Why call them Commies?


Posted On: Friday - January 9th 2026 5:12PM MST
In Topics: 
  Commies  Pundits

In our last post, the word "Commies", short for "Communists" obviously, appears a whole lot. I understand how readers may be wondering why we call the Antifa types, such as the latest "anti-NAZI", supposed anti Police State crowd in Minneapolis Communists.

Who ARE these guys?! The ones that Peak Stupidity enjoys seeing be sprayed in the face with various chemical compounds*, that is...



We've said before, such as in the old post None dare call them Commies, that no, it's not the original Communist ideology itself that fits these pieces of work (to put it nicely). They could not get through Das Kapital, The Communist Manifest, Mao's Little Red Book©, or probably any book at all. Are they on-board with the class struggle and the proletariat vs the bourgeoisie? There's actually a little bit of class struggle involved, even though the American ctrl-left has long struggled on behalf of race and sex. That has meant being against White Men as Job #1 for them.

These people were well described by Cajun ex-Cuban Humberto Fontova as Los Resentidos, "the Resentful Ones". Young people today have a lot to be resentful about. Not all of them want to destroy society though. It's the Communists in the lot that figure it'll take tearing down traditional America, the very society that created the best living conditions in the world, to "show these people".

Oh, yeah, they are supported by the Globalists like George Soros and such, as we've already learned about this latest batch, so doesn't that make them Globalists officially? I don't think these are the "eat zee bug" people, as much as I'd like to see that. No, they ARE in a class struggle, as they work to destroy what's left of the White Middle Class. The White Middle Class is being destroyed in large part by the immigration invasion. Therefore, they are for it.

The people you see out in the streets pretending to care about, or being duped into caring about, the ICE Police State rounding up people, care not a whit about the old rule-of-law-not-men, limited government America. They want to destroy it all, hoping for, not a Utopia this time, so I don't know what. They haven't thought that far ahead, as these new, more sexually, ethnically, racially, body-mass-indexually ink-cover diverse are not your Great-Granddaddy's Commies, those that could be found in 110 year-ago Russia or 100 year-ago Germany. They're missing a couple of dozen IQ points too. It's just that America has always been the prize catch, and in today's times, gotten to due to the VERY same people having infiltrated the Institutions, our country has become ripe for their struggle.



A REAL Nazi would use his service revolver. Even the smallest round would penetrate that umbrella nicely.

These Commies call the ICE guys doing the job we want done Fascists, hoping Americans will get duped. This is nothing new. The Antifa has been around longer than I'd first realized. They are of the same ilk that marched and caused havoc in century-ago Berlin against the Nazis, who WERE Fascists of a sort, but came to power due to their being the ones who got rid of these Communists. That didn't work out well... for ANYONE.



I think Americans can do better this time. We're thankfully not in the sorry state economically that Germany was in a century ago. Most Americans want nothing to do with them. We're better off just moving these people out of the way, so ICE can get Job #1 done. Would the old-timey Fascists have just thrown these annoyances into the snow at the side of the street? Hopefully that's all we'll have to keep doing. That's up to the Commies though.

ZeroHedge posted a very good article along these lines by pundit Brandon Smith - mentioned here before, entitled How Dare You Fight Back Against Communists!. Here's a big excerpt:
1) They work with the very same oligarchs, corporatists and globalists they claim to despise. They happily take the money of wealthy institutions and NGOs and do the bidding of their elitist masters as long as they get to tear down their enemies.

2) They employ illicit funding to pay for the mobilization of an astroturf army of provocateurs and agitators (useful idiots will naturally gravitate to this army over time because they wrongly assume it’s grassroots).

3) They use propaganda to justify the activist sabotage and disruption of the target society by falsely claiming that they represent the will of the populace and the rights of the “disenfranchised.”

4) They wrap themselves in the identity of the “victim”; they are the poor, downtrodden masses. They are the poverty stricken underclass. They are the abused and mistreated majority suffering under a minority of overlords (anyone more successful than they are or anyone who opposes their beliefs). Therefore, everything they do no matter how vicious, deceitful and destructive is morally exonerated.

5) The insurgents then agitate and provoke and poke and prod the society until it reacts to defend itself. When they finally get hit back, leftists then cry the tears of the wounded underdog.

6) They then attempt to abuse the laws and principles of the existing system in order to punish anyone who defends themselves against communist provocations. If they can get the law on their side, through corrupt judges and politicians, then they can cripple their opposition by making people afraid to fight back for fear of imprisonment.

7) When leftists can’t control the law they wail and rage over it’s rightful application. They act as if the enforcement of basic law and order is the same as government tyranny. How dare you fight back! How dare you subject them to the punishments they deserve!

8) A great and fabricated drama unfolds. Leftists play the role of martyrs who “only want to be free”, who only want “equity” and the same prosperity enjoyed by their betters. They only want to protect the rights of the vulnerable. In reality, they are militants trying to burn down your freedom and prosperity and pillage what they can in the process.

They don’t want to be equal to you, they want to plunder what you have so they can feel superior to you. They want to steal your wealth, your accomplishments and the life which you worked so hard to build. They are parasites, not people.

If any of this is sounding familiar it’s because we are experiencing this very process of communist revolution right now in America. And, I think it’s time to admit that our republic and our constitution (as we currently interpret it) are ill equipped to defeat an insurgency made up of millions of the same citizens that the republic was originally built to protect.

If the Founding Fathers were alive today, they would have already crushed this insurgency to dust and they would not be concerned about any constitutional conundrums. They understood that the liberties of the republic only apply to people who want to keep the republic alive. They do not apply to people who desire its death.
Well said, Mr. Smith. Thank you.


PS: I'm gonna add a good comment from another ZH post, this one about the shooting - Watch: New Footage Shows Federal Agent's Perspective In Minneapolis ICE-Involved Shooting. The new footage didn't help that much but a commenter with the handle Revolver2030 wrote:
Hey 'Trump4Israel..." [another commenter] From the get-go you seem to be very confused about who is really who and what is really what here. Sincerely. I'm more of an sovereign citizen type, have qualm's with both but certainly more the Left bro! And the ones doing all this anti-ICE stuff bro? Try to focus, but those are the "communists" bro. The officers are not communists, sorry just not. Now, could they fall under the (or a) definition of a federal fascist? Perhaps. I am certain those guys are doing a real and legit job though bro. They feel they are tryng to clean up and save (try) this country from the doldrums of unaccounted for waves of immigration.. You want a "country" or not? Can't have one when 10% of the population is unaccounted for and doesn't want to assim. I just don't get why "Americans" are out there putting themselves in danger to protect people who are truly.. And I don't just say this off the cuff... not friendly to this country and don't belong. Certainly not all or most even but there are nasty ones.. got to go.. If we are going to have a country, that is. Or, is the plan to not have one? Some say... by design..?
Agreed!




* I put it this way because I really don't know if that is a paintball, pepper spray, bear spray, or what? Thankfully, I'm not too familiar.


Comments (2)




Blood in the streets of Minnegadishu...


Posted On: Thursday - January 8th 2026 11:32AM MST
In Topics: 
  Commies  Immigration Stupidity  US Police State  US Feral Government  ctrl-left  Anarcho-tyranny

...Blood stains the snow near by East 34th Street.
Blood in my love in the terrible winter.
Bloody red sun of retarded St. Paul*.

She came in town and then she drove away
Sunlight in her hair...


Those doctored lyrics are from The Doors' song Peace Frog. That one is in the very best true Jim Morrison/Doors style, with a good tune, good sound, an ominous voice, and the usual weird lyrics. The following is not sung but spoken by Mr. Morrison:
Indians scattered on dawn's highway bleedin'.
Ghosts crowd the young child's fragile eggshell mind
Don't ask me what ... maybe I could at least tell you what drugs they were taking...

I'll hold off on the Venezuela post, as I'm still very conflicted about that. These recent protests in Minneapolis to prevent ICE from doing their job are something I am NOT conflicted about. The shooting of one Renee Good in her SUV is another is something that I'd rather let the law deal with before proclaiming the ICE agent's guilt or innocence. The video below has a pretty good view of the event and has generally good discussion underneath too.




No, even PURPOSELY running over a cop is not "Domestic Terrorism". We've got to stop with that nonsense. It looks like Mrs. Good turned the wheel to the right to get away. One wonders indeed, if the cop had time to draw and take 3 shots, why he couldn't have jumped to his right, out of the way?

On the other side of the ledger, I imagine this ICE guy had a lot of adrenaline flowing (not an excuse, mind you), and it was said that someone had tried to come out him with a vehicle earlier during the action. I will not agree with "She disobeyed direct orders." as a reason to shoot her.

The shooting was unfortunate. The ctrl-left will use this to their advantage. What is much different between this shooting and the George Floyd O/D 5 years back is that the Feral Gov't at least will prevent this ICE agent from getting completely railroaded, as did Derek Chauvin 5 years ago. Maybe there could be a fair trial... some may say, I'm a dreamer ...

The action itself that I've seen perhaps 20 minutes of is great. I didn't find the must-see clip that I'd seen on TUR, but the following one shows a lot of what I wanted to show. Adam Smith came through for me in the comments so here:




These Minneapolis Commies and very likely Commies arranged to be there from all over the country were there trying to impede ICE from doing its job, a job that any Conservative should be FOR. The woman shot dead was in that spot to block the road. During much of one of the videos, the reason the ICE agents were pushing people around was to get them out of the road so they could drive through with a white pick-up. I gotta say that I really enjoyed seeing these people get thrown down into the snow (not gonna hurt much) and have all manner of things sprayed into their faces when they wouldn't just get out of the way.

Now, I could see some Peak Stupidity readers being miffed by this attitude of mine. After all, we've had a couple of handfuls of posts a year and a half ago in which we enjoyed just the opposite, some fiesty Brits or Irishmen raising hell as the police tried to hold them off. (Check here for those posts.)

There's no contradiction though. Our biggest focus on this site is the Immigration Stupidity. Over in the UK, the people's protests were against the housing of aliens in the hotels, but really, "GET! THEM! OUT!" meant more than just out of the hotel. In the fun up in Minneadishu, "the people" do not represent the American people. They fight ICE because they want to shut down the Deportation Nation program. The useful idiots, or even those who are in on the plan, are claiming "NAZIs!" and "Police State!" because they don't think much or it often works, respectively.

After this shooting especially, I can see that the ctrl-left is using the Police State claims against ICE, which means against Deportations and against Trump of course. We need to stand fast and not get fooled by the BS of these Communists. It's not the first time this tactic has been used. Just go back 60 years. That is the time, from 1964 to 1967, I'd say, in which SO MANY destructive policies were developed.

The Hart-Cellar mass-immigration Act was passed without any ctrl-left marches and violence, as far as I know. However, there were protests about nearly everything else. As they protested and took over university buildings on behalf of Feminism, Socialism, anti-White-Men AA, etc. they shouted "Our Constitutional Rights!", really just so they could keep out of, or get out of, jail when necessary. I wasn't quite there at the time, but I can imagine that Americans bought a lot of that deception, at the time. We must not do the same this time around!

Those Commies are out on the streets of Minnegadishu, with only a little blood so far, because it's very important to them to block attempts by Americans to remove people who shouldn't be here. The Somalians up there are a great example - even were they not ripping off the taxpayers, we don't want them. I don't think a couple of million Somalians, as it'll get to soon (if we don't continue) will ever be all broken up about anybody's Constitutional Rights. Sharia Law or Shithole Law is their thing.

The shooting of Renee Good has been a godsend for the ctrl-left. Many of them are pretty happy it happened... breaking some eggs and all that ... not just in Minneapolis but all over as planned by the Protest Industrial Complex.

I'm with ICE! I should get a T-shirt.

OK, the song has been in my head the whole time here, so here's Peace Frog:




PS: I just read that Mrs. Good is a lesbian mom of 3 (they repeat "Mom of 3" but not so much the lesbian part) who left her kids in Colorado to participate, such as it was, in this planned agitation against ICE. What kind of Mom...? It just doesn't seem normal.


