Kung Flu Vax Sterility - Who knows?


Posted On: Monday - January 23rd 2023 8:26PM MST
In Topics: 
  Media Stupidity  Orwellian Stupidity  Kung Flu Stupidity

No, the WHO most certainly doesn't know, neither the band nor the World Health Organization. I'm writing about any possible effects of these gene therapy vaccines on sterility and fertility. Even though this is MY blog, I won't pretend to know one bit about how these "vaccines" could affect sterility in men and its counterpart, fertility (or lack thereof) in women. I wouldn't know enough to understand the biological mechanism is there is one.

Why speculate on it, then? Well, it's the fact that there were attempts made to force everyone to take these jabs, which came onto the "market" (government supply chain?) very quickly compared to previous vaccines. We have no assurance that there aren't some effects, and the risk/benefit ratio for young people is approaching "divide by zero" error. Consider that the "vaccines" don't even prevent the Kung Flu that has not had any serious effect on people of the age best suited for having children (especially women 18 to 28 y/o) anyway, and that there's visible evidence of health risks, especially cardio problems. Yes, risk/benefit is nearly infinite for people in the category

Were this 50, 40, arguably even 20, years back, one would expect the media to feature stories on possible effects, even if it were just speculation. After all "If it bleeds, it leads", they always said - scare the crap out of people, and they'll be back to read more. Some of it may even be true. I suppose this is a different time, and the media doesn't work like this anymore. There's a narrative to keep to, and if a story does not fit it, it not only doesn't lead, it doesn't appear at all in the new Lyin' Press.

When I was reading some of the formerly suppressed tweets while making the post Twitter Files expose the Twitter Ministry of Truth a couple of weeks back, I came upon the screen shots below:



I don't know this Andrew Boston - I'm not even sure I'd even let him cut on me (old Jimmy Buffett line there). Maybe he's a quack. However, he COULD be onto something, and there might be some effect on women too. I'd like to read more, granted not in the form of tweets. More importantly, the young people who DO like to get their news "stories" from tweets, could probably have really used some of this information. Some of the young people, in the biology/medical fields, may have even had some good arguments pro or con.

However, that conversation was made verboten. From the article on the suppressed tweets, including of Dr. Andrew Boston:



"Directly against guidance from authoritative sources..." See, I just don't like the sound of that, not one bit!

Let me re-emphasize right here, this post is not any solid argument about the effects on sterility/fertility from the Kung Flu shots either way. However, SOMEONE might want to discuss this. If this discussion was purposefully suppressed, at least on Twitter, as per the image above, what does that say about the confidence of those that have pushed for the shots to be mandatory? It could be the complete confidence of someone evil enough to have planned for these shots to affect sterility/fertility or it could be the underconfidence of the pushers in the safety of their jabs.

You gotta be stupid and/or awfully sheepishly compliant to put your trust in the claims of complete safety of these vaccines, including long-term sterility/fertility effects, from the "guidance of those authoritative sources." Just like I don't, they don't know... or, if they do, that's an even worse scenario...

Comments:
Dieter Kief
Friday - January 27th 2023 3:47AM MST
PS
Mod. - in the long term, we're all dead, as of now.
mRNA-wizzards like Swiss prof. (and Covid-pnic critic!) Beda M. allemann pointed out from decades of research - that no: No long time dmages to be expected of these vaccines.

The feritility data short term have Twitterer Robert Pezer and rwell2024.

Here's a bit more on this stuff as collected by an Unz commenter at ron's latets Covid vaccine article (the one with the syringe in the header, not the lab-leak one:

Some stuff found on late-night internet surfing:

COVID-19 vaccines and sudden deaths: Separating fact from fiction
https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccines-and-sudden-deaths?r=5p3cr&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

This one mentioned Peter McCullough, and not in a favorable way.

What’s really going on with myocarditis and COVID vaccines
You’re still more likely to be struck by lightning than to get the rare heart condition after the COVID jab.
https://www.popsci.com/health/myocarditis-covid-vaccine-heart/

I included this link for the sub-headline. Yes, there is some risk to getting a vaccination. ANY vaccination. But when the risks are honestly compared with the benefits, the great majority of the vaccines are beneficial. To the point of being modern miracles.

That’s why I expect to see RFK Jr as an especially despicable person, for his goal in life is to make US citizens fear all vaccines.
Adam Smith
Wednesday - January 25th 2023 8:00PM MST
PS: Good evening, gentlemen,

I agree with The Alarmist. Vaccines are dangerous and dubious.

