Posted On: Saturday - August 17th 2024 8:09PM MST
In Topics: Immigration Stupidity Music World Political Stupidity People's Revolt
I've been trying to keep following the story of the UK riots (finally!*) against the evil Population Replacement Programme aimed against the British people. ZeroHedge has had a little bit. (I haven't visited the Gateway Pundit in a while, the clickbait and Hispanic pandering by Jim Hoft having turned me off after half a year.) The way media works these days, it's hard to tell if a story is being censored hard or it has just tailed off.
Two weeks back, in England Burning: Enough is Enough!, Peak Stupidity embedded a video of the riots as reported by one Wesley Winters. It was great to have a view into it all, but having any verbal reporting going on is not necessary. What he had to say regarding what we could all see around him was superfluous, and though Mr. Winters was generally unbiased, he still had somewhat of an agenda with his questioning of members of the crowd.
I was excited to see this next one, embedded below, from a week back in a town called Middlesbrough. Also in Yorkshire**, this town is across the island in the northeast direction from Southport, near the North Sea coast. Mr. Winter named this video This Is Not England: Enough Is Done. It shows young Brits in Middlesbrough trashing cars, some house windows, and generally raising hell in an immigrant, aka, Moslem neighborhood.
I really wish Wesley Winter had shut up with his commentary on this one. I'm not really a believer in much "controlled opposition", but I could see how that term could fit. To me, Mr. Winter completely cucks out here and, inadvertently or not, is on the wrong side, against the British people.
"Some kids are litrally smashin' windows. They're litrally young kids ..." Closed captioning was of some help here, as otherwise, these blokes' English is beyond me!
Look, I get the annoyance and criminality of random and misdirected violence. That was my beef with the fools that blew up the wonderful "American Stonehenge" Georgia Guidestones 2 summers ago. I guess they thought they were on the right track in fighting evil, but, nah, they weren't.
What we see in the video is an attempt to continue the country-wide protest started with the trigger of the stabbing of a dozen people, with 3 young children being killed by the offspring of yet more very-foreign immigrants. What are these young people aiming to accomplish? To me, the idea is to get the message across: Foreigners Out!. In Germany, they put that to the tune of a famous pop song, singing Auslander Raus.*** Maybe a lot of them just like smashing stuff, but there's a general justified feeling of anger behind it all.
Mr. Winter goes along commenting on how wrong this is, mentioning to his audience and to some of his short-term interviewees (everybody is moving) that the right way to handle this is to talk with their MP's (Members of Parliament). Is he that stupid? For half a century these MP's have been pushing the Population Replacement Programme, with no support from the average bloke like these guys in Middlebrough. Whether it's due to blackmail or straight evil, the ministers of "their" government are completely against them and have absolutely no interest in listening to their complaints.
What's the deal, "British" reporter Wesley Winter? Would you have gone along with a crowd of Moslem rioters telling them to stop throwing rocks, or how about if you'd been in America in the summer of '20 reporting on antifa Commies and black thugs? Why are White people not allowed to riot?
I'm starting to think that Wesley Winter made this video out of fear of getting in trouble with the Totalitarian British authorities, so as to cover his ass. "No, I'm not inciting. I was there to tell the White people to stop rioting, see?" Whatever the reason, I wish he'd get out there and film but shut his mouth the whole time. His words show that either he doesn't understand the big picture or he's on the side of the Regime.
I had hoped the momentum of these riots would build, as that is the only way, it seems, for these people to avoid J6 type treatment. I'm not as hopeful today, but who knows what's not being covered?
I'd heard of this Clash song before but never heard the song itself until a few days ago in a ZeroHedge post. I liked it at first listen!
White riot, I wanna riot.OK, that's enough of that. We'll have something more lighthearted, I hope, next week. Have a happy Sunday, Peakers. Thank you so much for reading and writing in!
White riot, a riot of my own.
White riot, I wanna riot.
White riot, a riot of my own
Black man gotta lot a problems,
but they don't mind throwing a brick.
White people go to school,
where they teach you how to be thick.
* I would say the same for America too. When will people get angry enough?