* Nothing against St. Paul here, which is across the Mississippi River and north and east of the Minnesota River, but we needed something with 2 syllables for the song.


Comments (7)




January 6th, '21, 5 years back: American v European Resistance to Globalism


Posted On: Tuesday - January 6th 2026 7:56PM MST
In Topics: 
  Trump  Globalists  Orwellian Stupidity  World Political Stupidity  People's Revolt

Site Note: The last week and a half were an unintentional hiatus. As I explained quickly in the last 2 posts, I was missing my stuff. I imagine the average reader had already figured out I was on a trip based on that phoned-in post on a TSA "experience". We're still limited on tools here, but hopefully Peak Stupidity will be blogging at 75% power or so this week and next.



Yep, it's 5 years to the day today. 3 days prior, when I heard about it, I'd pictured another YUGE rally that would probably not have been worth going to, mainly due to Trump's manner of speaking. I was still tired of that - he has changed a bit lately for the better (and has definitely gotten more literate people to write the tweets) - but then I was hesitant about wasting my time. I remember very well trying to cajole 2 friends into traveling to the Federal Shithole, and then I had the date off by one, giving us more time to plan. They and I, none of us, knew what was going to go down and what was possibly planned.

I should give President Trump credit right here for releasing the J6ers, first thing after his taking office. If he hadn't kept THAT promise, I'd have figured this term would be just like Trump-45. We can talk about Venezuela later (next post or so), but the holding of average Americans charged with trespassing, some light rioting, and the kind of hell raising that pales in comparison to that out of the Antifa and BLM goons, as political prisoners was THE most egregious affront to the US Constitution out of Dark Brandon and his minions. Had it happened in the early '70s - that's the 1770's, the Declaration of Independence would have surely included this right up at the top of the grievances against the Regime.

Readers may think I'm so supportive of the J6ers because "that coulda' been me!', were the airline flight schedules somewhat more recovered from the Kung Flu PanicFest. I may well have been in the midst and taken in later - I do try to think of how much longer the American patriots would have been languishing in African-run prisons had Trump not kept this promise.

I wanted this post to go in a different direction though, very much along the lines of what I already wrote this past March in Defeating Globalism: Europeans v Americans. The comparison was between America and the 3 biggest countries (economy wise, I think) of Western Europe, the UK, France, and Germany. The governments of those 3 countries have their own ways of squashing any resistance to the Regimes in power and above that the EU Regime in Brussels.

Going from east to west, the German government protects itself and the Globalists' agenda with threats - all very constitutional and all, you know - to shut down any political party that is different enough to be "a threat to German democracy". The French government has conducted lawfare against the political Le Pan family members. This is akin to the lawfare against Trump, the NRA, and VDare here in America. (The former two beat it, but the very small VDare Foundation was forced to shut down.) In the UK, things have taken a more Orwellian turn, and communications alone that are in opposition to the Starmtrooper Regime are banned. This makes it hard to even start creating a serious opposition party. (Nigel Farage is a decent guy, but he and his party are milquetoast.)

The lack of that well-thought-out US Constitution has a whole lot to do with it, but I also think that the multiparty systems* with their compromises and alliances working against any serious opposition party make it more difficult for the Euro countries to fight the Globalists, at least at the executive level. You can say what you want about him (in the comments), but Trump is against the Globalists. He is a Nationalist as opposed to an anti-Nationalist (a friend's term). MAGA and Trump have gotten into a powerful position finally. As the UniParty Congress twiddles its thumbs, and the Judicial Branch at lower levels, at least, acts as an impediment, this Executive branch has been making moves that the Europeans can only dream of. I'm generally pretty happy with what's been done so far.

Where do the J6ers come in, back into this post? Nearly 8 years ago, I wrote a 6 part series entitled ""There's battle lines being drawn" ..." with the title coming from an old 1960s (Buffalo Springfield) protest song. In the 5th part**, I noted (this was a bit over half a year since Charlottesville, keep in mind):
This is where there is lots to be learned from the 1960's (and I'm finally getting to what I was going to write last Monday!). Individuals speaking out and raising hell may always get doxxed, shamed by their peers, and maybe even arrested with the book(s) thrown at them. Groups of a few dozen - same thing but with better legal protection due to economy of scale. 5,000 of you - hey are they going to arrest you all? Where will they keep you?
That didn't age well, I gotta say. Then, I wrote:
They've got hundreds of Motherland Security goons ready for any excuse to beat your ass during your march on Washington, FS? That'll work if there are 200 of you - 200,000 - not so much!
Well, not all 200,000 participated ... or, were invited in - 5 years ago today.

This was in those old posts somewhere too: Conservatives are much more likely to have jobs than the activists of the ctrl-left. This means, that, no, there WAS no BIG ongoing protest in front of the jails holding the J6ers.*** I never showed up myself even, shamefully. The Regime Media, something not all of us have weaned themselves off of, were not going to promote your Bono's Mothers of the Disappeared or anything like that.



It took a political fight, resulting in the election of President Trump above and beyond all cheating, to get us our J6 Political Prisoners released. Should we be discouraged the next time? What I think the aftermath of that day 5 years back has taught is that we're much better off enacting change if we have someone on our side at the top, as flawed as he may be, if not to "watch our six", at least to not be actively working to fry us. Failing that, the next ctrl-left Administration, if there is one, will be out for blood, with less respect for rule-of-law than the last as they work on behalf of the Globalists. If you're taking a chance of being shot dead from 10 ft by a cop 3 times your size while unarmed, or of not being seen in daylight again for 5 years, you'd tend to figure that you may as well go all out yourself.

I don't know who can replace him, but for now, it's President Trump that has put America miles in front of the European anti-Globalists.



* President George Washington and others of the Founders were hopeful that there wouldn't be ANY political parties. A man would drop his work to help run the nation for a while as an ACTUAL public service - what a concept! It didn't outlast George Washington though. After his 8 years, there were the Federalists against the Democratic-Republicans, with the latter winning all but one election (against John Adams in 1796) out of 7 with these 2 major "team match-ups".

** The rest of them are: the intro. ... the ctrl-left army ... The People of the Gun ... The official military ... The Conclusion.

*** There was some small group I'd read about.


Comments (6)




Belated Happy New Year wishes from Peak Stupidity


Posted On: Friday - January 2nd 2026 8:51AM MST
In Topics: 
  Holiday from Stupidity

Some dot-art work from Mr. Adam Smith.

I’ll have the tools to write proper posts next week. Sorry for any inconvenience. We know your on-line time is valuable…

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢄⣠⡆⠀⠀⢀⣀⢈⣸⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠼⠿⡟⠁⠀⠋⣞⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠋⠐⠃⣈⣃⣤⠤⠤⠴⠷⠶⠶⠶⠤⠤⣄⢠⠄⠀⠀⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡤⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠘⠱⡷⢦⠀⢀⡴⠚⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⡏⠓⠒⠦⢤⣫⡇⠀⢰⠺⣿⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⣠⡈⠀⢸⡦⠄⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠤⠤⠔⠒⠚⠉⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠰⠸⠏⠓⠦⣄⡀⠶⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠈⠁⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡏⠒⠢⠤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⡆⢀⣽⣾⡀⠀⠀⣠⠞⠛⢳⡀⢀⡴⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣠⣤⡤⠤⠤⢤⣄⣀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠙⠛⣹⢁⣤⣤⡃⠀⠀⣰⠏⣴⢋⡽⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⡄
⠀⠀⠀⣦⡆⠀⠈⣧⢠⠖⠋⠉⣁⣖⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣹⣿⠙⠓⠶⢤⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⢰⢣⡟⠁⠈⢻⡄⢠⡏⠀⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡄⠀⢠⡟⠀
⠀⠀⠈⠙⢉⡄⠀⠸⣾⡖⠤⠤⠵⣤⠄⠒⠒⠒⠋⠉⢸⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⢦⡀⣰⠃⠀⠓⠂⠀⠈⡇⣼⠀⠘⣹⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠀⠀⠘⢂⡟⢠⡿⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠀⠀⢹⣿⡀⠀⢠⡍⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠉⠑⠒⠒⠒⣲⡷⠃⠀⠀⡠⠔⠒⢲⡗⡟⠚⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣄⣤⣼⠀⣼⡆⢀⡴⠋⠀⣾⠁⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⡟⠁⠀⠀⢈⡁⠀⠀⣼⠃⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣼⠀⣿⣫⣿⣏⡾⠻⠾⣻⠗⠋⠀⠀⢸⡇⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠀⠀⠹⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣻⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣿⠋⠀⠀⢀⡞⣫⢟⡆⣴⠇⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⢺⠗⠋⢻⡟⢹⡿⠉⢀⡴⠋⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣽⣤⠀⠀⠙⢮⡢⣀⠀⢀⡰⣷⢇⠀⠀⢀⣠⣾⢟⡁⠀⠀⢠⡏⠀⠻⡬⠞⠁⠀⠀⢳⣄⣠⢔⡞⠁⠀⡞⡇⣷⠃⠀⢾⣠⣼⠁⠀⡆⠀⠀⠛⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⢻⣳⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠲⣭⣥⠞⠙⣳⣭⡭⠿⠛⠁⢿⣷⠀⠀⡞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣄⠀⡞⠀⠀⢠⡟⠀⣠⢤⢀⣴⡇⢸⡗⠚⠁⠀⠀⠛⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠓⠀⠀⠀⠀⠺⠓⠒⠂⢸⢸⠀⢠⣯⡏⠀⠐⠇⠀⠘⣿⠀⢰⡇⠀⠀⠀⢠⡄⠀⢸⡶⠞⠃⠐⣇⢀⣴⣿⠁⢰⡿⢋⣮⣸⠳⠼⠇⢠⠖⠒⠒⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣼⡆⡾⡼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡄⢸⠁⢠⣖⡆⣮⢇⡄⣼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⣁⡯⠞⠉⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⣠⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⡇⣷⢳⢃⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠇⣷⢸⢀⡿⠚⢱⣏⡾⠷⠋⠀⠀⢀⣤⠖⠋⣽⠁⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣠⣤⠴⠞⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇⡏⡟⠀⠉⠀⣴⠂⢠⡟⠀⠸⣿⠈⠧⠴⠋⠀⢀⣀⣤⢄⡶⠫⠖⠒⣵⠃⠛⠋⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣏⠉⠀⠉⠉⢁⣒⢧⢹⣀⢠⡄⠀⠧⠴⠋⠀⠀⠀⢿⠀⣀⣤⠶⠛⠉⠉⠀⣿⠀⢀⣠⠞⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⠀⠈⣳⡦⠴⠒⠒⡠⠏⠈⠫⠍⠉⠉⠉⠉⠑⣦⠀⢀⡴⠞⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠋⠠⣎⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣠⢤⠖⠋⣰⠏⠀⠀⡤⠤⢤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠓⠒⠒⠒⠒⠒⢒⠋⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠀⢰⡇⠀⠀⠘⠃⠀⢈⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⢧⣀⣀⣀⣀⡤⠞⠁⠀


Thanks, Adam!


Comments (9)




Subscribe to Peak Stupidity's financial newsletter (NOT!)


Posted On: Sunday - December 28th 2025 10:41AM MST
In Topics: 
  Economics  Scams

You know how Peak Stupidity has our ears to the ground about the big picture of Global Financial Stupidity*, right? It's the peak of this particular stupidity that we reckon will cause all stupidity to decline, barring a turn toward Communism.

Shouldn't you be a subscriber to our financial newsletter then?



We kid. There is, and will be, no financial newsletter. Anyone who know so much about the near future of stocks, bonds, commodities, etc., one of those After-the-fact Explainers, really would be better off keeping it to himself to make more money on those trades.

