Posted On: Monday - October 6th 2025 11:40AM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Trump  Globalists  Race/Genetics  ctrl-left
The blogger said, "Think Nationally, Act Locally" bumper stickers should be issued. All in favor of what he said, signify by saying 'aye'.... if, however, you are opposed... Don't mind me, this goes way, way back.
You also have to go a ways back to remember the Think Globally, Act Locally bumper stickers that used to adorn... I don't know, mostly Volvo station wagons. Those people driving around with the stickers weren't Globalists in the Peak Stupidity and generally current sense of the term. They just wanted to save the environment for the World, have
However, those behind the whole ideological campaign, including the issuance of the bumper stickers, were the types we're dealing with now. The only World Peace we'll get will be under the thumb of the "Eat Zee Bugs" and "Own Nothing" crowd, led by the Kier Starmers and George Soroses. They are the Globalists. Most of us don't think like them.
This guy sure doesn't. He's most assuredly not a Globalist:

If this happens, it's above and beyond what ANY of us immigration patriot MAGA types expected. Now, OK, we harped last time around on "You've got to codify it into law, ya' big dummy! Otherwise, the next guy will flip it right back around." We were right, and the next guy DID. It was ghastly and disastrous, and most of what President Trump has been bragging about is just trying to reverse the damage from those 4 years. However, as another post will have to get into, what has the Legislative Branch ever done for us?! Those guys don't seem to matter much right now. Trump is getting things done the only way that is working out.
He's the Administrator of the Federal Government. Yeah, the H1B Visa program is specified by law. However, the Administrator has every right to ... tweak the numbers a bit... just tweaking that nominal Indentured Servitude fee a bit higher to help administer the program. The same goes for this latest change to refugee acceptance numbers. Just tweak 'em a bit, turn the knob down... administrative housekeeping, that's all... from 125,000 to 7,500... if you're not a math guy, as Trump isn't, you don't calculate this trivia... that the rate of bringing in highly foreign bogus refugees is ... shhhhh ..., oh, 6% of the previous rate. Housekeeping... the bean counters gave me a number - I just run the place.
Well, listen, if the red-squad of the UniParty-run Congress won't get off its collective ass on these matters ... BTW, Trump-45 made some good efforts on this same iimmigration-invasion policy too, as related here in President Donald Trump: the Bad, **the Good**, and the Ugly. That post is from 5 years ago next week.
If it does come to 7,500 White (South)Afrikaner actual refugees from Black! persecution being let in, that's not any significant number* - probably still under a percent of people permanently entering the US annually via various means, but it's VERY symbolic. The reduction in the refugee racket by 94% is MORE THAN symbolic - that's a significant number, and it's important.
Instead of our usual disclaimer about the man (well just a bit), though we often can't stand the Reality-TV BSing and annoyances, and we wish often a Ron DeSantis or Ron Paul were up in there, I really don't believe either of them would go this far. That is, not so much with the numbers, but with putting this anti-foreigner, pro-White move right in the faces of the ctrl-left. What can the ctrl-left do with their bitching? It just won't work well.
Are there so many American that would agree with the ctrl-left that "Yeah, we need MOAR strange foreigners! We can't do without lots of refugees." That's what they're having to argue now (with their PRP goals left unsaid). It's Trump himself who made the effort to point out the persecution of White people in S. Africa, and right in front of the President of the place to boot! Who else would have done that? After seeing that, I think most White Americans now have more knowledge about the goings on in S. Africa. Yet Trump has put the ctrl-left into the very clear position of having to argue simply "No White people allowed!"
It's time to give this guy some credit. Those who claim "controlled opposition" or even the slightly less crazy idea that Trump really is part of the Establishment and doesn't care about us really aren't thinking this through. Were he going through the motions, he could have long ago stopped with "Well, Judge ABC in the nth circuit has blocked this, so we'll try something else" and "I've brought illegal immigration down by 25%, so... please clap..."
Trump is a Nationalist, and one might say a pro-(White) Nationalist (gasp!). It's true that he's not enough of a calm, detail-oriented guy to make efforts without having
What about the "Act Locally" part? Oh, that's a great story! It'll have to wait for the next post - this was getting too long.
PS: I got the tweet screenshotted above off The GateWay Pundit so thanks, GP's Ben Kew, for REPORT: Trump Planning to Slash Refugee Admissions to 7,500 Annually — Most Spaces Reserved For Persecuted White South Africans.
