our Kung Flu coverage, and more... The Stupidity stops for no man!

Thank you all for reading and writing in this week.


* "3 Men", in Spanish, the name of their 3rd album. "Tejas" was the name of their 5th album. They made 15 over the years, but arguably 9 of them in their prime - through 1985.


Comments (6)




SCROTUS and the alleged end of Affirmative Action


Posted On: Friday - June 30th 2023 3:16PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  US Feral Government  Race/Genetics  ctrl-left

Because we live here! - SCROTUS



I too don't know what the caption was about - it just sounded bad-ass.


I saved the two pictures that appear in this post a few weeks or a month ago. They were to be used in a post about the ctlr-left's newfound interest in corruption on the part of Supreme Court Justices. This corruption hasn't been a problem for the last 50 years, amazingly. These concerns have cropped up since the year-ago ruling against the unConsitutional usurpation of yet more States' authority that was called Roe v Wade.

The ctrl-left is SHOCKED, and I mean SHOCKED, really, that this one branch of the US Gov't does not have to always push the country to the left. I mean, they've had pretty good control of the Legislative Branch via the UniParty (80-90% member coverage, higher in the Senate) for a few decades, total control of the Media Branch for about 25 years, control of the Executive Branch for arguably the last 30-40, with the exception of those 4 years, '17-'21 - that's what has made them VERY ANGRY ... VERY ANGRY INDEED.

Yep, that's all 4 branches. Now, somehow, the SCROTUS, top of the Judicial Branch, has wandered off the plantation. This latest ruling yesterday against the nearly 60 y/o-long government mandates of discrimination in hiring, promotion, and admission of White men, called Affirmative Action, has made them even ANGRIER. They are again, VERY ANGRY INDEED!



I'll put the 2 posts together: the ctrl-left's vendetta against SCROTUS and the effect of this latest ruling that tries to uphold the Constitution. (The nerve!)

First of all, let me say that the impetus for the lawsuit that resulted in this ruling, on admission to Ivy League universities, is not anything I care much about, other than any unConstitutionality. of it. The Ivy Leagues and half of the rest of the universities can burn, for all I care. (I would divvy up that fraction by schools and departments.) When it comes to forced discrimination in the job market and inside Big Biz, I care a lot. (See our series Harvesting the fruits of a half-century of Affirmative Action - Part 1 - - Part 2 - - Part 3 - - Part 4 and Part 5.)

Will yesterday's decision 6-2* SCROTUS decision "end it, not mend it", to reverse-a-phrase the President Clinton of 28 years back? I'm not as optimistic as some. I believe the ctrl-left minions are hashing out work-arounds in faculty lounges, HR/corporate meetings, and coffee shops as we write this post.

It's be great to see a blizzard of lawsuits against this > half-century travesty. However, I expect the words "racist", "sexist", "homophobe", and "xenophobe" to be tossed into the fray, making most plaintiffs, lawyers, and judges scurry under their covers. We'll see on this. It's good to hold out hope.

Right here, I would like to thank President Donald Trump for appointing 3 pretty decent Justices, Neil Gorsuch, Brent Kavanaugh, and Amy Barrett. He was lucky to have gotten a chance to appoint 3 in one term, and he seems to have not let us down. That itself may be luck, or maybe Trump actually had good judgement or got good advice on these picks. I remember G.W. Bush having first tried to appoint some secretary or something, and then there was his big dud, John Roberts, still there screwing the pooch most of the time.

But, yeah, there's luck involved. Some go native, as Peak Stupidity explained in our Cocktail Party Theory of Political Stupidity. Others may very well be latent lefties by design, having plans to head left soon after the confirmation hearings are finished.

George H.W. Bush nominated the guy below for Justice 32 years ago tomorrow, and after a rash of sexual-harassment nonsense, he was confirmed in mid-October of that year, '91. I'd have to nominate him as the BEST OF SCROTUS over the course of my lifetime.**



For some reaction by prominent lefties against this latest court decision, you may want to read a couple of Steve Sailer posts (and the threads below) from today, You'll be Surprised to Learn That Michelle Obama Is Taking the Supreme Court's Affirmative Action Decision Personally (heh!) and Surprise! Former LARPer of Color Liz Warren Is Taking Personally That the Supreme Court Is Shutting Down Her Old Grift.

I would guess that the anti-corruption campaign against certain Justices will be put into high gear after this deal. This stuff about the scandalous behavior is even in Forbes magazine***. Guess who they are all picking on?

Clarence, ma man!



* Kenatta what-have-you Jackson Brown recused herself based on Hissy Fit.

** I don't follow all of the decisions closely, so perhaps Sam Alito and the late Antonin Scalia should share the honor.

*** That's from early May, as this anti-Conservative-Justice campaign got going.


Comments (15)




Two Thirds of a League Under the Sea: A Woke Disaster?


Posted On: Thursday - June 29th 2023 2:31PM MST
In Topics: 
  Political Correctness  The Future  Science  Muh Generation



I was very surprised to learn recently that the title of the well-known Jules Verne novel 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea was bogus. I only recently looked it up, to find out that the Olde English unit unit of length - the "league" - was 3 nautical miles for sea purposes (and 3 statute on land). That'd put the location of the story in the novel way out in space on the other side. I guess it just sounded cool. The now destroyed (and being recovered) Titan deep-water submersible was down at just about 2 nautical miles. (1 nm ≈ 6,000 ft., 6,076 to be more precise.) The pressure down there is 5,350 psi.

Because water is nearly incompressible, pressure varies almost linearly with depth, very unlike the pressure variation within the atmosphere, made of gases, for example. The factor is about one atmosphere (~14.7 psi)* for every 33 ft down. So that was easy. That's a LOT of pressure. Diving down to 400 ft is a big deal and must be done carefully, so 2 leagues under the sea is an not anything like a proper environment for a human being.