In our review of the Strauss & Howe books we mentioned a clever financial newsletter scam in the context of making predictions. I wish I'd thought of it, not because I want to scam people out of their money, but just because it's a clever simple mathematical idea I SHOULD HAVE thought of. It's also an idea just made for the internet age, having been almost infinitely more costly in the age of paper letters and postage.

Here's what you** do: You send out a series of 10 emails to a million recipients that deign to demonstrate for the them how well your financial eNewsLetter predicts moves in the market. OK, well, maybe you send them to 100 million people, as (hopefully) not one in 100 people are clicking on this crap in this day and age. (You can see why email beats the living out of letters with postage.) The predictions you make are binary, as in, this stock WILL rise this week, or this commodity will fall next Tuesday. If you do give numbers, you make them over a fairly wide range.

You write a simple little program that tailors these emails. Let's take 10 separate financial predictions that your advertisement for your pricy eNewsLetter predicts over a series of 10 emails to each recipient. Every combination of rise/fall for the first prediction is covered, so that's 10 different initial emails, with hopefully a million or so (just a very rough ballpark #) of each being read. Now, you've got 1/2 of these recipients a bit impressed that you "got it right" with your prediction by next week. The set of ad emails sent next week only go out to the 1/2 of the recipients to whom you had sent the correct prediction last week. Again, computers would be very helpful in this endeavor.

1/4 of your original set have now read ad emails that got 2 market calls right, one week after the next. That's better than the average Jim on CNBC. By now, some may already decide to subscribe. Wait until it's 1/32 of the recipients who have seen that you got "all" 5 predictions correct! They'll be signing up. Even if it takes 10 predictions in a row to get these recalcitrant losers off their asses, that's 1/1024 of your original list, still maybe a (very rough, cause SPAM folders) thousand people who totally believe in your system. Hell, why not buy a lifetime subscription of $1,800?! I mean, you're gonna save over the annual rate, and you'll be SO RICH that the $1,800 will be peanuts to you.

Another way to go might be to put all 10 predictions in one advertising email, with your software inserting all the combinations to make 1,024 different emails. Stretch the predictions to a month time-frame, and by the end of that, they'll be begging for your eNewsLetter. Dang, I wish I could do this with blog posts...


PS: Our posts may be coming few and far between this week, as, per my comment under the previous post, I am without the normal electronics temporarily. Some hotels have decent desktop computers on which one can save images and everything. This one has inop CTRL keys, which explains why you may see only the one topic key for a while.




* There are also many more related posts with the subject with the Economics and Inflation topic keys too.

** By "you", we mean here, "you people in Bangalore or Bombay".


Comments (12)




The TSA - A word to the wise


Posted On: Saturday - December 27th 2025 11:10AM MST
In Topics: 
  US Police State

Apparently, it's NOT OK to say "this is kinda faggy" when being felt up by an OFFICER of the TSA.

Though Stupidity is our Core Competency here, we feel it incumbent upon us to occasionally provide some of that "News You Can Use". That was such.

Our file photo below - supplied purely as clickbait - from this old post, shows a somewhat parallel situation but even worse. I.e., I don't think the TSA guy in my case was gay, but I probably wouldn't have been kicked out to another checkpoint if he had been... Just sayin'... queue up Third Rate Romance, Low-Rent Rendevoux.



Nope, no Humor tag today.


Comments (4)




Merry Christmas from Peak Stupidity


Posted On: Thursday - December 25th 2025 9:39PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Bible/Religion  Holiday from Stupidity

M E R R Y    C H R I S T M A S !


A friend of mine recommends Johnny Mathis' Oh Holy Night as his favorite Christmas song ever.



Now, here's Enya with Adeste Fedeles. I hadn't known that she even sang Christmas songs. The New Age music she is famous for was/is part of a movement that goes in a different direction, religiously. In this case, one can pick up some Latin, a whole lot easier to understand than whatever she sang in - Klingon, was it? - in some of the best of her Shepherd Moon and Memory of Trees days.



Then, I'm still partial to John Lennon's Happy Christmas. No matter what you think of the guy's politics (he hasn't been with us since 45 years ago), this is a great one.



Peak Stupidity will be really slow in posting for about a week, starting... right now... actually earlier today.


PS: Finally, because, Spirit of Christmas Present(s), I like this headline: Lawyer Wins Legal Battle With Homeowners Association Over Christmas Display – Uses Settlement Money to Buy More Lights. Ha, I have not heard of too many good experiences with Home Owners Associations, and maybe William Shakespeare was wrong. First, let's not kill ALL the lawyers. I like this guy's spirit!


Comments (8)




Strauss & Howe - Generations and The Fourth Turning


Posted On: Wednesday - December 24th 2025 7:00PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  History  The Future  Books  Muh Generation

(Continued from Strauss & Howe - Generational Theory.)

Here's a little bit of psychology of memory to chew on: Do all people use location to pin down their memories and even thoughts? I have found that I usually remember when I read a book, or even when I had a certain important thought, by where I was at the time. For this post, I was trying to pin down when I read these books to be reviewed first. I got a pretty good idea this way.

Where I lived at the time is important, but it was a wider range than I wanted. I know that I first took out William Strauss & Neil Howe's book Generations; The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069 in the mid/late 1990s. The book was published in '91, but I took it out of the library later, going by where I was and what I was generally doing then. I can pin it down to '97 because that's when I realized the www was becoming a big thing, and this is related to my thoughts after reading the book. Hey, if it works - easier than Michael Scott's technique (go to 02:55).

The book was interesting enough that I recall I took out their 2nd book (from '96), The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy—What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America's Next Rendezvous with Destiny soon afterwards. OK, that was fun, but, wait a minute, what is this crisis of which you speak? Crisis, what crisis? (Yes, a Supertramp song is long overdue on Peak Stupidity.)

Hell, in '97 I didn't see how we could even be in an Unraveling "turning". I mean, the internet was the next big American-made thing, and everything important with it was going on in America. The President at the time, Bill Clinton, being nothing but a pussy-hound and lover of power, didn't really have the kind of destructive ideals that one can see in the ctrl-left of today. Congress had him somewhat restrained, the Hildabeast was back in the Whitehouse kitchen baking cookies, and politically, things were still under control. Economically, the Globalists were in the process of outsourcing manufacturing to China, but this was early on. Things did not look bad at all 28 years ago, but I was 28 years younger too, it so happens.

By chance, I found one of these 2 books, I'm pretty sure The Fourth Turning, at the library in the early '00s, with that time not being so easy to pin down - say somewhere from '05 to '08. The funny part here is that I took the book out from the library with no recollection of my having read it or its companion book before until I was a chapter or so into it! Anyway, upon this reading, well, yeah, I could see how we were in a late-3rd or early 4th turning alright. That made the books seem pretty dang prescient. Remember, Strauss & Howe got the first one, Generations, published in '91, now over a third of a century back. "Hey, this saecula, turnings, and archetype crap just might work!" I figured. OTOH, was it just luck though?

I've been involved before with people who were into horoscopes. All manner of things can be explained by various and sundry movements in the night sky, and what, with the stars, planets, sun, moon, hell, maybe asteroids now, how you are doing can be "determined" on a daily, if not hourly, basis due to what's up there, depending on what or who is in conjunction with Uranus at the moment. The Chinese, with their 12-year cyclical calendar, are on a much longer time-scale with their Year of the Whatever silliness. What year you are born (within a lunar, not Gregorian calendar) supposedly has something to do with something. Really, the Chinese way is: so long as you get into a good school and buy a house with a view of some water, NOBODY CARES!

As I wrote in the previous post, there's a whole lot to this Generational Theory. There are many concepts explained that don't involve anything like astrological or Chinese silliness.

Firstly, let me bring back that note about the whole theory being made to fit Anglo-American history. Oooops, well, though immigration was brought up, IIRC, it was not in a critical fashion, just that some of the disunity during the current (at the time of writing) UNRAVELING involved that issue as one of many. No kidding, it's an issue! The thing is, if America has changed its demographics this much, does Strauss & Howe's Generational Theory mean anything? Should they write revisions for some one-third Hispanic/other foreigner saecula? Let's get past that for now, as otherwise this review would be over!

It could become somewhat tedious for the reader of these books, but I think many readers would really like that the examples of this cyclic history are thorough - each saeculum is covered, and each turning within is discussed, from the 1400s to the present, with some near future predictions based on the theory. The archetypes are explained thoroughly, and each named generation - all 25 of them - are covered, with discussion of how they fit their archetypes. The birth years of these cohorts are laid out, which is kind of nice if wants to know exactly what "muh generation" is. As I wrote, and as one can see in the big table shown in the last post, it's all very neat and tidy.

The examples, well, those are where I'll start getting critical. Peak Stupidity has mentioned this Strauss&Howe cherry-picking before, so we're FINALLY getting to it here in the very book review. The examples of why this turning occurred on schedule, how this generation became the type of people they are, all that is reliant on snippets of the culture at the time. Often, especially recently, since there's so much more documentation, it's pop culture references that are used. See, the G.I. Generation was permissive with their children, as noted by these couple of quotes by these politicians, these movie lines, these lyrics in the popular songs.

The problem with this is that millions of quotes, movie lines, song lyrics, etc. can be found every year to explain ANYTHING. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it was fun for the writers, and for the readers it rings very true if one lets it. I imagine the writers believed they were on the right track, but one could find quotes, movie lines, song lyrics, etc. to prove exactly the opposite for every turning and generation. In this way, it's not THAT unlike horoscope predictions and that time we (with a girlfriend) went to that fortune teller one day, and man, how'd she know all that?! This all reminds me of that financial newsletter email scam that I really wish I'd thought of. (I'll put that in another quick post.)

Another problem with the entire "Muh g-g-g-generation" thing is, again with another post coming, that the scores of millions of people in each of these generation do NOT all think alike. Even if you just discuss the generalities, when it comes to politics, no, not all Boomers voted for this and not all the Millennials voted for that. On important issues, 60-40% is considered overwhelming. Yet, that's 4 in 10 people born in those years that are NOT like this (whatever).

I wrote in the previous post that I don't have these books on me as I write. In this review then, I may have missed a few things I didn't like, but one big one just came to me (see, my memory can be pretty good at times). These two writers are big Statists. In all their discussion of the history with their examples to back up the theory, government seems to be a factor in way too much of it. I could see that being the case for the last couple of generations with this Feral Beast we are subject to, but that was certainly not always the case. Many American lived their lives without dealing with the US Gov't at all for much of the history of the country. The examples in these books lean way to heavily on what this government department did and how this election went and so on. Nah, there's been a whole lot more to life, affecting the raising of children and other aspects that have "made" the archetypes and turnings what they were that have NOTHING to do with government. As a part-time Libertarian, this was a big turn-off for me.

Back to the prescient predictions of this Fourth Turning, now, I doubt any Peak Stupidity readers would deny that America is in some kind of Crisis stage. These books are fair, or they are hedging, in that they note that not every Crisis stage will end up in a new First Turning HIGH. It may be that the country just goes a different direction, as in, it all ends. In that case, Strauss & Howe will have still not been wrong... so there's that...

I may get ahold of The Fourth Turning yet again, just to see what matches what between 1996 and 2026. I can't expect specifics about smart phones, AI, and the like from 30 years back, but I'm curious if much of the predictions about the now-already-passed UNRAVELLING turning and this current CRISIS turning at least conform to the theory with the set up we got: You've got your Baby Boomer Prophets in old age, as your 13th Generation Nomads are in mid-life "running"(?) things, your Millennial Heroes (I know, right?) are in Young Adulthood, and those Homeland Generation Artists, none of them born yet during the writing of The Fourth Turning, are mostly done being born and are from toddlers to college students.

It's thoughtful and fun. It's probably a bunch of hooey. No matter what, you'll get a little bit of history out of these books, and if you don't realize we're in a CRISIS by now, you really need to probably are too dumb to be able to read.