*. Also, it's a only 0.15% of the number of White people still in South Africa. I doubt all want to leave anyway. What a complete disaster, completely of the West's doing, it was to turn the place over to black rule and possibly soon abandon the whole civilizational project after 4 centuries. Africa Wins, they'll tell you.
Per the GP article linked to in the post-script, are only 197 Afrikaner refugees who have actually arrived here so far.
*********************************
[UPDATED 10/06 late:] Uhhh, that would be 6% and 94%... here I am giving Trump a hard time about math...
*********************************
Comments:
Moderator
Tuesday - October 7th 2025 7:37PM MST
PS: Nope, I don't like the sound of that either, Alarmist. I've got that substack post in a window, and I'll read it later on.
Moderator
Tuesday - October 7th 2025 7:36PM MST
PS: Hello, M. Yes, if you model things in terms of lost life-years and what productive things - adding to the GDP, as they would put it - could have been done with all that time, you can get into Trillions.
One could do that for a lot of things, I suppose. "If you banned High-Fructose Corn Syrup" it would save America $5 Trillion a year!"
One could do that for a lot of things, I suppose. "If you banned High-Fructose Corn Syrup" it would save America $5 Trillion a year!"
The Alarmist
Tuesday - October 7th 2025 11:52AM MST
PS
Here’s a “cheery” though on the future of acting locally…
++++++++
“ The future will be increasingly localized, with much less product variants and with much simple lifestyles. Remaining diesel supplies will be diverted entirely to maintain agriculture and food delivery, focusing on plant based foods (animal husbandry requires a lot more fuel than growing peas and beans). For the average citizen this will translate into higher food and skyrocketing meat prices, leaving little to no budget to buy anything else than a shirt or a pair of shoes every now and then.”
source: https://thehonestsorcerer.substack.com/p/the-electrification-of-road-transport
+++++
🕉
Here’s a “cheery” though on the future of acting locally…
++++++++
“ The future will be increasingly localized, with much less product variants and with much simple lifestyles. Remaining diesel supplies will be diverted entirely to maintain agriculture and food delivery, focusing on plant based foods (animal husbandry requires a lot more fuel than growing peas and beans). For the average citizen this will translate into higher food and skyrocketing meat prices, leaving little to no budget to buy anything else than a shirt or a pair of shoes every now and then.”
source: https://thehonestsorcerer.substack.com/p/the-electrification-of-road-transport
+++++
🕉
M
Tuesday - October 7th 2025 3:50AM MST
PS
A major part (probably most) of that cost of traffic collisions is the years of life that fatality would have had if he lived to the average age of death. Probably including the money that he would have earned, and the taxes paid.
So it's a model, and like most models it's arguable.
I wonder if most of the people who die in collisions actually are employable. Is the model wrong in that sense?
Should a 16-year old criminal who dies in a crash he caused have a value based on his youth and average GDP per capita? Which is how that model works now.
A major part (probably most) of that cost of traffic collisions is the years of life that fatality would have had if he lived to the average age of death. Probably including the money that he would have earned, and the taxes paid.
So it's a model, and like most models it's arguable.
I wonder if most of the people who die in collisions actually are employable. Is the model wrong in that sense?
Should a 16-year old criminal who dies in a crash he caused have a value based on his youth and average GDP per capita? Which is how that model works now.
Moderator
Monday - October 6th 2025 8:34PM MST
PS: Here's hoping one of the lefty SCROTUS members drops out soon, and Trump gets to pick another. Hopefully he'll listen to the right people if he does so.
"Jeb! asked them to clap and they clapped. That's leadership." That was a good LOL, HTP. Thanks!
"Jeb! asked them to clap and they clapped. That's leadership." That was a good LOL, HTP. Thanks!
Moderator
Monday - October 6th 2025 8:33PM MST
PS: Sorry I didn't answer you under that last post, Alarmist. No, that wasn't me, but I didn't seen this commenter's name under the 1st video that Mr. Smith found... I guess it's another, but those get-something-for-nothing sales pitches just piss me off, as do the type of people that go for them. IOW, FTW, or something.
I'd say that's a good guess, Adam, based on context, rather than "For The Win".
I'd say that's a good guess, Adam, based on context, rather than "For The Win".
Human Teeth Parade
Monday - October 6th 2025 8:23PM MST
PS: Jeb! asked them to clap and they clapped. That's leadership.