The Titan story is interesting infotainment, and there a few aspects being discussed. Regarding one of them, I have no problem with whatever toys any grown-up boys want to play with next. Dangerous or not, it's always great for the world to have guys out there exploring and learning new things. Too bad, per Dieter Kief, this project used some of that "CARES Act" money. I don't like that aspect, no siree.

When it comes to the political aspect of the story of the failure of the Titan deep sub, I don't know any more than anyone else. I refer the reader to Race Realist blogger Paul Kersey. The excerpts from the Lyin' Press (usually) are normally the bulk of his posts, and he adds commentary and sometimes a few extra details on stories that hit close to home. That's the case again in CEO of Doomed Submarine Going to Titanic Didn't Want to Hire '50-Year-Old White Guys' Because They're Not 'Inspirational', as it appears on The Unz Review.**

Peak Stupidity has noted a something in our many posts on the Big Biz world. The HR ladies** and the big cheeses are, if not the very founders of it, big proponents of the anti-White-man D.I.E. program***. The designers/builders of the Titan worked within a medium/small sized company called OceanGate. The outfit has (or had, to be both accurate and maybe a bit morbid) 47 employees, a very convenient number when it comes to keeping out from under the massive Feral Gov't regulatory beast****. Lots of regs start applying at the 50 employee level.

The founder of OceanGate (in '09), Stockton Rush, was one of the 5 explorers on board. (Yeah, it was an all male thing. Did anyone have any problem with that?) The D.I.E./Woke aspect here is the attitude of this 61 y/o White man, as he mouthed the usual diversity platitudes. I believe that was nothing more than a corporate jargon reflex. These people love the corporate "24/7", "Core Competencies", "bandwidth", and "low hanging fruit" jargon.***** The diversity platitudes are expected, though, when taken seriously, they can mean trouble. Was that the case with the Titan?

The Titan was basically a cylindrical pressure vessel. For the life of me, I find searching for simple stuff like the P.V. dimensions harder and harder, but I got the wall thickness of 5" and am guessing from "height" of 9' that the P.V. diameter was something like 6', scaling from the pictures. This makes it a "thick-walled" pressure vessel, defined by engineers as one with a thickness < 1/10 of the radius. (Well, which radius, inside or outside? If that difference is significant to you, then, guess what, it's not a thin-walled pressure vessel. Haha!)

Now, this is engineering. Engineers make approximations to make things easier. This was especially important before fast ubiquitous computers, and we'll get more into that, but even now, as the idea is to keep the theory under control, i.e. theory that has already been worked out accurately. The difference between what's defined as thin-walled vs. thick-walled is in the former, the stresses within the material don't vary much across the radial dimension, so can be considered constant. (For the other 2 dimensions, the axial, and the tangential - using polar coordinates, of course - there is nothing to make them vary in either type P.V. so long as it's a cylinder, or sphere for that matter.) Why the dividing line right at 1:10? That's close enough for engineers to a situation in which that stress is fairly constant and easy to calculate.

The barely calculus-based derivation of the longitudinal stress in a thin-walled P.V. come from a force balance between this constant stress acting on a cross-section of wall and the pressure as applied to the area on the end caps. (No, the shape of the ends doesn't matter at all for this.) Take a slice perpendicular to the z-axis (length) and you get σ A x-section= P Ainternal. That's σ 2π r t = P πr2, which simplifies nicely to σ = Pr/2t.

For the tangential stress we do something similar. Take a cross section the long way. The forces acting from the stress on the 2 areas, one on top and one on the bottom, therefore, 2 L t, must equal the force from the pressure acting on that x-sections area, but only the projection of that area (note that if we're summing forces horizontally, pressure forces near the top, for example, would have very small components in the direction we are summing.) Don't worry, it all works out! A diagram would be extremely helpful, but I can't do that right now. So, σ 2 L t = P L D, or σ = Pr/t. That's often called the "hoop stress" and it's double the longitudinal stress.

Those stresses combine to get a value that can be compared to the inherent strength of the material. Again, the Titan was NOT a thin-walled PV, but to just get an idea of the magnitude, the shear stress that would result from those 2 normal stresses (in the thin-walled P.V. theory) would end up equal to the larger of those 2 - please don't ask - I LUV LUV LUV Mohr's Circle, but I'm tryin' to finish a blog post here, y'all, and I'm not getting paid. There's no way to pay me, if you tried. Anyway, that max. shear stress would be in the range of 40 ksi. (That's ksi, a bastard of a unit, meaning kilo pounds/square inch.) 40 ksi is up there with the yield strength of some regular materials, but not near that of specialized aerospace stuff. The Titan was made with carbon fibers within an epoxy matrix of material.

Why'd I do all the calculations? Admittedly, that was partly for fun, is the answer, but also to give the idea that this was serious business. Let's do more thinking. For a thin-walled P.V., the simple theory to get stresses was based on INTERNAL pressure, but with the signs reversed, we get the same numbers with compressive stresses resulting. As you've probably read regarding this Titan deal, and may know elsewhere regarding concrete, some materials have different strengths under compressive stresses vs under tensile ones. How well was this all known for this complicated non-isotropic material (different strengths in different directions of stress)?

Compressive loading has a failure mode that is not a factor with tension. That would be buckling or crippling. To start off simply, let's discuss briefly 2-D, with buckling in columns. It's basically 2 2-D problems, unless the thing is axisymmetric, aka, a round column. The difference in this mode of failure is that the inherent strength of the material is not a factor, but the geometry and the stiffness (the x-sectional shape and the material's "modulus of elasticity" - a material property, the latter being one number for an isotropic material but NOT for these composites) are.

This is easy to envision. You've got a 1" diameter piece of steel/iron plumbing pipe. You weld 2 1' square pieces to each end, one for the floor and one to stand on. Make it a one foot length of pipe. Unless is this some cheap 1 mm wall, China-made crap (see 2 paragraphs down), well, it'll hold you. Say, you're 200 lb, and let's say it's only 1/16" wall. We get a x-sectional area of 2πr t, so, for simple axial loading, σ = F/A = 200 lb/(0.062in)2π(0.5in) = 1000 psi = 1.0 ksi = peanuts.