Now, since I read and wrote "Nomads", I've got a song in my head from earlier that decade I first read these books. This Nomad archetype was enjoying Indigo Girls music, before and after they had to be known as Lesbians. The following song from their excellent Nomads, Indians, Saints album has a really great melody and a good acoustical guitar riff with great harmony with lyrics from the title, AND it kind of fits all this heavy thinking.

Here you go...
I'm coming home with a stone strapped onto my back.
I'm coming home with a burning hope turning all my blues to black.
I'm looking for a sacred hand to carve into my stone,
a ghost of comfort, angel's breath,
to keep this life inside my chest.

This world falls on me.
Dreams of immortality.
Everywhere I turn
the beauty just keeps shaking me...




The Indigo Girls were (basically):
Emily Saliers
Amy Ray (lead singer on this song)


PS: Don't forget that William Strauss & Neil Howe, wrote these 3 other books based on their Generational Theory: Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail?, written with also one R.J. Matson) back in 1993, Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation*, written by William Strauss only in 2000 and The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End from just 2 years, back, '23) written by Neil Howe only. Mr. Strauss died 18 years ago. I'll have to check out these books.

I'm sorry, no offense to William Strauss or that whole generation of upcoming HEROES, but this is an excerpt from the goodreads site by reviewer Lesley Reed on Millennials Rising:
A sampling of their potential influence in this decade: pop music will become more melodic and singable and sitcoms more melodramatic and wholesome; there will be a new emphasis on manners, modesty, and old-fashioned gender courtesies; and they'll resolve the long-standing debates about substance abuse. "They will rebel against the culture by cleaning it up, rebel against political cynicism by touting trust, rebel against individualism by stressing teamwork, rebel against adult pessimism by being upbeat, and rebel against social ennui by actually going out and getting a few things done."
Wait, WUT?


Comments (2)




Strauss & Howe - Generational Theory


Posted On: Tuesday - December 23rd 2025 7:11PM MST
In Topics: 
  History  The Future  Books  Muh Generation

It's about damn time ... for a book review of 2 books I read in the late 1990s and early '00s! This is also long in coming in that I've written probably a half dozen times here on Peak Stupidity that I'd have a review of the books, Generations and The Fourth Turning, errrr, any day now. (They go together, and there are now 3 other books I believe, that these authors, or one of them, have written on the same subject that I haven't read.) Today is that day ... well, bleeding into tomorrow too.

Is it feasible to do a book review of 2 books I've read a couple of times 20 and nearly 30 years ago? In this case, I think so. The main and very interesting theme of these books is very well known at this point, explained well on this wiki page on "Generational Theory" for your or my reference. Therefore, in this post, I'll do my best to explain that simply, and in at least one further post, I'll review the books. Keep in mind, that, as interesting as all this is, I am not really down with the whole idea, and the book review will not be all favorable.

Strauss & Howe's big idea is that the history and future history of the Anglo, British and then American*, people, can be described not as a linear progression, but as a cyclic process. I would describe it as a spiral, as there's no contention by these writers that things return, economically, politically, etc. to their same state after each cycle, but we'll use the terminology that's in the books. There's LOTS of terminology in these very organized view of the cycles, the 4 periods ("turnings") within each cycle, and the 4 different archetypical peoples of the different generations that are each in 1 of 4 stages of life progression during each. Whewww! Don't worry - there are lots of tables.

It's so neatly tied up that there are people that seem to take this series of books, or say Generational Theory, as their bible. One I recall is the pundit Jim Quinn, featured on ZeroHedge still (after my seeing him on there over a dozen years ago too) with writing from his Burning Platform blog. (I generally agree with his views.) Steve Bannon is also said to be an acolyte. Another reason one might think of these books as some sacred texts is that if he had read them soon after they were published, they would seem pretty darned prescient at this point or even 20 years ago. I'll get to this in the review.

Again, you could just read the wiki page, but I hope the reader will get this quick summary and use the wiki page for more reference.

Here's the gist of Strauss & Howe's Generational Theory: The cycles of Anglo-American history, or "saecula", are about 85 years long, a long human lifespan. Each of them contains 4 roughly generation-long (21 1/4 year average) periods within called "turnings", a term that is unfortunately confusing. One would think that turnings would be the short periods when society goes from one of these 4 periods to the next, but a 'turning" IS the period itself, hence the name of the 2nd book I read. There are 4 TYPES of turnings only, Highs, Awakenings, Unravellings, and Crises**, but each individual turning is named and associated with a generation, such as Baby Boom generation, that name referring to the people born during that 20-odd year period, during the Great Depression and WWII crisis. That "Boomer" generation was probably the first widely known by a name, well before these books, but Messrs Strauss & Howe got pretty creative in naming the 25 generations from WAY BACK WHEN to today's infants. That's half a Millenia worth of generations.

Back to the saecula, they are all named too, going back to before the Reformation, yes, THAT Reformation. The start of this known cyclic history (?) is the last 2 turnings of the Late Medieval Saeculum going back to the year 1435. The authors just describe the Unraveling Turning, named Retreat from France, and the Crisis Turning, named War of the Roses.

The Reformation Saeculum is the only one that completely took place in the Old World still, England, that is. Within that one, just as one example (the rest being in the tables) there were these generations in the corresponding turnings: The Reformation Generation (has a nice ring to it) was born roughly during the Tudor Renaissance HIGH turning. By "roughly", I don't mean the generation in question had a hard time coming through their respective birth canals here, but the periods when the different generations were born correspond roughly, but not exactly, to the turnings to which they are attached in the tables.

Next, there were the Reprisal Generation, born during the Protestant Reformation AWAKENING turning, the Elizabethan Generation, born during the Counter-Reformation Reaction and Marian Restoration UNRAVELING turning, and the Parliamentary Generation, born during the Armada Crisis, well CRISIS turning. Not all the names of the generations are so political in nature, BTW.

These turnings (periods, remember) and generations are so far back in history that it's difficult for anyone but a Historian of Britain to make sense of it, so I'll do the same for the most recent COMPLETED saeculum - that'd be the Great Power Saeculum, which went on from 1865 to 1946. I'll phrase it differently in case that helps, but I'll also add in the "archetype" for each generation, something we'll get to shortly.

The HIGH turning, the Reconstruction***, Gilded Age (1865 - 1886), was the period, approximately, when the Missionary Generation (of Prophet archetype) were born (1860 - 1885). The AWAKENING turning, the Missionary Awakening/Progressive Era (1886 - 1908), was when the Lost Generation (of Nomad archetype) were born (1883 - 1900). The UNRAVELING turning, World War I, Roaring Twenties, Prohibition (1908 - 1929), was when the G.I. Generation (of Hero archetype) were born (1901 - 1924). The final, CRISIS turning of the Great Power Saeculum was The Great Depression, World War II (1929 - 1946), when the Silent Generation (of Artist archetype) were born (1925 - 1942).

About the archetypes now, the theory is that the mentality, I guess one could put it, of the many generations in history changes in a cyclic fashion too, and among 4 archetypes. The archetypivity, if I may, is both the cause of the direction of society during the turnings in which they live and is determined by the stages of life (again of 4 stages - so very neat and organized!) that these "cohorts" in a generation undergo during each turning of their lives. (So, go the turnings of their lives, goes the old American Telenovella Soap Opera.) Here you go ("YA" is Young Adulthood.):



In this way, with both causation and effect being functions of these many generations' stages of life as the cyclic societal periods go by, Strauss & Howe distance their theory from a basic long-term horoscope.

Strauss & Howe made a great effort to explain why people born during certain types of periods (turnings), and not just that, but are young adults during other certain periods, in midlife during others, and old during others, act as they do, generally. (This theory is not a big complex high-brow horoscope - that should be duly noted on the back covers of the books.) Note that "generally" I wrote - Strauss & Howe are not absolutists, but still, in the review, I'll explain a couple of reasons the pigeonholing of people into named generations is generally bunk.

What these writers are very common-sensical about is that they don't draw out solid round-numbered years for the saecula, turnings, and generations. There's some shrinking and stretching of the periods to match history, and I don't see that as cheating. As one real off-theory exception, the Civil War Saeculum has its 4 turnings but with only 3 generations attached. This saeculum is only 72 years long. It's Nomad-archetype Gilded Generation is followed by the Artist-archetype Progressive Generation, with no Hero-archetype generation in between. I give them credit for making it all fit and for seeing and dealing with an appropriate exception to their neat 4-of-everything theory.



That small table, taken from the wiki page, shows one aspect of society that is said to be changing through each saecula, ending up at the same level at the same turning every time around. The book presents many more aspects. All are explained by the presence of the 4 different archetypes of people being in their certain stages of life at the time. Permissiveness of parents is one example. Because society is like "this" during an Awakening, the Artist parents are more permissive, and their Nomad kids grow up to be like "this", which means that in the next turning, "this" will happen, etc. It goes on like that, everything is neat cycles of history.

I'll leave the big table below for the reader to peruse. If this Generational Theory developed by Strauss & Howe seems too hokey already, you can stop here. Our review will appear tomorrow, hopefully, if you want to know more to decide whether these books might be good reading.







* The reader may already see a problem with this theory coming into play right here. If these book are to predict the future of THESE people, how does that work after the massive immigration changes to our demographics? We'll get to this in the review.

** The authors make a comparison of the 4 turnings of a saeculum to seasons of the year. A High is compared to Spring, an Awakening to Summer, an Unraveling to Fall, and a Crisis to Winter.

*** I don't at all see the so-called "Reconstruction" of the South being any part of a HIGH, not for anyone involved!


Comments (6)




Creedence Clearwater Revival - Up Around the Bend


Posted On: Saturday - December 20th 2025 10:58PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music

Well, I got mostly done with the 1st post of a couple on (FINALLY!) the Strauss & Howe books and their Generational Theory, but it's getting late, and I am not ready to mash [Submit].

We'll therefore go back to an old Peak Stupidity practice of putting random great Rock or Pop songs up. Creedence Clearwater Revival, from El Cerrito, California (across the bay from San Francisco) was one of the best of the best rock bands of the best era in Rock. Under this name*, CCR made 5 great albums in the 2 years, 1969 and 1970, and 7 albums during the years '68 - '72. They were short-lived but made much music that was the soundtrack to a generation. (We'll get to that "muh generation" stuff next week.)

(Goin') Up Around the Bend is my all-time favorite from this band. It's 2 minutes and 45 seconds of great guitars and vocals by, IMO, the guy with the best voice ever in Rock history, John Fogerty



CCR was:

John Fogerty - lead vocals and lead guitar
Tom Fogerty - rhythm guitar
Stu Cook - bass guitar
Doug Clifford - drums

The other band members sang back-up vocals and occasionally lead vocals too.

No, we haven't been as productive as CCR this week, but we'll have the Strauss & Howe posts and various and sundry stupidity posts next one. Thanks so much for reading and writing in, Peakers. Happy Sunday.



* They played since the end of the 1950s as first The Blue Velvets and then The Golliwogs before becoming CCR.


Comments (4)




Discriminatory Neighborhood Watch signage


Posted On: Thursday - December 18th 2025 11:05PM MST
In Topics: 
  General Stupidity  Lefty MegaStupidity  University  Race/Genetics

This one's no big news, just some general stupidity that we run into every day.



It's really pretty non-discriminatory and welcoming, to non-criminals of different ethnicities.


Instapundit linked me to the following from a site called MLive, "M" for Michigan, I gotta assume: Here’s why ‘Neighborhood Crime Watch’ signs in Ann Arbor are going away. Ann Arbor is not just a college town, it's one of the very biggest, the college, that is. The University of Michigan has 53 1/2 thousand students.

Somewhat coincidentally, I came upon another MLive page about UM enrollment near the top of my search for that. Undergraduate enrollment is up 3% from last year, while grad student enrollment, composed of the bulk of foreign students, is down. Guess why. Guess who, more like it:
International students have been subject to increased scrutiny by the federal government. In April, the Donald Trump administration revoked visas or legal residencies over 20 international UM students and graduates.