** ... aka, a big chunk of northern England, which long ago was one county.
*** I neither know nor care what the original inane pop song was, I get "auslander" because it's obvious, and I know "raus" from Hogan's Heroes.
Comments:
Adam Smith
Monday - August 19th 2024 12:15PM MST
PS: One more...
https://i.ibb.co/Kqg2vyn/Doesn-t-Feel-Like-Pakistan-Anymore.png
☮️
https://i.ibb.co/Kqg2vyn/Doesn-t-Feel-Like-Pakistan-Anymore.png
☮️
Adam Smith
Monday - August 19th 2024 9:24AM MST
PS: Good afternoon...
https://www.teepublic.com/pin/49144945-oi-mate-ya-got-a-loicense-fer-dat
https://i.ibb.co/mhNYDvD/Keep-Britian-White.jpg
Happy Monday! ☮️
https://www.teepublic.com/pin/49144945-oi-mate-ya-got-a-loicense-fer-dat
https://i.ibb.co/mhNYDvD/Keep-Britian-White.jpg
Happy Monday! ☮️
Moderator
Monday - August 19th 2024 6:23AM MST
PS: M, I can see that your comment would best fit underneath that old post, but I also understand you figure (correctly) that probably nobody including me would know it was there. ;-}
Thanks for all that information on the Canadian Senate. As for the corruption here, my Devil's Advocate paragraph about Amd XVII was to say that it may have been though that local politics would be corrupt with the State legislators picking Senators. Well, now the corruption is nationwide. I'm thinking of the HIldabeast being a New York Senator here. The elections have become nationwide affairs.
As with many of the post-B.O.R. Amendments, this is yet another usurpation of State power. That's what I wrote - right now, my State legislator "delivers $5 million to my neighborhood" (as per one post and another later today) and maybe votes on highway funding, resolutions to thank people, and other minor stuff. Back when he would have been involved in picking the 2 Senators, he'd be more important. (The guy we unfortunately have right here, well, I'm glad he's not more important, but that's just the small picture for me.0
Thanks for all that information on the Canadian Senate. As for the corruption here, my Devil's Advocate paragraph about Amd XVII was to say that it may have been though that local politics would be corrupt with the State legislators picking Senators. Well, now the corruption is nationwide. I'm thinking of the HIldabeast being a New York Senator here. The elections have become nationwide affairs.
As with many of the post-B.O.R. Amendments, this is yet another usurpation of State power. That's what I wrote - right now, my State legislator "delivers $5 million to my neighborhood" (as per one post and another later today) and maybe votes on highway funding, resolutions to thank people, and other minor stuff. Back when he would have been involved in picking the 2 Senators, he'd be more important. (The guy we unfortunately have right here, well, I'm glad he's not more important, but that's just the small picture for me.0
Moderator
Monday - August 19th 2024 6:16AM MST
PS: Mr. Smith, I'm glad you spelled some of that out from the video. I think I was going to mention at least the "we should get together with the Moslems" bit at least, but the post would get too long.
The "but I'm not a racist" remarks were disgusting to me. They have been indoctrinated so thoroughly. I understand just leaving direct statements like "we hate living in a Moslem neighborhood" or "These are not my people" out. However, that English bloke saying "this has been coming for 40 years" nailed it. I wonder how "Keep Britain White" would go over.
I should have used CC, because I realized later it did a decent job. Otherwise, maybe even part of that exchange about Mr. Winter being British, I just can't follow these people with that Yorkshire accent. (Yeah, I could follow Wesley Winter, but I didn't care to listen to him too much ...)
I think it's wrong to let this become "us vs the cops" too. Maybe you're right that some of these were antifa types, instigating trouble to bring more Anarcho-Tyranny (the latter part) down on the White people. However, it's important there is momentum and that the Regime be aware that this won't stop until the invasion is stopped. I'd read it was a Moslem neighborhood, so if hell-raising could go on without random smashing of stuff - is that possible? - well, it's important for the Moslem community to know that the Brits are going to quit taking this lying down.
