Posted On: Thursday - July 9th 2026 6:24PM MST
In Topics: Immigration Stupidity Trump
The PRP is the Population Replacement Programme.
Here's our standard Disclaimer, one that probably should be assumed by the reader, but we'll continue putting it up top:
The man's an annoying braggart, he talks a load of BS, he knows he should get us out of Iran, but, EGO, and, we think His latest thing, getting involved in soccer penalties and the FIFA, is another stupid distraction that should be none of his business. The foreign player in question was a Bug-Out Baby (remember last week?), the US team lost anyway, and NOBODY CARES about some stupid game in which the players are required to run around a field pretending they have no arms!
All that can be quite the distraction, but then, this is no distraction - this is part of Trump's work against the PRP:
This is great progress. I'd thought that the refugee admittance count was zero with the exception of 17,000 White South Africans. The bar graph shows denial rates, not absolute numbers. One may note that the worst admittance rates, close to Ann Coulter's "It's not over until the immigrant wins", were seen at the end of Øb☭ma's first term and the beginning of his 2nd, with 65% of fake* "refugees" admitted. The 20th Century up through '17 (remember the date) saw admission numbers between 45% and higher, but mostly above 50%.
Though things don't look so bad from '21 - '25 RELATIVELY:
1) The absolute numbers were probably much higher. After all, when your chances are good, and the country all but invites you in, there's an incentive for higher numbers to try to achieve "asylum".
2) Dark Brandon let people in via all kinds of methods. The main way was via entry across an almost wide-open border. (Remember the Border Patrol being ordered to cut through the razor wire on the Rio Grande that Texas had put up?)
'25 got us back down to ~32% admittance, but last month it was down to just over 7%!
There's a lot of strategic planning that went into the achievement of these great numbers, not that I believe Trump is that strategic planner himself. Immigration Judges are making these calls. As VDare used to write about for many years, the immigration judges have been extremely pro-immigrant. They've been part of the entrenched bureaucracy, the Administrative State**.
Well, fire them all, and let God sort 'em out, one is tempted to say. Nah, but the problem has been the process, in which these fake asylum seekers are allowed to come INTO America while their cases are adjudicated. Aaaaannnnd, they're gone... into the interior of America. The Trump Administration has worked to change this policy. Last I heard, yet another leftist judge blocked the effort.
Therefore, it's important to replace these judges as quickly as possible with new judges (last I read somewhere, 10,000) who will (hopefully!) play ball.
As I wrote above, there must be some strategic planning, I suppose by Trump's teams under Steven Miller and Tom Homan. I can see that Trump DOES know what's going on and understands the strategy, at least, seeing as how he mentions all these moves.
I'm sorry, Peak Stupidity sick-of-Trump readers, I too, would rather see someone like Ron DeSanity doing this job. We'll have to take what we got though, so long as he's fighting hard against the PRP. This latest data is very encouraging. I'd like to see 2-3% by the end of the year. Some of them might actually need asylum.
* They're almost all fake. The idea of asylum is that you get out and head to the nearest "safe" country, that is one officially a peace. You don't need to go to North America.
** ... NOT to be confused with the Deep State. See also Will the REAL Deep State please stand up...
Comments:
The Alarmist
Friday - July 10th 2026 4:40AM MST
PS
The fewer migrants the better, because they’re eating our wildlife and pets.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/she-going-eat-it
🕉
The fewer migrants the better, because they’re eating our wildlife and pets.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/she-going-eat-it
🕉
I guess Mrs Burka there didn't think anyone would notice. It was good to see the Brit neighbors get on her about it. The article says the gulls of all sorts are protected wildlife. I'd like to see the lady take on a gator sometime - make it a fair fight.
Thanks for the link. I read about 10-20% of the ZH articles - sometimes only the comments.