Now, do the same with a 100 foot length. (Call the PS accounting office to ask about hazard pay, first. It's hard to collect later.) What's gonna happen? Buckling, that's what. The stress in the material is the same, as length doesn't appear in that calculation we just did. No, but this failure mode is one of instability. The slightest off-center application of the force - your ass 100' up there! - results in a bending loading that results in more deflection, resulting in more bending loading, in an unstable fashion. Now, you're back on the ground, perhaps injured, but consider yourself better off than Stockton Rush is.

With a hollow cylinder, we have a 3-D and much more complicated mode of failure due to instability called crippling. Envisioning this is easy too. Stand on an empty Coke can sometime. Then get a friend - or if you're pretty agile, you can do it yourself - to lightly kick the side of said can. There you go, down to Earth, and little Greta thanks you for recycling ahead of time. This already difficult theory, the crippling mode, is made all made more complicated when it's done on this composite material. BTW, that Coke can is a seriously-thin walled P.V. Thickness is about 4 thousandths of an inch. With a diameter of 2.6", that's a t/r of 0.003.

Now, finally, regarding the engineering work that must have been done, you've likely read about the fatigue effect too. Yet again, for simple homogenous, isotropic metals, work in this field has been done for most of a century******. It's not just pressure vessels such as airplane hulls that undergo fatigue. Think of any rotating part. The simplest would be motor shaft with a pulley with a belt around it. The tensions on both sides of the belt go in roughly one direction, causing stress in the round shaft. So? Yeah, but this loading direction is fixed in space while the shaft rotates. The stresses are applied back and forth (up and down in value) every rotation. At 1,800 rpm, you get a lot of cycles in a hurry! Then, for these metals, the empirical data used is made for numbers like millions to billions of cycles. Airplane hulls must be light, hence they get made to withstand cycles in the range of 10's or 100's of thousands.

What about that sub? I don't know. It wasn't going to undergo thousands of cycles, but again, things get more complicated with new materials. (Also, compressive loading on a thick-walled P.V. is different from that in the composite lay-up aircraft hulls which are thin-walled and undergo internal pressure.)

Now, your PS blogger here is not going on and on with this engineering talk just for his health. Then too, I don't claim to know enough to make any comment on the failure of the engineering work either. (I guess, with the sub having been pulled up, OceanGate and we will find out at some point.) I do have a point though. This goes back to the comment on the 50-y/o White men and the disparagement of the hiring of them. Did Affirmative-Action-Adjacent engineering have something to do with this? It's likely not, because, as I wrote above, all that talk was just a reflexive platitude out of Stockton Rush. I think the problem is not about the engineering not being done by 50 y/o White men in the future, but about it not being done the 50 y/o White of today, in the future.

Let me explain. It's not just about the age and race, but about the times. It's about there being more and more reliance on software tools than on very basic deep understanding, by engineers. Yes, one could call this part of the decline in competence that has been one of our themes lately.

OK, just to go back into it a tad, when the math in the theory gets unsolvable in closed form, then we resort to software, since we can now. That's not a bad thing. Finite Element (and Finite Difference) analysis for stress/strain and for heat transfer has been around for half a century. Yet, many problems were too big, and engineers had to make proper assumptions, find empirical methods, and/or get more into the theory. Engineers had to be creative. I mean, the only other way to run a big model was to get more of those Hidden Figures gals to do billions of calculations, yeah, just get 'em, by the 100's of thousands, working there in the nursing home. What's a couple of hundred tonnes of creamed corn in comparison to a new Cray mainframe?

OK, anyway, the computers are so fast now, that, other than in the fields of turbulent gas dynamics and such, there is confidence that anything that can be properly set up as a model can be analyzed, with accurate results. Is there too much confidence, and are the underlying assumptions that the software is written around different sometimes? Was that the case with the new material used in the Titan?

Under the Global Climate Stupidity topic key, Peak Stupidity discussed 6 years ago the problems with the reliance on mathematical models of the entire climate of the Earth. We don't have a problem with the effort to do this. We just have a problem with those who have this false confidence that this complicated of a task (with still unknown processes involved and complicated interactions) has resulted in anything like an accurate working model.

This overconfidence in "the software" is more of a problem with the younger generations. They don't want to look at the calculus and the experimental results graphs. Instead, they want to get as many pieces of software as possible and plug lots of shit in. I think this overconfidence and over-reliance is a likely cause of the Titan disaster.

What that means is we need not only 50 y/o and older White men doing this serious work, but we need the 50 y/o White men of today, who got their engineering/tech knowledge 30 years back. 50 y/o White men doing this 10 or 20 years from now may not cut it. Going woke in addition? Well that'll just bring things to a point where they'll have to send convicts down in the subs, as nobody will want a part of that. That's if anyone would know how to do a project like this in what's left of America in 2050.



* Sorry to the Euros and, well everyone non-middle-aged and older American, but we'll stick to English units in this post.

** I see that Mr. Kersey has been keeping his titles shorter lately. Yes, this one IS shorter. ;-}

*** OK, here we go ... HR is the scourge of the Big Biz world!: Part 1 - - Part 2 and Part 3.

**** The Big Gov readers here, and you know who you are (the one guy?) may see that as having been a factor in the disaster in the deep. Nah, we're talking government. Would anyone in Woke/AA Government know more than these guys?

***** Yeah, it's been so long, I had to look a couple up. Once and former cube dwellers may enjoy this page on a site called Wavelength.

****** In fact, one big impetus for fatigue analysis and crack growth study was the demise of a few of the de Havilland Comets, the first operational commercial jetliners (by 6 years), that were mentioned briefly in our recent post 1st World Memories of Suid Afrikaanse Lugdiens (CtDC - Part 7). Cracks started at square window corners (normal windows were square, so...) and the repeated pressurization cycles caused crack growth - it's called "metal fatigue". There was more to the demise of that airliner than that - there were also some hard landing due to the differences in operating a new type of airplane like this.