The "but I'm not a racist" remarks were disgusting to me. They have been indoctrinated so thoroughly. I understand just leaving direct statements like "we hate living in a Moslem neighborhood" or "These are not my people" out. However, that English bloke saying "this has been coming for 40 years" nailed it. I wonder how "Keep Britain White" would go over.
I should have used CC, because I realized later it did a decent job. Otherwise, maybe even part of that exchange about Mr. Winter being British, I just can't follow these people with that Yorkshire accent. (Yeah, I could follow Wesley Winter, but I didn't care to listen to him too much ...)
I think it's wrong to let this become "us vs the cops" too. Maybe you're right that some of these were antifa types, instigating trouble to bring more Anarcho-Tyranny (the latter part) down on the White people. However, it's important there is momentum and that the Regime be aware that this won't stop until the invasion is stopped. I'd read it was a Moslem neighborhood, so if hell-raising could go on without random smashing of stuff - is that possible? - well, it's important for the Moslem community to know that the Brits are going to quit taking this lying down.
M
Sunday - August 18th 2024 4:27PM MST
PS
No doubt there was corruption in Senators being appointed/elected by the state legislature. That depends on how corrupt the members of that legislature are. There is always some sort of logrolling going on at least.
In Canada it's both worse and better. It's worse because Senators are appointed by the Crown on the advice of the Prime Minister. Which (as with all such things) actually means it's the Prime Minister choosing. Which means they are party hacks of the Prime Minister's party. In this case mostly Liberal as they have governed for the majority of my lifetime.
It's better because everyone knows they are party hacks. Which means they have limited power to do things. They certainly don't introduce new bills.
On the other hand it also means there's really only one house with any power on the legislative side. That can be good or bad depending on your point of view.
I had to look up stuff about Canadian Senators and I learned that I would not have been eligible until a few years ago. You must be between 30 and 75, own property worth $4,000 in the province you will be representing and reside in that province. I rented until a few years ago, so would have failed that requirement...
You can tell that requirement was made a long time ago; I'm not sure you could fit an outhouse on a $4,000 lot where I live. Admittedly I live in a very expensive city; you might be able to get a small woodlot a few hours drive north of here and fulfill it that way.
I don't think direct election actually made US Senators less corrupt. The problem is really their incumbency - once a senator, basically you die or retire, you don't not get re-elected. Which means "investing" in a Senator will pay back for a long time and it's a pretty sure thing.
Since US Senators were intended to stay there for a long term as a counter to mob enthusiasm, I'm not sure how you would fix that.
I think though that you could put that upper age of 75 in, and it would help. After all, there's a lower age limit, so why not an upper one?
Yes, the Senate name comes from the Latin for "chamber of old men", but you could argue that people just didn't get that old when the term was invented.
Of course, good luck getting any sort of Amendment in place in the current atmosphere.
No doubt there was corruption in Senators being appointed/elected by the state legislature. That depends on how corrupt the members of that legislature are. There is always some sort of logrolling going on at least.
In Canada it's both worse and better. It's worse because Senators are appointed by the Crown on the advice of the Prime Minister. Which (as with all such things) actually means it's the Prime Minister choosing. Which means they are party hacks of the Prime Minister's party. In this case mostly Liberal as they have governed for the majority of my lifetime.
It's better because everyone knows they are party hacks. Which means they have limited power to do things. They certainly don't introduce new bills.
On the other hand it also means there's really only one house with any power on the legislative side. That can be good or bad depending on your point of view.
I had to look up stuff about Canadian Senators and I learned that I would not have been eligible until a few years ago. You must be between 30 and 75, own property worth $4,000 in the province you will be representing and reside in that province. I rented until a few years ago, so would have failed that requirement...
You can tell that requirement was made a long time ago; I'm not sure you could fit an outhouse on a $4,000 lot where I live. Admittedly I live in a very expensive city; you might be able to get a small woodlot a few hours drive north of here and fulfill it that way.
I don't think direct election actually made US Senators less corrupt. The problem is really their incumbency - once a senator, basically you die or retire, you don't not get re-elected. Which means "investing" in a Senator will pay back for a long time and it's a pretty sure thing.
Since US Senators were intended to stay there for a long term as a counter to mob enthusiasm, I'm not sure how you would fix that.