The federal administration restored the records of those students and graduates, officials said in an April 28 update.
Ha. Gotta up that game, but that was a valiant effort... something completely O/T of my post here though*, other than, yeah, it's a college town, so you're gonna get some really unintelligent, stupid stuff happening quite often.

We can't blame the foreigners for this bit. It's usually local people, as these college towns often have many hangers-on, people who can't get themselves to leave. They don't change their views from that indoctrinated university mindset. City councils go far left. I had a landlady long ago who told me that November to make sure and vote the local Commies out of office. I was glad to try to help her, but the place was truly hopeless.

Oh, this post is about "Neighborhood Watch" signs. I remember them. There was a point to these, back 25 years ago, before the age of ubiquitous cameras. Though the signs do make it seem like there is some sort of camera involved, nah ... The program, I assume having spread all over the country since it was started by the National Sheriff's Association in 1972, involved residents actually getting together in person and arranging their own watches of the neighborhood to prevent burglaries and maybe worse.

Perhaps by at least a decade ago**, all that's been left of most Neighborhood Watch programs has been the signs. At some point, criminals figured out they mean nothing. As a lady in the article stated, the signs are like furniture - I could not tell you where any of them are near me, even were there a dozen of them. So, OK, take them down. This will prevent eye clutter, hopefully cut down a few instances of vehicular damage involving Chinese grad students, and, from my quick calculation, the 5-10 tons of scrap steel would net the City of Ann Arbor ~$500 - $1000.

"That's very reasonable, so where does this get stupid?", you ask, reasonably. Here:
Neighborhood watch programs emerged in the 1970s during a period of national anxiety about crime and social change, but research shows they don’t reduce crime and often reinforce racism, council stated in a resolution.

“These programs were often rooted in assumptions about who did and did not ‘belong’ in a neighborhood, reinforcing race-based hyper-vigilance and suspicion particularly toward Black, Brown, and other marginalized residents and visitors,” it states.

“This dynamic encouraged informal surveillance practices that disproportionately targeted people of color and contributed to patterns of exclusion under the guise of public safety.”
This is called "showing one's ass." That's technical terminology for which I felt obligated to go to (very appropriately here) this Urban Dictionary page. The bolded part of the definition is what I'm getting at:
... making yourself look like a jackass or an asshole, being a dick. embarrassing yourself or the people you are with in public or in front of other people, usually by doing something socially unacceptable. exposing your true colors in a negative way, also, having a nasty attitude in a public setting.
The Neighborhood Watch program was unwelcoming to criminals. I'm sure you'd have read NOTHING about black and brown people. "Marginalized residents"? Well, if that means burglars and murderers, yes, the idea was to keep these people outside the margins of the Neighborhood Watch zones. "Yeah, we had to marginalize some folks."

This one gets stupider with every movement of the scroll bar.
But for many other residents and visitors, particularly people of color, the signs are very visible and the message they send is not one of welcome, but of suspicion, [City Councilwoman Karen Jen] Eyer said.
This statement had an obvious implication that it's these "people of color" who are the criminals. Yes, you're showing your asses here, Jen Eyer and the rest of the Ann Arbor City CouncilPeople. This story comes across as downright Babylon Beesque.

The self-defense shooting of Travon Martin in '12 was brought up by these people too.. I'd almost forgotten, but George Zimmerman had kept an eye on young Trayvon as part of his Neighborhood Watch group activities.
The tragedy of Martin being fatally shot by a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Florida, did not happen in isolation,...
No, it happened because young Trayvon was beating Mr. Zimmerman's head onto the concrete.
... Harrison said. It happened in a broader environment that normalized surveillance over relationship and fear over familiarity, she said.

“Neighborhood watch was built on an old idea that heterogeneous neighborhoods create danger,” she said. “Ann Arbor is built on the understanding that diversity creates strength.”
They do, and it doesn't. I can't believe people still say that with a straight face.
As a university city, unfamiliar faces are not an exception, they are the norm, Harrison said. People from around the world come here to live, work, study and visit, and the city’s public messaging should reflect that, she said.
Having unfamiliar faces as the norm is the opposite of having a community. I'd want to keep a watch on the potential criminals. That's the kind of discrimination that BUILDS communities.



* This and local happenings - yet MOAR building of student housing, I think - does have me thinking of that University Bubble and when it will pop.

** There's still a website up.


Comments (7)




Chile turns blue?


Posted On: Wednesday - December 17th 2025 7:36PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Liberty/Libertarianism  Geography  Race/Genetics  World Political Stupidity

Besides obvious weather jokes here, this title has another point, one that may be a little confusing. A couple of days ago ZeroHedge reported Chile Turns Hard To The Right: Tough-On-Crime, Anti-Immigration Candidate Easily Wins Presidency. One expects ZH commenters to make appropriate corrections, and at least once commenter below the article noted that being against crime and invasions is not necessarily "right" ideologically. It's just right logically and patriotic.

This is not the old "the Right" of Latin America. Peak Stupidity has written before - see Mormons, Commies, Shitholes, and Crown Jewels for one example, that the Latin American countries seem to jump back and forth from Communism to (somewhat) too-far right Caudillo*-led semi-dictatorship regularly. The word "Junta" comes from that neck of the woods. From our post:
Let me tell you about South America, though very generally, and about Venezuela. Back in the 1980's that country was the "crown jewel" of the continent. For various reasons, probably good stuff for another post, all the countries in Latin America has have been run badly for most of their histories. Simon Bolivar was the guy who liberated more than 1/2 the countries in South America from the Spaniards, who were no Magna Carta-drafters or Constitutional scholars themselves. Subsequent to these liberations, the mixed native-Spanish people have been running these semi-shitholes into the ground, pulling them out of the ground and back, in 10 - 50 year cycles. Some have been in the shithole phase for their entire histories so far - bad timing, that, huh? In general, down there, military juntas come and go, Commies take over for long periods, death squads try to get rid of the Commies, along with other people they never did like and so forth.
Things have changed somewhat lately. Argentinian President Javier Milei is a Libertarian. You don't see that much down in Latin America, and we continue to wish him good luck with all that...



Now, per ZH, one Jose Kast was just elected President of Chile, and he's another Trump/MAGA acolyte. Love him or hate him be a little annoyed with him at times, Trump really has had an effect all over the world. This guy Kast is not just about economics - he is with the people angry on the existential issue of the immigration invasion too. "What?!", you, the reader, exclaim. "These countries are ARE the immigration invasion." No, it's more the Mexicans, Guatemalans, Salvadorans, and then people from holes all over the world lately. The semi-White countries of the S. American ice cream cone portion - Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay - still have enough White people to have a chance to building (back) decent nations. People have been invading, as into our lands too.
In an election where the decisive themes echoed mounting concerns in the Americas and Europe, a conservative who's vowed to crack down on illegal immigration and crime trounced his Communist opponent in Sunday's presidential election in Chile. The result confirms a major political current that now has many Latin American countries embracing right-wing politics.
He won the election 58% to 42% over Communista Jeannette Jara. (Miss Jara declined Peak Stupidity's phone calls.)
Crime weighed heavily in the contest, with 63% of Chileans saying it was their biggest worry. That's about double the global average. Illegal immigration (40%) is the second-biggest concern. The two worries go hand-in-hand, as a 50% surge in murders from 2018 to 2024 is largely the work of international criminal gangs. Chile has more than 300,000 illegal immigrants, many of them Venezuelan.
We were there, only in Santiago, unfortunately, back in '18. It's difficult for a Gringo rube to distinguish among Chicanos, but I do have some pictures somewhere of people in a park in that city that looked like they didn't fit in.
At Kast's victory rally, supporters wore red "Make Chile Great Again" hats,...
... Guiding off the inauguration date, he has repeatedly warned illegals of how many days they
[have] to self-deport, before his administration kicks them out. Self-deporation, [sic - WTH, ZH?] Kast has said, will give them the opportunity to bring their possessions with them, while avoiding detention. "If you don't leave voluntarily, we will detain you, retain you, expel you, and you'll leave with what you have on," said Kast. Kast's looming victory had already had a striking effect, with wary illegal immigrants surging into Peru ...
Ah, geeeze!
... so much so that Peruvian President Jose Jeri declared a state of emergency in late November. Meanwhile, authorities along Chile's border say illegal entries have plummeted.
We've commented on this game of illegal alien hot potato before. This is an international version of the game being played down there - that and futeball. I don't blame most of the people for trying to get out of increasingly shitholic places, but I guess you've just got to fix your own places. This ain't the 1800s. Most countries are full enough...

All that written, my real impetus to write this post was the one map below. Peak Stupidity loves our Geography.



Note a quirk here, something the lack of a legend doesn't help with. It looks to me like the left-leaning countries, none dare call them Communist(?) - are depicted in red. The new allegedly right-leaning countries are depicted in blue. Now there's a bit of common sense that you just don't see on maps in this country. For the life of me, most times I STILL have to think "Oh, right, it's backwards... need to flip it around."

This map is based on the leaders of the countries, so it only means so much. The colors may not have much permanence. It is interesting to see Brazil in red, a country that is said to have had its own cheatfest election back in '22. The incumbent Jair Bolsonaro was allegedly beaten by Communist Lula da Silva 50.9 - 49.1%. Mr. Bolsonaro has been given the '21-'24 Trump treatment, this in a country with even less rule-of-law.

Then there's Venezuela (kinda wish we'd just stay away), a basket case, from Crown Jewel only 40 years back. My feeling from talking to people from Columbia is that it's a much better place than during the worst of the drug production years of the 1990s. The Guiana's? Besides the rocket launching site in French Guiana, these places are demographically "unsound"**. I mean, the Jonestown Massacre was probably the best thing that's ever happened in the Guianas!

Bolivia is a mystery, known about or visited by only Los Banditos Yanquis, as far as I know. Paraguay, sure, I can see it being blue, what with the grandsons of Nazis and all residing there. A poor Commie doesn't stand a chance.

Uruguay, well, our report about the place is still coming - sorry about the delay. I just read that in the '24 election, in a run-off just before we visited, one Yamandú Orsi of the Broad Front defeated Álvaro Delgado of the Republican Coalition. The former is also big in the Movement of Popular Participation. OK, if you're in a country with parties named "fronts", expect Communism to arrive any day. The Broad Front and the Movement of Popular Participation. That's extremely Monty Pythonesque. "What ever happened to the Broad People's Popular Front, Reg?" "That's them over there on the side of the building. "Splitters!"



That mural with the whole set of (Steve Sailer-coined) Conquistador-Americans must have been there from before the election. I saw this in Colonia del Sacramento. In Montevideo, I "snapped" the following picture:



Except for the first guy to chime in, I found this pretty refreshing, I mean if you're gonna have graffiti everywhere... which Montevideo most certainly does.

Finally, regarding the map, one could probably extend the red right on up the road, through the Darien Gap ... and on up, bypassing only El Salvador (based on leadership only, remember), right up through Del Rio , Bellingham, Washington.

No, that wasn't finally actually. If we're gonna mention the country Chile, we will have to include the weather report. It's a big country north-south-wise, with various micro-climates and large features. I am primarily interested in the weather on January 6th of '14:





* Thanks go to commenter E.H. Hail for his bringing this term to light here. (That's in regard to a certain orange dude.)

** I had an idea that these countries that hardly any Americans know about, and the less the FedGov does the better, would be good bug-out places. The demographics nixed that one.


Comments (4)




Not your Daddy's Gear Jammers


Posted On: Tuesday - December 16th 2025 8:09PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Music  California  Trump  Peak Stupidity Roadshow  People's Revolt



From ZeroHedge - Replacement Of American Truckers With Unvetted, Unqualified Migrant Drivers Must Stop. Unvetted? Give me a break!

(NOTE: The excerpts below are all from a different article. We'll discuss the above one later.)