*****************************
[UPDATED 2 hrs. later:]
Per Dieter Kief, this project did use some taxpayer money. Fixed.
*****************************
*****************************
[UPDATED 06/30:]
Geeze! Math error right in the title! I was thinking 1 league = 1 nm when I first did this. That was the easy part.
*****************************
*****************************
[UPDATED 06/30:]
Not "titanium matrix" around the carbon fibers but epoxy, as is the norm. I had a hard time imagining a metal matrix, but I figured I haven't kept up, and I shouldn't get ANYTHING off non-technical articles. (Fixed after watching the "Sub Brief" guy in the video provided by commenter Adam Smith.) What were made of titanium were the 2 end fittings. They were epoxied on to the standard carbon fiber wrap.
*****************************


Comments (26)




Keep Kustomers' Kash King


Posted On: Wednesday - June 28th 2023 9:10PM MST
In Topics: 
  General Stupidity  Immigration Stupidity  Humor  Curmudgeonry  Economics

Sign seen at the covinence store this week:



I like the idea. Peak Stupidity covers the niche market in stupidity and curmudgeonry that is the attempt to phase out the use of cash. China has pretty much been there/done that, but I'll probably have a chance to report on that accurately pretty soon. (Please check out the Economics topic key for other posts on the topic.)

I'm sorry if this offends a reader or two*, but I don't get the idea of going around with a only a couple of bucks cash. It's not like a potential mugger can see you've got a hundred or two on you. People do though, and they buy that Hershey bar or 20 oz Coke with a credit or debit card. Hell yeah, ding 'em for the 25¢.

I don't think this store owner's problem is the non-use of cash, though. What he's on about is the processing fees of some sort - I'm not sure if there are any on debit cards vs credit cards, but he doesn't specify. He's not really a very good communicator in general, judging by the sign alone.

The owner is a nice guy though, a fairly friendly •Indian. He has an extra large • on his forehead in fact, which I take as the markings of his status as the covinence store chain Assistant Regional Manager, or at least Assistant to the Regional Manager.

I don't get a chance to have any long conversations with the guy. There are often lottery ticket losers scratching off cards in front of me and then buying others right there to see if they can make it up in volume. Behind me are guys and girls waiting to buy snacks, cokes, or red bull, as I stand there in the middle to pay cash for gas.

Therefore, I did not have a chance to ask the gentlemen about his children, and more specifically, whether he will be bringing up the new State Spelling Bee champion.

"I came to this country with 10 rupiees in my pocket and a bootleg copy of Goodnight, Constuction Sight! I had nothing. We are razing you to due bedder."


PS: I would call it 4 misspellings in that sign. You can have more than one per word. Let's not even get into the grammar. That's just the cost of Population Replacement doing business.



* Keep in mind that, per Section 109 para. (c)(1)(vi) of the FBC (Federal Blog Code), Peak Stupidity is an Equal Opportunity Offender.


Comments (23)




The Falun Gong Gang does Toronto


Posted On: Tuesday - June 27th 2023 12:29PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  China  Bible/Religion  World Political Stupidity



Who did I happen to run into on a beautiful afternoon in downtown Toronto, Canada but many hundreds of yellow-clad Chinese people of the Falun Gong. No, they are not actually a gang, per se. Cans of spray paint were nowhere to be found, there was nary a facial tattoo on the lot of them, and I saw no one's hands placed in some sort of stupid contorted position. They did all wear that shiny yellow clothing. Is that a gangland thing? I think it's a Chinese thing.

The massive Falun Gong movement became such about 30 years ago in China. Their thing is doing slow calisthenics and meditation in large groups in the outdoors. Per the Wiki page:
The practice emphasizes morality and the cultivation of virtue, and identifies as a practice of the Buddhist school, though its teachings also incorporate elements drawn from Taoist traditions. Through moral rectitude and the practice of meditation, practitioners of Falun Gong aspire to eliminate attachments, and ultimately to achieve spiritual enlightenment.
Yeah, that's pretty much what I said.

That particular Wiki page, BTW, is reasonably unbiased when it comes to the Chinese politics - to be discussed shortly - but, not in regard to American politics. Wiki bemoans:
Falun Gong administers a variety of outreach organizations in the United States and elsewhere, including the dance troupe Shen Yun*. They are known for their views against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and their anti-evolutionary stance. They also operate Epoch Media Group, which is known for its subsidiaries, New Tang Dynasty Television and The Epoch Times newspaper. The latter has been broadly noted as a politically far-right media entity, and it has received significant attention in the United States for promoting conspiracy theories, such as QAnon and anti-vaccine misinformation, and producing advertisements for former U.S. President Donald Trump.
OMG! I kind of like The Epoch Times. Plus:
It has also drawn attention in Europe for promoting far-right politicians, primarily in France and Germany.
There are far-right politicians in France and Germany? Who knew? We could use some in America too!

Well, that Wiki excerpt is stomping on my post, as I was about to relate that the Falun Gong folks were supported by the Chinese Communist Party up through the mid-1990s sometime. I was not paying attention to anything in China then, but by the late 1990s, I'd been reading continual news items and editorials about the Falun Gong in the Wall Street Journal. The writers were somewhat aloof but generally supportive of this group. I remember the news about these people being thrown in jail in large numbers and such things. (That could never happen here though, no way ... we're a free coun... oh, never mind.)

The loss of that LUV from the CCP was likely due to the CCP not wanting any large group of people in the country to be unified on any matter besides CCP ideas, even if they did just stand around breathing slowly and doing yoga. Additionally, it's very possible that one's mind might get clear enough during this meditation to realize that a CCP is not a good thing to have.

Well, moving ahead 2 1/2 decades, there were definitely hundreds, if not upwards from a thousand, Chinese Falun Gong members marching through downtown Toronto. These are Canadian residents - you don't leave China together as a Falun Gong group in matching T-Shirts (or whatever) to do a protest tour.



