PS: "So he compensates for it through editing. I appreciate the fact that he wants to convey his points in the most efficient way possible." Yeah, someone explained that to me before. Could he not just leave a dead 1/2 to full second when he knows it's a break point, then splice with the extra time for thoughts to sink in?

Anyway, I did watch that video. I was searching for other videos on this story, but PJW comes up a lot. I have no argument with his take on things.

PS

"Regarding PJW, I'll check out that video, but I gotta get past that very annoying herky-jerky stuff that this guy is known for, on this blog:"

Yes, that bothered me too when I first started watching him, but I guess I'm used to it now. I can see why he does it: he wants to make a short, punchy video with no dead air and with everything stated just the way he wants. Unless your a polished actor who has been able to reherse your script, that's hard to do. So he compensates for it through editing. I appreciate the fact that he wants to convey his points in the most efficient way possible.

PS: Haha, nice lighting effects from the low sun. I'll put a name in there, though I have a feeling ...

PS: Yes, "Far Right Death squads" That was the S. and Central American thing. I imagine some of them did go well too far, but we heard it only one-sided up here. (I knew a guy in college who was from Argentina - talked about the "evil" Peronists down there. His family were intellectuals.)

The problem with Communists is that you have to go far beyond the rule-of-law to take care of the problem. Otherwise, they will use it to prevent you from blocking their agenda. It becomes too late after a while... ask the Cubans, the Venezuelans, some 120 year old Russian people... So, you get a Hitler, or Peron, or "Far Right Death Squads".

PS: Agreed with our first comment, Mr. Anon. Another thing I didn't mention is that people should just stop agreeing that "far right" means bad. Does "far left", if they'd say it, mean bad. This goes back to the usual suspect, from 1945, I'm afraid.

Regarding PJW, I'll check out that video, but I gotta get past that very annoying herky-jerky stuff that this guy is known for, on this blog:

https://www.peakstupidity.com/index.php?post=2377

Paul Joseph Watson Wangs Chung Tonight

PS

A sign from God, over London ...

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/08/06/01/88194055-13712439-Londoners_were_amazed_to_see_a_large_cloud_looming_over_the_capi-a-29_1722905843801.jpg


source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13712439/Golden-cloud-London-Donald-Trump-orange-face.html

🕉

PS

Do you see any death squads? If not, then there isn’t any Far Right in those pictures.

PS

Paul Joseph Watson on the White Riot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qymh7qWwfQ

PS

If you just believe what almost everybody believed 20 years ago, you are now a conservative and therefore "problematic". Believe what almost everybody believed 40 years ago, and you are a far-right reactionary.

Far-right reactionary it is then.

And, of course, pace the media, nobody is ever "far left", or "hard left" or even just "left".

PS: Ahhaa, I just saw you have another post up, Mr. Hail. I'll write you on there tomorrow.

https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2024/08/04/kamala-harris-and-female-solipsistic-narcissism-in-the-political-in-21st-century-usa/