Peak Stupidity has written about the story of the dangerous imported truckers that are plying the roads of America before. We covered a lot of, errr, mileage in our post Sick Sikh "trucker", tribalism, and making hay of it all at the end of this summer. Let me recap, with an addition based on our thoughts from the recent post (of last week) Better Hooverville than Hooverstan - those thoughts are what's been inserted and are in italics:
My next point is that with all the talk of California's and Washington's role in these deaths, along with the immigration system, I don't want to hear about "more vetting", "harder CDL tests", and "reading English"**. Let me put it this way: I wouldn’t care if Sikhs were the best damn drivers in the world. I wouldn’t care if they spoke and read English better than all Americans other than William Safire. I don’t care if they will now be vetted down to the number of times they were put in the RTC (Responsible Thinking Center, aka detention) in elementary school back in the Punjab. I don't care that the traffic is no worse, due to that these guys driving the roads are not adding to the traffic because they are only replacing the other ... American drivers.(!)

They shouldn’t be here to begin with!
I won't link to them all, but The Gateway Pundit is good for immigration horror stories such as these, and there have been more publicized horrific wrecks since that post due to incompetent foreign (generally Indian) truckers in Texas, Oregon, and Washington. I'll look at the stories and be somewhat glad - hate to say it in light of the carnage to the innocent motorists involved - that Americans might finally get outraged and some might DO SOMETHING.

In that previous post, it was Ron DeSantis who was doing something about it. He can only make efforts that affect Florida and Florida roads. President Trump, OTOH, CAN affect the whole country. He has been making efforts to get the corrupt, negligent driving schools, CDL issuers of the California government, etc to cease and desist. He's obviously got some good help, as he has been attacking the problem - one that Trump does know is really about that these people are in America to begin with - on various fronts.

This has been more of that administrative action, as the UniParty Congress won't act. One silver lining of the Welfare State we have is that your .org's, .edu's, .gov's, and a bunch of .com's too suckle on Uncle Samantha's teet, one that Trump can pull away from them and turn them into squealing runts.

California Governor Gavin Newscum is one such squealing runt. He doesn't like ...
... the decision by the Department of Transportation (DOT) to hold back $33 million in federal funding for commercial vehicle safety programs because of the state’s decision not to comply with the federal requirements.
He doesn't like how...
The English language requirement was reinstated by the DOT in May of this year
... and ...
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the United States would pause the issuance of worker visas for commercial truck drivers.
... and ...
“We’ve now knocked 9,500 truck drivers out of service for failing to speak our national language—ENGLISH!” Duffy wrote in a Dec. 10 post on X. “This administration will always put you and your family’s safety first.”
... and ...
Around 44 percent of the roughly 16,000 truck driving schools in the country could be forced to close.
ohhhh, so sad ... and ...
Late in November, the DOT warned that Pennsylvania could lose up to $75 million if the state does not immediately revoke the commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) issued to foreign nationals and “correct dangerous failures” identified in its CDL program.
The latter was about Pennsylvania, and Newscum doesn't care about what Pennsylvania does... or does he? Here's another article from ZeroHedge (originally, The Epoch Times):California Sues Trump Admin Over $33 Million Withheld Due To Trucker English-Proficiency Rules. The Governor of California, probably any governor of California there might be these days, does not even pretend to care about the horrific traffic deaths caused by these incompetent and unprofessional foreigners. As with all of the ctrl-left and the Globalists, they are in this for the destruction of the White Middle Class. This requires changing decent Middle Class careers into low-wage unprofessional labor done by foreigner replacements. Though it's not his State money, Newscum would support Pennsylvania and other States when they do the same. They've got a common goal.

While perusing some other articles searched up with the text string "horrific Indian truck driver wrecks" I had another thought about this travesty. Perhaps this replacement of good American jobs in the trucking business is not ONLY being done for the usual reasons the Population Replacement Programme has been implemented.

Some articles about trucker protests came up. It wasn't the first time truckers have made use of their economic importance en masse, but we all remember the huge and important Canadian anti-mandatory-vax trucker protest in the Winter of '22. For a reminder, here's a PS post from that time - Inspiration from the Canucks, eh?.* (I wondered how many Sikhs were involved - a quick web search says quite a few were.)

That "People's Revolt" up in Ottawa had the whole world watching. Though the protest eventually dispersed, with many involved getting not too much short of the J-6 treatment, it might have scared the Globalists. If you recall, that was the time they promptly changed course to an orthogonal heading, the Infotainment of the Ukraine-Russia war. Do they want foreign replacement truckers in the White countries also so that there will be no more such uprisings? Low-paid foreign non-owner/operator gear jammers are not likely to start or lead such a movement.

We've embedded a couple of trucker songs already, but I'll paste in George Thorogood and his Delaware Destroyers here. From their 40 year-ago Maverick album, this is Gear Jammer:






* See also Tired of Tyranny - Tucker on the Truckers and An optimistic take of the Canadian trucker protest from Timur the Lame, too optimistic, especially wrt Canada, I say in hindsight. In the aftermath, we posted The Semi Fascists O' Canada.


Comments (2)




Don't Cross the River


Posted On: Saturday - December 13th 2025 8:38PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music

... if you can't swim the tide.

I can't leave that nasty BLM woman at the top of the Peak Stupidity site for the rest of the weekend.

My favorite America song isn't Sister Golden Hair, one we featured last Saturday. It's very short, but Don't Cross the River, also from half a century ago, is my favorite.

The live version is slower than what I've been used to and doesn't have the banjo. Here's the album version.



Enjoy a restful Sunday, Peakers. Thanks for reading what little we've had lately. Next week's posts will hopefully be more frequent and more interesting.


Comments (7)




Mon Sheri Amore, bigger than the Milky Way...


Posted On: Saturday - December 13th 2025 8:24PM MST
In Topics: 
  Race/Genetics  Female Stupidity



From ZeroHedge, we read Social Justice Gone Wild: Oklahoma BLM Leader Indicted On Fraud, Money Laundering Charges.

These stories come weekly and often daily. There are tons of them. It usually involves black women in government positions because that's where the money is. I can't list them all. I just look a shot at finding out the percentage of Mayors of American cities who are black - the search has not been too fruitful, but a 7 y/o CNN article bemoaned that "Black women govern only 4% of the biggest US cities." As something like 8% of the American population that is too lo ... WAY too high, because some of us don't like to see our property tax money totally blown on Style-and-Profile Mercedes, handbags, and expensive vacations. They can't seem to help themselves.
Tashella Sheri Amore Dickerson, 52, served as Executive Director of Black Lives Matter OKC (BLMOKC). As Executive Director, Dickerson had access to BLMOKC’s bank, PayPal, and Cash App accounts, where federal prosecutors allege she looted the organization “for her personal benefit,” including travel to Jamaica and the Dominican Republic, tens of thousands of dollars in retail shopping, more than $50,000 in food deliveries, a vehicle, and six properties.
It's bad enough that women in general aren't prone to caring about Rule-of-Law so much over their own neeeeds, but black women are at a whole 'nother level. It's not just Rule-of-Law they don't care about, but they don't particularly care about doing the right thing, period. That American society, aka, the ctrl-left-run Institutions, have encouraged a feeling of entitlement in them has made the problem of black woman political grift ubiquitous.

I know, almost all US Senators come in with a normal amount of assets and leave as multi-millionaires. They are still mostly White and mostly men. Congressbroad Nancy Pelosi's story, for example is something else, a success story for the ages.

Let's leave the Somalians out of it just for the moment because we haven't counted all the $Billions yet. They're in a class by themselves - they could do Big Tashellas's $3 million in grifting in half an hour.

When you see a politician make a 10,000% profit in, say, cattle futures, it's time to investigate. For these black women purporting to be in charge of budgets, when you see one has gained over 100 lb while in office, subpoenas should be issued.

At least this time it wasn't any of my money.


PS: Note the Culturally French-Black! name of our grifter of the day, She's middle-named Sheri Amore. Old Steve Wonder fans would recognize this name as coming from one his many great songs. Mr. Wonder's title is in actual French, Mon Cherie Amore, "lovely as a summer's day...", translates to "my darling love" or "my lovely darling".

The grifter above was born in 1973 +/1 a year, while Mr. Wonder wrote his song in 1969. No matter, you'd have to be blind to write a song about this fat grifter of the BLM. (Sorry, Stevie!!)


Comments (4)




It's twenty degrees, and the hockey game's on...


Posted On: Thursday - December 11th 2025 7:18PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Bread and Circuses

...could you beam me somewhere, Mr. Scott?



Peak Stupidity has explained what our problem is with "Sportsball". Posts on the subject can be found with that little-used topic key Bread & Circuses, the use of that tag alone pretty much doing the explaining. There is a specific series though - see Intro. - - Unlimited Breadsticks - - The Greatest (number of) Shows on Earth - - The Media Circus and a Conclusion.

Using "Sportspuck", however, would sound kind of awkward, but we did go to a, and my first, pro Hockey game. A friend hooked us up with some very good seats too.

The regular PS reader may have determined without hiring a Jim Rockford at $2,000 a day ... plus expenses (he's gone up!) that our headquarters is not in Edmonton, Alberta, Toronto, Ontario, The Maritimes, or even down south in Minneagadishu. We don't play hockey. Nobody here plays hockey*. Nobody from around here is on a pro hockey team, because he wouldn't have had a rink or frozen pond to practice on. If I could PLAY hockey, this whole post would have to be revised.

But, hey, they were good seats, and I'd promised the kid. Here are some impressions:

The lighting is amazing. They can turn the whole rink into a big advertisement now. Loud music - at least it's rock sounding - is played right up until that ump guy drops the puck during the face-off.

Where are the air horns nowadays? I went to a minor league game way back, and people had those loud boater-emergency-style air horns. You'd hear them on the games on the radio too. I think it's a good thing they've been apparently banned. There are enough fights down on the rink.

Well, you'd think in today's NHL, rather than going to a fight and seeing a hockey game break out, as the old joke goes, we'd have to endure a lot of mean tweeting and un-LIKE-ing on the ice and difficult "conversations". No, they still do have fights, the about only one we saw was pretty minor ... league. I didn't come for that.

The crowd was very well behaved. The fights were contained to the that one on the rink. In a metro area that is 15-25% Black! and with 25% or so foreigners, the crowd was 99% White. That might explain some of it... In fact the only black person I saw was a girl with the 2nd biggest Afro I'd seen since the 1970s, not quite as big as the one on the escalator in our recent post on this important matter. With our great seats, that was not a factor.

"Our" team won. OK, that's getting to the Sportsball matter now. What's exactly "our" team? We didn't live in this city, but the people from there ALSO don't play hockey and can't ice skate (maybe a few transplants with their own skating rink somewhere can), and don't have high school friends in the NFL, etc. That "local" team is made up of Canadians and Europeans, and Russians, one of whom, going by name, may well have had a great-grandfather involved in the story of Doctor Zhivago. "Our team", my ass. What does it mean to "support the team" really?

I guess that's OK. I don't begrudge the people their Bread & Circuses. We can't all be discussing and blogging about politics all day as a hobby. In fact, our host, being not much more of a fan than I, but with the tickets, is big into politics too, very much on OUR side. One can't help but wonder, though, how different things would be if Americans had paid 1/10 the attention they pay to the Sports-ball&puck to what's been done to their country over my lifetime. Rather than the voices of a few crying in the wilderness being ignored, imagine if Americans had cared enough about the politics that has been interested in them, rather than fixating on their favorite hockey players from far off places that don't even want to know them.

Yet, they've got the jerseys. At the arena, I checked one of them, and it cost over $200, before tax! Hats were cheaper, at something like $40.

This one's a better deal though:



I get buying a team shirt or hat, if nothing but to show pride in one's town. I can't see EVER caring enough about the Bread & Circuses to buy a jersey of a certain player. (As my kid noted, what if he gets traded?)