In the words of Jerry Seinfeld, "Good luck with all that ..."


I talked to a few of them, and gave a thumbs up to others. It was all pretty friendly. A lady I talked to gave me a flyer, but I told her that I already hated the CCP, so she should save the paper hence the planet. There was something specific they were protesting too, which was that there are apparently Chinese Communist Party-run police stations IN CANADA. I guess what's left of the English-speaking population there may still see the familiar RCMP signs, whereas the readers of Mandarin understand that's actually the Radical Communist Mandarin-speaking Pot-sticker mongers. (Work in progress.)

Then, a non-yellow-clad lady, with the group but not in the march, came up to us pedestrians with a clipboard. It was a petition: "Sign here to support the elimination of the CCP."

I felt the need to speak up here: "Uhhh, yeah, I think you're gonna need more than a clipboard to eliminate the CCP. You're gonna need a whole lot of guns." That didn't sit well with her, so this lady decided to seek signatures elsewhere.

I ended up hanging out in a park nearby. Toronto is no longer the Great White North, and I don't write that because the weather was nice that day. It was as diverse as they seem to want it. Then I did see a group of White people. There were 50 to 100 of them in a group. This was another protest/demonstration, albeit smaller, and also about China. The main chant was: "Get the CCP out of Canada!" Well, yeah... It turned out this was also about the police station thing.

They were moving right along, so I didn't get up from the park bench in time to be able to have a word. I have nothing against their "demand", but then, I was going to make my own chant. That'd be something along the lines of: "If you hadn't have let millions of Chinese people into Canada, the CCP WOULDN'T BE in Canada." along with "... You dumbasses!"


PS: I will note here that I learned something about doing effective chants in a protest from these guys, the White Canadians. One guy would say a line through the bullhorn, and another guy, I think at the far end, would chant it back. I don't know what it is about that method, but it's good. I wonder if that's the Communist's ancient Chinese secret.



* Peak Stupidity's * to note that we have mentioned that Shen Yun business before. See here and here. Shen Yun is kind of a ballet with politics. Hopefully they tiptoe around the really controversial stuff. (Yes, pun intended! I mean, why wouldn't I ...)


Comments (8)




Pride goeth before the eject button


Posted On: Monday - June 26th 2023 7:01PM MST
In Topics: 
  Genderbenders  Movies

In yet another of Peak Stupidity's growing list of movie non-reviews* due to exasperation with the PC/Wokeness, I will admit in this post that they really got me.

I do realize there are other, more "high-tech", options these days for watching movies or old TV shows. I have my reasons for not signing up for Netflix, Hulu, What-have-you, though, the main one being that I don't WANT to end up spending so much time in front of the idiot plate, even without it being hooked up to the agitprop channels. (It hasn't been for 24 years now.)

So, while at the small branch of the library for books too, and occasionally, recommended videos that I've had held for me, I peruse whatever videos are there at the time and take quick looks at the blurbs on the back. I grab 2 to 4, because it's FREE!**, FREE!, I tells ya! Here's the blurb for a movie called Pride:



My boy even asked me later about that title, what with all the Pride Rainbow stuff that we are being subject to by the Potomac Regime. "Nah, see, it's some old movie set in England or Wales or something." I didn't know anything else about it. I just take a quick look at the things, as I've got nothing to lose, and I have back-ups.

"Are you sure about that? I think it's like all that 'Pride Month' stuff." "No, see, the word 'pride' meant other stuff back before all this crap. There's no reason that couldn't be the title of a good movie."

A week or two later, in goes the movie, into the player. Well, I sure didn't get very far. You know the system with the DVDs in which little bits of the movie are shown with a theme song in something like a 1 minute loop, as it waits for the viewer to press PLAY or some other options? Well, that's how far I got. I saw some scenes that told me, oh, yeah, this IS that new Pride shit.

Bastards! How'd I get fooled? Firstly, I saw "1984" in the blurb and thought that was the year the movie was made. Nope, it's SET in 1984. Then too, the pictures on the back of the DVD case did not scream "gay!, tranny!, genderbenders!, BLT-G++!



Not really, right? Or, am I out of it? Anyway, [EJECT!]

This was after already having ejected one for boredom, one recommended one that was not going to be good after all, and then an old movie - B&W, even - that looked like it was going to be a PC story. I popped in one more after all this that's kind of OK so far. I didn't have time to finish it after all that.

Serendipitously, as we visited the library again, I found Season 3 of the Rockford Files right where I left it and left off!***


* The representative post on this niche topic is Tried to watch a movie - here's 3 reviews in one!. There are a few others around.

** Sure it is, just like those FREE lunches - PS opinion on public library "improvements" can be seen here and here.

*** I only stopped watching a year or so back due to my thinking most of the discs were bad. It turned out to be our player.


Comments (12)




Half-Century-Gay Elton John slams Florida


Posted On: Saturday - June 24th 2023 9:41PM MST
In Topics: 
  Genderbenders  Music  President DeSantis

It's the hurricanes that regularly slam into the State that worry Floridians. A 3/4-century-old bitchy homosexual is not so much of a big worry. It's not like it's a half-century ago, just before Reg Dwight's, aka, Elton John's, official gayness, as he wrote and sang some of the best pop and rock* in history for half a decade. (It'd put the period from his Madman Across the Water album in 1971 to Rock of the Westies in '75.) He was a force of nature then.

Mr. John and his "husband" have a problem with Governor DeSantis' and the Legislature of Florida's having gotten laws passed to fight the BLT-G++ Genderbender anti-family stupidity. I can't find decent articles to link you to, but the story includes a bit about the John's (?) not wanting to "do" residency in the US again. Hopefully, they can find other places in which to avoid onerous taxes placed on them by Socialist countries.

Are the good people of Florida or the United States supposed to be all butthurt (oops!) about this news? Who cares? Elton should just take my advice, take the next flight, and grow some funk of his own. (That was so macho ...)