SafeNow
Monday - October 6th 2025 3:58PM MST
PS
The scope of “the major questions” doctrine is up before Scotus this term. (“major questions” must go to Congress.) The Trump action in question is tariffs. There, I think Trump will lose, because the economic consequences are enormous..that is, major.And Trump’s “economic emergency” theory will get tossed. But if the Supremes set out proper standards, Trump will win on refugees. This is immigration, which belongs to the President; plus, it is not major. Hopefully the Scotus “standards “ will give Trump a wide berth to do other stuff.
The scope of “the major questions” doctrine is up before Scotus this term. (“major questions” must go to Congress.) The Trump action in question is tariffs. There, I think Trump will lose, because the economic consequences are enormous..that is, major.And Trump’s “economic emergency” theory will get tossed. But if the Supremes set out proper standards, Trump will win on refugees. This is immigration, which belongs to the President; plus, it is not major. Hopefully the Scotus “standards “ will give Trump a wide berth to do other stuff.
Adam Smith
Monday - October 6th 2025 3:30PM MST
PS: Ok, so apparently I lied about not submitting another comment before I read this post...
https://www.atssa.com/news/traffic-fatalities-up-25-from-a-decade-earlier-fatal-and-serious-crashes-cost-nearly-1-9-trillion-new-report-shows/
(I mean, it wasn't 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 a lie because I meant it at the time...)(Apparently it was bullshit though...)
So yeah. $1.9 trillion (with a T) is almost like real dollar buck$!
Pretty wild... ☮️
https://www.atssa.com/news/traffic-fatalities-up-25-from-a-decade-earlier-fatal-and-serious-crashes-cost-nearly-1-9-trillion-new-report-shows/
(I mean, it wasn't 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 a lie because I meant it at the time...)(Apparently it was bullshit though...)
So yeah. $1.9 trillion (with a T) is almost like real dollar buck$!
Pretty wild... ☮️
Adam Smith
Monday - October 6th 2025 3:25PM MST
PS: Good evening, gentlemen... Mr. Alarmist,
𝐼’𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑠’ 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐹𝑇𝑊 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠.
Fuck The World? (Is my guess.) Also, From a comment a couple posts back...
𝑑𝑖𝑑 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 “$90𝑘 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 $16𝑘” 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑏𝑖𝑡 𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑐?
I found several different videos titled “$90k trucks for $16k” including these...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJi9WkAyDfY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_p4QHEuNgU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdlhXreOJtk
But I'm not sure which one you're talking about. Perhaps it is a different video altogether? Meanwhile... While searching for the $90𝑘 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 $16𝑘 video I stumbled upon this study...
https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812263
(from 2014) that alleges that...
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑚 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑣𝑒ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 2010 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 $836 𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛.
Which seems almost unbelievable to me. If this is true today's numbers are surely higher.(?)
In any case, one of the above videos has a subtitle that suggests that 𝑇ℎ𝑒 $867 𝐵𝐼𝐿𝐿𝐼𝑂𝑁 𝐶𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑟𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝑖𝑠 𝐺𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑊𝑂𝑅𝑆𝐸...
What a time to be alive! (Anyway...) I'm going to go read Achmed's post before I submit more comments.
Happy Monday! ☮️
𝐼’𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑠’ 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐹𝑇𝑊 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠.
Fuck The World? (Is my guess.) Also, From a comment a couple posts back...
𝑑𝑖𝑑 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 “$90𝑘 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 $16𝑘” 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑏𝑖𝑡 𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑐?
I found several different videos titled “$90k trucks for $16k” including these...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJi9WkAyDfY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_p4QHEuNgU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdlhXreOJtk
But I'm not sure which one you're talking about. Perhaps it is a different video altogether? Meanwhile... While searching for the $90𝑘 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 $16𝑘 video I stumbled upon this study...
https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812263
(from 2014) that alleges that...
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑚 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑣𝑒ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 2010 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 $836 𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛.
Which seems almost unbelievable to me. If this is true today's numbers are surely higher.(?)
In any case, one of the above videos has a subtitle that suggests that 𝑇ℎ𝑒 $867 𝐵𝐼𝐿𝐿𝐼𝑂𝑁 𝐶𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑟𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝑖𝑠 𝐺𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑊𝑂𝑅𝑆𝐸...
What a time to be alive! (Anyway...) I'm going to go read Achmed's post before I submit more comments.
Happy Monday! ☮️
The Alarmist
Monday - October 6th 2025 2:13PM MST
PS
My bumper sticker:
“Act Locally: FTW”
I’ll leave it to viewers’ imagination to arrive at what FTW means.
🕉
My bumper sticker:
“Act Locally: FTW”
I’ll leave it to viewers’ imagination to arrive at what FTW means.
🕉