Well, now we'll get to this Jimmy Buffett song again. It's appropriate this season.

Boat drinks,
the boys in the band ordered boat drinks.
Visitors scored on the home rink.
Everything seems to be wrong.

Lately, the newspaper mentioned cheap airfare.
I've got to fly to Saint Somewhere.
I'm close to bodily harm.

It's 20 degrees and the hockey game's on.
Nobody cares, they are way too far gone.
Screamin', "Boat drinks!"
Somethin' to keep them all warm.
This one is from 1979, from Mr. Buffett's album Volcano.



My favorite part:
This morning
I shot six holes in my freezer.
I think I got cabin fever.
Somebody sound the alarm.

I'd like to go where the pace of life's slow
Could you beam me somewhere, Mister Scott?
Any old place here on Earth or in Space
You pick the century, and I'll pick the spot.
Jimmy Buffett, no longer with us, was from south Alabama, but he spent much of his life in the Florida Keys or on mother, mother, ocean. His Coral Reefers and the Parrotheads all would rather go where it's warm.




* I've ice skated twice, and contrary to advice given to me that it's not like rollerblading, it IS a lot like rollerblading, so I could do it.


Comments (10)




Tim Walz's political career has been seriously retarded


Posted On: Wednesday - December 10th 2025 6:53PM MST
In Topics: 
  Elections '16 - '24  Lefty MegaStupidity  Humor  Trump  Media Stupidity



Special needs adults have taken offense to the repeated, emphatic description of Tim Walz's mental capacity being somehow like their own.

"Saying Tim Walz is one of us is insulting and hurtful," said local man Brett Masterson, who has had a significant intellectual disability since birth. "Comparing my cognitive ability to Tim Walz is one of the most painful slurs I've had to endure. The special needs community deserves better than being compared to Walz. This bigotry needs to stop."
Those guys are pretty funny! No wait, it's NOT funny?

Micheal Scott explains yet again how using the word "retard" is bad:



Got it. So it's OK if ctrl-left Minnesota Governor, ex-Presidential candidate Tim Walz's FRIENDS call him seriously retarded. President Trump is not one of his friends, however. He really should apologize. The Babylon Bee continues:
President Trump has issued an official apology for categorizing Tim Walz as a special needs adult. "I deeply, sincerely apologize to the special needs community for comparing you lovely people to Tim Walz," said Trump. "No one deserves to hear that they're like Tim Walz. It was very insulting to you, I'm sorry to have said it. Can you believe I'm apologizing? I never do that, because I'm almost never wrong -- but I was this time. I love special needs people, they're some of my favorite people, nothing like that homo Tim Walz."
Done, and done. The REALLY funny thing is, is that giving that kind of apology is something Trump really would do.

There are a whole lot of public servants in America that should be in jail. That's another post. That people call them public "servants" is yet another post. Public servant Tim Walz is surely one of them, the ones that ought to be in jail. Peak Stupidity gave our latest opinion on this guy a week back in the post Tampon Timmy and the Somalians. The numbers - that is, money stolen from Minnesota and other American taxpayers, have only gone up since then. Our opinion of Tim Walz has not gone up. He's not just a huge corrupt thief, but he's a traitor in addition. He deserves a lot more than just the President's calling him out with a slur.

Yet, with the Regime Media being all in for the ctrl-left, they have turned, or tried to turn, this huge story about treasonous, corrupt Timmah! into one about President Trump's wrongful use of that slur, "seriously retarded". Hah!

There's a background to the use of the word. As with "idiot", "imbecile", "moron". etc., the term "retarded" had a medical or psychological use. Regarding the progression of a child's intellectual growth, "retarded" simply means that a child's intellect has been held back, falling behind the average. I don't know how long one would have to go back in time to hear it being spoken by a teacher, guidance counselor, or principal.

Yes, it HAS become a slur, though not one of the worst of slurs by any means.* It works for me... every time I write it! It's just very fortuitous that we have the Timmah! Timmah! Livin' the lie! line from South Park to go along with Trump's use of the slur "retarded".

If you're this low and you haven't pulled the power out yet...



... "Retard! Retard! Retard!"


It's true. The Airbus 320 series (at least) calls the flying pilot who doesn't pull the throttles to idle by about 20 ft up a retard. It's a (mostly) French-built plane, so the accent is on the 2nd syllable, as in, "re-TARD". I mean what kind of retard wouldn't pull the power back yet?

... oh, oh, wait, all this time, I was surprised pilots would put up with that, but it was just the French-written software voice calling for "re-tarding" of the throttles! Live and learn. It all makes sense now, even more so, in fact, were Tim Walz the flying pilot. He's not a pilot, thank God, but his political career is being retarded.
At publishing time, the homosexual community had demanded that people stop comparing them to Tim Walz.
LOL!!

Final question: Would President Trump be off the hook and his investigations into Timmah and the Somalians' corruption be welcomed had he called Mr. Walz a "Special Needs Governor"?



* My personal opinion is that the slur "jackass" has been sorely underutilized.


Comments (7)




Better Hooverville than Hooverstan


Posted On: Monday - December 8th 2025 9:35PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Race/Genetics

Hoover, Alabama is not a real town. One might imagine that it would have been some sleepy Southern town with its own Andy and Barney back in the day, but really it was formed from a suburban area on the south side of Birmingham due to ... you guessed it (if you're a regular Peak Stupidity reader).

Birmingham played a prominent role in the instigated race rioting and destruction and the violent attempt at pushback by White Alabamans 60 years back. White people, and really anyone in favor of Freedom of Association, a limited Federal Gov't and all that, lost. As in hundreds of other cities in America, White people fled the new inner city dysfunction. This "town", really just a big suburb, had it pretty good as late as the year 2000, with over 85% White and under 7% Black. By '20, the numbers were 68% and 17%. "They're baaaaaacccck!"

If race relations can be somehow contained, something Alabamans have been dealing with much longer than much of the country, I guess someone somewhere figured they'll make life a little worse for the Alabamans of Hoover, cause, why not, right? The front of the immigration invasion involving Moslems is not the biggest, but it's significant. Cultural Destruction can ruin your town at the pounding of a judge's gavel.

Let me go back to a very old Peak Stupidity post, Nice Church ladies destroy Lewiston, Maine, in which I attempted to describe how and why townspeople will not readily stand up against these efforts to initially infiltrate, and later flood their towns with foreigners:
The poor bastards who’ve got to live with the huge change to their quality of life and culture for now on (with always a downward trend), know right away it's gonna be a bad thing, and may go to those initial town hall meetings "conversations":

“We’re just bringing in downtrodden families, plus maybe a couple of poor teenagers, from Somalia. I hope there are no racist xenophobes here. If so, it’s only 15 asylum-seekers to our town of 30 thousand – how can you be so mean and nasty to object?!” Well, nobody objects. Nobody in town wants to have everyone else there look at him like that nasty foul-mouthed bad guy that isn’t compassionate enough to provide a “room at the inn”.*

At the next asylum-seeker meeting for another 20 asylum-seekers, its just the same, except you won’t even find 1/2 the people there from town to show up to object, as they can imagine how embarrassing it would be. This goes on for years, and people have kids. People find it easier to move to a different town than to say anything. You’d think that’d be silly… but no, it's pretty much all that's left to do.
As compared to what keeps happening this looks like very good news:



This tweet (screenshot here) came from The Gateway Pundit, but I am LOATH to link to its Gateway Hispanic posts*. You can watch or read here about the plans to move Moslem school and community center from nearby Homewood to Hoover.

Hoover citizens fought back at a City Council meeting. The video is uplifting - just hear the elation and relief in the voices of those clapping after the ruling.**



It's a small thing, and after all, these particular foreigners have already been in America, Alabama, and even the same (Jefferson) county. The important question is are people finally standing up?

Uhhhh, it's not quite that great. The reader may recall a few posts we wrote about an attempt, successful too, BTW, to let apartments be built against the zoning codes, and the worry that caused nearby residents. I.e, who exactly would be living right near them? See It's a Beautiful Day in the Leafy Neighborhood and It's another beautiful day in the leafy neighborhood ....

The worries were really about a lot more residents being concentrated nearby and, the locals in the Zoom meeting*** wouldn't say it, but who they might be. However, the complaints were all about "the traffic". Sure, the traffic was something of a factor with all the kids nearby, but no...

In the case of this proposed Islamic school in Hoover, there was another vague explanation about "the guidance for that sector", some "tech village", and the "comprehensive plan", generally a bunch of BS, but "the traffic" was brought up too:
The Islamic Academy of Alabama was met with opposition at Hoover's Planning and Zoning meeting. Residents spoke on traffic issues, sticking to the comprehensive plan, and other reasons why they are against it moving to the city.
The site, with the currently empty 100,000 ft2 building, is in Meadowbrook and described as off of US-280 and US-119:



I didn't capture it but the limited access road that curves around at the north is the 280.


Nah. We're talking 265 students. This is not about the traffic - it's about the Moslems! As far as I've seen on this, nobody will or nobody can say that his opposition to the school is about the Moslems. I'd really hoped that Trump's boldness over the years, and his most recent talk about the garbage Somalians especially would have emboldened regular Americans to just, well, tell the freaking truth.

There's nothing wrong with wanting your home to stay populated with your own people. There's nothing wrong to say you don't want mass influxes of strange foreigners to your town!


This is just as on the race issue, for which White Americans have danced around the truth for half a century. They feel the need to do the same regarding the Population Replacement Programme on a local level so as not to be those BAD, BAD, xenophobic, people, the type who wouldn't have let Mary and Joseph , make that Madia y Hose-A, borrow a spot in the barn. Hey, the next Hey-Suess could be born, who knows?

After a little initial elation, for me this story turned disappointing. Objections claiming "the traffic!" is the problem may have** worked this time. If you use the bogus arguments (very much like "Vetting!") however, you lose the big fight, as it'll be hard for anyone to get by with an objection later when the site for a mass influx of foreigners does not present any realistic traffic problem. Maybe the "newcomers" have all been vetted too, thoroughly, I tell you, by the Defense Investigative Service. Who cares? Just say no!

I suggest people follow the lead of the President of the United States with their wording - how about some truth? I get it, though, The President has a big security detail, but you could be called names. True, you might get fired from your job too, etc, etc... but, NOT if the townspeople of the next Hoover, Alabama ALL together tell their City Council members that "We are against this plan because we want this place to remain America!



* I felt the need to read, and all but some links on the page are in English. I sent to reader to a TV station site - sorry 'bout that!

** It's only an initial ruling to "not recommend" the use of the building for that school. It's not over.

*** This was during the Deep Dark Days of the Kung Flu PanicFest.


Comments (6)




Hair - a touchy subject these days


Posted On: Saturday - December 6th 2025 1:30PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Pundits  Race/Genetics

As an acolyte, one might call me, of Conservative alt-right(?) pundit extraordinaire Steve Sailer, a good many of our posts still start with his ideas. The subject of black women's hair, World War Hair by his running theme, is something Mr. Sailer holds dear. It's one of his subjects we'll discuss today.

I'm sure Mr. Sailer doesn't really care about the specific twists and curls of this non-touchy subject - Don't you dare! - of the hair itself, but it's the whole Regime Media treatment of it, pun not intended but greatly welcomed!, that he's written much about. He reads the New York Times, see... so we don't have to. This sounds like a ridiculously niche topic for him, less interesting than even golf course architecture to "some" of us. We don't complain - Peak Stupidity, after all, has presented more than a handful of posts about exercise machine console energy and power calculations - I! GET! IT! - NOBODY CARES!

There's more to what Mr. Sailer writes about however, on this subject, than just the hair styles. He notices that the media promotes this subject that nobody but the subjects themselves care about, in order to explain the bigger picture.