The same '75 album, Rock of the Westies also had a great song called Island Girl. To paraphrase a lyric line, "Elton John, Elton John, Elton Jo-oh-on, tell me whatchu wantin' with the straight man's world."

I try not to feature the same song twice on Peak Stupidity, something I did accidentally did until this edit, so per SafeNow memories, here is a duet from near the end of EJ's best period, 1976. As "Elton John" was an alias or stage name, so was "Kiki Dee", aka, Pauline Matthews. Kiki Dee was also there doing backing vocals on Island Girl.



I really like another duet Elton John did. It was ostensibly a Neil Sedaka song, but Elton's singing was a big part of the song Bad Blood, from '75.

Thanks for reading the blog, Peakers, and even more for writing in! We'll be back next week with more of the stupidity you crave. Also, thanks for the music suggestion, SafeNow. I would have bet real money I'd put that one up already, but I checked the dBase. Nope.


* His band could really rock - see Funeral for a Friend/Love Lies Bleeding, well hear it some time ... LOUD!

**************************
[UPDATED 06/25]
Changed out music, Don't Go Breaking my Heart for Island Girl, since the latter was already featured on the blog.
**************************


Comments (8)




Harold Robinson on the Competency Crisis


Posted On: Thursday - June 22nd 2023 7:40PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  Americans  US Feral Government  The Future  Race/Genetics  Educational Stupidity  Big-Biz Stupidity



Under this recent post, Peak Stupidity commenter E.H. Hail pointed us to this very interesting article on the decline of competency in America. The writer is one Harold Robinson, and exactly who he is, his occupation, and his whereabouts were discussed in that same thread.

Mr. Robinson wrote this article for Palladium on-line (I guess?) magazine. (Who prints stuff out anymore?) After reading this excellent article, to be discussed herein, I did check out a few of the other articles on that site. From the looks of the home page and half of another article I perused there (on Xinjiang, China, from '18) this magazine features long well-written essays. It's not the site you can depend on to, cough, cough, you know like ... cough have something new to read daily. It looks like you'll see something new once or twice a week.

Palladium magazine's ABOUT page has the names of 5 Editor/Manager types and 8 regular "correspondents". They invite freelance writing, and that must be the deal with Mr. Robinson and his article to be discussed. It is directly within Peak Stupidity's wheelhouse. The regular reader would have seen our recent articles on the subject of declining competency in America. For starters, check out the Harvesting the fruits of a half-century of Affirmative Action series - Part 1 - - Part 2 - - Part 3 - - Part 4 and Part 5, or Demographics to DIE for from - - Competence is dying and Potentially lethal combination of Cheap China(?)-made crap and low competence. Then, there is our series on South Africa (latest installment here) for an example that's already far gone. Back in the US, just one specific case of growing incompetency due to changing demographics in the service "industry" is discussed in our Hotel Haiti series - Part 1 - - Part 2 - - Part 3 and Part 4 .

OK, link bomb away, we can climb up to cruise altitude and praise and critique the article in question. As I wrote, this is in our wheelhouse. Peak Stupidity sees the slow (for now!) decrease in the ability to live 1st World lives. It is mostly due, IMO, to the large change in demographics that has occurred in America over the last half century. Affirmative Action, in effect for over half a century now, was a screw-job on White Men, no doubt. However, there were lower, sometimes token, numbers, and we had the attitude that we'd still do our thing with the additional burden of parasitic AA hires. The new Wokeness, with its insistence on quotas in all fields is making, and will make, a competent workforce a thing of the past wherever it's in effect.

Mr. Robinson seems to agree with this assessment. He starts off, in his introductory section, discussing recent military and industrial disasters, and he relates the problem with the workforce and modern Woke working environment. He discusses the century old to half-century-ending American practices of meritocracy and the use of the many standardized tests. He notes the "collision course" of the meritocratic system with the decade long (early 1960s to early '70s) series of Civil Rites laws, Supreme Court rulings, executive orders, and laws that were made to push non-White-Men into all the American Institutions.

Mr. Robinson's 2nd section, titled From Meritocracy to Diversity, goes back to the origin of the entrance qualifications to universities, with the explanation going back to Griggs v Duke Power (the impetus from Big Biz for the hiring of degreed employees). He discusses the ways Big Biz has been roped into the D.I.E. program, including the scourge of the HR "professionals.

Next, in Diversity in Theory and Practice, Mr. Robinson explains more about the escalation of D.I.E. in big corporations via "ask, tell, make". Going back to colleges and professional programs, he tells us how all the admission qualifications have been going away, because, DIEVERSITY. Then he discusses the very recent changes from the BLM/Woke pressure - with a helping hand from the Kung Flu PanicFest - that has resulted in the elimination of entrance and even EXIT! (i.e. Medical Boards) qualifications.

Mr. Hail noted that this great article may be something to bring to the attention of illustrious blogger Steve Sailer This university admissions discussion is especially in Steve Sailer's wheelhouse. He just loves that stuff. However, I will say here that Mr. Sailer likes to see and play with the numbers. Harold Robinson, writing here for Palladium tells the story without numbers and specific schools and racial headcounts. I'm fine with that, as I can see this guy's reasoning is sound, and he has the story right. Mr. Sailer might not be fine with that. Also, Mr. Sailer is too nice, and often a bit naive, to straight-out tell readers that the continuation of all this is leading to serious trouble, as in a 3rd-World nation.

There are 2 more long sections in this article, Competency Is Declining From the Core Outwards and The American System Is Cracking, that are not fun, but are very important reading material. This all goes along with what the articles on this site are trying to explain about our future. All the "complex systems" that let us live good lives in this nation are breaking down due to the lack of any serious fight against the D.I.E. non-White-male madness. I wish that a large majority of America could read this article.