I think though that you could put that upper age of 75 in, and it would help. After all, there's a lower age limit, so why not an upper one?
Yes, the Senate name comes from the Latin for "chamber of old men", but you could argue that people just didn't get that old when the term was invented.
Of course, good luck getting any sort of Amendment in place in the current atmosphere.
Adam Smith
Sunday - August 18th 2024 12:19PM MST
PS: Good afternoon, Achmed and Frens!
Interesting video...
27:00 Oi m8! u got a loicense for that lighter?
(Seriously? How did these White Britons get their hands on a lighter?)
(Do they even allow the sale of those things in AirStrip One?)
More seriously though...
(I took a few notes...)
At about 12:30 the 𝐼𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛 lady says...
"We just want our town back. We should be joining together with the Moslems 'cause its got nothing to do with race. We're not racist. We should be sticking together and stop the boats commin' in."
(Perhaps she has heard of The Alarmist's plan for dealing with the boats?)
https://i.ibb.co/BnCWVyG/Save-The-West.jpg
(Nah. Probably not.)
She goes on...
"The police have started all of this.* It was peaceful 'til they (the police) started."* & "It was peaceful 'til we started marching then the police started."*
I agree with the bloke at 17:10 when he says...
"This has been coming for 40 years."
"Now its hitting and its going to get worse."
(Well, this remains to be seen.)
17:45 Mr. British Bloke again...
"It's obviously not racist. You not from here. You're not British."
To which Mr. Winter replies... "I'm from here, yeah."
British Bloke: "Yeah, but you're not British."
Winter: "I have a British passport."
----------
Yeah, but you're not British.
Are you British, Mr. Winter?
(Funny. You don't look British.)
----------
Also from the British Bloke...
18:06 "The only violence I've seen today is from the police."*
18:23 "The biggest crime here is the Cleveland Police."*
*Yeah, well, that's what cops do. They are violent thugs.
-------
But I do agree with Mr. Winter (and some of the locals) about the random window and car smashing. This will not solve the problem. If anything it will give the state more reason to crack down on White Britons.
(They wouldn't dare crack down on brown people or gypsies for smashing things. White people in the other hand...)
I do wonder if some of the people smashing random things are a British version of antifa or something.
(Agents provocateur? to discredit the anti-stabbing movement? Maybe? I don't know.)
But yeah. Interesting times in AirStrip One.
Thanks for the video, Achmed. This Great Replacement of White people can't go on forever. (I hope?)
Happy Sunday! ☮️
Interesting video...
27:00 Oi m8! u got a loicense for that lighter?
(Seriously? How did these White Britons get their hands on a lighter?)
(Do they even allow the sale of those things in AirStrip One?)
More seriously though...
(I took a few notes...)
At about 12:30 the 𝐼𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛 lady says...
"We just want our town back. We should be joining together with the Moslems 'cause its got nothing to do with race. We're not racist. We should be sticking together and stop the boats commin' in."
(Perhaps she has heard of The Alarmist's plan for dealing with the boats?)
https://i.ibb.co/BnCWVyG/Save-The-West.jpg
(Nah. Probably not.)
She goes on...
"The police have started all of this.* It was peaceful 'til they (the police) started."* & "It was peaceful 'til we started marching then the police started."*
I agree with the bloke at 17:10 when he says...
"This has been coming for 40 years."
"Now its hitting and its going to get worse."
(Well, this remains to be seen.)
17:45 Mr. British Bloke again...
"It's obviously not racist. You not from here. You're not British."
To which Mr. Winter replies... "I'm from here, yeah."
British Bloke: "Yeah, but you're not British."
Winter: "I have a British passport."
----------
Yeah, but you're not British.
Are you British, Mr. Winter?
(Funny. You don't look British.)
----------
Also from the British Bloke...
18:06 "The only violence I've seen today is from the police."*
18:23 "The biggest crime here is the Cleveland Police."*
*Yeah, well, that's what cops do. They are violent thugs.
-------
But I do agree with Mr. Winter (and some of the locals) about the random window and car smashing. This will not solve the problem. If anything it will give the state more reason to crack down on White Britons.