I'm not sure if every reader here would get the slight facetiousness in our recent post Jet Bridge Carol. The poster, shown again here, is revisionist, in that the woman's hairstyle hearkens to 1970's Bob Newhart Show's Carol the receptionist. However, if anyone is appropriating anyone else's "bit", it'd be White Carol having the Afro that most Afro-Americans* had. Actress Marcia Wallace could have had hair that was best worn that way. I don't know, I don't care. She was the smart-assed funny receptionist, is all.



I have no idea how many machines and different gels it takes to look like this, but it's a pretty nice look.

I really have not paid attention to black women's hair my whole life. There was one cutie from the Islands, possibly significantly White, who I liked. She had fairly straight, flowing hair, but the situation didn't get close to my having a reason to touch it, much less care how she took care of it. Not my job. As I read a few of Steve Sailer's and commenters' discussions of the matter, I realized that I hadn't even known what a weave is, what these woman do with their hair, and how much trouble and expense is involved. I mean, I'd seen thousands of these hairstyles, but I had no reason to care what was going on there. We men look at other parts first, and if they don't do it, the rest is just a blur.

Mr. Sailer's big point is that it's either a WHOLE LOT of trouble and expense or plain impossible for black women to make their hair like, say, this:

Why is it always "Marsha, Marsha, Marsha?!" - Big Mike Øb☭ma



Unless they are nearly White, black women can never make their hair look like Marsha Brady did. I am partial to straight hair on women but also greatly appreciate the Farrah Faucetts, Christy Brinklies and the like, to go back to the same era, as White women can do all sorts of beautiful things with it.

Jennifer Anniston, beautiful haired White woman from 2 decades later:



Actually, she had much longer nicer hair other times, but this picture stood out for some reason.


Slewing forward 2 1/2 more decades, to around 2020, we noticed this masked young lady from a woman's site teaching us "The Riskiest Places for Catching Coronavirus Revealed". It would have been well worth it...



If you can tell she's cute even with that Kung-Flu mask on, she's PRETTY, indeed.


I'm not really partial to blondes either, if that makes a difference to any sensitive black women readers, though somehow all examples here are blondes. (They not only have more fun, but they get in more PS file photos.). Whether it's straight, parted in the middle, flowing with curls that do take some effort too, black women are obviously jealous of how much men like this hair. Black women just can't DO THIS with their hair. It also doesn't help when you have a women-of-Wal-Mart body style either.

That's the big point. Mr. Sailer does not rant against the scourge of Feminism as we do here for a damn good reason. However, he understands the ill effects of women in positions, such as "journalism", in which their mode of "thinking", if one could call it that, does not work for us in a well-run society. His Sailer's Law of Female Journalism is a classic:
The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.
Yes, it's funny cause it's true. Jealousy for men's attention and lust is very important, and you can't fool Mother Nature ... with the compound silicone providing somewhat of an exception. So, black women have it tough - there's no getting around that.

I've meant to write this post for nearly a month, so in the meantime, not only did I run into this ZeroHedge article - Pennsylvania Governor Signs Law Banning "Hair Discrimination", but Mr. Sailer published another "World War Hair" article on his substack site (unfortunately paywalled) - . I oughta briefly discuss them both.

The CROWN Act! Ha, I say we require hats be worn by men at all time, except during sleep time. Some of us men might appreciate that. Or forget hair styles completely, like in the Iron-Rice-Bowl-Hair world of Mao's China. As for women, ZH excerpts Governor Shapiro, working with bill sponsor U.S. Rep. La'Tasha D. Mayes who exclaims in bold:
"Real freedom means being respected for who you are - no matter what you look like, where you come from, who you love, or who you pray to...For too long, many Pennsylvanians have faced discrimination simply for hairstyles that reflect their identity and culture - that ends today..."
Yes, it surely will end once the law is passed. Now, I can't see the powerpoint - down in front!

This La'Tasha is a woman. Have you ever noticed that they don't always say what they mean. You think it's this one thing you did wrong, but a month later, you find out that was not what she was mad about at all!
“This is going to help people by making sure that, wherever you work, or wherever you're applying for a job, they can't look at your hair and size you up - not based on your qualifications and all of the professional development you have and all of your education,” said PA House Speaker Joanna McClinton. “They will not look at your hair and decide you can't work here. They will not look at your hair and decide you don't belong in this C-suite. They will not look at your hair and say, ‘you can't be in the boardroom.’”

"Hair discrimination has taken confidence from our children, but that ends today," Mayes said. "Hair discrimination has taken dignity from workers, but that ends today. It has taken access to economic opportunities, hopes and dreams, but that begins to end today."
No, it's not about the workplace and professional development, La'Tundra. You want more men to look at you, and if it takes a law to (somehow) make that happen, so let it be written, so let it be done! THIS! MARSHA! BRADY! JENNIFER! ANNISTON! CUTE! FLU-MANCHU! GIRL! SHIT! ENDS! NOW!

Mr. Sailer got back to this niche but illustrative subject of his after reading yet another New York Times article. He wrote Michelle Obama Declares World War Hair, subtitled Are white people really to blame for why Michelle gets her hair straightened? What I could read from that post were well under a thousand words, but they say a picture is worth a thousand words, so here:

Remember, neither of these two were ever elected to office:



That's not to say it wouldn't be an interesting thought-election, Big Mike v Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.

What can you say to them? We're sorry, but you can't compete with White girls when it comes to hair? It's the truth, as much as they try. Would it not be better if they went back to the more natural easier-to-maintain "Afro" or something such as Jet Bridge Carol's style? I don't find short hair of any kind less pretty than the crazy braided-up weave get-ups either.

Men of other races too surely like the beautiful hair of the Marsha/Jennifer/File-photo-chick types too. Can black men settle for the natural black women, so women will generally be happier? Would one need to ask these question were it 1955 outside?

Well, here's an extreme example:



She seems to like it. We don't go to the movies much anymore, so what's the problem?

Just for the record, though one may bitch about things that can't be changed, it's not like some White hair styles don't require a lot of time and money too. I was witness to a 4 hour long hair highlighting operation one day. If the girl doing it wasn't her sister, that would have cost a pretty penny. (I don't even like that highlighting bit...)

Here's the deal: Pundit Steve Sailer's discussion about black women's hair troubles is not so much out of concern for these poor, jealous ladies, although he's more concerned than I am. He's been relating the big picture, which is that women's personal problems have become causes for political change. That's not the way you run a society.

That wasn't the deal back in the days of America, the band too, I mean. Sister Golden Hair, from the Hearts album, is from right at half-century ago America, and America.

America were:
Gerry Beckley – lead and backing vocals, keyboards, guitars, bass, harmonica.
Dewey Bunnell – lead and backing vocals, guitars, percussion,
Dan Peek – lead and backing vocals, guitars, bass, keyboards, harmonica.



... near the end of this song's long ending, I still hear "... and, we've got a winner!" This song was on for me one of the first times I ever heard pop music on the radio. The DJ talked over the ending, explaining that there had been a number 10 dialer, who won a record or something.


PS: Now, this was just uncanny! Just a day before writing this post, as I'd picked out the big-Afro picture already, I ended up on an escalator behind a woman with hair right about that size, bigger than I'd ever seen in real life before. I was about 1 foot behind her. This is the weird part - contrary to all Steve Sailer/commenters/MY writing before, I DID want to touch it! I couldn't tell, but wanted to know, how much of it was part of her Eskimo-style coat and how much was hair. Far out, man!


* Look, that was just their preferred term at the time - I don't pick them!


Comments (9)




Breaking roofing news


Posted On: Friday - December 5th 2025 10:01PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Trump



There's been so much good news on the immigration invasion counterattack lately, but no, why would I be tired of it? That "tired of winning" line from Trump never made a lick of sense. What I do get tired of is seeing hopeful moves on this existential problem go nowhere. Trump is not very good at following up on what comes out of his mouth. (Sometimes that's a good thing, though!)

We'll see about the actual deportations based on the latest great news about the ending of the "Temporary" Protected Status of many hundreds of thousands of first Haitians, now Somalians. Next, Trump's told us of the banning of importation of people from so far 19 countries. It's not George Carlin's exact list of words you can't couldn't say on the radio, but it's close. Jared Taylor, as enthused as Peak Stupidity about all this, listed these countries, though he says 100 would be nice round number.
Afghanistan, Burma, The Congo, Equatorial (NOT Polar) Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela*
That's 5 continents with shitholes in them. I think I kinda got that out of 6th and 8th grade Geography.

We all want to see action, but this talk is heartening at least. What is more heartening is real and personal reporting from a friend of changes due to the Trump Administration's work against the PRP. Operation Charlotte's Web was a big story a couple of weeks ago, you can probably recall. We've got some related news.

There's a big house this friend is involved with, not a McMansion but an actual mansion by my estimation, in the Charlotte area, that needed a new roof due to hail damage. It's a BIG roof, as the place is more rambling than the kind of mansion we usually picture. The cost is upwards of $90,000! Yes, that's the price of a small house 20-30 years ago, and yes, it's too much. However, as my friend discussed, the insurance company is willing to pay that. That this amount is about the same as the total of all his premiums he's paid over the years really makes us both wonder. He says the price is nuts, but if the house sells, that's just a selling point - "It's got a new $90-something thousand dollar roof!"

The big news he told me is simply this: This roofing project has been delayed due to the effect of Operation Charlotte's Web. In other words, the illegal aliens that would be doing it don't feel so comfortable coming out of the shadows and into the sun right now. Will that remain the case? Will the roofing company worry about who its Spanish-speaking workers actually are, or they just laying low until the ICE storm has passed? Would the company even think about hiring Americans, with that increased labor cost... that doesn't mean a hill of beans as compared to the money they will make on this roof?

The deal is, if every roofing company really had to hire Americans, they would still be competitive and make lots of money. As it is today, if you're the one patriotically hiring actual Americans at a higher rate, you'll lose the bids. Any difference you might charge for based on better quality (if there IS any) will not be known about until that 30 year roof starts leaking 5 or 10 years later. By then, nobody is held accountable.

Now, as usual, I need to limit the length of these posts. Just pondering some of the economics of the roofing business had me thinking of 3 more posts. One of them will be based on the "Con" below, another will be about the breakdown of the costs of, and profit taken, from this big roof project, with simple calculations done in various ways to check "Does It Make Sense?", and another will be about a different type of illegal alien labor.

A bigger question than those about this one big roof, would be, is it wise to have the ICE agents detain illegal aliens very publicly as in the Charlotte's Web operation? It surely helped in this case, as it's not likely the couple of hundred illegal aliens detained, of many 10's of thousands (maybe 100's) in the region, just happened to be part of this particular roofing crew! That's one of the pro's of doing these public displays, whether intended to be public or not. Peak Stupidity has discussed before the ratio of self-deportees vs forced-ones back 71 years ago during President Eisenhower's Operation Wetback. Over the 4 southern border States, it varied from 6.25:1 to 9.75:1. I can imagine it going even higher in the current media environment. By all means, Regime Media, bring us some big sob stories!

The big con (as in pros & cons) of the public method is that opposing forces, the ctrl-left judges and others still in control of the Institutions, will have big targets. Instead, imagine continuing a quiet, steady program of a few dozen, maybe a hundred, illegals taken in to custody in each of a hundred large or medium sized cities daily. The numbers will add up, yet how many judges in how many jurisdictions has the ctrl-left got? How big a story can you make to promote your newsroom when the same thing is happening in a hundred other places? There are a lot of Home Depot parking lots, and there are a lot of Chinese Buffet restaurants**!

The one personal anecdote shows evidence of Deportation Nation having at least SOME effect on the labor market.



* Only 40 years ago, this was the crown jewel of Latin America. It really is a shame.

** Yes, them too. I did some quick math in my head on whether these big buffet places could still exist and how it would work out were these ladies out of Fujian (mostly) arrested. Another thing about the Chinese - Indians too - is that THAT news would travel fast. Imagine having to go home across all that distance! Send a few of them home, and they will surely stop coming.


Comments (2)