Now, I'll give a few criticisms. Harold Robinson concentrates almost solely on the white-collar workforce in this article. He talks about the increasing numbers of AA/D.I.E. executives and managers who are incompetent including discussion of people running the Government.* Really, I don't see that as the real problem. After all, the NAZI and Soviet Russian Governments were run by almost all White men, but, arguably, Totalitarianism is worse on us the more competently it's practiced. I am not at all concerned with the US military having gotten into this Wokeness. Let the navy ships crash out in the South China Sea. I would like a weaker and weaker American military that (when it eventually comes to it) States or the American people can beat more easily. I'd like to see the US Feral Gov't, most especially, the IRS, be so incompetent that they do nothing resembling their functions as prescribed by Congress.

As can be seen in our Hotel Haiti series for example, Peak Stupidity is more concerned with the incompetence in blue collar and/or service work. There are professionals that Mr. Robinson discussed too, doctors for worrisome(!) example. Incompetent engineers are a REAL problem. Put the latter together with an incompetent blue collar workforce and bridges fall down, roads crack, machines break even faster than the current China-made Crap, and life becomes ever more of a struggle just to stand still economically. Bad service everywhere adds to the misery.

Mr. Hail brought up the lack of attention paid in this article to the Kung Flu as a point of discussion. Besides mentioning that the Covid gave impetus to the removal of testing requirements (done previously in person), the writer had only this to say:
The more recent coronavirus pandemic was another teachable moment. What started just three years ago with a novel respiratory virus has caused a financial crisis, a bubble, soaring inflation, and now a banking crisis in rapid succession.
I don't think that was all about incompetence. Much of that was purposeful, by power-hungry and greedy people who took advantage of the latest virus. It doesn't sound like Mr. Robinson gets this, but I'm not sure from the 2 sentences.

I will now excerpt the last part of Harold Robinson's conclusion:
Americans living today are the inheritors of systems that created the highest standard of living in human history. Rather than protecting the competency that made those systems possible, the modern preference for diversity has attenuated meritocratic evaluation at all levels of American society. Given the damage already done to competence and morale combined with the natural exodus of baby boomers with decades worth of tacit knowledge, the biggest challenge of the coming decades might simply be maintaining the systems we have today.

The path of least resistance will be the devolution of complex systems and the reduction in the quality of life that entails. For the typical resident in a second-tier city in Mexico, Brazil, or South Africa, power outages are not uncommon, tap water is probably not safe to drink, and hospital-associated infections are common and often fatal. Absent a step change in the quality of American governance and a renewed culture of excellence, they prefigure the country’s future.
It could be worse than that even. All of this reminds me of the Mike Judge movie Idiocracy. I don't think Mike Judge's time span of 500 years is correct. We could be there in 100, maybe 50.


* The writer rightly puts the focus on the FAA's Air Traffic Control system, which is a part of government. There have been an undue share of near-disasters lately. I wonder if the Globalist elites who push all this D.I.E. stuff onto the Western world can see the problems they have caused. These people do like to travel. Maybe they plan on bailing out of the West.


Comments (20)




I am Non-Man - Hear me Roar!


Posted On: Thursday - June 22nd 2023 7:40PM MST
In Topics: 
  Genderbenders  Music  Feminism

American's Cultural Revolution, call it Cult Rev 2.0 for the World, is going swimmingly, as the Instapundit likes to say. He uses that word sarcastically though. I think those willingly in charge of Cult Rev 2.0, and the usual useful idiots, are likely pleased with its speed and progress. The Genderbending nonsense that has been pushed for the last 5 years or so is so damned stupid that Chairman Mao (of that 1st go-around) couldn't have imagined it in his wildest wet Red Dreams. Yet, it's moving right along.

The deal now, per a tweet I came upon, is that the word "woman", and I'm sure its plural, "women" is no longer acceptable, per the Revolution. This must have something to do with the transgender business, though it would hurt my head too much for me attempt to figure how. We'll just have to deal with it.

There are many other terms that have been in use by men, some with very nice connotations and others not. Going in some sort of chronological order here and without including the more specific terms, we note that there were/are dames, broads, chicks, and so on... The cops use just plain "female", but as a noun, one of the most annoying terms, IMO. "Lady" is always in. Also, they've always been girls when fairly young, up through 30-40 even, depending on the utterer and gals when older than that. The use of the latter term goes right on up through the oldest gal in the world, still living on rice and sweet potatoes at 115, somewhere in the deepest parts of China - she remembers Cult Rev 1.0 so is glad to be called "gal" or about anything - just don't call her a Capitalist Roader!

The word "women", in English, is obviously an extension to men. The Bible tells us that women are not true originals, having been taken from Adam's rib cage. Well, the Feminists don't like any of that and so tried on a different spelling, "womyn" or "wymen" or double-"y" "wymyn". The latter reads a bit olde-Englishey but is only annoying to me based on the shrieking harpies (see, there's another one) that use it.

As of late, there's been a disturbance in The Force, if you will, well, known more widely as a crack in the Coalition of the Fringes*. The recent Genderbender / BLT-G++ crowd tell us that being a woman is just not that freaking simple. To clear, yes, clear, things up, we are supposed to use "Non-Man" instead, per the prestigious Johns Hopkins University.

The thing is, if your Communist campaign is to work, you have to enforce these things. In the time of the original Cult Rev, there was no internet around. Was it easier to enforce these programs then? You'd have to print new books, such as those Little Red ones and take the old ones. As the N. Vietnamese Commies came down into the south and Saigon in 1975, one could be shot for having English or French books at home. Pol Pot's Commies just figured anyone who was an intellectual, i.e., might read a lot should just be shot. The wearing of eyeglasses makes one LOOK LIKE an intellectual, so hell, why not kill everyone who wears eyeglasses in the whole of Kampuchea. What? Wasn't it Cambodia? Yes, it's gone back and forth, but nobody noticed as they couldn't make it out without eyeglasses.

Americans have kept their guns, so a Mao, Ho Chi Minh, or Pol Pot type effort won't work. Nowadays, it's all on-line anyway. It must be weird to be in the middle of a page on a Kindle book when all instances of "women" change to "non-man" before one's eyes.