Sanitation, Refrigeration and Central Heat > vaccines

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2017/04/20/the-occult-archetype-called-vaccination/

It's Been Written?
Wednesday - January 25th 2023 6:00AM MST
PS Found the flashdrive with the Johns Hopkins SPARS 2025-2028 Plandemix PDF, getting the coffee ready.
McHealthcarez is not your friend and sterility is a feature and not a bug to the World Extermination Forum.
Gill Bates says pump the stuff into the food supply for the not-a-vaxx shirkers.
That has already been done with livestock for a decade.
The Alarmist
Wednesday - January 25th 2023 4:26AM MST
PS

Your wife would be very correct to be an anti-vaxxer (🐜) ... nearly all the vaxxes on the childhood schedule are dubious in benefit and likely contribute to increased risk of autism.

To be frank, most of the miracles attributed to vaxxes, e.g. Polio, were actually derived in a large part by advances in public health measures, like simply washing one’s self and drinking clean water. Some vaxxes actually cause more harm than they might prevent, e.g. DTaP.

All vaxxes carry a risk. Let’s face it, the whole principle is to insult your immune system in a small way in the hopes it will learn to handle a greater insult. What could possibly go wrong with that?
Moderator
Tuesday - January 24th 2023 5:47AM MST
PS: "Local Bolshevik enemedia is parroting the HQ with your booster is a flu shot horse crap." GPS, my wife is more worried the latest flu shot is actually too much of the booster. She won't take anymore flu shots now. I only did once or twice in my life - didn't get the flu with one and didn't get the flu without one.

I'm not against all real vaccines, but now my wife has gotten to be one of the anti-vaxxer types from the pre-Covid era. That'd be the people that Ron Unz thinks somehow coalesced into the highly organized cabal of "anti-vaxxers". I know I've got my dues paid up to date!

I've tried to convince the man that, no matter what our very-varying views on the dangers of this Kung Flu jab are, a large majority of us would be happy for everyone to agree that none of this should be mandatory. PERIOD. Is that too much to ask? If so, why?

PS: Corrected my typo "ant-vaxxers". Yeah, I'd like to vaccinate the fire ants, with the best of the boosters! Gasoline and firecrackers are easier though.
Moderator
Tuesday - January 24th 2023 5:40AM MST
PS: Alarmist and Dieter, I think this effect may not be known about for a long time, if there is one. I want to write a quick post on the question of the methodology to figure this out.
Gaslight Psywar Spectacle
Tuesday - January 24th 2023 5:38AM MST
PS Wow! Just saw one stating that the Criminals IN Action came up with the COV-LARP for the really big Fundamental Transformation show.
One of the oldest aggregators says DOD bioweapon.
How does a vaccine need booster reup?
If you can still come down with, how is that a vaccine?
Rhetorical (always questioning) is fun.
Local Bolshevik enemedia is parroting the HQ with your booster is a flu shot horse crap.
Moderator
Tuesday - January 24th 2023 5:37AM MST
PS: I agree completely regarding Substack, Mr. Kief. I meant to add that there are still venues for open discussion. Even though Twitter is not MY thing, it is a lot of people's information source (unfortunately), and I question the motives of those that attempted - successfully - to stifle discussion on the vaccines and fertility.

You wonder whether there will be attempts so squash Substack writers too, even if it doesn't seem like it now. It must be a hundred, a thousand, or more times bigger in amount of writing than our favorite, The Unz Review (and no sarcasm there - Ron Unz made a great website.)

If you have a link to what you consider one of the best articles about this issue on Substack, please paste in a link here.
The Alarmist
Tuesday - January 24th 2023 4:20AM MST
PS

Sterility, like many other “side effects,” is a feature, not a bug of these vaxxes.

The vaxxes are every bit as safe as they are effective at their stated purpose.
Dieter Kief
Tuesday - January 24th 2023 1:51AM MST
PS
No doubt it is of great benefit, that Elon Musk did re-open Twitter to controversial subjects.
Apropos: Substack has always been open to those and millions of words have been written there about the Covid-vaccines and their side-efeects. And not only that: Even YouTube and lots & lots of blogs on wordpresss did discuss this subject - as did millions of people - - - ON Twitter, because they found ways around the Twitter Ban.
Oh - I learned too: No big fertility issue. - There might well be minor issues of that kind, and if so, that would be a very important finding. But to this day, as far as I know: No good arguments for the big effect, and rather weak ones for the weaker anti-fertility theses.
WHAT SAY YOU? : (PLEASE NOTE: You must type capital PS as the 1st TWO characters in your comment body - for spam avoidance - or the comment will be lost!)
YOUR NAME
Comments