(They wouldn't dare crack down on brown people or gypsies for smashing things. White people in the other hand...)
I do wonder if some of the people smashing random things are a British version of antifa or something.
(Agents provocateur? to discredit the anti-stabbing movement? Maybe? I don't know.)
But yeah. Interesting times in AirStrip One.
Thanks for the video, Achmed. This Great Replacement of White people can't go on forever. (I hope?)
Happy Sunday! ☮️
Moderator
Sunday - August 18th 2024 11:49AM MST
PS: I take all those alerts seriously, so, fixed, M. Thanks.
As for that mistake of US Constitution Amendment XVII, know *I* didn't make a mistake. How old do you think I am? (I kid here, of course, but not about my age...) I would have been dead set against that travesty, but that would have meant exactly diddly-squat.
Peak Stupidity has a whole series about all the Amendments post-Bill-of-Rights, with the "Morning Constitutional" topic key. Re: 17 on direct election of Senators:
Peak Constitutional Amendment - XVII
https://www.peakstupidity.com/index.php?post=1455
A few excerpts from that post:
This seems, just as with Amendment XI (passed only 6 years after the Constitution took effect), to be nothing but an Administrative change or "housekeeping" if you will. No, but nobody goes through the trouble it takes to change the US Constitution just for a bureaucratic rule change. Amendment XVII, providing for the direct election of US Senators by State residents, rather than State legislators, is another State's rights issue that has gone the same way as always, in favor of the Big Central "Federal" Government.
AND
This was a great shift of power away from the State legislators though. These people are pretty local. Unlike your 1 in 454 Congressman, whom you only get to see close up right near election time without an appointment and lots of time on your hands, most Americans don't know their State Senators' and Representatives' names. If these were the guys and gals that were going to decide who were the 2 individuals to go to the US Senate as 2 in 100, you'd better believe Americans would know their names. We'd make an effort to meet with them, rather than in this era, where the most important thing on their agenda this week might be to vote on the State Insect.
Much of this is due to the even greater number of powers the Feral Gov't has taken from the States, with not a whole lot of resistance, I might add. Nowadays, the point of being in the State Legislature is likely to move farther up than that in politics, not to do a whole lot for the State.
Now, as some of the argument in the Constitution Center's interpretation page goes, the idea of having direct elections for US Senator was to get the corruption out of the process. One might say that now, at least the people themselves can decide the matter, so how can it be as corrupt or arbitrary as before? Yeah, that was before TV and the women's vote (by a p-hair, it turns out). I don't know, read the arguments there, but keep in mind there were the Progressives pushing their agenda even back a century ago:
So, Mr. M, you are preaching to a choir boy that was not around in 1913. That was, as the song goes, "a very bad year...."
(I hope you will read that post. Thanks for the comment, one I agree with as usual.)
As for that mistake of US Constitution Amendment XVII, know *I* didn't make a mistake. How old do you think I am? (I kid here, of course, but not about my age...) I would have been dead set against that travesty, but that would have meant exactly diddly-squat.
Peak Stupidity has a whole series about all the Amendments post-Bill-of-Rights, with the "Morning Constitutional" topic key. Re: 17 on direct election of Senators:
Peak Constitutional Amendment - XVII
https://www.peakstupidity.com/index.php?post=1455
A few excerpts from that post:
This seems, just as with Amendment XI (passed only 6 years after the Constitution took effect), to be nothing but an Administrative change or "housekeeping" if you will. No, but nobody goes through the trouble it takes to change the US Constitution just for a bureaucratic rule change. Amendment XVII, providing for the direct election of US Senators by State residents, rather than State legislators, is another State's rights issue that has gone the same way as always, in favor of the Big Central "Federal" Government.
AND
This was a great shift of power away from the State legislators though. These people are pretty local. Unlike your 1 in 454 Congressman, whom you only get to see close up right near election time without an appointment and lots of time on your hands, most Americans don't know their State Senators' and Representatives' names. If these were the guys and gals that were going to decide who were the 2 individuals to go to the US Senate as 2 in 100, you'd better believe Americans would know their names. We'd make an effort to meet with them, rather than in this era, where the most important thing on their agenda this week might be to vote on the State Insect.