First, per an Unz Review commenter, they're going to have to change to old song lyrics, hoping people won't notice, as it's not the lyrics that make a good song anyway.

Song titles to be revised:

From the soul music genre:
(You make me feel like a) Natural Non-man from Percy Sledge
When a Man Loves a Non-man from Aretha Franklin

The old Rock & Roll standards:
Oh, Pretty Non-man from Roy Orbison

Country, old and new:
She's a Good-Hearted Non-man from Waylon Jennings (and sometimes Willie too)
Man, I Feel Like a Non-man from Shania Twain

The Disco era:
More than a Non-man from the Bee Gees

The Rock Era:
LA Non-man by The Doors
Sweet-Talking Non-man by ELO

Reggae:
No Non-man, No Cry from Bob Marley and the Wailers

Finally, from the Feminist genre itself:
I am Non-Man, Enn Oh Enn dash Emm Ay Enn! by Peggy Lee
I am Non-Man (Hear me Roar) by Helen Reddy

The song we'll feature here is from guess who? Nope, not The Who but The Guess Who, and it's from 53 years back. The song from this Canadian band had a lot of vitriol against American Non-men.

Our vitriol in this post is just aimed at men and non-men who push this Cult Rev 2.0 garbage. Whatever the lyrics be, this is a good old rock song. (The flip side of that single record was No Sugar Tonight / New Mother Nature which I think has a better tune, 2 of them actually.)



The Guess Who was:

Burton Cummings – vocals
Randy Bachman – lead and rhythm guitar
Jim Kale – bass
Garry Peterson – drums


* H/T, Steve Sailer, of course.


Comments (5)




Stupid Man Locked out of Smart Home


Posted On: Wednesday - June 21st 2023 9:38PM MST
In Topics: 
  Humor  Political Correctness  Artificial Stupidity  Orwellian Stupidity  Big-Biz Stupidity  iEspionage



Alternate title: Live by the iEspionage, die by the iEspionage

I try to stay aware of all the ways my smart phone can keep track of me, and it's not that I believe the things I set in "Settings" for privacy will stop the evil Orwellian scum that can use the info. I cannot fathom the mind of someone either naive enough or uncaring enough to get one of those amazon Alexis home spy devices. Bezos and company are clear enough about what they are doing with those.*

Well, apparently, along with smart phones, smart cars, smart toasters, and smart toilets(?), there are smart whole houses. The convenience of one of those must be PHENOMENAL!, like you don't have to flip light switches, and the water may turn on when it looks like you're due for a shave, I don't know, in order for someone to happily invite computer spyware to run and spy on his home.

There can be problems, though... such as when Amazon Locks Man Out of His Smart Home After Baseless Racism Accusation. This is going to be a complete copy/paste job, as that site is IGN SEA, the "SEA" meaning Southeast Asia, so I'm not afraid of being sued from Phnom Penh or Jakarta by this Izzatul Rasali. (Thank you, Sir, for the story.)
In a world where technology has seamlessly intertwined with our daily lives, a man recently encountered an occurrence that showcased why relying on tech can be inadvertently complicated.
Complicated? It thought computers were gonna simplify our lives. Also, I'm not so sure about the "inadvertently" part.
The alarming incident caused a smart-home owner to get locked out of his home for a week due to a misunderstanding with an Amazon delivery driver.
After a couple of hours of that, I'd have smashed a window and when I got inside asked Alexis how to fix it.
The unwanted disruption happened when a package was delivered to Brandon Jackson’s home by an Amazon driver. Everything seemed like it was going smoothly until Jackson was unable to access his Amazon Echo devices the next day, indicating that his account had been locked.
All his tools and helpful appliances work only under the control of Jeff Bezos and his programmers. Let's go, Brandon!
In a post shared by Jackson on Medium, he initially thought that someone might have attempted to log into his account repeatedly, which triggered the safety lockout mechanism when he was unable to interact with his devices.

In an attempt to address the problem, Jackson contacted Amazon’s customer service and was asked by an executive if he knew why his account was locked.

“When I answered I was unsure, their tone turned somewhat accusatory. I was told that the driver who had delivered my package reported receiving racist remarks from my ‘Ring doorbell’.”
Brandon's doorbell called someone a nigger? I don't get this stuff...
Jackson, who claimed that his house has multiple cameras recording everything that happened within his property, reviewed the footage and found no proof of such remarks being uttered. According to him, the driver, who was wearing headphones, must have misheard the doorbell as the only sound it could make was the automated response, “Excuse me, can I help you?”
I'd have already sent that thing back just based on the bad grammar programmed in at the Chinese factory, but maybe the doorbell was right about this. Did this delivery driver damage Brandon's stuff due to carelessness and stupidity? Per another doorbell I've heard from, "It's all so tiresome..."

You can't blame this one on Brandon because...
Adding to his bafflement, upon reviewing the footage, it became evident that no one was home during the incident, meaning the delivery driver had truly misinterpreted the situation. However, despite clearing the air with Amazon, Jackson’s account was still locked for an entire week.
One is considered guilty of racism until definitively proving one's innocence - that takes donations, apologies, and yard signs. Yes, it can take weeks.
Amazon allegedly did not opt for a more reasonable approach, such as sending a warning email or contacting the homeowner before locking him out of his own house. Following the messy ordeal, Jackson said he is “seriously considering discontinuing” his Amazon Echo devices.
Seriously? Just because an Orwellian network of iEspionage spyware appliances locked you out of your own house for a week due to a wholly manufactured slight reported by a diverse Amazon delivery man, you would change your whole life around?! You might have to switch on lights and set your alarm clock yourself. Oh, the humanity! That's right, how about some more humanity, rather than a life full of Artificial Stupidity?


* An acquaintance told me about a 1 1/2 hour video interview with Jeff Bezos on this stuff, but I forget the "venue", which would help in looking it up. I'll be seeing him again and will get the info.


Comments (16)