Much of this is due to the even greater number of powers the Feral Gov't has taken from the States, with not a whole lot of resistance, I might add. Nowadays, the point of being in the State Legislature is likely to move farther up than that in politics, not to do a whole lot for the State.
Now, as some of the argument in the Constitution Center's interpretation page goes, the idea of having direct elections for US Senator was to get the corruption out of the process. One might say that now, at least the people themselves can decide the matter, so how can it be as corrupt or arbitrary as before? Yeah, that was before TV and the women's vote (by a p-hair, it turns out). I don't know, read the arguments there, but keep in mind there were the Progressives pushing their agenda even back a century ago:
So, Mr. M, you are preaching to a choir boy that was not around in 1913. That was, as the song goes, "a very bad year...."
(I hope you will read that post. Thanks for the comment, one I agree with as usual.)
M
Sunday - August 18th 2024 9:53AM MST
PS
Pedant alert: MP stands for Member of Parliament, not Minister of Parliament. This is for the House of Commons only; House of Lords members have a title.
The nearest equivalent in the American system would be Representative or Congressman.
Canadians (and most other countries that use the parliamentary system) also have an MP and it means the same thing. We have a Senate, and those are Senators. But Senators are appointed in Canada, which makes them less powerful than US Senators (they are rightly seen as being not as legitimate).
One of the mistakes you made was to change to directly electing Senators instead of appointing them via the state legislature. Among other things, the American Senate is now being seen as a springboard to the Presidency, while the jobs are pretty much the opposite.
You are correct though, in saying that these MPs are the people in pretty much all parties who have been pushing more immigration, or at the very least being extremely supine in not opposing it.
Pedant alert: MP stands for Member of Parliament, not Minister of Parliament. This is for the House of Commons only; House of Lords members have a title.
The nearest equivalent in the American system would be Representative or Congressman.
Canadians (and most other countries that use the parliamentary system) also have an MP and it means the same thing. We have a Senate, and those are Senators. But Senators are appointed in Canada, which makes them less powerful than US Senators (they are rightly seen as being not as legitimate).
One of the mistakes you made was to change to directly electing Senators instead of appointing them via the state legislature. Among other things, the American Senate is now being seen as a springboard to the Presidency, while the jobs are pretty much the opposite.
You are correct though, in saying that these MPs are the people in pretty much all parties who have been pushing more immigration, or at the very least being extremely supine in not opposing it.
Moderator
Sunday - August 18th 2024 8:15AM MST
PS: Yeah, that's the way it will go until angry Brits continue with enough momentum such that the Totalitarian police commissioners and such can no longer pick up everyone involved and throw them in gaol. They are still a large number, and when it gets to where the country won't run if they lock 'em all up, then things will change.
I've always thought a White strike would be a good idea. The problem is that most White people are responsible and realize.they'd be the ones to have to clean up the mess at the end of it. Things would go 3rd-Worldly pretty quickly after even a week of White men staying home.
This ain't over... hopefully...
I've always thought a White strike would be a good idea. The problem is that most White people are responsible and realize.they'd be the ones to have to clean up the mess at the end of it. Things would go 3rd-Worldly pretty quickly after even a week of White men staying home.
This ain't over... hopefully...
The Alarmist
Sunday - August 18th 2024 3:37AM MST
PS
Winter cucked because he prefers to not go to gaol, which is where any White Brit is currently being sent if they express anything that appears to support the protests on social media.
PoC rapes a girl, gets two months; White Brit criticizes that on social media, gets 21 months.
Welcome to our future.
🕉
Winter cucked because he prefers to not go to gaol, which is where any White Brit is currently being sent if they express anything that appears to support the protests on social media.
PoC rapes a girl, gets two months; White Brit criticizes that on social media, gets 21 months.
Welcome to our future.
🕉
My wife knows this lady that came from China to marry some guy in the San Fran. Bay area. After she came, the lady told my wife "There are too many foreigners here." "What do you want? You moved to America." "I know, but there are too many foreigners here!" Hey, uhhh, hate to tell you but ...